Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 5, 2009

Request to expedite denied; employer's plant closure and applicant's financial hardship did not constitute true urgency.

The applicant filed a Request to Expedite Proceedings, alleging discrimination on the basis of disability.

She argued expedition was necessary because the respondent employer was closing operations at her plant and moving out of the country, and she was experiencing financial hardship.

The respondents objected, noting the employer remained an operating entity in Ontario and the applicant had received severance and workplace injury benefits.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding the circumstances were not so particularly urgent as to distinguish the application from other cases, as the employer subsisted in the jurisdiction and financial hardship alone does not generally constitute urgency.

Mickle v. ArvinMeritor Canada, 2009 HRTO 777

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2009

Human rights application allowed to proceed past preliminary limitation period check.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of perceived mental disability after his participation in a vocational placement was terminated.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application was filed more than a year after the last incident.

The applicant submitted that he only became aware of the discrimination when he obtained access to unfavourable reports months later.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's response appeared to satisfy the limitation period requirements at this preliminary stage and directed that the application be served on the respondents.

Reid v. Ontario March of Dimes, 2009 HRTO 747

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 21, 2009

Respondent deemed to have accepted human rights allegations after failing to file a Response.

The applicant filed an Application alleging discrimination in housing on the basis of disability.

The respondent failed to file a Response despite receiving notice of the Application and two Interim Decisions directing it to do so.

The Tribunal ordered that the respondent is deemed to have accepted all allegations in the Application and waived all rights to notice or participation in the proceedings, pursuant to Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Zvonimir Basic v. Wynn Family Properties, 2009 HRTO 672

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 27, 2009

Request to expedite proceedings denied as applicant failed to demonstrate truly urgent circumstances.

The applicant filed a Request to Expedite Proceedings under Rule 21 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, citing concerns about a two-year limitation period for potential civil claims arising from an alleged assault by police officers.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant failed to demonstrate truly urgent circumstances requiring the resolution of the human rights dispute in a particularly rapid manner compared to the regular process.

Kranz v. Ottawa Police Service, 2009 HRTO 360

Tribunal orders complainant and Commission to provide further particulars specifying which facts constitute alleged racial profiling.

The respondents in a human rights complaint alleging racial profiling by police requested further particulars from the Commission and the complainant.

The respondents argued the statement of facts failed to specify which elements constituted discriminatory conduct.

The Tribunal found the statement of facts lacked sufficient particularity regarding the precise nature of the impugned conduct.

The Tribunal ordered the Commission and complainant to identify the specific aspects of the narrative relied upon as indicators of racial profiling, or confirm that no further particulars would be provided.

McKay v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2009 HRTO 342

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 19, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of related Employment Standards Act proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex (pregnancy) following her termination upon return from pregnancy leave.

She requested a deferral of the application pending the conclusion of proceedings under the Employment Standards Act, 2000.

The Tribunal granted the request to defer, noting that the issues and factual circumstances were similar, there was potential for overlapping remedies, and an appeal of the ESA order was likely in process.

Matechuk v. OLG at Thousand Islands, 2009 HRTO 324

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 12, 2009

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as it duplicated a previously filed Commission complaint.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging that the respondents, a lawyer and law firm representing his ex-wife in matrimonial litigation, subjected him to discrimination and reprisal by making false claims about his mental health.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed on a preliminary basis because the applicant had previously filed a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission based on the same facts, which was dismissed.

The Tribunal found that the subject-matter of the current application was substantially the same as the previous complaint.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction under section 53(8) of the Human Rights Code.

Mark v. Jagtoo and Jagtoo, 2009 HRTO 281

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 24, 2009

Respondent given 5 days to file a response to human rights application or face default proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the respondent.

The respondent failed to file a response within the required 35-day period.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a response within 5 days, along with an explanation for the delay, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice and deem the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

Maya Fundiler v. Intercon Security, 2009 HRTO 198

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 19, 2009

Tribunal scheduled a hearing to consider early dismissal based on a prior Landlord and Tenant Board decision.

The applicant alleged discrimination in housing and services on the basis of race, sex, sexual orientation, and receipt of public assistance.

The respondent requested early dismissal of the application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the substance was appropriately dealt with by the Landlord and Tenant Board.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision scheduling a conference call to hear oral submissions on the section 45.1 request.

Dann v. Coombs, 2009 HRTO 176

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 17, 2009

Tribunal directed applicant to provide submissions on timeliness, prima facie case, and personal respondents.

The applicant filed a human rights application against the Toronto Public Library and several individuals, alleging discrimination and harassment based on multiple grounds.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed for failing to make out a prima facie case and for being untimely, and that the personal respondents be removed.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the applicant to provide written submissions clarifying the timeliness of the allegations, the connection between the alleged conduct and the Code grounds, and the basis for continuing the application against the personal respondents.

Nacon Dioba v. Toronto Public Library, 2009 HRTO 165

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 17, 2009

Psychiatric Patient Advocate Office granted leave to intervene in human rights complaint regarding police reference checks.

The Psychiatric Patient Advocate Office (PPAO) requested leave to intervene in a human rights complaint challenging the Toronto Police Services Board's policy on disclosing Mental Health Act apprehensions in police reference checks.

The PPAO sought to participate by way of written submissions on the legal issues.

With the consent of the complainants and the Commission, and no objections from the respondent or the Attorney General, the Tribunal granted the PPAO intervenor status, noting its significant interest and distinct perspective on mental health issues.

A.S. and E.C. v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2009 HRTO 166

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 13, 2009

Request to expedite denied; submissions ordered on whether prior Commission dismissal bars the application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by his ex-wife's lawyer and law firm.

The applicant requested to expedite the proceedings, which the Tribunal denied for failing to demonstrate true urgency.

The respondents requested preliminary dismissal, arguing the substance was identical to a prior complaint dismissed by the Ontario Human Rights Commission and the Law Society of Upper Canada.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to provide submissions on whether the application is barred by section 53(8) or section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

Mark v. Jagtoo & Jagtoo Professional Corporation, 2009 HRTO 31

Michelle Wright

2 cases2008–2013

Michael Doi

4 cases2008–2017

Jane Letton

127 cases2008–2022

Isfahan Merali

5 cases2008–2011

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 30, 2008

Publication ban and intervenor status granted in human rights complaint regarding police reference checks.

The complainants challenged the respondent's policy of disclosing mental health apprehensions on police reference checks.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal granted the complainants' request for a publication ban to anonymize their identities due to the highly personal nature of the information at issue.

The Tribunal also granted intervenor status to the Attorney General of Ontario to adduce expert evidence on the relevancy of such apprehensions to vulnerable sector checks.

A.S. and E.C. v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2008 HRTO 437

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 29, 2008

Request to defer human rights application pending criminal proceedings denied.

The respondent requested an order deferring the human rights application on the basis that the subject matter was also the subject of concurrent criminal court proceedings.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that deferral was not appropriate because the criminal proceedings did not involve the same parties, would not address the human rights allegations, and could not provide human rights remedies.

Martinez v. Peel Police Services Board, 2008 HRTO 434

Raj Anand

54 cases1981–2017

Michael Dunn

6 cases2008–2018

Kevin MacNeill

5 cases2008–2012

Anthony Griffin

52 cases1989–2014

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 11, 2008

Attorney General granted intervener status and hearing bifurcated to address OHSA application in second stage.

The Attorney General of Ontario requested to intervene in the human rights complaint and sought to bifurcate the hearing.

The Proposed Intervener suggested that the first stage address the location of the complainant's duties without its participation, and if the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) is engaged, it would participate in the second stage.

The complainant and the Commission consented to this approach.

The respondents consented to the intervention but argued the Proposed Intervener should participate throughout.

The Tribunal granted the request to intervene and bifurcate the hearing, allowing the Proposed Intervener to participate only in the second stage if the interaction between the OHSA and the Human Rights Code needs to be addressed.

Loomba v. Home Depot Canada, 2008 HRTO 389

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 3, 2008

Request for early dismissal deferred pending mediation of consolidated human rights applications.

The applicant filed two human rights applications alleging discrimination and reprisal in housing.

One respondent requested early dismissal on the basis that the Landlord and Tenant Board had already dealt with the substance of the application.

Given the common facts and the parties' willingness to mediate, the Tribunal deferred the request for early dismissal and directed that the applications proceed together to mediation.

Dann v. Coombs, 2008 HRTO 345

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 2, 2008

Request for interim remedy to stay Landlord and Tenant Board orders dismissed for failing procedural criteria.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging that the respondent, a City Councillor, ignored her requests for assistance regarding her housing situation.

The applicant subsequently filed a Request for Interim Remedy, seeking to stay proceedings and orders of the Landlord and Tenant Board that terminated her tenancy.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that it failed to satisfy the criteria under Rule 23 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

The Tribunal noted that the concerns raised related to residential tenancy disputes outside its jurisdiction, making it inappropriate to grant an interim remedy that would effectively review the Board's decisions.

Dann v. Collins, 2008 HRTO 341

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 27, 2008

Style of cause amended and request to expedite proceedings deferred pending mediation.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex (pregnancy).

The Tribunal amended the style of cause to reflect the proper legal name of the respondent organization.

The applicant also filed a Request to Expedite Proceedings, which the respondents agreed to, subject to the personal respondent's availability.

As the parties agreed to engage in mediation, the Tribunal scheduled mediation and deferred the determination of the Request to Expedite Proceedings until after mediation, if necessary.

Guay v. 1481979 Ontario Inc., 2008 HRTO 312

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 21, 2008

Tribunal deferred early dismissal request and referred human rights application to mediation.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code.

The respondents requested early dismissal under section 45.1, arguing the substance of the application had been dealt with by the Employment Standards Branch, or alternatively deferral pending an Ontario Labour Relations Board appeal.

The applicant withdrew the appeal and opposed early dismissal.

Because both parties expressed interest in mediation, the Tribunal deferred the early dismissal request and referred the matter to mediation.

Wanda McLeod-Yip v. Carl Zeiss Canada Ltd. and Lynn Mousmanis, 2008 HRTO 289

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 14, 2008

Tribunal directed a hearing to determine respondents' preliminary requests to dismiss the application.

The respondents requested that the human rights application be dismissed on a preliminary basis under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the substance was appropriately dealt with in other proceedings including grievance arbitration and an OLRB complaint.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the Registrar to schedule a hearing to determine the preliminary issues, including the section 45.1 request and timeliness under section 34, and directed the parties to communicate regarding accommodation needs for the hearing format.

William George Thomson v. Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation and Ontario Labour Relations Board, 2008 HRTO 269

Page 43 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 43 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Mickle v. ArvinMeritor Canada, 2009 HRTO 777

Ena Chadha

Reid v. Ontario March of Dimes, 2009 HRTO 747

Ena Chadha

Zvonimir Basic v. Wynn Family Properties, 2009 HRTO 672

Ena Chadha

Kranz v. Ottawa Police Service, 2009 HRTO 360

Mandy Eason

Kimberly R. Murray

Glenn Chu

Bay Ryley

Ena Chadha

McKay v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2009 HRTO 342

Ena Chadha

Matechuk v. OLG at Thousand Islands, 2009 HRTO 324

Ena Chadha

Mark v. Jagtoo and Jagtoo, 2009 HRTO 281

Ena Chadha

Maya Fundiler v. Intercon Security, 2009 HRTO 198

Ena Chadha

Dann v. Coombs, 2009 HRTO 176

Ena Chadha

Nacon Dioba v. Toronto Public Library, 2009 HRTO 165

Ena Chadha

A.S. and E.C. v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2009 HRTO 166

Ena Chadha

Mark v. Jagtoo & Jagtoo Professional Corporation, 2009 HRTO 31

Michelle Wright

Michael Doi

Jane Letton

Isfahan Merali

Ena Chadha

A.S. and E.C. v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2008 HRTO 437

Ena Chadha

Martinez v. Peel Police Services Board, 2008 HRTO 434

Raj Anand

Michael Dunn

Kevin MacNeill

Anthony Griffin

Ena Chadha

Loomba v. Home Depot Canada, 2008 HRTO 389

Ena Chadha

Dann v. Coombs, 2008 HRTO 345

Ena Chadha

Dann v. Collins, 2008 HRTO 341

Ena Chadha

Guay v. 1481979 Ontario Inc., 2008 HRTO 312

Ena Chadha

Wanda McLeod-Yip v. Carl Zeiss Canada Ltd. and Lynn Mousmanis, 2008 HRTO 289

Ena Chadha

William George Thomson v. Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation and Ontario Labour Relations Board, 2008 HRTO 269

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai