Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Lily Harmer

6 cases1991–2026

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 10, 2009

Human rights application dismissed for being filed outside the one-year statutory limitation period.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the university regarding a plagiarism charge.

The application was filed more than two months after the one-year statutory deadline.

The Tribunal held a preliminary hearing to determine if the delay was incurred in good faith.

Finding that the applicant lacked due diligence and his explanation lacked credibility, the Tribunal concluded the delay was not incurred in good faith and dismissed the application.

Barua v. University of Toronto, 2009 HRTO 2148

Tribunal resolves preliminary issues including witness exclusion, party removal, and document production in human rights application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on family status and association.

On the first day of the hearing, the Tribunal addressed several preliminary issues.

The Tribunal ordered the exclusion of non-party witnesses but denied requests to exclude children from the hearing room and to impose a publication ban regarding prior settlement minutes.

The Tribunal also removed the individual respondents from the proceeding, finding no compelling reason to keep them as parties.

Finally, the Tribunal ordered both parties to produce requested documents, including the applicant's financial and medical records, and the respondents' statistical information and exclusion letters.

Capocci v. York Catholic District School Board, 2009 HRTO 1956

Paula M. Rusak

18 cases1981–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 17, 2009

Human rights application dismissed for failing to establish a prima facie case, save one resolved issue.

The applicant filed an application alleging workplace harassment and discrimination based on disability and age.

At the hearing on the merits, the respondents moved for a non-suit after the applicant's case.

The Tribunal dismissed all allegations for failing to establish a prima facie case, except for one allegation regarding exclusion from a training course due to age.

The parties subsequently resolved the remaining training issue, and the Tribunal dismissed the application in part and declared it finally disposed of.

Morton v. Sarnia (City), 2009 HRTO 1951

Robert Baldwin

11 cases2008–2023

Melissa Mark

17 cases2009–2015

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 9, 2009

Tribunal rules character evidence inadmissible and allows court reporter on condition of sharing transcript.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on sexual orientation by the respondents in an after-school program.

At a case management meeting, the applicant requested further witness statements and sought to exclude a respondent witness who would only provide good character evidence.

The respondents requested permission to have a court reporter at the hearing.

The Tribunal denied the request for further witness statements, ruled the character evidence inadmissible, and allowed the court reporter on the condition that any transcript be shared with the applicant and the Tribunal.

Segal v. Toronto (City), 2009 HRTO 1907

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 29, 2009

Tribunal requested submissions on whether to defer human rights application pending concurrent civil proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability after the respondent condominium corporation attempted to remove her support dog pursuant to a 'no pets' by-law.

The respondent requested early dismissal, noting it had previously commenced a civil application in the Superior Court of Justice to enforce the by-law.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision on its own initiative, directing the parties to provide written submissions on whether the human rights application should be deferred pending the outcome of the civil proceeding.

Judy Atkinson v. Essex Condominium Corp. #5, 2009 HRTO 1802

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 23, 2009

Tribunal ordered further submissions on its jurisdiction over a US-based corporation administering the LSAT.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging the respondent discriminated against her by refusing to fully accommodate her disability-related needs during the Law School Admission Test (LSAT).

The respondent requested early dismissal, arguing the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction because it is a US-based corporation and all accommodation decisions are made in Pennsylvania.

The Tribunal ordered both parties to provide further written submissions on the jurisdictional issue, specifically directing them to address a relevant British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal decision.

Emma Arenson v. Law School Admission Council, Inc., 2009 HRTO 1767

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 22, 2009

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to provide hearing availability dates.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After a mediation meeting failed to resolve the matter, the Tribunal scheduled a hearing.

The respondents requested a rescheduling, and the Tribunal repeatedly contacted the applicant for her availability dates.

Despite multiple phone calls and a written warning that failure to respond would result in the application being deemed abandoned, the applicant did not provide the requested dates.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Sarah-Jane Edwards v. The Corporation of the Township of North Kawartha and Craig Watson, 2009 HRTO 1749

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 20, 2009

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to maintain current contact information.

The applicant filed a human rights application but subsequently failed to update his contact information or communicate with the Tribunal.

Notices and correspondence sent to the applicant's phone, email, and mailing address were returned as undeliverable.

As the applicant failed to respond to Tribunal directions or provide updated contact information as required by the Rules of Procedure, the application was deemed abandoned and dismissed.

Roger Plante v. Cemtol Manufacturing, 2009 HRTO 1713

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 2, 2009

Adjournment request denied; respondents ordered to produce original documents at the hearing.

The respondents requested an adjournment of the hearing due to changes in the witness list and disclosure issues.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding no extraordinary circumstances.

The applicant requested an order for the production of various financial and operational documents.

The Tribunal ordered the respondents to produce the original documents on the first day of the hearing for inspection, given their claim of financial inability to photocopy and mail them.

The Tribunal also ordered that the applicants' evidence be heard first, followed by the respondents'.

Knibbs v. Brant Artillery Gunners Club, 2009 HRTO 1601

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 8, 2009

Tribunal orders consolidation of two related human rights applications and permits amendments to pleadings.

The applicants, who are cousins and former co-workers, filed separate human rights applications alleging discrimination, harassment, and reprisal by the respondents.

The applicants requested that their applications be consolidated and heard together, that two individual respondents be removed from one application, and that the other application be amended to include a claim of reprisal.

The Tribunal granted all requests, finding common issues of fact and law, no prejudice to the respondents, and no objections raised by the respondents.

Knibbs v. Brant Artillery Gunners Club, 2009 HRTO 1419

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 4, 2009

Reconsideration request dismissed; applicant failed to establish compelling circumstances or reasonable apprehension of bias.

The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application after she failed to attend the hearing.

She argued that the Tribunal failed to accommodate her disability and financial constraints by refusing a written or electronic hearing, that the adjudicator was biased, and that her personal information should be removed from the decision.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the applicant had not cooperated in the accommodation process, that there was no reasonable apprehension of bias, and that amending the decision to remove personal information was not warranted.

Donna Jenner v. Toronto Newsgirls Boxing Club and Savoy Howe, 2009 HRTO 1413

Christopher Diana

41 cases2001–2025

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 27, 2009

Human rights application dismissed after applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal scheduled a hearing and sent notice to the applicant.

The applicant failed to comply with disclosure rules and did not attend the hearing, despite confirming his awareness of the hearing date to respondents' counsel.

The Tribunal dismissed the application due to the applicant's failure to attend and provide evidence in support of his allegations.

Hunter v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2009 HRTO 1333

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 25, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of an ongoing union grievance based on the same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging harassment, discrimination, and reprisal in employment.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the application because the facts and issues were part of an ongoing union grievance.

The applicant did not object to the deferral provided the grievance was resolved quickly.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance proceeding, finding it to be the most fair, just, and expeditious way to proceed.

Angela St. Micheal v. London District Catholic School Board, 2009 HRTO 1311

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 25, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of an ongoing concurrent grievance proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability and reprisal.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the facts and issues were part of an ongoing grievance proceeding where an arbitrator remained seized of the matter.

The respondents requested deferral, and the Tribunal ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the grievance proceeding, as the arbitrator had the authority to apply the Human Rights Code.

Nelson Tomas v. Direct Energy, Courtney Gordon and Andrew Steenson, 2009 HRTO 1310

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 17, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of ongoing union grievance on same facts.

The applicant filed an application alleging employment discrimination.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the application because the facts were part of an ongoing union grievance.

The applicant agreed to the deferral.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance proceeding, noting that the labour arbitrator has the authority to interpret and apply the Code.

Aref v. Hamilton-Wentworth Catholic District School Board, 2009 HRTO 1270

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 17, 2009

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as allegations did not meet the Code's definition of record of offences.

The applicant filed an Application alleging that the respondent discriminated against her on the basis of a record of offences when it terminated her employment as a debt collector.

The termination allegedly resulted from a lawsuit falsely accusing her of disclosing a debtor's debt to a neighbour.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the allegations did not fall within the Code's definition of 'record of offences', which requires a pardoned criminal conviction or a provincial offence conviction.

The applicant failed to provide submissions, and the Application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Eudokia Opariek v. Collectcorp Inc., 2009 HRTO 1271

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 14, 2009

Tribunal defers decision on respondent's failure to respond pending applicant's submission of prior court documents.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by her condominium corporation.

The respondent failed to file a response despite being served with the application and a subsequent interim decision.

The Tribunal deferred deciding on the respondent's failure to respond until the applicant submitted documents from a prior related court proceeding, and ordered the application to be sent to additional condominium officials.

Judy Atkinson v. Essex Condominium Corp. #5, 2009 HRTO 1266

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 13, 2009

Respondent granted final extension to file Response before Tribunal proceeds without his participation.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

The respondent failed to file a Response within the required timeframe, despite requesting and being granted an extension of time.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent that failure to file a Response by a final deadline could result in the Tribunal proceeding without his participation and deeming him to have accepted the allegations.

Susan Warren v. Sam Calogero, 2009 HRTO 1257

James Heeney

10 cases2009–2022

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 13, 2009

Human rights application dismissed as abuse of process due to valid full and final release.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging racial discrimination after his employment was terminated due to a plant closure.

The respondent requested early dismissal of the application because the applicant had signed a full and final release in exchange for an enhanced severance package.

The applicant argued he was distraught and under economic duress when he signed the release.

The Tribunal found that the applicant understood the release and that his financial difficulties did not amount to economic duress.

The application was dismissed as an abuse of process.

Carleton Douse v. William E. Coutts Company Limited operating as Hallmark Canada, 2009 HRTO 1254

Brian O'Byrne

20 cases1983–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 6, 2009

Age discrimination application dismissed; delay in responding to customer complaints was for non-discriminatory reasons.

The applicant, a senior citizen, alleged that the respondents discriminated against him based on his age by failing to respond to two customer complaint letters in a timely manner.

The letters concerned the refusal of a manager to provide him with free racing programs.

The Tribunal found that while there was a delay in responding to the letters, the applicant failed to prove that his age was a factor.

The respondents provided credible, non-discriminatory reasons for the delay, including a misplaced letter and a medical emergency.

The application was dismissed.

Foldes v. Woodbine Entertainment Group, 2009 HRTO 1222

Page 26 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom RabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven GerredSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Sean FlahertyCounsel
2 appearances
Corey ChandlerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
2 appearances
Ernst GoetzeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Najeem EbrahimiAgent
2 appearances
Richard ClarkeSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Matthew OrchardCounsel
1 appearance
C. April StewartAgent
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Shaheynoor TalukderCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine PorCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance
Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance
David TurnerCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Pranavan GaneshalingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brennagh SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 26 of 29 (567 cases)

Lily Harmer

Ken Bhattacharjee

Barua v. University of Toronto, 2009 HRTO 2148

Kathryn J. Bird

John-Paul Alexandrowicz

Iain T. Donnell

Ken Bhattacharjee

Capocci v. York Catholic District School Board, 2009 HRTO 1956

Paula M. Rusak

Ken Bhattacharjee

Morton v. Sarnia (City), 2009 HRTO 1951

Robert Baldwin

Melissa Mark

Ken Bhattacharjee

Segal v. Toronto (City), 2009 HRTO 1907

Ken Bhattacharjee

Judy Atkinson v. Essex Condominium Corp. #5, 2009 HRTO 1802

Ken Bhattacharjee

Emma Arenson v. Law School Admission Council, Inc., 2009 HRTO 1767

Ken Bhattacharjee

Sarah-Jane Edwards v. The Corporation of the Township of North Kawartha and Craig Watson, 2009 HRTO 1749

Ken Bhattacharjee

Roger Plante v. Cemtol Manufacturing, 2009 HRTO 1713

Ken Bhattacharjee

Knibbs v. Brant Artillery Gunners Club, 2009 HRTO 1601

Ken Bhattacharjee

Knibbs v. Brant Artillery Gunners Club, 2009 HRTO 1419

Ken Bhattacharjee

Donna Jenner v. Toronto Newsgirls Boxing Club and Savoy Howe, 2009 HRTO 1413

Christopher Diana

Ken Bhattacharjee

Hunter v. Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services), 2009 HRTO 1333

Ken Bhattacharjee

Angela St. Micheal v. London District Catholic School Board, 2009 HRTO 1311

Ken Bhattacharjee

Nelson Tomas v. Direct Energy, Courtney Gordon and Andrew Steenson, 2009 HRTO 1310

Ken Bhattacharjee

Aref v. Hamilton-Wentworth Catholic District School Board, 2009 HRTO 1270

Ken Bhattacharjee

Eudokia Opariek v. Collectcorp Inc., 2009 HRTO 1271

Ken Bhattacharjee

Judy Atkinson v. Essex Condominium Corp. #5, 2009 HRTO 1266

Ken Bhattacharjee

Susan Warren v. Sam Calogero, 2009 HRTO 1257

James Heeney

Ken Bhattacharjee

Carleton Douse v. William E. Coutts Company Limited operating as Hallmark Canada, 2009 HRTO 1254

Brian O'Byrne

Ken Bhattacharjee

Foldes v. Woodbine Entertainment Group, 2009 HRTO 1222

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Applicant

Counsel for Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Baywood Homes

for Beck Taxi Limited

for both Applicants

for Bruce Johnston

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

for himself

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

for Robert Half International

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

for Sherilyn Koenig

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

for the Affected Organization

for the Affected Party

for the Applicant

for the Applicants