Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 5, 2009

Request to add individual respondent to human rights application granted.

The applicant requested an order to add an individual as a respondent to his human rights application, having previously been unable to name him due to not knowing his surname.

The existing respondents opposed the request, but the proposed individual respondent did not file a response.

The Tribunal granted the request under Rule 1.7(c) of its Rules of Procedure, finding it fair and just to add the individual as a respondent given the allegations of discrimination against him.

Abdulwasi Ali v. Centre for Security Training and Management Inc., 2009 HRTO 1202

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 30, 2009

Human rights application dismissed after the applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code but failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

Despite receiving notice and being offered accommodation for her disability-related needs, the applicant refused to attend, citing financial constraints and dissatisfaction with the Tribunal's processes.

The respondents attended and requested dismissal.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, noting that the applicant bears the responsibility to attend and provide evidence in support of her allegations.

Donna Jenner v. Toronto Newsgirls Boxing Club and Savoy Howe, 2009 HRTO 1181

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 29, 2009

Request to add individual respondent granted on consent.

The applicant requested an order to add an individual as a respondent to his human rights application.

Counsel for the organizational respondent confirmed understanding that the individual would be added and that their response would apply to him as well.

The Tribunal granted the request and amended the style of cause accordingly.

Smith v. Wal-Mart Canada, 2009 HRTO 1164

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 27, 2009

Early dismissal denied as applicant did not seek human rights remedies in parallel civil proceedings.

The respondent requested an early dismissal of the human rights application, arguing it was barred by s. 34(11) of the Human Rights Code due to parallel civil proceedings.

The Tribunal found that while the applicant had requested a stay of the civil proceedings initiated by the respondent, there was no indication the applicant had sought remedies under s. 46.1 of the Code in those civil proceedings.

The request for early dismissal was therefore denied.

Martin Simard v. Nipissing Condominium Corporation No. 4, 2009 HRTO 1150

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 27, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of ongoing union grievance proceedings based on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging disability discrimination in employment.

The facts of the application were also the subject of several ongoing union grievances.

The Tribunal, on its own initiative, requested submissions on whether to defer the application pending the completion of the grievance proceedings.

The applicant opposed deferral due to delay in the grievance process, while the respondent and the union supported it.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application, finding it to be the most fair, just, and expeditious way of proceeding, consistent with its general practice where there is an ongoing grievance based on the same facts.

Charles Smith v. CAMI Automotive Inc., 2009 HRTO 1149

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 24, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent WSIB and WSIAT proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination by the WSIB and a claims adjudicator regarding his participation in a labour market re-entry program.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the application pending the conclusion of concurrent proceedings before the WSIB's Appeals Branch and the WSIAT.

The Tribunal found that deferral was the most fair, just, and expeditious way to proceed, as the applicant was raising the same facts and issues in both forums.

The application was deferred pending the conclusion of the workplace safety and insurance proceedings.

Hansen v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2009 HRTO 1134

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 24, 2009

Tribunal scheduled a preliminary hearing to address issues of release, prima facie case, and delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination regarding his ineligibility for non-pension benefits after his employment was terminated.

The respondent requested early dismissal, arguing the applicant had signed a full and final release over seven years prior and that the application was out of time.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision scheduling a half-day hearing to hear oral submissions on whether the application should be dismissed based on the release, failure to disclose a prima facie case, or untimeliness.

Lambe v. OMERS Administration Corporation, 2009 HRTO 1135

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 23, 2009

Respondents given final deadline to file Response to human rights application before Tribunal proceeds without them.

The applicant filed a human rights application.

The respondents failed to file a Response within the required 35-day period.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondents that failure to file a Response by a specified final deadline could result in the Tribunal proceeding without further notice to them and deeming them to have accepted the allegations.

Andrew Hayward v. Fairway Publications Inc. and Peter Mumford, 2009 HRTO 1129

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 22, 2009

Request to expedite proceedings dismissed as applicant's reasons were too vague to demonstrate true urgency.

The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code and requested that the proceedings be expedited due to a family emergency and personal issues.

The organization respondent opposed the request, arguing insufficient information and delay in filing.

The Tribunal found the applicant's reasons too vague and lacking in detail to justify expediting the proceedings over other matters.

The request to expedite was dismissed, and the style of cause was amended to correct the individual respondent's name.

Marcus v. MoRoCo Chocolate Bar Restaurant, 2009 HRTO 1100

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 21, 2009

Termination following workplace injury found discriminatory, but damages reduced due to applicant's false pleadings.

The applicant alleged that his employment was terminated because of a workplace injury to his elbow.

The respondent claimed the termination was solely due to the applicant's repeated misuse of a company credit card for personal purchases.

The Tribunal found that while the applicant had misused the credit card, he had not done so after signing a final warning letter.

The Tribunal concluded that the applicant's subsequent workplace injury and need for accommodation was a factor in the termination, violating the Human Rights Code.

However, the Tribunal found the applicant engaged in an abuse of process by lying in his pleadings to maximize lost income claims, and accordingly reduced his monetary compensation.

Quattroci v. Boz Electric Supply Ltd., 2009 HRTO 1082

Kate Sellar

26 cases2009–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 7, 2009

Human rights application stayed against corporate respondent due to bankruptcy; individual respondent removed on consent.

The applicant filed a human rights application against a corporate respondent and an individual respondent.

The corporate respondent subsequently filed for bankruptcy.

The Tribunal held that the proceedings against the corporate respondent were stayed pursuant to s. 69 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

The Tribunal also granted the respondents' request, on consent, to remove the individual respondent from the application.

McDonald v. Bruce Bissell Buick Pontiac Limited, 2009 HRTO 984

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 7, 2009

Tribunal extended deadline for proposed individual respondent to respond to request to add him.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to add an individual, Yanik Leduc, as a respondent to his human rights application against Wal-Mart Canada Corp. The applicant failed to clearly specify the proposed respondent in his request and omitted the cover page of the form.

To facilitate an accessible procedure, the Tribunal relieved against the failure to comply with the Rules, directed that the Tribunal would send the necessary documents to the proposed respondent, and extended the deadline for him to file a response.

Peter Smith v. Wal-Mart Canada Corporation, 2009 HRTO 991

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 6, 2009

Application dismissed; HRTO lacks jurisdiction to review WSIB adjudicative decisions regarding statutory benefits.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination with respect to employment and contracts after the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board reduced his loss of earning benefits.

The HRTO issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding that adjudicative decisions of statutory tribunals are not a 'service' under the Code and the HRTO does not have the authority to hear appeals from the decisions of other statutory tribunals.

Caldeira v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2009 HRTO 973

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 26, 2009

Adjournment granted due to municipal strike; hearing converted to case management meeting.

The respondents requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing due to a strike at the City of Toronto, which made it difficult for counsel to communicate with respondents and witnesses.

The Tribunal found the strike constituted exceptional circumstances and granted the adjournment, converting the scheduled hearing date into a case management meeting.

Segal v. Toronto (City), 2009 HRTO 925

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 18, 2009

Tribunal ordered corporate respondent to disclose proposed individual respondent's address to facilitate service.

The applicant filed a human rights application and subsequently requested to add an instructor as an individual respondent.

As there was no indication the request was served on the proposed respondent, the Tribunal ordered the corporate respondent to provide his last known address to the applicant.

The Tribunal also set a timeline for the applicant to serve the request and for the proposed respondent to file a response.

Abdulwasi Ali v. Centre for Security Training and Management Inc. and Christopher Menary, 2009 HRTO 880

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 16, 2009

Respondents ordered to file a Response by a specified date or face proceedings without notice.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondents.

The respondents failed to file a Response within the required 35-day period.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondents to file a Response by June 22, 2009, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice to them.

Jack Schiff v. Ridout & Maybee LLP, Kenneth Hanna and David Heller, 2009 HRTO 864

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 16, 2009

Tribunal scheduled a preliminary hearing to address respondents' requests to dismiss application for delay and prior proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on ethnic origin after being suspended for three years by the University Tribunal for plagiarism.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed due to delay under section 34 of the Human Rights Code and because the substance of the application was appropriately dealt with in another proceeding under section 45.1.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario issued an interim decision scheduling a half-day hearing to hear submissions from the parties on these preliminary issues.

Sona Barua v. Governing Council of the University of Toronto and David Naylor, 2009 HRTO 860

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 16, 2009

Request for reconsideration dismissed as applicant failed to identify any grounds under Rule 26.5.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision (2009 HRTO 588) that dismissed his application for lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant did not identify any of the grounds for reconsideration under Rule 26.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, but merely stated he did not understand the reasoning and repeated his previous submissions.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration, noting that reconsideration is not an opportunity to reargue a case.

Larke v. Camisle Golf, 2009 HRTO 859

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 15, 2009

Tribunal ordered written submissions on whether to defer human rights application pending WSIB proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination with respect to services.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the application pending the outcome of a related proceeding before the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision ordering the parties to provide written submissions on whether the application should be deferred.

Frank Hansen v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board and Cathy Sabev, 2009 HRTO 846

Caroline V. (Nini) Jones

15 cases2004–2025

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 5, 2009

Human rights application dismissed for failing to establish a prima facie case of discrimination.

The applicant alleged that her former employer discriminated against her on multiple grounds, including race, sex, and age, when it terminated her employment and denied her severance pay.

At the hearing on the merits, after the applicant presented her case, the respondent requested that the application be dismissed for failing to disclose a prima facie case of discrimination.

The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to establish a nexus between her Code-protected characteristics and the termination of her employment, noting that much of her evidence was illogical or internally inconsistent.

The application was dismissed.

Manminder Jagait v. IN TECH Risk Management Inc., 2009 HRTO 779

Page 27 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom RabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven GerredSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Sean FlahertyCounsel
2 appearances
Corey ChandlerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
2 appearances
Ernst GoetzeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Najeem EbrahimiAgent
2 appearances
Richard ClarkeSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Matthew OrchardCounsel
1 appearance
C. April StewartAgent
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Shaheynoor TalukderCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine PorCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance
Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance
David TurnerCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Pranavan GaneshalingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brennagh SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 27 of 29 (567 cases)