Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as out of time; waiting for grievance outcome does not justify delay.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging workplace discrimination and reprisal five months after the one-year statutory deadline.

He argued the delay was unintentional and caused by waiting for the outcome of a union grievance process.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding the delay was not incurred in good faith because the applicant could have filed a timely application while continuing to pursue his grievance, and he knew well before the deadline that the union might not advance his grievance further.

Ashok Kumar v. Unilever Canada Inc., 2010 HRTO 1113

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2010

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal upon consent of the respondents.

The applicant filed a Request to Withdraw an Application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code, conditional on the respondents not taking legal action against her.

The respondents consented to the withdrawal and confirmed they had no current intention of taking legal action.

The Tribunal granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Lindsey Geroux v. Office Depot Inc. and Bill Brent, 2010 HRTO 962

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2010

Tribunal ordered parties to provide written submissions on jurisdiction and deferral of human rights application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment, housing, and services.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year limitation period and failed to identify specific acts of discrimination.

The applicant also acknowledged a concurrent proceeding before the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

The Tribunal ordered the respondents to file written submissions on the issues of jurisdiction and deferral, and gave the applicant an opportunity to reply.

Christine Longtin v. McArthur Family Medical Centre and Dino Smiljic, 2010 HRTO 961

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2010

Human rights application allowed to proceed past preliminary stage; submissions requested on deferral pending College proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the respondents.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed outside the one-year limitation period.

After reviewing the applicant's written submissions, the Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the delay was not incurred in good faith.

The Tribunal directed the parties to provide written submissions on whether the application should be deferred pending the outcome of a concurrent proceeding before the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

Christine Longtin v. Royal Ottawa Hospital and R. Kunjukrishnan, 2010 HRTO 960

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2010

Tribunal declines to dismiss late application at preliminary stage and requests submissions on deferral.

The applicant filed a human rights application more than one year after the last alleged incident of discrimination, claiming she only discovered the discrimination upon obtaining her medical records.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for untimeliness.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the delay was not incurred in good faith, and declined to dismiss the application at the preliminary stage.

The Tribunal also noted a concurrent proceeding before the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario and directed the parties to provide written submissions on whether the application should be deferred.

Christine Longtin v. Ottawa Hospital – Civic Campus and Y. Charbonneau, 2010 HRTO 959

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2010

Adjournment request denied as counsel's scheduling conflict was not an extraordinary circumstance.

The respondents requested an adjournment of the third day of a scheduled hearing because their counsel had to attend her daughter's graduation.

The request was made more than five days after the Confirmation of Hearing Notice was received.

The Tribunal found that the reason provided did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance as required by the Tribunal's Information Bulletin for late adjournment requests.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment but agreed to end the hearing early on that day to accommodate counsel.

Sofe Karaoulis v. RHCC Holdings Limited, 2010 HRTO 958

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2010

Reconsideration of jurisdictional dismissal denied; provincial incorporation did not alter federal jurisdiction over interprovincial courier.

The applicant requested reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her human rights application for lack of jurisdiction.

The original decision found that the respondent, a national courier service, fell under federal jurisdiction pursuant to s. 92(10)(a) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The applicant argued that a newly obtained Corporation Profile Report proving the respondent was provincially incorporated warranted reconsideration.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the provincial incorporation was not a new fact and had already been considered in the original decision.

Connor v. Eazy Express, 2010 HRTO 953

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2010

Tribunal requests written submissions to determine whether to defer discrimination application pending grievance proceeding.

The applicant, a police constable, filed an application alleging employment discrimination based on disability.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the completion of a grievance proceeding and a misconduct investigation.

Noting contradictory submissions regarding the status of the grievance, the Tribunal directed the police association and the respondents to provide written submissions on the deferral issue before making a determination.

Storey v. Hanover (Town), 2010 HRTO 952

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2010

Tribunal refuses to defer human rights application where concurrent civil claim does not allege discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability and record of offences following her termination after a medical leave.

The corporate respondent requested deferral of the application due to an ongoing civil proceeding for wrongful dismissal.

The Tribunal dismissed the deferral request because the civil claim did not allege discrimination or seek human rights remedies, and the human rights application was at a more advanced stage.

The Tribunal also struck the ground of record of offences as there were no supporting allegations, and directed the applicant to clarify her intentions regarding the individual respondent.

Dewey v. Cash Store Financial Services, 2010 HRTO 951

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 22, 2010

Human rights application against a bank dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to housing and services against a bank and an individual.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because banking is a federally regulated business.

The applicant did not provide submissions.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction, as banking falls under federal jurisdiction pursuant to s. 91(15) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

Christine Longtin v. Scotiabank and Ginger Robinson, 2010 HRTO 873

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 20, 2010

Application stayed against bankrupt corporate respondent and dismissed against individual respondent for lack of address.

The applicant filed a human rights application against a corporate and an individual respondent.

The corporate respondent filed an assignment in bankruptcy.

The Tribunal held that the proceedings against the corporate respondent were stayed pursuant to section 69 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

The Tribunal also dismissed the application against the individual respondent because the applicant failed to provide a correct address for service, despite being given notice and an opportunity to do so.

Jacquelyn Trowell v. 6286160 Canada Limited o/a CR Printing and Sameer Hage, 2010 HRTO 859

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 20, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal communications.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

After a scheduled mediation was cancelled, the Tribunal attempted to contact the applicant and her counsel multiple times to reschedule or determine the status of the application.

The applicant's counsel advised they were unable to contact the applicant.

Following a final warning letter to which no response was received, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Hutchison v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2010 HRTO 865

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 16, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent professional disciplinary proceedings.

The applicant, a registered midwife, alleged discrimination on the basis of sex when her contract was not renewed after she requested maternity leave.

The respondents denied the allegations, stating the non-renewal was due to poor work performance, and noted a complaint had been filed with the College of Midwives of Ontario (CMO).

The respondents requested the Tribunal defer the application pending the CMO proceeding.

The Tribunal found deferral appropriate to avoid duplication of evidence and inconsistent findings, noting the applicant consented to the deferral.

Cloutier Holtz v. Midwives of Sudbury, 2010 HRTO 847

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 16, 2010

Tribunal requested written submissions from parties on whether to defer human rights application pending WSIAT appeal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to employment because of disability against his employer, his union, and the WSIB.

The employer and union requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the application pending the conclusion of the applicant's appeal before the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT).

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the WSIB and the union to file full written submissions on the deferral issue, and allowing the applicant to file a reply, before making a determination.

Georgios Zissakos v. Toronto Transit Commission, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113 and Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2010 HRTO 838

Franchisor remains a named respondent in human rights application pending full evidentiary hearing.

The applicant filed a human rights application against a Tim Hortons franchisee and its franchisor, The TDL Group Corporation.

The Tribunal requested written submissions on whether the franchisor should remain a named respondent.

The applicant argued the franchisor had sufficient control over the franchisee's operations to be deemed an employer, and that removing it at a preliminary stage would be premature.

The franchisor withdrew its request for early dismissal.

The Tribunal directed that the franchisor remain a named respondent, noting that the question of its liability should be determined following evidence and argument at the hearing.

Gordon Atkinson v. Three Degrees Restaurant Corporation and The TDL Group Corporation, 2010 HRTO 821

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 14, 2010

Respondents granted extension to file Response after failing to meet initial deadline.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondents.

The respondents failed to file a Response within the required 35-day period, instead sending an unsigned letter claiming the corporate respondent had closed.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondents of the consequences of failing to respond under Rule 5.5 and granted them an extension to April 21, 2010, to file a Response and explain the delay.

Terri-Lynn Garrie v. Janus Joan Inc. and Stacey Szuch, 2010 HRTO 820

Lyne Lavergne

3 cases2010–2010

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 12, 2010

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as employment lacked sufficient connection to Ontario.

The applicant filed an application alleging sexual harassment and discrimination in employment.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, arguing the applicant worked in Québec and the alleged incidents occurred there.

The Tribunal applied the 'sufficient connection' test and found that the applicant's employment lacked a sufficient connection to Ontario, as her employer's place of business, her residence, and her usual place of employment were all outside the province.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Wood v. 507417 Ontario, 2010 HRTO 800

Lyne Lavergne

3 cases2010–2010

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 12, 2010

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as the employment had no sufficient connection to Ontario.

The applicant filed an application alleging sexual harassment and discrimination in employment.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, arguing the applicant worked in Québec and the alleged incidents occurred there.

The Tribunal applied the 'sufficient connection' test and found that the applicant's employment had no sufficient connection to Ontario, as her employer's place of business, her residence, and her usual place of employment were all outside the province.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Andrea Smith v. 507417 Ontario Inc., Willis Brazolot & Co. Inc., Dennis Brazolot and Christopher Willis, 2010 HRTO 802

Lyne Lavergne

3 cases2010–2010

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 12, 2010

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as employment had no sufficient connection to Ontario.

The applicant filed an application alleging sexual harassment and discrimination in employment.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, arguing the applicant was employed and worked in Québec.

The Tribunal applied the 'sufficient connection' test and found that the employer's place of business and the applicant's usual place of employment were outside Ontario.

The fact that the applicant lived in Ontario and the employer was a subsidiary of an Ontario company was insufficient to grant jurisdiction.

The application was dismissed.

Legg v. 507417 Ontario, 2010 HRTO 801

Sari Springer

31 cases1993–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 26, 2010

Oral hearing scheduled to determine if delay in filing human rights application was in good faith.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by the respondent university regarding admission to a Master's program.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed as it was filed more than one year after the last alleged incident.

The applicant claimed the delay was in good faith because she only discovered the discrimination later through freedom of information requests.

The Tribunal found credibility issues in the pleadings regarding when the applicant discovered the alleged discrimination and scheduled a half-day oral hearing to determine the preliminary issue of timeliness.

Farideh Ghafourian v. The Governing Council of the University of Toronto, 2010 HRTO 675

Page 24 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claudio MastroianniSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeremy MajorSelf-represented
1 appearance
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Shawn WestonAgent
2 appearances
Deolinda MarquesSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elzbieta SzylukSelf-represented
2 appearances
Juan ReyesSelf-represented
2 appearances
Glen MorrisonAgent
2 appearances
Civita GauleyCounsel
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance
Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Aaron CrangleCounsel
1 appearance
Alexander KowalCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Andy PushalikCounsel
1 appearance
Angela E. RaeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
John SaundersCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan L. DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Agnes WintersingerAgent
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance
André NowakowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew AshenhurstCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew CoxCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Bill MatharuSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 24 of 29 (567 cases)

Ken Bhattacharjee

Ashok Kumar v. Unilever Canada Inc., 2010 HRTO 1113

Ken Bhattacharjee

Lindsey Geroux v. Office Depot Inc. and Bill Brent, 2010 HRTO 962

Ken Bhattacharjee

Christine Longtin v. McArthur Family Medical Centre and Dino Smiljic, 2010 HRTO 961

Ken Bhattacharjee

Christine Longtin v. Royal Ottawa Hospital and R. Kunjukrishnan, 2010 HRTO 960

Ken Bhattacharjee

Christine Longtin v. Ottawa Hospital – Civic Campus and Y. Charbonneau, 2010 HRTO 959

Ken Bhattacharjee

Sofe Karaoulis v. RHCC Holdings Limited, 2010 HRTO 958

Ken Bhattacharjee

Connor v. Eazy Express, 2010 HRTO 953

Ken Bhattacharjee

Storey v. Hanover (Town), 2010 HRTO 952

Ken Bhattacharjee

Dewey v. Cash Store Financial Services, 2010 HRTO 951

Ken Bhattacharjee

Christine Longtin v. Scotiabank and Ginger Robinson, 2010 HRTO 873

Ken Bhattacharjee

Jacquelyn Trowell v. 6286160 Canada Limited o/a CR Printing and Sameer Hage, 2010 HRTO 859

Ken Bhattacharjee

Hutchison v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2010 HRTO 865

Ken Bhattacharjee

Cloutier Holtz v. Midwives of Sudbury, 2010 HRTO 847

Ken Bhattacharjee

Georgios Zissakos v. Toronto Transit Commission, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113 and Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2010 HRTO 838

Mandy Wesley

James D. Heeney

Ken Bhattacharjee

Gordon Atkinson v. Three Degrees Restaurant Corporation and The TDL Group Corporation, 2010 HRTO 821

Ken Bhattacharjee

Terri-Lynn Garrie v. Janus Joan Inc. and Stacey Szuch, 2010 HRTO 820

Lyne Lavergne

Ken Bhattacharjee

Wood v. 507417 Ontario, 2010 HRTO 800

Lyne Lavergne

Ken Bhattacharjee

Andrea Smith v. 507417 Ontario Inc., Willis Brazolot & Co. Inc., Dennis Brazolot and Christopher Willis, 2010 HRTO 802

Lyne Lavergne

Ken Bhattacharjee

Legg v. 507417 Ontario, 2010 HRTO 801

Sari Springer

Ken Bhattacharjee

Farideh Ghafourian v. The Governing Council of the University of Toronto, 2010 HRTO 675

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Applicant

Counsel for Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Baywood Homes

for Beck Taxi Limited

for both Applicants

for Bruce Johnston

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

for himself

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

for Robert Half International

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

for Sherilyn Koenig

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

for the Affected Organization

for the Affected Party

for the Applicant

for the Applicants

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

for the Intervenor

for the Ontario Nurses' Association