Proceeding terminated following a memorandum of settlement and representation vote regarding a sale of business.
The applicant union applied for a declaration of a sale of business under section 69 of the Labour Relations Act following the creation of a new transit authority.
The parties entered into a memorandum of settlement agreeing to a bargaining unit description and a representation vote between two unions.
Following a representation vote in which the applicant union won the majority, the Board terminated the proceeding in accordance with the settlement.
Duty of fair representation complaint dismissed without a hearing as union's representation was reasonable.
The applicant filed a complaint alleging that her union breached its duty of fair representation under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act during her termination grievance arbitration.
The union and the employer requested that the application be dismissed without a hearing.
The Board found that the union's decisions, including not hiring a lawyer and not calling certain witnesses whose evidence would not have altered the outcome, were reasonable and did not constitute arbitrary, discriminatory, or bad faith conduct.
The application was dismissed.
Proceeding to be deemed terminated unless parties request relisting after one-year adjournment.
The Board noted that more than a year had elapsed since the matter was adjourned pending conciliation.
The Board directed the parties to advise by October 26, 2001, if they wished to have the proceeding relisted for hearing, failing which it would be deemed terminated.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant sought to withdraw the application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Application terminated for late filing and incomplete contact information under Rule 15.
The applicant filed an application alleging a breach of section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The application was delivered to the responding parties but was not filed with the Board within the five-day time limit required by Rule 14 of the Board's Rules of Procedure.
Additionally, the application lacked sufficient contact information for the responding trade union.
Consequently, the Board terminated the application pursuant to Rule 15, without prejudice to the applicant's ability to file a fresh application in compliance with the Rules.
Union's request to dismiss duty of fair representation complaints without a hearing denied.
The applicants filed duty of fair representation complaints against the union regarding the settlement of group classification grievances.
The union and the intervenor employer requested that the applications be dismissed without a hearing for failing to state a prima facie case.
The Board found that while the union provided a detailed and plausible explanation for its conduct, the applicants' allegations had enough substance to preclude dismissing the applications at the preliminary stage.
The request to dismiss was denied and the matters were referred for consultation.
Representation vote ordered in certification application; majority declined to seal ballot box despite section 8.1 notice.
The applicant trade union applied for certification.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and gave notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The majority of the Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support to obtain a representation vote and directed that a vote be taken.
The majority did not order the ballot box sealed.
The dissenting Board member would have directed the ballot box to be sealed pursuant to section 8.1(4) of the Act.
Application for certification dismissed after union failed to win majority in representation vote.
The Canadian Union of Public Employees applied for certification.
A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in favour of the applicant.
As a result, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application for certification.
Applications for certification withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought leave to withdraw its applications for certification after a representation vote had been directed.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the applications were withdrawn.
Board directs representation vote for proposed bargaining unit of security services employees.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
Having determined that the proposed bargaining unit was appropriate and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.
Representation vote directed and ballot box sealed in certification application due to bargaining unit dispute.
The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the Town of East Gwillimbury.
The responding party disputed the applicant's estimate of the number of employees in the proposed bargaining unit and proposed a different unit, giving notice under section 8.1 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The Board found the applicant's proposed unit could be appropriate and directed a representation vote, ordering that the ballot box be sealed and the votes not counted until the Board orders otherwise due to the significant numerical difference between the parties' estimates.
Union certified as bargaining agent following successful representation vote and agreement on bargaining unit.
The applicant union applied for certification.
Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the parties agreed on the appropriate bargaining unit description.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board issued a certificate to the applicant union for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.
Union decertified after majority of employees vote in opposition during representation vote.
The applicant filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.
Following a representation vote in which more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.
The applicants, McMaster University Staff Association and Maureen Lennon, filed an application against McMaster University.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the applicants leave to withdraw the application.
Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant filed an application against the responding party.
On the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
The applicant requested to withdraw her application via a letter dated October 4, 2001.
The applicant, United Steelworkers of America, sought to withdraw its application against the responding party, Teletech Canada Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
The applicants, McMaster University Staff Association and Maureen Lennon, sought to withdraw their application against McMaster University.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Uncontested application granted; PSU Case Manager determined not to be an employee under the Act.
The applicant employer brought an application under section 114(2) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, seeking a determination that its PSU Case Manager exercised managerial functions and was employed in a confidential capacity in matters relating to labour relations.
The responding union did not dispute the application.
The Board determined that the individual was not an employee for the purposes of the Act pursuant to section 1(3)(b).