25 total
Asset sale and third-party releases approved in CCAA proceeding over objections of founding shareholders.
The applicant, Green Relief Inc., sought approval of a transaction for the sale of its assets to 2650064 Ontario Inc. in the course of a CCAA proceeding.
The transaction included a condition precedent releasing claims against current directors, legal counsel, the Monitor, and its counsel.
Certain founding shareholders opposed the release, arguing the court lacked jurisdiction to grant it prior to a plan of arrangement and that they wished to pursue claims for loss of chance.
The court approved the transaction and the release, finding the sale process was reasonable and the release was rationally connected to the restructuring, benefiting creditors by preventing the depletion of the estate through indemnity claims.
The court temporarily lifted the stay of proceedings to allow claims covered by tail insurance to be filed.
The court dismissed Ontario's motion to lift the CCAA stay on its $330 billion health care cost recovery action against tobacco companies.
Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario sought to lift a stay on its $330 billion health care cost recovery action against three tobacco companies (JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco, Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc.) and eleven co-defendants, which was imposed under CCAA proceedings.
Ontario proposed to temporarily stay the effects of any judgment.
The court dismissed the motion, emphasizing the need to preserve the status quo in CCAA proceedings to facilitate a global resolution of significant claims.
Allowing Ontario's action to proceed would alter the level playing field, distract from restructuring efforts, and impose significant costs, prejudicing other stakeholders.
The court affirmed its broad jurisdiction under the CCAA to impose a blanket stay on all proceedings.
The applicants, JTI-Macdonald Corp., Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited, Imperial Tobacco Company Limited, and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., sought protection under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) following a $13.5 billion judgment from the Quebec Court of Appeal and other ongoing litigation.
JTI-Macdonald Corp. and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. moved for orders to file Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) leave applications but suspend further proceedings.
Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited and Imperial Tobacco Company Limited sought a blanket stay of all proceedings and limitation periods.
The Quebec class action plaintiffs opposed the motions and sought to partially lift the stay.
The court affirmed its broad jurisdiction under CCAA s. 11 to stay all actions, including appellate proceedings and limitation periods.
The court dismissed the motion by JTI-Macdonald Corp. and Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc., and granted Imperial Tobacco's motion, finding that a blanket stay best preserved the status quo and facilitated a global resolution for all stakeholders.
Motion granted to add subsidiary as CCAA applicant and approve interim financing and priority charges.
In the context of CCAA proceedings, the applicant sought to add its highly integrated subsidiary, GuestLogix Ireland Limited, as an applicant to facilitate a comprehensive sale and investor solicitation process.
The applicant also sought approval for an Administration Charge, a Directors' Charge, and an Interim Lender's Charge to secure interim financing of up to US $3,000,000.
The court granted the unopposed motion, finding the addition of the subsidiary appropriate and the requested charges and financing necessary and reasonable under the CCAA.
Initial CCAA protection granted; proposed Monitor replaced due to potential conflict of interest.
The applicant, GuestLogix Inc., sought an initial order under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) for a stay of proceedings, the appointment of a Monitor, and authorization for super-priority charges.
The court found the applicant to be an insolvent debtor company with over $5 million in unsecured liabilities, making it eligible for CCAA protection.
The court granted the stay and the requested Administration and Directors' Charges.
However, due to a potential conflict of interest raised by a secured creditor, the court declined to appoint the proposed Monitor, Deloitte Restructuring Inc., and instead appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc.