Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent criminal proceedings in the Ontario Court of Justice.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the respondents with respect to employment and contracts, including incidents involving conservation officers.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal dismiss or defer the application because the respondent Ministry was concurrently prosecuting the applicant in the Ontario Court of Justice for charges related to the same incidents.

The applicant consented to the deferral.

The Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the proceedings before the Ontario Court of Justice to avoid duplication of evidence and inconsistent findings.

Blais v. Ontario (Natural Resources), 2010 HRTO 671

Thomas Stefanik

17 cases1982–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 26, 2010

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as respondent is a federally regulated courier.

The applicant, a courier driver, filed a human rights application against her employer, a national courier service.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, arguing it is a federally regulated transportation undertaking.

The Tribunal agreed, finding that the respondent engages in transportation works extending beyond the province, placing it under federal jurisdiction pursuant to s. 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The application was dismissed.

Katie Connor v. Eazy Express Inc., 2010 HRTO 673

Thomas A. Stefanik

34 cases1981–2023

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 26, 2010

Request to expedite proceedings dismissed due to vague reasons and unexplained delay in filing.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code and subsequently requested that the proceedings be expedited because she was moving out of Ontario for work.

The respondent opposed the request, noting the lack of factual support and the applicant's delay in filing the application.

The Tribunal dismissed the request to expedite, finding that the applicant's reasons were too vague, lacked detail regarding her move, and failed to explain why she could not participate from outside Ontario.

Furthermore, the applicant had delayed filing her application for over seven months without explanation.

Flanagan v. Diversified Global Asset Management, 2010 HRTO 676

Joseph Griffiths

21 cases2005–2026

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 16, 2010

Request to expedite proceedings dismissed for failing to demonstrate truly urgent circumstances.

The applicant, a condominium resident, filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability because the respondent required him to cart his companion dog on common grounds.

The applicant requested an expedited proceeding, claiming that carting the dog exacerbated his catastrophic injuries.

The respondent opposed the request, arguing the applicant had known of the rule for years and submitted evidence suggesting he could perform physically demanding acts.

The Tribunal dismissed the request to expedite, finding the applicant's submissions too vague and lacking medical evidence to demonstrate truly urgent circumstances.

Anderson v. Carleton Condominium Corporation #8, 2010 HRTO 569

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 15, 2010

Respondents' request to reschedule hearing granted; parties directed to provide alternative dates.

The respondents requested to reschedule the hearing dates due to counsel's unavailability.

The applicant opposed the request and asked that the hearing be rescheduled as close as possible to the original dates.

The Tribunal granted the respondents' request to reschedule, noting it was made within the required timeframe, and directed the parties to provide alternative dates.

Borraro v. Greater Sudbury Police Force, 2010 HRTO 565

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 11, 2010

Tribunal orders production of applicant's medical records and denies request to add reprisal claim.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed several preliminary requests.

The applicant's request to amend the application to add a ground of reprisal was denied because the allegations did not fall within the scope of section 8 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent's request for production of the applicant's medical, WSIB, and business venture records was granted, as they were arguably relevant to the claims.

The respondent's request for an adjournment was denied.

Due to the applicant's failure to comply with disclosure rules, the Tribunal directed the applicant to confirm his continued participation in the proceeding, warning that failure to do so could result in dismissal.

Blayne Neilon v. Bourgeois Motors Limited, 2010 HRTO 528

Christine LeBlanc

6 cases2010–2014

Blair McCreadie

17 cases2000–2015

Andy Pushalik

13 cases2010–2021

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 8, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after the applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

A hearing was scheduled, but the applicant failed to attend without providing an explanation.

The respondent attended and requested that the application be dismissed.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned due to the applicant's failure to appear and provide evidence in support of the allegations.

Drenic v. The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada, 2010 HRTO 514

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 5, 2010

Tribunal declined to dismiss untimely application at preliminary stage, directing a hearing on good faith delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability more than one year after the last alleged incident.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for untimeliness.

The applicant's representative submitted that the delay was incurred in good faith due to the applicant's lack of capacity related to her disability.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the delay was not incurred in good faith and directed the matter to a preliminary hearing on the issue of timeliness.

Faoro v. Claire’s Stores, 2010 HRTO 500

Ernest J. Guiste

In Private Practice64 cases2000–2025

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 3, 2010

Reconsideration request dismissed as it challenged non-final interim orders and failed to address the final order.

The applicant requested reconsideration of an interim decision that granted an adjournment and removed an individual respondent from the application.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, noting that under Rule 26.1, only final decisions can be reconsidered.

The only final aspect of the interim decision was the removal of the individual respondent, but the applicant's reconsideration request failed to provide specific reasons under Rule 26.5 to challenge that removal or explain the failure to respond to the original request.

Alabi v. Cancer Care Ontario, 2010 HRTO 478

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 3, 2010

Tribunal removed 11 individual respondents from human rights application for failing to allege specific discriminatory acts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the University of Ottawa and 12 individual respondents regarding academic matters.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss against 11 of the individual respondents because the application failed to identify specific acts of discrimination committed by them.

Finding that the applicant's written submissions failed to explain how these individuals breached the Code, the Tribunal ordered that the 11 individuals be removed as respondents to the application.

Dawit Tuquabo v. University of Ottawa and John Basso, 2010 HRTO 477

Peigi Ross

21 cases1995–2015

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 17, 2010

Human rights application dismissed; firefighter failed to prove off-duty criminal misconduct was caused by alcohol addiction.

The applicant, a firefighter, alleged that the respondent municipality discriminated against him on the basis of disability by suspending and terminating his employment due to off-duty criminal misconduct related to his alcohol addiction.

The respondent argued the termination was due to his criminal record, which caused reputational harm and operational hardship, and denied knowledge of the addiction or a nexus to the misconduct.

The Tribunal found that while the applicant had an alcohol abuse disorder, he failed to prove a causal relationship between his addiction and the criminal misconduct, which included criminal harassment and assault.

The application was dismissed.

John Fleming v. The Corporation of the City of North Bay, 2010 HRTO 355

Jennifer Fantini

8 cases2009–2016

Ernest Guiste

7 cases2009–2013

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 10, 2010

Adjournment granted due to counsel's failure to provide disclosure to applicant; individual respondent removed.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the hearing because his counsel failed to attend due to a double booking and failed to provide him with the respondents' disclosure package.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment, finding that the counsel's failure to provide the disclosure package to the applicant constituted an extraordinary circumstance.

The Tribunal also granted the respondents' unopposed request to remove the individual respondent from the application, as the corporate respondent acknowledged vicarious liability and had the capacity to remedy any alleged Code infringement.

Alabi v. Cancer Care Ontario, 2010 HRTO 302

Clara Matheson

16 cases2009–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 4, 2010

Adjournment granted as failure to receive hearing notice constituted an extraordinary circumstance.

The respondent requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing, claiming they did not receive the Confirmation of Hearing Notice and had a scheduling conflict.

The applicant opposed the request, arguing the respondent was aware of the dates and that an adjournment would delay the applicant's planned surgery.

The Tribunal granted the adjournment, finding no definitive evidence that the respondent knew the exact hearing dates prior to December 23, 2009, and concluding that the failure to receive the notice constituted an extraordinary circumstance.

Landra v. David’s Gourmet, 2010 HRTO 260

Gabriel Cormier

Practising Law - Employed5 cases2010–2023

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 29, 2010

Human rights application dismissed; tenant's allegations of sexual harassment and reprisal by housing staff not credible.

The applicant, a tenant in social housing, alleged that female staff members of the respondent housing corporation sexually harassed him, made sexual advances, and discriminated against him on multiple grounds.

He further alleged that the respondents engaged in reprisals, including issuing a trespass notice and incorrectly calculating his rent, after he rejected the advances and complained.

The Tribunal found the applicant's evidence not credible, noting he misinterpreted innocuous actions as sexual advances.

The Tribunal accepted the respondents' evidence that the rent calculation error was a mistake and the trespass notice was issued due to the applicant's disruptive behaviour.

The application was dismissed.

Boukort v. Ottawa Community Housing Corporation, 2010 HRTO 214

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 25, 2010

Request for reconsideration of decision dismissing human rights application for delay dismissed.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a previous decision that dismissed his human rights application for being filed outside the one-year deadline.

The applicant argued the decision was based on wrong information and that he did not receive notice, but failed to provide new determinative evidence or show he missed the hearing.

The Tribunal dismissed the request for reconsideration, noting that reconsideration is not an opportunity to reargue the case.

Barua v. University of Toronto, 2010 HRTO 159

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 19, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent civil proceeding regarding condominium pet by-law.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability after the respondent condominium corporation sought to enforce a 'no pets' by-law to remove her support dog.

The respondent had previously commenced a civil proceeding in the Superior Court of Justice seeking an order to enforce the by-law.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the human rights application pending the outcome of the civil proceeding.

Finding that both proceedings arose from the same facts and raised the same core discrimination issue, the Tribunal deferred the application to avoid duplication of evidence and inconsistent findings.

Atkinson v. Essex Condominium Corp. #5, 2010 HRTO 123

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 12, 2010

Tribunal assumes jurisdiction over out-of-province testing agency but denies interim accommodation for upcoming LSAT.

The applicant alleged the respondent discriminated against her by refusing to fully accommodate her disability-related needs for the LSAT.

The respondent sought early dismissal, arguing the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because it operates exclusively in Pennsylvania.

The Tribunal found it had jurisdiction, as the opportunity to write the LSAT was provided in Ontario.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to file a complete Response, finding the applicant's pleadings constituted consent to release her information.

The Tribunal denied the applicant's request for an interim remedy to force the accommodation for an upcoming test date, finding she had not established it was just and appropriate in the circumstances.

Arenson v. Law School Admission Council Inc., 2010 HRTO 38

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 7, 2010

Request to consolidate two identical human rights applications filed by spouses granted on consent.

The applicants, who are spouses, filed nearly identical human rights applications alleging discrimination based on disability and sex.

They requested that the Tribunal consolidate the applications because they are based on the same set of facts.

The respondent consented to the request.

Applying the factors for consolidation, the Tribunal found common issues of fact and law, a public interest in avoiding multiple proceedings, and no prejudice to any party.

The request to consolidate the applications was granted.

Ilha v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2010 HRTO 32

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 4, 2010

Request to withdraw human rights application against two of three respondents granted without terms.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code against three respondents.

The applicant subsequently filed a Request to Withdraw the Application in relation to two of the respondents.

As no responses to the request were filed, the Tribunal granted the request pursuant to Rule 10.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, withdrawing the application against the two respondents without terms.

Gordon Atkinson v. Three Degrees Restaurant Corporation, 2010 HRTO 3

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 18, 2009

Tribunal requested written submissions on whether to dismiss or defer a potentially late and barred application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging his employment was terminated due to disability.

The respondent requested deferral because the applicant had also filed a wrongful dismissal claim in Small Claims Court.

The Tribunal noted the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year statutory deadline and that the concurrent civil proceeding might bar the application under s. 34(11) of the Code.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the parties to provide written submissions on whether the application should be dismissed or deferred.

Martel v. CBV Collection Services, 2009 HRTO 2221

Page 25 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claudio MastroianniSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeremy MajorSelf-represented
1 appearance
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Shawn WestonAgent
2 appearances
Deolinda MarquesSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elzbieta SzylukSelf-represented
2 appearances
Juan ReyesSelf-represented
2 appearances
Glen MorrisonAgent
2 appearances
Civita GauleyCounsel
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance
Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Aaron CrangleCounsel
1 appearance
Alexander KowalCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Andy PushalikCounsel
1 appearance
Angela E. RaeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
John SaundersCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan L. DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Agnes WintersingerAgent
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance
André NowakowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew AshenhurstCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew CoxCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Bill MatharuSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 25 of 29 (567 cases)

Paul Gonsalves

Michael Bennett

Ken Bhattacharjee

Blais v. Ontario (Natural Resources), 2010 HRTO 671

Thomas Stefanik

Ken Bhattacharjee

Katie Connor v. Eazy Express Inc., 2010 HRTO 673

Thomas A. Stefanik

Ken Bhattacharjee

Flanagan v. Diversified Global Asset Management, 2010 HRTO 676

Joseph Griffiths

Ken Bhattacharjee

Anderson v. Carleton Condominium Corporation #8, 2010 HRTO 569

Ken Bhattacharjee

Borraro v. Greater Sudbury Police Force, 2010 HRTO 565

Ken Bhattacharjee

Blayne Neilon v. Bourgeois Motors Limited, 2010 HRTO 528

Christine LeBlanc

Blair McCreadie

Andy Pushalik

Ken Bhattacharjee

Drenic v. The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada, 2010 HRTO 514

Ken Bhattacharjee

Faoro v. Claire’s Stores, 2010 HRTO 500

Ernest J. Guiste

Ken Bhattacharjee

Alabi v. Cancer Care Ontario, 2010 HRTO 478

Ken Bhattacharjee

Dawit Tuquabo v. University of Ottawa and John Basso, 2010 HRTO 477

Peigi Ross

Ken Bhattacharjee

John Fleming v. The Corporation of the City of North Bay, 2010 HRTO 355

Jennifer Fantini

Ernest Guiste

Ken Bhattacharjee

Alabi v. Cancer Care Ontario, 2010 HRTO 302

Clara Matheson

Ken Bhattacharjee

Landra v. David’s Gourmet, 2010 HRTO 260

Gabriel Cormier

Ken Bhattacharjee

Boukort v. Ottawa Community Housing Corporation, 2010 HRTO 214

Ken Bhattacharjee

Barua v. University of Toronto, 2010 HRTO 159

Ken Bhattacharjee

Atkinson v. Essex Condominium Corp. #5, 2010 HRTO 123

Ken Bhattacharjee

Arenson v. Law School Admission Council Inc., 2010 HRTO 38

Ken Bhattacharjee

Ilha v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2010 HRTO 32

Ken Bhattacharjee

Gordon Atkinson v. Three Degrees Restaurant Corporation, 2010 HRTO 3

Ken Bhattacharjee

Martel v. CBV Collection Services, 2009 HRTO 2221

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Applicant

Counsel for Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Baywood Homes

for Beck Taxi Limited

for both Applicants

for Bruce Johnston

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

for himself

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

for Robert Half International

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

for Sherilyn Koenig

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre