21 total
Irregularities in issuing family application deemed technical; venue change denied pending financial disclosure.
The respondent brought a motion seeking a declaration that a family law application was not validly issued, a change of venue, and leave to file an answer.
The court held that any irregularities in the issuance of the application were merely technical and did not invalidate the proceeding.
The request for a change of venue was denied due to the respondent's failure to comply with a prior court order requiring financial disclosure.
Leave to file an answer was not granted immediately; instead, the court imposed a condition that the respondent first comply with the disclosure order within 30 days, failing which a further motion would proceed to determine whether leave should be granted.