Who is Brian Eyolfson?

Brian Eyolfson is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 700 decisions on record from 2008 to 2016. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, other tribunals.

What tribunal does Brian Eyolfson sit on?

Brian Eyolfson sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Brian Eyolfson decide?

Brian Eyolfson's most common areas include Human Rights (700 decisions), Administrative Law (195 decisions), Other Tribunals (165 decisions). Brian Eyolfson has handled 700 decisions across 8 areas.

How many decisions has Brian Eyolfson made?

Brian Eyolfson has 700 decisions on record from 2008 to 2016.

Who frequently appears before Brian Eyolfson?

Representatives who frequently appear before Brian Eyolfson include Self-represented, Michael Christianson, Henry Freitag.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Brian Eyolfson — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Employment and Labour Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Landlord and Tenant

Indigenous Legal Issues

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Brian Eyolfson

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

700

cases · 9 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 570Vice-chair· 54Adjudicator· 48Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 11Vice-Chair· 1

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 4, 2009

Respondent given final deadline to file Response to human rights application before Tribunal proceeds undefended.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

The respondent failed to file a Response within the required 35-day period.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate under Rule 5.5 and granted a final extension to file a Response, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice.

Dave Copeland v. TeleTech Holdings Inc., 2009 HRTO 776

Laundromat owner discriminated against patron by requiring her to move her mobility scooter outside.

The complainant, who uses a motorized scooter for mobility, alleged discrimination in services on the basis of disability after the owner of a laundromat demanded she move her scooter outside and subsequently told her to take her business elsewhere.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario found that the respondent owner failed to accommodate the complainant's disability-related needs in a manner that respected her dignity when he insisted she place her scooter outside, despite her concerns about theft and cold weather.

The Tribunal also found that the subsequent request for her to take her business elsewhere flowed directly from this discriminatory conduct.

The corporate respondent and the owner were held jointly and severally liable and ordered to pay $2,500 in general damages, read the Commission's policy on the duty to accommodate, and post a Code card.

Donnelly v. Spinz Coin Laundries, 2009 HRTO 754

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 4, 2009

Section 34 human rights application dismissed as it was based on a prior Commission complaint.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal found that the allegations related to a complaint previously filed with the Ontario Human Rights Commission.

Pursuant to section 53(8) of the Code, the Tribunal cannot accept a section 34 application based on a prior Commission complaint.

The application was dismissed, with instructions that the applicant must file a transitional application under section 53(5) if he wishes to pursue the claim.

Abul Kalam v. The Brick Warehouse L.P., 2009 HRTO 734

Luba Kowal

11 cases1987–2009

Connie Vernon

24 cases2004–2021

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Leave granted to withdraw human rights application.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw his human rights application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Antonio Borraro v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of the Attorney General and John Luczak, 2009 HRTO 763

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw their human rights application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Ionie Haywood v. Metro Toronto Condominium Corporation 624 and Newton-Trelawney Property Management Services, 2009 HRTO 762

James Heeney

10 cases2009–2022

Angela Rae

34 cases1990–2023

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Leave granted to withdraw human rights application.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondent made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Sarantopoulos v. Tsotsos, 2009 HRTO 761

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw his human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondent made no submissions.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Justin Pitters v. K.E.M. Richer Enterprises Canadian Tire, 2009 HRTO 760

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw his human rights application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Rebelo v. Omstead Foods Limited, 2009 HRTO 767

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application against the respondent condominium corporation pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondent made no submissions.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Finnie v. Nipissing Condominium Corporation No. 4, 2009 HRTO 771

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Anna Neudorf v. Port Bruce Manor and Tessa Kuipers, 2009 HRTO 770

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw their human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondent made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Timothy Miller v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2009 HRTO 769

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Lockwood v. Lennox and Addington Family and Children’s Services, 2009 HRTO 768

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondent made no submissions.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Martinez v. 2012342 Ontario Inc., 2009 HRTO 766

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Lillian Napierala v. North of Superior Programs and Paula Bosanac, 2009 HRTO 765

JoAnne Frenschkowski

1 case2009–2009

Earl Heiber

4 cases2009–2024

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw her human rights application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

McFadden v. Daniel Chan Dentistry Professional Corporation, 2009 HRTO 764

Richard Miller

43 cases2005–2025

Patrick T. Brode

5 cases2007–2022

James A. Renaud

14 cases1996–2021

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 26, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent grievance arbitration on the same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex (pregnancy) and family status.

The applicant had also filed a grievance under her collective agreement based on the same facts and issues.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the outcome of the grievance arbitration.

Despite all parties opposing deferral, the Tribunal found that the grievance and application were based on the same facts and issues, and that the arbitrator had the power and responsibility to apply human rights legislation.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance and arbitration process.

Elizabeth Laba v. The Corporation of the City of Windsor, Al Reaume and David Fields, 2009 HRTO 693

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 22, 2009

Human rights application deemed abandoned after applicant failed to provide updated contact information.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of race, ancestry, and sex.

After the respondent filed a response, the applicant's former counsel advised they no longer represented her and did not have her current contact information.

The Tribunal issued an Interim Decision directing the applicant to provide updated contact information and confirm her interest in proceeding, warning that failure to do so could result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant failed to respond and the correspondence was returned.

The Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and closed the file.

Brecknell v. Niagara Regional Police Service, 2009 HRTO 673

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 4, 2009

Tribunal directed parties to provide written submissions on whether it has jurisdiction over a First Nation daycare.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in the area of goods, services and facilities against a First Nation and its daycare centre.

The respondents noted that the First Nation is a band under the Indian Act and operates the daycare on a reserve.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the parties to provide written submissions on whether the matter falls within federal or provincial jurisdiction.

Barbe v. Henvey Inlet First Nation, 2009 HRTO 554

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 29, 2009

Tribunal grants consent request to withdraw application against settled respondents and amend style of cause.

The applicant filed a Request for Order during Proceedings to withdraw the human rights application against several respondents with whom she had reached a settlement.

The remaining respondents consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted the request, withdrew the application against the settled respondents, and amended the style of cause accordingly.

Elizabeth Lewis v. Lakeridge Health Corporation, 2009 HRTO 530

Brian Eyolfson

HRTO0 cases2008–2016

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 29, 2009

Respondents' request for further information from the Commission regarding a withdrawn complaint denied.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The respondents requested early dismissal under section 53(8) of the Human Rights Code, arguing the subject-matter was the same as a prior complaint filed with the Commission.

The Tribunal previously directed the Commission to provide a statement of facts regarding the processing of the applicant's complaint.

The Commission provided the statement, explaining the complaint was never formally filed.

The respondents then requested further information and documents from the Commission.

The Tribunal found the Commission's statement of facts adequately complied with its direction and denied the respondents' request for further information, granting them five days to provide submissions on the section 53(8) issue.

Wilberforce v. Lennox and Addington Family and Children’s Services, 2009 HRTO 517

Page 33 of 35 (700 cases)

Applicant

Lisa MilneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernard MusoniSelf-represented
1 appearance
Darlene KaboniSelf-represented
1 appearance
Charlene ParkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sam SantucciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tosh SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Kisha ChatterjeeCounsel
2 appearances
Grace PermaulCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher DianaCounsel
1 appearance
Patrick T. BrodeCounsel
1 appearance

for 1531315 Ontario Ltd. o/a Spinz Coin Laundries and himself

Gino CostabileSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Cindy Welykyi, Z.K. by his next friend T.S., T.S., Mimi Marilyn Gow, Debora Crew, Harold (Mike) Large, Betty Jarvis and Allan Mageau

Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Commissionaires Great Lakes

Phillip DayAgent
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Government Services and the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario

S. Zachary GreenCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, Respondent

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Cindy WelykyiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela CostabileSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mimi Marilyn GowSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, William Bowerman, Betty Jarvis, and Elsie Biloki

Debora CrewSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Allan MageauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harold (Mike) LargeSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself and on behalf of Bette Hawley

Brian HawleySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Karen Courser

Karen CourserSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Law School Admission Council and Kristine Jackson

Joan Van TolCounsel
1 appearance

for Law School Admission Council and Kristine Jackson, Respondents

Joan Van TolCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Lai, Respondent

Naomi D. LoewithCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Thomson

David A. WhittenCounsel
1 appearance
Ellen A.S. LowCounsel
1 appearance

for Queen’s University at Kingston

Diane KellyCounsel
1 appearance

for Rouge Valley Co-operative Homes Inc. / Board of Directors, Laura Borden and Amanda Whalen

Kiel ArdalCounsel
1 appearance

for Sheena Khan, Respondent

James SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected party

Cynthia IrelandAgent
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance
James A. RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Henry FreitagSelf-represented
4 appearances
Charlene ParkerSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn A. PietersCounsel
3 appearances
Peter ManciniAgent
3 appearances
Ian A. WilsonCounsel
3 appearances
Susan KoviosSelf-represented
3 appearances
Sau-Ling HumSelf-represented
2 appearances
James RobertsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
David CohenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elena MaximovaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leslie AustinSelf-represented
2 appearances
M. Kate StephensonCounsel
2 appearances
Ben WeiglSelf-represented
2 appearances
Zane RothCounsel
2 appearances
Hana AbdulSelf-represented
2 appearances
John BerrySelf-represented
2 appearances
Dijana SimonovicCounsel
2 appearances
Stacey HarrisonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Yong Xiang LiSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Marko Ivancicevic

M. Kate StephensonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant/Respondent

Ali SleimanAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicants

Megan HinsleySelf-represented
3 appearances
Trevor HinsleySelf-represented
3 appearances
Jerald LodgeSelf-represented
1 appearance
M.N.Agent
1 appearance
Nir GepnerCounsel
1 appearance
A.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Bette HawleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian HawleySelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Commission

Bay RyleyCounsel
3 appearances
Jason TamCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony D. GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Sharon AbrahamsCounsel
1 appearance
Sharon Ffolkes AbrahamsCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Vusumzi MsiCounsel
3 appearances
Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
2 appearances
Ruby DonnellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steve GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan CampeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard MillerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporate Respondent

Mark E. GeigerCounsel
2 appearances

for the individual Respondents

Maurice GreenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Zachary GreenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Ontario Human Rights Commission

Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor/Respondent

Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance

for the Named Respondent

Jonathan RabinovitchCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association

Bernie HansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Anthony D. GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Folarin ObikoyaCounsel
1 appearance
Monmi GoswamiCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Adrienne LeiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Paula M. RusakCounsel
4 appearances
Michelle M. SchriederCounsel
3 appearances
Lorraine J. PorCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn BrandowCounsel
2 appearances
William R. GaleCounsel
2 appearances
Marvon WilkinsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Bora NamCounsel
2 appearances
Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance
Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jacqueline SilveraAgent
1 appearance
James H. CookeCounsel
1 appearance
James HendersonCounsel
1 appearance
Jason AdrianAgent
1 appearance
Jason MurdySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey DickAgent
1 appearance
J. Michael HickeyCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan CockerCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Lilit IzakelianCounsel
1 appearance
Lindsay BeckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Intervenor COPE Ontario COPE Local 343, and Respondents Jancie Best, Elizabeth Fong and Sean Clancy

Glenn WheelerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent/Applicant

Shane SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Borland Software Corporation

Melissa FrugéCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jimi Bonotti

Jimi BonottiSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaws Companies Ltd.

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Ombudsman

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Abbey

Veronique HenryCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents

Kate McNeillCounsel
3 appearances
Heather CrispCounsel
3 appearances
S. Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances
Doug WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Glenn K.L. ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Wendy SokoloffCounsel
2 appearances
Gary D. GrahamCounsel
2 appearances
J. BondCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffrey B. SimpsonCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffrey E. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer TrépanierCounsel
1 appearance
Jeremy HannCounsel
1 appearance
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Karen M. SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
K.C. WysynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Kelly GrahamCounsel
1 appearance
Kiel ArdalCounsel
1 appearance
Kimberly D. PepperCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa C. CabelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Barbra Schlifer Commemorative Clinic and Carolina Gana

Kate McNeill-KellerCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent SIU Special Investigations Unit Civilian Oversight

Ian ScottAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents Local 1000A Loblaws and Gary Brown

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Tania Bloomfield, Jonathan Cohen, Davina Blenman, Zoraida Van Ael, Nina Sengupta, Christina MacDonell and Sarah Hicks

Maurice GreenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Star Security Inc.

Laurie GouldAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent Steve Gibbons

Steve GibbonsSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga and Dara Marcoccia

Shana FrenchCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondents Tokmakjian Inc. (now operating as Tok Transit) and Ben Pistillio

Joseph K. MorrisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Veolia Transportation Services (Canada) Inc., Andreea Claici and Christina Trentadue

Thomas W. AgnewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care and Carol Lambie

Janice BlackburnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents William Blair, Brian Kellar, Christopher Groff and Peter Eckersall

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Regional Municipality of York – York Region Transit

Stephen MaioCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Toronto Police Services Board

Cara GibbonsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for University of Ottawa

Kathryn Prud’hommeCounsel
1 appearance

for University of Windsor

David AmyotCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Brian Kellar, Christopher Groff and Peter Eckersall

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
1 appearance

for William Bowerman and Elsie Biloki

Debora CrewAgent
1 appearance

for York University

Joanna RainbowCounsel
1 appearance

for Z.K. and herself

T.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Elizabeth LabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Teri RatneiyaSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Antonio BorraroSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
5 appearances
Justin PittersSelf-represented
1 appearance

700

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

6.9

cases/mo

HRTO700(100%)

Decision types

motion

659

trial

Page 33 of 35 (700 cases)

Brian Eyolfson

Dave Copeland v. TeleTech Holdings Inc., 2009 HRTO 776

Monmi Goswami

Folarin Obikoya

Christine Elwell

Brian Eyolfson

Donnelly v. Spinz Coin Laundries, 2009 HRTO 754

Brian Eyolfson

Abul Kalam v. The Brick Warehouse L.P., 2009 HRTO 734

Luba Kowal

Connie Vernon

Brian Eyolfson

Antonio Borraro v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of the Attorney General and John Luczak, 2009 HRTO 763

Brian Eyolfson

Ionie Haywood v. Metro Toronto Condominium Corporation 624 and Newton-Trelawney Property Management Services, 2009 HRTO 762

James Heeney

Angela Rae

Brian Eyolfson

Sarantopoulos v. Tsotsos, 2009 HRTO 761

Brian Eyolfson

Justin Pitters v. K.E.M. Richer Enterprises Canadian Tire, 2009 HRTO 760

Brian Eyolfson

Rebelo v. Omstead Foods Limited, 2009 HRTO 767

Brian Eyolfson

Finnie v. Nipissing Condominium Corporation No. 4, 2009 HRTO 771

Brian Eyolfson

Anna Neudorf v. Port Bruce Manor and Tessa Kuipers, 2009 HRTO 770

Brian Eyolfson

Timothy Miller v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2009 HRTO 769

Brian Eyolfson

Lockwood v. Lennox and Addington Family and Children’s Services, 2009 HRTO 768

Brian Eyolfson

Martinez v. 2012342 Ontario Inc., 2009 HRTO 766

Brian Eyolfson

Lillian Napierala v. North of Superior Programs and Paula Bosanac, 2009 HRTO 765

JoAnne Frenschkowski

Earl Heiber

Brian Eyolfson

McFadden v. Daniel Chan Dentistry Professional Corporation, 2009 HRTO 764

Richard Miller

Patrick T. Brode

James A. Renaud

Brian Eyolfson

Elizabeth Laba v. The Corporation of the City of Windsor, Al Reaume and David Fields, 2009 HRTO 693

Brian Eyolfson

Brecknell v. Niagara Regional Police Service, 2009 HRTO 673

Brian Eyolfson

Barbe v. Henvey Inlet First Nation, 2009 HRTO 554

Brian Eyolfson

Elizabeth Lewis v. Lakeridge Health Corporation, 2009 HRTO 530

Brian Eyolfson

Wilberforce v. Lennox and Addington Family and Children’s Services, 2009 HRTO 517

Applicant

Counsel

for 1531315 Ontario Ltd. o/a Spinz Coin Laundries and himself

for Cindy Welykyi, Z.K. by his next friend T.S., T.S., Mimi Marilyn Gow, Debora Crew, Harold (Mike) Large, Betty Jarvis and Allan Mageau

for Commissionaires Great Lakes

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Government Services and the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, Respondent

for herself

for herself, William Bowerman, Betty Jarvis, and Elsie Biloki

for himself

for himself and on behalf of Bette Hawley

for Karen Courser

for Law School Admission Council and Kristine Jackson

for Law School Admission Council and Kristine Jackson, Respondents

for Michael Lai, Respondent

for Michael Thomson

for Queen’s University at Kingston

for Rouge Valley Co-operative Homes Inc. / Board of Directors, Laura Borden and Amanda Whalen

for Sheena Khan, Respondent

for the Affected party

for the Affected Party

for the applicant

for the Applicant

for the Applicant Marko Ivancicevic

for the Applicant/Respondent

for the Applicants

for the Commission

for the Complainant