21 total
The accused was convicted of assault causing bodily harm after her self-defence claim was rejected due to a grossly disproportionate response.
The accused was charged with assault causing bodily harm and assault with a weapon after striking the complainant on the back of the head with a drinking glass at a bar.
The accused claimed self-defence under section 34 of the Criminal Code.
The court found that while there was an air of reality to the self-defence claim based on the accused's evidence regarding her anxiety and prior abusive relationships, the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the force used was not reasonable in the circumstances.
The accused's response was grossly disproportionate to the threat posed.
The accused was found guilty of assault causing bodily harm, with the assault with a weapon charge stayed pursuant to the Kienapple principle.
Sentencing was adjourned.