IBEW Local 636 declared bargaining agent following representation vote; other unions' bargaining rights terminated.
The applicant employer applied for a determination of bargaining units and bargaining agents following a municipal reorganization under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997.
The parties agreed on the bargaining unit description.
Following a representation vote where the majority favoured the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 636, the Board declared it the bargaining agent and terminated the bargaining rights of the other responding unions.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant sought to withdraw their application against Thibodeau Forest Products and the Ministry of Labour.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.
The applicant, Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 4175, sought to withdraw its application against Wingham & District Hospital.
Employment Standards Act matter terminated following parties' Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant filed an application under the Employment Standards Act.
The parties reached Minutes of Settlement.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the matter in accordance with section 69.1(5) of the Employment Standards Act.
Employment Standards Act appeal resolved by Minutes of Settlement dividing trust funds equally between employer and employee.
The employer applied under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act to review an Order to Pay.
The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed according to the settlement, with $1,497.60 to the employer, $1,497.60 to the employee, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
The Ministry of Labour was given ten days to request a hearing if necessary, failing which the matter would be deemed terminated.
The applicant requested to withdraw the application.
Employment standards appeal resolved by settlement with funds disbursed to employer and employee.
The applicant employer appealed an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed according to the settlement, with $395.20 returned to the employer, $218.40 paid to the employee, and the $100 administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
The application was deemed terminated subject to any request by the Ministry of Labour to relist the matter.
Applicant's request for an extension of time to make submissions granted.
The applicant requested an extension of time to make submissions.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, extending the deadline to June 4, 2001, and allowing the union or employer to respond by June 18, 2001.
The Board also agreed to telephone the applicant to convey the decision as a courtesy.
Board orders return of $8,998.59 held in trust to employer following settlement of appeal.
The employer appealed an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.
The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement requiring the Director of Employment Standards to return $8,998.59 held in trust to the employer.
The Board ordered the return of the funds and noted the employer's intention to seek repayment of the administrative fee, directing the employer to Rule 112 of the Board's Rules of Procedure if it wished to pursue that issue.
Application for certification dismissed after union failed to win majority in representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.
No statement of desire to make representations was filed.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application for certification and directed the Registrar to destroy the ballots after 30 days.
Representation vote ordered in construction industry displacement application for certification.
The applicant union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, seeking to displace the intervenor union as the bargaining agent for a unit of construction workers.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that it appeared to have the requisite 40% membership support in the proposed bargaining unit.
Consequently, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees.
Board directed production of work records and particularization of misconduct allegations in certification application.
The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification in the construction industry.
The Board previously ordered a representation vote and sealed the ballot box.
Several issues remained in dispute, including whether the applicant was precluded from bringing the application, the nature of the work performed on the application date, and whether the intervenor had adequately particularized its allegations of misconduct.
The Board directed the responding party to produce payroll and work records to clarify the work performed.
The Board also found that the intervenor's allegations of misconduct did not meet the requirements of Rule 38 of the Board's Rules of Procedure and directed the intervenor to fully particularize its allegations prior to the scheduled hearing.
Board directs representation vote in application to terminate construction industry bargaining rights.
The applicant filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union in the construction industry.
After resolving a procedural issue regarding the Certificate of Delivery, the Board found the application timely under section 63(2) of the Act and that at least forty percent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the union.
The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.
Board strikes late unfair labour practice allegation against superintendent but permits particulars of original claims.
In the context of certification applications and an unfair labour practice complaint, the responding employers brought a preliminary motion to strike new allegations of improper conduct filed by the applicant union.
The employers argued the amendments were filed too late under Rule 38 of the Board's Rules of Procedure.
The Board found that some of the new details were merely particulars of original allegations and permitted them.
Post-vote allegations against a specific individual were allowed solely as admissions against interest.
However, a new allegation against the site superintendent was struck because it was not raised promptly and the union offered no reasonable explanation for the delay.
Representation vote directed for construction industry certification application by non-affiliated trade union.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit.
As the applicant was not an affiliated bargaining agent, the Board directed a representation vote among all unrepresented employees of the responding party in all sectors of the construction industry in the County of Lambton.
Board directs representation vote in construction industry certification application.
The Board found that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty percent in the proposed bargaining unit.
Although the responding party disputed the estimated number of employees, it agreed with the bargaining unit description and that the ballots should be counted.
The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union at the time the application was made.
As the applicant is not an affiliated bargaining agent, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken among all unrepresented employees at work in the construction industry for the responding party in the County of Lambton.
Board directs payout of trust funds per settlement and adjourns administrative fee dispute sine die.
The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay.
The parties reached a settlement where $6,000 of the $10,000 held in trust would be paid to the employee and $4,000 returned to the employer.
The employer indicated a desire to appeal the retention of the administrative fee.
The Board directed the payout of the trust funds according to the settlement and adjourned the matter sine die for up to one year to allow the employer to pursue the administrative fee issue if desired.
The applicant brought a matter before the Ontario Labour Relations Board under the Employment Standards Act.
The Board terminated the matter in accordance with section 69.1(5) of the Employment Standards Act.