The appellant sued the Attorney General of Canada for improperly rejecting his proposal submitted in response to a Request for Proposal for Informatics Professional Services.
The proposal was rejected because the appellant's proposed personnel lacked the required security clearance.
The motions judge granted partial summary judgment to the respondent, finding no triable issue as the mandatory security requirements were not met.
The Court of Appeal upheld the decision, finding no ambiguity in the RFP documents and no basis to interfere.