Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Nadia Chandra

Practising Law - Employed41 cases2009–2026

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 28, 2009

Interim remedy for modified duties on 24-hour shift schedule denied to pregnant firefighter.

The applicant, a pregnant firefighter, requested an interim remedy requiring the respondents to provide her with modified duties on a 24-hour shift schedule to accommodate her pregnancy and childcare needs.

The respondents had offered modified duties on a straight day schedule.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for an interim remedy, finding that while the application appeared to have merit, the applicant failed to establish that the balance of harm favoured granting the request or that it was just and appropriate in the circumstances.

Joanne Blanchette v. The Corporation of the Town of Oakville, Richard Boyes and Brian Durdin, 2009 HRTO 703

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 19, 2009

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after neither party attended the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal scheduled a hearing and sent notices to both parties.

Neither party complied with disclosure requirements, and neither party attended the scheduled hearing.

The adjudicator concluded that the applicant had abandoned the application and dismissed it.

Thomas Deby v. Aditya Birla Minacs, 2009 HRTO 662

Peigi Ross

21 cases1995–2015

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 6, 2009

Adjournment request denied; financial inability to obtain legal advice is not an extraordinary circumstance.

The applicant requested an adjournment of his human rights hearing, arguing he needed time to sell his home to afford a legal opinion regarding the impact of the proceeding.

The respondent opposed the request, citing prejudice due to the availability of its witnesses and the passage of time since the applicant's termination.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, noting the applicant failed to request rescheduling within five days of receiving the Confirmation of Hearing and finding that his financial situation did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance justifying a delay.

John Fleming v. The Corporation of the City of North Bay, 2009 HRTO 587

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 5, 2009

Tribunal declines to dismiss late-filed age discrimination application at preliminary stage due to applicant's health issues.

The applicant filed an application alleging age discrimination after being terminated from her employment.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application was filed more than one year after the last alleged incident.

The applicant provided written submissions explaining that her delay was due to a heart attack, quadruple bypass surgery, subsequent depression, and a lack of awareness of the discrimination.

The Tribunal applied the 'plain and obvious' test and found it was not plain and obvious that the delay was not incurred in good faith.

The Tribunal directed that the application proceed and be served on the respondent.

Shaw v. Royal Canadian Legion 479, 2009 HRTO 567

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 5, 2009

Respondent ordered to provide full name and contact details of a proposed individual respondent.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings seeking the last name and contact details of a proposed individual respondent identified only as 'Yannick the night support manager'.

The respondent did not file a response.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to provide the full name and last known address of the individual to the applicant and the Tribunal.

Peter Smith v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2009 HRTO 570

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 4, 2009

Respondents given final deadline to file Response to human rights application before Tribunal proceeds without them.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondents.

The respondents failed to file a Response within the required 35-day period.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondents to file a Response by a specified date, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice to them and deem them to have accepted the allegations.

Arthur Martin v. Trailmobile Canada Limited, 2009 HRTO 553

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 1, 2009

Application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw the application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondents took no position on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Donald Dorge v. UAP Inc. and Dale Green, 2009 HRTO 551

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2009

Request to expedite proceedings dismissed as circumstances were not truly urgent.

The applicant, a pregnant firefighter, filed an application alleging discrimination based on sex and family status after the respondents refused to accommodate her with modified duties on a 24-hour shift schedule.

She requested that the proceedings be expedited so the matter could be resolved before her due date.

The Tribunal dismissed the request to expedite, finding that the circumstances were not so urgent as to justify priority over other matters.

Joanne Blanchette v. The Corporation of the Town of Oakville, Richard Boyes and Brian Durdin, 2009 HRTO 546

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 28, 2009

Request to expedite proceedings dismissed as financial hardship from job loss did not constitute true urgency.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of sex after her employment was terminated shortly before the end of her maternity/parental leave.

She requested that the proceedings be expedited due to financial hardship, as her Employment Insurance benefits were exhausted.

The respondent consented to the request.

The Tribunal dismissed the request to expedite, finding that the applicant had not demonstrated circumstances so truly urgent as to justify giving the application priority over other matters.

Valeeva-Semeryk v. GeniSys Management Solutions, 2009 HRTO 514

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 28, 2009

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After both parties failed to attend a scheduled mediation, the Tribunal attempted to contact the applicant to determine his intentions.

The Tribunal issued a Notice advising that the application would be deemed abandoned if he did not respond.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's correspondence.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Michael Easton v. Sykes Assistance Services Corporation, 2009 HRTO 509

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 27, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw their human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Joe Pasqua v. The Ottawa Hospital, 2009 HRTO 503

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 27, 2009

Leave granted to withdraw human rights application.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw their human rights application pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The respondents made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Brian Dockal v. The Big Carrot, Corina Zambri, Audrey Duann and Suzanna Ramirez, 2009 HRTO 508

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 27, 2009

Application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal on consent of the parties.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw their human rights application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent consented to the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Alcheikh v. Van-Rob, 2009 HRTO 507

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 27, 2009

Human rights applications withdrawn following parties' settlement agreement.

The parties agreed to settle the applicant's human rights applications filed under sections 34 and 53(3) of the Human Rights Code.

They waived their right to make oral submissions and requested the Tribunal to dispose of the applications without a hearing.

The Tribunal ordered the applications withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the settlement.

Forde v. Avon Maitland District School Board, 2009 HRTO 506

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 27, 2009

Leave granted to withdraw human rights application.

The applicant requested leave to withdraw his human rights application filed under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent made no submissions on the request.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Williamson v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2009 HRTO 505

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 21, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of related union grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed an application alleging disability discrimination in employment.

The respondent council requested deferral because the matter was the subject of a union grievance referred to arbitration.

The Tribunal amended the name of the respondent union and ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance, finding that deferral was the most fair, just, and expeditious way to proceed given the ongoing grievance based on the same facts and issues.

Joseph Perpich v. South Essex Community Council and Canadian Union of Public Employees, 2009 HRTO 469

John-Paul Alexandrowicz

In Private Practice32 cases1998–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 30, 2009

Preliminary motion to dismiss human rights application denied, but family status ground struck.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal dismiss the human rights application on a preliminary basis, arguing it was untimely, outside the Tribunal's jurisdiction, an abuse of process, and failed to make out a prima facie case.

The applicant alleged discrimination based on family status and association with persons identified by a prohibited ground (students with anaphylaxis).

The Tribunal dismissed the request to dismiss the application entirely, finding it was timely, within jurisdiction, not an abuse of process, and raised allegations sufficient to establish a prima facie case of discrimination by association.

However, the Tribunal struck the ground of 'family status' as the allegations did not relate to a parent and child relationship.

Capocci v. York Catholic District School Board, 2009 HRTO 107

Request to add proposed respondent dismissed for failing to allege facts supporting a Code violation.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sex discrimination in employment against the respondents.

She subsequently requested an order to add Loblaws Inc. as a respondent, arguing that Loblaws was responsible for the selection process for a training program from which she was rejected.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the applicant failed to allege facts that, if proven, could support a finding that Loblaws violated her rights under the Code, as there was no allegation that Loblaws' refusal to select her was based on her sex.

Julie Marchese v. Fortinos (Highway 20 & 53 2004) Ltd. and Nicola Alfeiri, 2009 HRTO 25

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 5, 2009

Early dismissal of human rights application denied as parallel child protection proceeding was still ongoing.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on race and colour.

The respondents requested early dismissal under s. 34(11) of the Human Rights Code, claiming a civil action had been filed, and under s. 45.1, arguing the substance was being dealt with in an ongoing child protection proceeding.

The Tribunal dismissed the s. 34(11) request due to lack of evidence of a civil claim.

The Tribunal denied the s. 45.1 request as premature because the child protection proceeding was still ongoing, without prejudice to the respondents renewing the request once that proceeding concluded.

The Tribunal also amended the respondent organization's name.

S.D. v. Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, 2009 HRTO 8

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 24, 2008

Respondents given final deadline to file Response to human rights application.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondents.

The respondents failed to file a Response within the required 35-day period.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision noting the failure to respond and warning the respondents that failure to file a Response by January 9, 2009, could result in the Tribunal proceeding without further notice to them and deeming them to have accepted the allegations.

Noakes v. Mississauga Football League, 2008 HRTO 430

Page 28 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom RabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven GerredSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Sean FlahertyCounsel
2 appearances
Corey ChandlerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
2 appearances
Ernst GoetzeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Najeem EbrahimiAgent
2 appearances
Richard ClarkeSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Matthew OrchardCounsel
1 appearance
C. April StewartAgent
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Shaheynoor TalukderCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine PorCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance
Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance
David TurnerCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Pranavan GaneshalingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brennagh SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 28 of 29 (567 cases)

Nadia Chandra

Ken Bhattacharjee

Joanne Blanchette v. The Corporation of the Town of Oakville, Richard Boyes and Brian Durdin, 2009 HRTO 703

Ken Bhattacharjee

Thomas Deby v. Aditya Birla Minacs, 2009 HRTO 662

Peigi Ross

Ken Bhattacharjee

John Fleming v. The Corporation of the City of North Bay, 2009 HRTO 587

Ken Bhattacharjee

Shaw v. Royal Canadian Legion 479, 2009 HRTO 567

Ken Bhattacharjee

Peter Smith v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2009 HRTO 570

Ken Bhattacharjee

Arthur Martin v. Trailmobile Canada Limited, 2009 HRTO 553

Ken Bhattacharjee

Donald Dorge v. UAP Inc. and Dale Green, 2009 HRTO 551

Ken Bhattacharjee

Joanne Blanchette v. The Corporation of the Town of Oakville, Richard Boyes and Brian Durdin, 2009 HRTO 546

Ken Bhattacharjee

Valeeva-Semeryk v. GeniSys Management Solutions, 2009 HRTO 514

Ken Bhattacharjee

Michael Easton v. Sykes Assistance Services Corporation, 2009 HRTO 509

Ken Bhattacharjee

Joe Pasqua v. The Ottawa Hospital, 2009 HRTO 503

Ken Bhattacharjee

Brian Dockal v. The Big Carrot, Corina Zambri, Audrey Duann and Suzanna Ramirez, 2009 HRTO 508

Ken Bhattacharjee

Alcheikh v. Van-Rob, 2009 HRTO 507

Ken Bhattacharjee

Forde v. Avon Maitland District School Board, 2009 HRTO 506

Ken Bhattacharjee

Williamson v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2009 HRTO 505

Ken Bhattacharjee

Joseph Perpich v. South Essex Community Council and Canadian Union of Public Employees, 2009 HRTO 469

John-Paul Alexandrowicz

Ken Bhattacharjee

Capocci v. York Catholic District School Board, 2009 HRTO 107

Michelle Henry

Elyse Mallins

Adriana Greenblatt

Ken Bhattacharjee

Julie Marchese v. Fortinos (Highway 20 & 53 2004) Ltd. and Nicola Alfeiri, 2009 HRTO 25

Ken Bhattacharjee

S.D. v. Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, 2009 HRTO 8

Ken Bhattacharjee

Noakes v. Mississauga Football League, 2008 HRTO 430

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Applicant

Counsel for Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Baywood Homes

for Beck Taxi Limited

for both Applicants

for Bruce Johnston

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

for himself

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

for Robert Half International

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

for Sherilyn Koenig

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

for the Affected Organization

for the Affected Party

for the Applicant

for the Applicants

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

for the Intervenor

for the Ontario Nurses' Association