Lisa Tucker

The member, a teacher, faced allegations of professional misconduct for touching a colleague without her consent on multiple occasions.

The member pleaded no contest to the allegations and agreed to a statement of uncontested facts.

The Discipline Committee found the member guilty of professional misconduct, specifically engaging in disgraceful, dishonourable, or unprofessional conduct, and conduct unbecoming a member.

Accepting a joint submission on penalty, the Committee ordered a reprimand, a four-month suspension of the member's certificate of qualification and registration, and the successful completion of coursework on professional boundaries.

The Member, a teacher, pleaded no contest to allegations of professional misconduct relating to the possession of child pornography on his cell phone and SD card.

The Discipline Committee found the Member guilty of professional misconduct, including engaging in a prohibited act involving child pornography, disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional conduct, and conduct unbecoming a member.

Pursuant to the mandatory penalty provisions of the Ontario College of Teachers Act, 1996, the Committee ordered the immediate revocation of the Member's Certificate of Qualification and Registration and a written reprimand.

The Ontario College of Teachers brought a discipline proceeding against the member for professional misconduct.

The member entered a plea of no contest and the parties presented a joint submission on penalty.

The Discipline Committee found that the member engaged in professional misconduct contrary to subsections 1(18) and 1(19) of Ontario Regulation 437/97.

The Committee accepted the joint submission and ordered a reprimand, a four-month suspension of the member's certificate, and the completion of coursework on professional boundaries.

The Member, a school principal, pleaded guilty to professional misconduct for engaging in a pattern of anti-Black racist comments towards staff and falsifying a student's attendance record to cover up one of the incidents.

The Discipline Committee accepted the Agreed Statement of Facts and found the Member guilty of professional misconduct, including making false statements, falsifying records, and engaging in disgraceful, dishonourable, and unprofessional conduct.

The Committee accepted a joint submission on penalty, ordering a reprimand, a 10-month suspension of the Member's Certificate of Qualification and Registration, and the completion of coursework on anti-Black racism, inclusive leadership, and professional ethics.

The Member, a teacher, faced disciplinary proceedings for failing to immediately report a student's allegation that another teacher had touched her inappropriately.

Instead of reporting the matter to the proper authorities, the Member told the student he could not hear details about a colleague and assumed his reporting duty was fulfilled when he learned the principal was aware of the allegation.

The Member pleaded no contest to professional misconduct.

The Discipline Committee found the Member guilty of professional misconduct for failing to comply with the ethical standards of the profession and the duty to report.

Accepting a joint submission on penalty, the Committee ordered a reprimand and noted that the Member had already completed the required coursework on professional ethics and the duty to report.

The Member, a teacher, was found guilty of professional misconduct for verbally and psychologically abusing a special needs student.

At the request of the student's parents, the Member ran a 'boot camp' at her home to discipline the student, which involved physical labour such as carrying a cinder block and scooping water from a pool.

The Member filmed the student and shared the video without permission, and also reprimanded the student inappropriately via videoconference.

The Discipline Committee accepted a joint submission on penalty, ordering a reprimand, a five-month suspension of the Member's teaching certificate, and the completion of coursework on classroom management and appropriate discipline.

The Ontario College of Teachers brought disciplinary proceedings against a member for professional misconduct.

The member pleaded no contest to allegations of verbally and psychologically abusing students, failing to adequately supervise students, and engaging in sexual misconduct.

The member made derogatory, profane, and sexualized comments to students, mocked individuals with disabilities, and left students unsupervised outside while they burned wood in small ovens, resulting in a fire.

The Discipline Committee found the member guilty of professional misconduct and accepted a joint submission on penalty, ordering a reprimand, a five-month suspension, and the completion of a classroom management course.

The Ontario College of Teachers brought disciplinary proceedings against the Member for professional misconduct, alleging inappropriate physical contact with students, including tapping a student with his foot and pulling chairs out from under seated students.

The Member pleaded no contest to the allegations and agreed to a statement of uncontested facts.

The Discipline Committee found the Member guilty of professional misconduct for physically abusing students, failing to comply with the Act and regulations, and engaging in disgraceful, dishonourable, or unprofessional conduct.

Accepting a joint submission on penalty, the Committee ordered a reprimand, a three-month suspension of the Member's Certificate of Qualification and Registration, and the successful completion of an anger management course.

The Member, a teacher, pled guilty to professional misconduct after being criminally convicted of possessing and accessing child pornography.

The Discipline Committee of the Ontario College of Teachers accepted an Agreed Statement of Facts and Guilty Plea, finding the Member guilty of professional misconduct, including engaging in a prohibited act involving child pornography.

Pursuant to the mandatory penalty provisions of the Ontario College of Teachers Act, 1996, the Committee ordered a written reprimand and the immediate revocation of the Member's certificate of qualification and registration.

The Member, an elementary school teacher, pleaded guilty to professional misconduct for engaging in a pattern of inappropriate communications and boundary violations with two female students.

Over several years, the Member sent hundreds of personal emails and messages, gave gifts with hidden messages, and failed to report concerns about a student's well-being.

The Discipline Committee found the Member guilty of failing to maintain professional standards, emotional abuse, and disgraceful conduct.

Accepting a joint submission on penalty, the Committee ordered a reprimand and a six-month suspension, noting the Member had already resigned his teaching certificate and undertaken never to reapply.

The Member, a school principal, pleaded guilty to professional misconduct for failing to take immediate steps to respond to and report an alleged video circulating at the school depicting a student having sex with males.

The Discipline Committee accepted a joint submission on penalty, ordering a reprimand and requiring the Member to complete a course on professional ethics and responsibility with an emphasis on reporting obligations.

The member, a teacher, faced disciplinary proceedings for professional misconduct involving boundary violations with two students.

The member admitted to meeting privately with a vulnerable student, hugging students, providing unqualified counselling, and disclosing personal struggles, which caused emotional harm.

The member also breached a school board directive by contacting the student while reassigned home.

The Discipline Committee accepted a joint submission on penalty, finding the member guilty of professional misconduct.

The member was reprimanded, suspended for six months, and ordered to complete a course on professional boundaries.

The Ontario College of Teachers brought disciplinary proceedings against a member for professional misconduct, including verbal and psychological abuse of students, sexual misconduct, and practising under the influence of a substance.

The member pleaded no contest to the allegations, which involved making inappropriate and sexualized comments and gestures to students, attending school smelling of a substance contrary to prescribed treatment, and failing to follow absence reporting protocols.

The Discipline Committee accepted the uncontested facts and found the member guilty of professional misconduct.

Accepting a joint submission on penalty, the Committee ordered a reprimand, a two-month suspension of the member's certificate of qualification, and the successful completion of a course on boundary violations.