Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 26, 2010

Requests to expedite and for interim relief denied due to insufficient particulars in the application.

The applicant, a nursing student who was allegedly dismissed from his program after receiving a failing grade, filed an application alleging discrimination on the basis of sex and race.

He also filed a Request to Expedite and a Request for Interim Relief.

The Tribunal found that the application lacked sufficient particulars to ascertain the basis of the discrimination claim.

The Tribunal denied both requests due to insufficient information to determine urgency or merit, and directed the applicant to provide detailed facts supporting his claim within 10 days.

Seifu Wondimagnehu v. Algonquin College, 2010 HRTO 664

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 25, 2010

Individual respondent given 7 days to file Response or face consequences of non-participation.

The applicant filed a human rights application against a corporate and an individual respondent.

The individual respondent failed to file a Response despite reminders.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the individual respondent to file a Response within 7 days, warning that failure to do so could result in the Tribunal proceeding without further notice and deeming the respondent to have accepted the allegations pursuant to Rule 5.5.

Renee Gagne v. 496276 Ontario Ltd. c.o.b. as Greco’s Pizza and Pasta Restaurant and Neil Solmes, 2010 HRTO 641

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 23, 2010

Tribunal scheduled a hearing to determine respondents' request to dismiss application for delay and lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board.

The respondents filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to dismiss the application on grounds of adjudicative immunity, lack of jurisdiction, and delay.

The Tribunal found that the jurisdictional issues could not be determined on the written materials alone and scheduled a half-day teleconference hearing to consider whether the application should be dismissed.

Zubiak v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2010 HRTO 629

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 23, 2010

Individual respondents removed from human rights application on consent.

The applicant filed a Request for Order to remove Doug McDonald and Geri McDonald as individual respondents.

The respondents consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted the order, noting its case law advising against the unnecessary naming of individual respondents, and amended the style of cause accordingly.

Elsa Torrejon v. 114735 Ontario Inc.O/A Weston Property Management, 2010 HRTO 628

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 23, 2010

Tribunal directed applicant to provide further particulars connecting her allegations of toxic workplace to a Code ground.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability.

One of the respondents requested the Tribunal dismiss the application for lack of jurisdiction, arguing the allegations did not connect to a Code ground.

The Tribunal found the applicant's allegations described a toxic work relationship but did not assert a disability at the time of the alleged ill-treatment, nor did the reprisal claim clearly relate to enforcing a Code right.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide further particulars and submissions on jurisdiction before making a final determination.

Morrissey v. Investors Group Financial Services, 2010 HRTO 624

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 22, 2010

Reconsideration granted where applicant failed to attend hearing due to confusion over notice.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application after he failed to attend a scheduled hearing.

The applicant claimed he did not receive notice of the proceeding.

The Tribunal found that intervening correspondence and the applicant's failure to receive a Case Assessment Direction created confusion about whether the hearing would proceed.

Concluding that the applicant did not receive proper notice through no fault of his own, the Tribunal granted the reconsideration request and directed the parties to provide written submissions on the respondents' outstanding request for an order.

Christianson v. Special Investigations Unit, 2010 HRTO 406

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 19, 2010

Tribunal grants union intervenor status and schedules preliminary hearing on respondent's early dismissal request.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination based on disability and reprisal.

The applicant's union requested intervenor status, which the Tribunal granted.

The respondent requested early dismissal, arguing the issues were resolved through grievance settlements and prior complaints to the Commission.

The Tribunal scheduled a preliminary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed for abuse of process, delay, or because the substance was appropriately dealt with in another proceeding.

DeSousa v. Toronto (City), 2010 HRTO 370

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 19, 2010

Reconsideration of human rights application dismissed as new evidence did not address the original delay.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application on the basis of delay.

She submitted new facts and evidence, including medical records and personal recollections, arguing they were determinative of her case.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the new evidence related to the merits of the case and failed to address the issue of delay, which was the sole basis for the original dismissal.

Diler v. Cambridge Memorial Hospital, 2010 HRTO 392

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 18, 2010

Six individual respondents removed from human rights application; applicant ordered to provide further particulars.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment.

The respondents filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to remove six individual respondents and dismiss the application for lack of jurisdiction.

Applying the Persaud framework, the Tribunal removed all six individual respondents, finding no compelling reason to continue the proceeding against them.

The Tribunal also noted that the applicant appeared to be alleging disability discrimination rather than record of offences, and ordered the applicant to provide further particulars before ruling on the jurisdictional challenge.

Waller v. Polycorp, 2010 HRTO 374

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 18, 2010

Request to add party and for early document production denied as procedurally improper and premature.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to add her husband as a party and requesting production of a driver's abstract from the individual respondent.

The Tribunal denied the request to add the husband, noting that a separate application with his consent was required under section 34(5) of the Human Rights Code.

The request for production was denied as premature because the Tribunal had not yet sent a Confirmation of Hearing.

Nancy Denesuik v. Lennox and Addington Family and Children’s Services and Yvonne Williams, 2010 HRTO 373

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 6, 2010

Tribunal dismissed 'record of offences' claim because the applicant had not received a pardon.

The respondent brought a Request for Order During Proceedings to dismiss the portion of the application alleging discrimination on the basis of 'record of offences'.

The applicant had been terminated after being denied a leave of absence to serve a 12-month custodial sentence for a drug trafficking conviction.

The Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction over the 'record of offences' claim because the applicant had not received a pardon, which is required under the definition in section 10(1) of the Human Rights Code.

The ground was removed from the application.

Wayne Marsh v. Spinrite LP, 2010 HRTO 273

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 4, 2010

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because 'record of offences' does not include mere criminal charges.

The applicant alleged discrimination in employment on the basis of 'record of offences' after being fired shortly after being arrested and charged with matters unrelated to his employment.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal held that the Code's definition of 'record of offences' requires a conviction for a pardoned offence or a provincial offence, and does not apply to mere criminal charges.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Steven Aitchison v. Mid Canada Fiberglass, 2010 HRTO 262

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 1, 2010

Early dismissal denied as prior Employment Standards proceeding did not address human rights issues.

The respondent requested early dismissal of the human rights application, arguing that an Employment Standards proceeding had appropriately dealt with its substance.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the Employment Standards Officer's decision only addressed unpaid wages and termination pay, and did not consider the reasons for termination or the alleged human rights issues.

Lawrence v. Debt Control Agency, 2010 HRTO 225

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 1, 2010

Request to expedite denied and matter to proceed without notice to bankrupt corporate respondent.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment and requested to expedite the proceedings.

The corporate respondent subsequently entered bankruptcy, ceased operations, and failed to file a response.

The Tribunal denied the request to expedite as there was no longer a position for the applicant to return to.

The Tribunal ordered that the matter proceed without further notice to the corporate respondent due to its bankruptcy, and directed the applicant to confirm her intention to proceed or face abandonment of her application.

Assunta Young v. Marathon Pulp Inc. and Eugene Reid, 2010 HRTO 224

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 27, 2010

Termination immediately following an employee's allegation of racial discrimination constitutes unlawful reprisal under the Code.

The applicant, a security guard, alleged discrimination on the basis of race, colour, place of origin, and ethnic origin, as well as reprisal, following his termination.

The Tribunal found no evidence to support the allegations of racial discrimination regarding a workplace altercation and subsequent disciplinary meeting.

However, the Tribunal found that the respondents' impromptu decision to terminate the applicant's employment immediately after he alleged racial discrimination constituted a reprisal under section 8 of the Human Rights Code.

The applicant was awarded damages for lost wages and injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect.

Bertrand v. Primary Response, 2010 HRTO 186

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 13, 2010

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the alleged discrimination occurred entirely outside Ontario.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the Vancouver Police Department based on events that occurred entirely in British Columbia.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, to which the applicant did not respond.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, holding that the Human Rights Code is provincial legislation and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction over acts committed outside of Ontario.

Jeffrey East v. Vancouver Police Department, 2010 HRTO 54

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 5, 2010

Tribunal requested written submissions on applicant's request to reconsider dismissal for failure to attend hearing.

The applicant filed a Request for Reconsideration of a decision that dismissed his human rights application as abandoned after he failed to attend a hearing.

The applicant claimed he did not receive notice of the proceeding.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the parties to provide written submissions on the reconsideration request.

Christianson v. Special Investigations Unit, 2010 HRTO 8

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 5, 2010

Reconsideration request denied; grandparent status alone does not fall within the protected ground of family status.

The applicant requested reconsideration of an interim decision that dismissed her human rights application against eight respondents and removed four grounds, including family status.

The applicant, supported by the Ontario Human Rights Commission as an intervenor, argued that the definition of family status should include grandparent-grandchild relationships.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the applicant's allegations were based merely on her status as a grandparent, not on a parent-and-child type of caregiving relationship, and therefore did not fall within the protected ground of family status.

M.F. v. Child and Family Service Timmins and District, 2010 HRTO 18

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 5, 2010

Human rights application deferred on consent pending conclusion of related grievance arbitration.

The applicant requested to defer her human rights application pending the completion of a grievance filed by her union.

The respondent consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted the deferral, noting its general practice to defer applications when an ongoing grievance under a collective agreement involves the same facts and issues.

Cross v. Quinte Healthcare, 2010 HRTO 17

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 5, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to file formal withdrawal forms.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The applicant later wrote to the Tribunal requesting to withdraw the application immediately.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a formal Request to Withdraw and provide proof of service, or notify the Tribunal if he wished to continue.

The applicant failed to respond or file the required forms.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Michael Deane v. Condor Signal & Communications Inc., 2010 HRTO 16

Page 45 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 45 of 49 (975 cases)