Board orders disbursement of funds held in trust in accordance with parties' Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant director applied for a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director of Employment Standards to be disbursed in accordance with the settlement, with $1,000 paid to the employee, $1,006.24 returned to the employer, and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
Board declares sale of business to new corporation and awards union $56,677.32 for hiring hall violations.
The applicant union sought a declaration that Diamond Steel and Collin Erectors Inc. were a single employer or that a sale of business had occurred, along with a grievance referral for hiring hall violations.
The responding parties failed to file responses.
The Board found that the directing mind of Diamond Steel transferred his expertise and business operations to the newly incorporated Collin Erectors Inc. to avoid collective bargaining obligations.
The Board declared that a sale of business had occurred under section 69 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, binding Collin Erectors Inc. to the collective agreement.
The Board also upheld the grievance, finding that Collin Erectors Inc. employed non-union workers in violation of the agreement, and ordered it to pay $56,677.32 in damages to the applicant.
Board directed a Labour Relations Officer to post notice of the proceeding at the project site.
The applicant union sought a declaration that the responding parties were a single employer or that a sale of business occurred under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, along with allegations of unfair labour practices.
The responding parties did not file a response.
The Board previously noted it could not determine if affected employees had received notice.
After the applicant advised that notice had not been posted and provided the project location, the Board directed a Labour Relations Officer to post notice of the proceeding at the project site to allow affected employees to make submissions.
Union certification application dismissed after Board includes Shippers in bargaining unit and counts disputed 'No' ballot.
The union applied for certification to represent production and maintenance employees at the employer's facility.
Following a representation vote, the parties disputed whether two Shippers should be included in the bargaining unit and whether one of them exercised managerial duties.
The Board found the Shippers did not exercise managerial authority and shared a community of interest with the production unit, thus their ballots were counted.
The Board also ruled that a disputed ballot with overlapping pencil marks in the 'No' window was valid and not spoiled.
As the union did not receive more than fifty percent of the votes, the application for certification was dismissed.
Reconsideration of refusal to order representation vote dismissed due to union's negligible representation in intermingled unit.
The applicant union (OPSEU) requested reconsideration of a Board decision that declined to order a representation vote following the sale of an ambulance service to Hotel Dieu Hospital.
OPSEU argued that the decision was inconsistent with another recent Board decision where a vote was ordered.
The Board dismissed the request, noting that in this case, OPSEU represented only 0.02% of the employees in the intermingled service unit, as its bargaining rights for former Crown operator employees did not transfer under the Crown Employees Collective Bargaining Act.
Union certified as bargaining agent following successful representation vote and agreement of the parties.
The Ontario Public Service Employees Union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for employees of The Corporation of the Township of Augusta.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with the agreement of the parties on all issues, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.
Duty of fair representation complaint dismissed due to extreme delay and lack of jurisdiction over legal fees.
The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint against the union, seeking reimbursement for legal costs incurred in successfully defending a highway traffic charge arising from an incident at a picket line.
The union requested that the application be dismissed without a hearing.
The Board dismissed the application, finding that the 21-month delay in bringing the complaint was unjustified.
Furthermore, the Board held that the union's decision regarding the reimbursement of legal fees for a highway traffic offence does not fall within the scope of the duty of fair representation.
Matters adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.
The parties agreed to adjourn the matters sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
If no request to proceed is made within that time, the matters will be deemed terminated.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year at applicant's request.
The applicant requested an adjournment sine die.
The responding party did not appear.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no further action is taken.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Board issues consent declarations finding responding entities are successor employers bound by the collective agreement.
The applicant union filed an application under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act seeking a declaration of a sale of business.
The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement agreeing that several of the responding corporate entities are successor employers to the Sault Ste.
Marie Public Utilities Commission and are bound by the current collective agreement.
The Board issued declarations on consent reflecting the settlement and withdrew the application with respect to PUC Telecom Inc.
Board deems unresponding employers to have accepted facts but directs union to confirm employee notice posting.
The applicant union filed an application for a related employer and sale of business declaration, as well as unfair labour practice complaints, against the responding parties.
The responding parties failed to file a response.
Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Board's Rules of Procedure, the Board deemed the responding parties to have accepted all facts stated in the application.
However, the Board could not determine if notice to affected employees had been posted.
The Board directed the applicant to advise the Registrar regarding the posting of notice before proceeding further.
Board issues procedural directions for employer's complaint against certified worker member regarding a work stoppage.
The applicant employer filed a letter indicating its intent to file a complaint under section 49(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, alleging that a certified worker member recklessly or in bad faith directed a work stoppage.
The Board issued procedural directions requiring the applicant to provide detailed information and identifying the responding parties, and appointed a Labour Relations Officer to attempt mediation.
Production of historical remittance reports denied as they would not assist in establishing area practice.
The Labourers requested an order directing the Carpenters to produce historical remittance reports from competitors to establish area practice regarding the ratio of carpenters to labourers on scaffold crews.
The Board declined the request, finding the reports would not assist as they would not identify whether the carpenters were doing scaffolding or the circumstances of the work.
The Board also adjourned a related grievance referral pending the outcome of a newly filed jurisdictional dispute application, and set dates for a pre-consultation conference and consultation.
The applicant sought to withdraw the application.
Board directs posting of notice and deems facts accepted after responding parties failed to respond.
The applicant union applied for a declaration that the responding parties are a single employer or that a sale of business occurred under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding parties failed to file a response and failed to post the required Notice to Employees at the job site.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed a Labour Relations Officer to post the notice at the job site.
Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Board's Rules of Procedure, the Board deemed the responding parties to have accepted all facts stated in the application due to their failure to respond.
The applicant sought to withdraw the application against the responding parties.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Employment Standards Act application terminated following parties' Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant filed an application under the Employment Standards Act.
The parties reached Minutes of Settlement.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board terminated the matter in accordance with section 69.1(5) of the Employment Standards Act.
IBEW Local 636 declared bargaining agent following representation vote under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act.
The applicant employer applied for a determination of bargaining units and bargaining agents following a municipal restructuring under the Public Sector Labour Relations Transition Act, 1997.
The parties agreed on the bargaining unit description.
Following a representation vote where the majority voted in favour of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 636, the Board declared it the bargaining agent and terminated the bargaining rights of the other responding unions.