Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 1, 2010

Respondents deemed to have accepted discrimination allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on disability.

The respondents failed to file a Response despite receiving notice and subsequent warnings from the Tribunal.

The Tribunal found that the respondents were evading service and refusing to participate.

As a result, the Tribunal ordered that the respondents are deemed to have accepted all allegations in the Application and waived all rights to further notice or participation.

The Tribunal provided directions to the applicant regarding the next steps to finally dispose of the Application.

Garrie v. Janus Joan, 2010 HRTO 1792

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 25, 2010

Hair salon ordered to pay $1,000 for denying service to a Black customer based on race.

The applicant, a Black man with dreadlocks, alleged that the respondent hair salon discriminated against him by refusing to provide a scalp massage and hair wash on the basis that they do not do "Black" hair.

The Tribunal found that while the salon's manager initially may have been willing to provide the service, he became angry during a dispute with the applicant's fiancée and subsequently refused the service, citing the applicant's race as a reason.

The Tribunal concluded that the applicant's race was an operative factor in the denial of service, constituting discrimination under the Human Rights Code.

The respondent was ordered to pay $1,000 for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect, and the manager was ordered to complete human rights training.

Aubrey Armstrong v. Anna’s Hair & Spa Inc., 2010 HRTO 1751

Employer ordered to pay $10,000 after manager's irrational fear based on racial stereotypes tainted termination decision.

The applicant, a Black man originally from Uganda, alleged that his employer discriminated against and harassed him on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, ethnic origin, and age.

The Tribunal found that while the employer had legitimate concerns about the applicant's work performance, his manager's decision to issue a warning notice and terminate his employment was tainted by racial discrimination.

Specifically, the manager developed an extreme and irrational fear of the applicant based on stereotypes of Black African men being threatening and violent.

The Tribunal awarded the applicant $10,000 for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect, and ordered the employer to provide human rights training to its managers.

Bageya v. Dyadem International, 2010 HRTO 1589

John Illingworth

3 cases2010–2014

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 21, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

Despite being aware of the scheduled hearing dates, the applicant failed to attend the hearing.

Her representative requested an adjournment, stating he had been unable to contact her, but provided no evidence of extraordinary circumstances.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned due to the applicant's failure to appear and provide evidence in support of her allegations.

Pollard v. Dafco Filtration Group, 2010 HRTO 1581

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 19, 2010

Adjournment request denied; representative's inability to contact the applicant is not an extraordinary circumstance.

The applicant's representative requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing dates because he was unable to contact the applicant by telephone or mail.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario denied the request, finding that the inability to contact a client does not constitute an extraordinary circumstance justifying an adjournment under the Tribunal's Practice Direction.

The Tribunal warned that failure to attend the hearing could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

Donna Pollard v. Dafco Filtration Group Corporation and Habib (Bob) Assaad, 2010 HRTO 1556

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 14, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending related grievance proceeding; internal investigation not a 'proceeding' for dismissal.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging workplace harassment, discrimination, and reprisal.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed because an internal employer investigation had dealt with the substance of the application, or alternatively deferred pending a related union grievance proceeding.

The Tribunal held that an internal investigation is not a 'proceeding' under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code and denied the request to dismiss.

However, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance proceeding to avoid duplication and inconsistent findings.

Nash v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2010 HRTO 1530

Louis Mostyn

Not Practising Law16 cases1996–2022

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 12, 2010

Tribunal directed respondents to file a Response and address whether the application should be deferred.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination, harassment, and reprisal in employment.

The Tribunal noted that a related union grievance proceeding was in progress and requested submissions on whether the application should be deferred.

Due to contradictory information and a lack of submissions from the respondents and the union, the Tribunal directed the respondents to file a Response addressing the deferral issue, and requested further submissions from the applicant and the union.

Jasmin Whittle-Wilson v. City of Toronto Home for the Aged and Patty Burke, 2010 HRTO 1504

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 8, 2010

Union granted intervenor status; human rights application deferred pending conclusion of ongoing grievance proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging harassment, discrimination, and reprisal by the respondent employer.

The applicant's union filed a Request to Intervene, which was granted on consent.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer consideration of the application because the facts were part of an ongoing union grievance.

With the consent of all parties, the Tribunal deferred the application pending the conclusion of the grievance proceeding, noting that the labour arbitrator has the authority to apply the Human Rights Code.

Alejandro Juani v. The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, 2010 HRTO 1490

Geneviève Debané

2 cases2010–2010

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 7, 2010

Tribunal declined to defer human rights application where related union grievances were held in abeyance.

The applicant filed an application alleging disability discrimination in employment.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer the application because the issues were identical to an ongoing union grievance proceeding.

The union opposed deferral, stating it had placed the grievances in abeyance until the Tribunal heard the case.

The Tribunal declined to defer the application, finding it inappropriate to do so when the related grievances were being held in abeyance, and directed the respondents to file a response.

Guy Damude v. Pilkington Glass of Canada and Tracy Ellinger, 2010 HRTO 1482

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 7, 2010

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to file withdrawal form.

The applicant filed a human rights application but later informed the Tribunal by telephone that he intended to withdraw it.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a formal Request to Withdraw and warned that failure to respond would result in the application being deemed abandoned.

The applicant failed to respond by the deadline, and the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Yota Hsu v. The Hamilton Street Railway Company, 2010 HRTO 1476

Tyler Inkster

In Private Practice6 cases2010–2020

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 23, 2010

Tribunal grants requests to amend pleadings and issues case management directions regarding witness evidence and allegations.

The applicant and respondents both filed requests to amend their pleadings.

The Tribunal granted both requests.

The Tribunal also reviewed the parties' pleadings and witness disclosures, noting concerns about unclear allegations regarding disability discrimination and reprisal, new allegations not in the pleadings, and potentially repetitive or irrelevant witness evidence.

The Tribunal directed that the first hour of the upcoming hearing be dedicated to addressing these case management issues.

Mounir v. Brampton Neighbourhood Resource Centre, 2010 HRTO 1413

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 21, 2010

Tribunal denies request to dismiss and seeks submissions on consolidation and deferral pending grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed three separate human rights applications against the respondents relating to the same events.

The respondents requested that one application be dismissed on the basis that a complaint had been filed with the Commission, and alternatively requested deferral pending a grievance arbitration.

The Tribunal denied the request to dismiss as no Commission complaint had been filed.

The Tribunal directed the parties to provide written submissions on whether the three applications should be consolidated and whether they should be deferred pending the conclusion of the grievance proceeding.

Paterno v. The Salvation Army, 2010 HRTO 1388

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 15, 2010

Tribunal directs respondent to file evidence of termination date to determine if application is time-barred.

The applicant filed a human rights application against her former employer.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed because it was filed outside the one-year statutory deadline, claiming it terminated the applicant's employment and sent a termination letter by registered mail in September 2007.

The applicant disputed receiving the letter and alleged it was backdated.

The Tribunal found that the timeliness issue could not be determined without further evidence and directed the respondent to file documentary evidence supporting its claim regarding the termination letter.

Cooper v. Goodmans, 2010 HRTO 1357

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 11, 2010

Organization respondent ordered to produce last known addresses of individual respondent.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking the last known postal and e-mail addresses of the individual respondent from the organization respondent.

The organization respondent did not file a response.

The Tribunal ordered the organization respondent to deliver and file the requested addresses within five days.

Heather Dewey v. Cash Store Financial Services Inc. and Belinda Grcar, 2010 HRTO 1328

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2010

Tribunal reversed its administrative dismissal after applicant proved timely response to correspondence.

The Tribunal reconsidered on its own initiative a previous decision that had dismissed the application for abandonment.

The applicant's counsel provided evidence that correspondence had in fact been sent to the Tribunal within the required timeframe.

The Tribunal reversed the dismissal and directed the parties to provide new availability dates for mediation.

Hutchison v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2010 HRTO 1262

Andrew Ashenhurst

6 cases2010–2015

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 2, 2010

Tribunal orders applicant to clarify damages claim and produce specific documents; adjournment request denied.

The respondents requested an order for the applicant to produce his entire Employment Insurance claim file and Income Tax Returns, and for an adjournment of the hearing.

The Tribunal found the request for the entire EI file too broad but ordered the applicant to clarify if he is seeking damages for lost income and, if so, to produce specific relevant EI documents and tax returns.

The request for an adjournment was denied as the failure to produce documents did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance.

Gogance v. Matrix Logistics Services, 2010 HRTO 1247

Roslyn McGilvery

2 cases2010–2012

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 26, 2010

Human rights application dismissed after applicant failed to attend the scheduled hearing.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal scheduled a hearing, but the applicant failed to attend, having previously informed a Tribunal staff member that she would not be coming.

The respondent attended and requested the application be dismissed.

The Tribunal dismissed the application due to the applicant's failure to attend and provide evidence in support of her allegations.

Peyton v. Dollarama, 2010 HRTO 1184

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 19, 2010

Adjournment request denied; belief that applicant will not attend is not an extraordinary circumstance.

The respondent requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing on the basis that the applicant had failed to return communications or disclose documents and witnesses, leading the respondent to believe she would not attend.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the respondent's belief did not constitute an extraordinary circumstance justifying an adjournment.

The Tribunal noted that failure to comply with disclosure rules would be addressed at the hearing, and if the applicant failed to attend, the application could be dismissed as abandoned.

Claudette Peyton v. Dollarama L.P., 2010 HRTO 1129

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2010

Tribunal declines to dismiss application for lack of jurisdiction and requests submissions on deferral.

The applicant filed an application alleging that the respondent discriminated against him with respect to employment because of his disability, specifically challenging the respondent's policy on disability related to mental stress.

The Tribunal had issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, suggesting the application was outside its jurisdiction.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application was outside its jurisdiction, as it raised a ground and area under the Code.

The Tribunal directed the respondent to file a Response and requested submissions from both parties on whether the application should be deferred pending the outcome of any outstanding workplace safety and insurance proceedings.

Seberras v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2010 HRTO 1114

Kate Sellar

26 cases2009–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2010

Tribunal grants unopposed request to add manager as individual respondent after surname disclosed.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sexual harassment and discrimination by the corporate respondent's president and a manager identified only as 'Ricardo'.

After the respondents disclosed the manager's surname in their response, the applicant requested an order to add Ricardo Darmanie as an individual respondent.

As no party objected and the addition was necessary for a fair resolution, the Tribunal granted the request and added Mr. Darmanie as a respondent.

Jacqueline Pelletier v. Hylan Group Inc., Mehran (Mathew) Ansari and Ricardo Darmanie, 2010 HRTO 1115

Page 23 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claudio MastroianniSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeremy MajorSelf-represented
1 appearance
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Shawn WestonAgent
2 appearances
Deolinda MarquesSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elzbieta SzylukSelf-represented
2 appearances
Juan ReyesSelf-represented
2 appearances
Glen MorrisonAgent
2 appearances
Civita GauleyCounsel
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance
Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Aaron CrangleCounsel
1 appearance
Alexander KowalCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Andy PushalikCounsel
1 appearance
Angela E. RaeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
John SaundersCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan L. DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Agnes WintersingerAgent
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance
André NowakowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew AshenhurstCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew CoxCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Bill MatharuSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance
David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance
Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 23 of 29 (567 cases)

Ken Bhattacharjee

Garrie v. Janus Joan, 2010 HRTO 1792

Ken Bhattacharjee

Aubrey Armstrong v. Anna’s Hair & Spa Inc., 2010 HRTO 1751

Stefan Janicki

Natalie Schernitzki

Ken Bhattacharjee

Bageya v. Dyadem International, 2010 HRTO 1589

John Illingworth

Ken Bhattacharjee

Pollard v. Dafco Filtration Group, 2010 HRTO 1581

Ken Bhattacharjee

Donna Pollard v. Dafco Filtration Group Corporation and Habib (Bob) Assaad, 2010 HRTO 1556

Ken Bhattacharjee

Nash v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2010 HRTO 1530

Louis Mostyn

Ken Bhattacharjee

Jasmin Whittle-Wilson v. City of Toronto Home for the Aged and Patty Burke, 2010 HRTO 1504

Ken Bhattacharjee

Alejandro Juani v. The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, 2010 HRTO 1490

Geneviève Debané

Ken Bhattacharjee

Guy Damude v. Pilkington Glass of Canada and Tracy Ellinger, 2010 HRTO 1482

Ken Bhattacharjee

Yota Hsu v. The Hamilton Street Railway Company, 2010 HRTO 1476

Tyler Inkster

Ken Bhattacharjee

Mounir v. Brampton Neighbourhood Resource Centre, 2010 HRTO 1413

Ken Bhattacharjee

Paterno v. The Salvation Army, 2010 HRTO 1388

Ken Bhattacharjee

Cooper v. Goodmans, 2010 HRTO 1357

Ken Bhattacharjee

Heather Dewey v. Cash Store Financial Services Inc. and Belinda Grcar, 2010 HRTO 1328

Ken Bhattacharjee

Hutchison v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2010 HRTO 1262

Andrew Ashenhurst

Ken Bhattacharjee

Gogance v. Matrix Logistics Services, 2010 HRTO 1247

Roslyn McGilvery

Ken Bhattacharjee

Peyton v. Dollarama, 2010 HRTO 1184

Ken Bhattacharjee

Claudette Peyton v. Dollarama L.P., 2010 HRTO 1129

Ken Bhattacharjee

Seberras v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2010 HRTO 1114

Kate Sellar

Ken Bhattacharjee

Jacqueline Pelletier v. Hylan Group Inc., Mehran (Mathew) Ansari and Ricardo Darmanie, 2010 HRTO 1115

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Applicant

Counsel for Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Baywood Homes

for Beck Taxi Limited

for both Applicants

for Bruce Johnston

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

for himself

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

for Robert Half International

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

for Sherilyn Koenig

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

for the Affected Organization

for the Affected Party

for the Applicant

for the Applicants

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79