The appellant husband appealed a motions judge's order increasing spousal support payable to the respondent wife.
The motions judge found a material change in circumstances under s. 17(4) of the Divorce Act due to a significant, unforeseen increase in the appellant's disposable income following an arbitration award.
The Court of Appeal applied the deferential standard of review from Hickey v. Hickey and found no error in the motions judge's application of the Willick test or calculation of support.
The appeal was dismissed with costs.
