Applications withdrawn with leave of the Board following Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant sought to withdraw its applications following the filing of Minutes of Settlement.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the applications were withdrawn.
Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties for up to one year.
The applicant union filed an application against the responding party employer.
On the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
If neither party requests to proceed within that time, the matter will be deemed terminated.
Appeal of Inspector's decision dismissed as untimely because it was filed beyond the 30-day statutory limit.
The applicant appealed an Inspector's decision not to issue orders under the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
The Inspector's decision was dated March 10, 2000, but the appeal was not received by the Board until April 18, 2000.
The Board dismissed the appeal as untimely because section 61(1) of the Act requires appeals to be made within 30 days, and the Act provides no discretion to relieve against this time limit.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the request of the applicant.
The applicant union requested to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.
Application for review of an Order to Pay terminated following Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant employer applied for a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed according to the settlement, with $943.59 returned to the employer and the administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
The matter was deemed terminated.
Application for review terminated due to the applicant's failure to file completed forms.
The applicant filed a partial application for review.
The Board advised the applicant of the deficiencies and provided the proper forms and instructions, warning that failure to provide the completed forms within 20 working days could result in termination of the application.
After more than 20 working days passed without any response from the applicant, the Board terminated the application.
Union certification application dismissed after failing to secure more than 50% of representation vote.
The applicant union applied for certification.
A representation vote was held, and not more than 50% of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant.
No statement of desire to make representations was filed within the time fixed under Rule 62.
The Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further applications for certification by the applicant for this bargaining unit.
Consent adjournment sine die granted for a period not exceeding one year.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the consent adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, noting that if neither party brings the matter on for hearing within that time, the application will be terminated and the representation vote ballots destroyed.
Late employment standards appeal terminated after applicant provided untruthful explanation for delay.
The applicant appealed an Officer's decision not to issue an Order to Pay outside the 45-day statutory time limit.
The applicant requested an extension of time, claiming the Ministry of Labour delayed in advising him that he had sent his application to the wrong office.
The Board found the applicant's explanation contradicted by documentary evidence and concluded he was not being truthful.
The Board declined to exercise its discretion to extend the time and terminated the application as untimely.
Union certification granted following successful representation vote in the construction industry.
The applicant union applied for certification in the construction industry.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant for the specified bargaining unit.
Adjournment request denied; employer's busy season is not a compelling circumstance absent mutual consent.
The employer requested an adjournment of an employee's appeal hearing because the scheduled date fell at the beginning of its busy season.
The Ministry of Labour did not object, but the employee did.
The Board denied the request, noting that absent consent from all parties, hearings are only adjourned in the most compelling circumstances, which were not present here.
Board invites submissions on whether two files should be scheduled for hearing together.
The applicant opposed the determination that two Board files be scheduled for hearing together.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board invited submissions from the other parties before making a decision on the scheduling.
Board orders disbursement of trust monies following settlement of employer's appeal of Order to Pay.
The employer appealed an Order to Pay under the Employment Standards Act.
Prior to the hearing, the parties resolved their differences and entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the Director of the Employment Standards Branch to disburse the monies held in trust to the responding employee.
Hearing adjourned sine die as parties resolved the underlying language dispute for negotiations.
The responding party requested an adjournment of a scheduled hearing because the parties were continuing to negotiate and its representative was unavailable.
The Board noted that the only issue identified in the application was a dispute about the language of negotiations, which the parties had already agreed on how to resolve.
Finding no outstanding matters requiring intervention, the Board adjourned the matter sine die.
Duty of fair representation complaint dismissed as premature because the underlying grievance was still under consideration.
The applicant filed a duty of fair representation complaint alleging the union failed to forward her grievance regarding an anniversary increase to arbitration.
The union and employer indicated that the union's grievance committee had not yet determined whether to advance the grievance.
The Board dismissed the complaint as premature, noting its consistent practice of not inquiring into such complaints while the underlying grievance is still under discussion in the grievance procedure.
Board issues procedural directions regarding production of documents and particulars for preliminary objections in ESA appeal.
The employer and two employees appealed an Employment Standards Officer's Order to Pay regarding unpaid overtime, public holiday pay, and eating periods.
In this procedural decision, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the Ministry of Labour an extension to provide the basis for its wage calculations.
The Board also directed the employer to provide material facts and detailed arguments supporting its preliminary objections regarding jurisdiction, timeliness, and alleged breaches of natural justice.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Association des enseignantes et des enseignants franco-ontariens, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, Le Conseil scolaire de district du Centre-Sud-Ouest.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The applicant and responding party agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.
Board amends previous decision to correct typographical error in scheduled hearing dates.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued an amendment to its decision dated March 27, 2000, to correct a typographical error in the scheduled hearing dates.
The dates were amended from October 28 and 24, 2000, to October 23 and 24, 2000.
Application withdrawn at the request of the applicant with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79, requested to withdraw its application against the City of Toronto.