21 total
Mandatory interlocutory injunction for disability benefits set aside due to lack of proven irreparable harm.
The defendant insurer appealed an order granting a mandatory interlocutory injunction that required it to pay periodic disability benefits to the plaintiff pending trial.
The Divisional Court allowed the appeal and set aside the order, finding that the motions judge erred in concluding the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm.
The Court held that social stigma, loss of dignity, and potential loss of residence were not supported by the evidence as constituting irreparable harm in this context, and that the policy did not provide for ongoing future benefits without proof of continuing disability.