Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 30, 2009

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as allegations did not relate to Code grounds.

The applicant filed an application alleging reprisal in employment after being laid off.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide written submissions explaining how her concerns related to the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to identify any ground of discrimination or explain how her dismissal was connected to an attempt to claim or enforce rights under the Code.

The Tribunal found it had no jurisdiction over the application and dismissed it.

Tina Colamartino v. TransGlobe Property Management Services, 2009 HRTO 1177

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 29, 2009

Request to dismiss application under section 45.1 denied as Law Society instituted no proceedings.

The applicant alleged age discrimination and reprisal after the respondent law firm refused to hire him as a summer or articling student.

The respondents requested that the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that the substance of the application had been appropriately dealt with by the Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC).

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the LSUC did not institute proceedings and therefore did not deal with the substance of the application.

Schiff v. Ridout & Maybee, 2009 HRTO 1162

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 28, 2009

Tribunal scheduled a teleconference to determine if it has jurisdiction over a complaint against the WSIB.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal by the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) in the handling of his claim and benefits.

The WSIB filed a Request for Order During Proceeding seeking to dismiss the application for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that its adjudicative functions are not 'services' under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal scheduled a teleconference hearing to determine whether the application falls within its jurisdiction.

Edwards v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2009 HRTO 1158

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 28, 2009

Tribunal amends human rights application to correct inadvertently checked ground of discrimination from record of offences to disability.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of 'record of offences'.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the narrative described denial of a profit sharing allotment due to absences related to illness and surgery, which did not align with the cited ground.

The applicant's counsel explained that the applicant inadvertently checked the wrong box and intended to claim discrimination based on 'disability'.

The Tribunal found it plain and obvious that the allegations related to disability, amended the application accordingly, and directed it to be served on the respondent.

Generoux v. Wal-Mart Canada, 2009 HRTO 1157

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 20, 2009

Tribunal orders preliminary hearing to determine if signed release bars pregnancy discrimination application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of sex (pregnancy).

The respondent employer requested early dismissal of the application, arguing it was barred by a General Release signed by the applicant upon her termination.

The applicant alleged she signed the release based on untrue reasons provided for her dismissal.

The Tribunal ordered a preliminary hearing by teleconference or written submissions to determine whether the application should be dismissed because of the signed release.

Farima Ramezani-Namin v. IBM Canada Limited, 2009 HRTO 1073

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 20, 2009

Applicant ordered to respond to employer's request for early dismissal based on signed release.

The respondent employer requested the early dismissal of an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, arguing that the applicant had signed a full and final release.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's Notice of Request to Dismiss.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision ordering the applicant to advise whether she intends to pursue the application and to explain why the release does not bar the application, failing which the application may be dismissed as abandoned.

Gerri Hynes v. The CUMIS Group Limited, 2009 HRTO 1076

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 20, 2009

Request for early dismissal denied; criminal investigation is not a 'proceeding' under section 45.1.

The respondents requested the early dismissal of an application alleging sex discrimination and sexual harassment.

They argued that closed criminal investigations into the allegations constituted another proceeding that appropriately dealt with the substance of the application under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code.

They also argued the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction because the applicant was an independent contractor, not an employee.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that a criminal investigation is not a 'proceeding' under section 45.1, and that determining the nature of the employment relationship requires a full evidentiary hearing.

Sutton v. Jarvis Ryan Associates, 2009 HRTO 1072

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 16, 2009

Tribunal denies early dismissal of shelter discrimination claim but removes personal respondents from the application.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in goods, services, and facilities based on place of origin, ethnic origin, and disability, relating to his stay at a shelter.

The respondents requested an early dismissal, arguing the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction and the application failed to establish a prima facie case.

The Tribunal dismissed this request, finding it had jurisdiction and the allegations, if true, could establish a prima facie case.

The Tribunal granted the Salvation Army's request to remove four personal respondents, as the corporate respondent could be held liable and there were no direct allegations against some of the individuals.

Ignacio Drenic v. The Governing Council of The Salvation Army in Canada, 2009 HRTO 1059

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 16, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent union grievance regarding failure to accommodate.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, specifically a failure to accommodate her back injury.

The applicant's union had also filed a grievance regarding the same matter.

The Tribunal, on its own initiative, considered whether to defer the application pending the conclusion of the grievance proceedings.

Finding that the subject matter and potential remedies were substantially the same, the Tribunal deferred the application.

Black v. Niagara Health System, 2009 HRTO 1056

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 15, 2009

Applicant directed to provide updated contact information for respondent after Tribunal mail returned undeliverable.

The applicant filed a human rights application against three individual respondents.

The Tribunal's interim decision sent to one respondent was returned as undeliverable due to an incomplete address.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide a current, complete, and accurate address for the respondent, or to explain why the previously provided address is believed to be correct, in accordance with Rule 6.6(b).

Mahesparan v. Kee, 2009 HRTO 1050

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 7, 2009

Tribunal addresses preliminary matters including incomplete forms, request to expedite, and potential statutory bar.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment and contracts on the basis of disability.

In this interim decision, the Tribunal addressed several preliminary matters.

The Tribunal dismissed the allegations regarding contracts due to the applicant's failure to complete the required form.

The applicant's request to expedite the proceedings based on financial hardship and health issues was denied as no truly urgent circumstances were demonstrated.

The Tribunal ordered the applicant to provide information regarding a previous human rights complaint to determine if the current application is barred by section 53(8) of the Code.

The corporate employer was added as a respondent, while the request to remove personal respondents and the request to dismiss or defer the application were deferred pending the resolution of the section 53(8) issue.

Norman Traversy v. The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Hazel McCallion, John McDougall, Kevin Duffy, Brian Walsh, Louise Ann Riddell, Roger Clement, and Janice Baker, 2009 HRTO 990

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 3, 2009

Tribunal directs service of employment application after finding it raises potential Code-based discrimination claims.

The applicant filed an application alleging reprisal in employment against his former employer and supervisors.

The Tribunal initially issued a notice of intent to dismiss, noting the narrative did not clearly identify a Code-based reprisal.

After reviewing the applicant's submissions, the Tribunal found the application also raised concerns regarding differential treatment based on place of origin and inappropriate questioning of illness-related absences.

The Tribunal concluded the application may raise matters within its jurisdiction and directed that it be served on the respondents.

Parathan Paramanathan v. Best Buy Canada Ltd., Asif Zia, Michael Fernandes and Ashishkumar Patel, 2009 HRTO 957

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 3, 2009

Human rights application dismissed for failing to identify a ground of discrimination or Code violation.

The applicant filed an application alleging reprisal in employment but failed to identify a ground of discrimination or explain how the alleged mistreatment related to a Code ground.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss, to which the applicant did not respond.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as it lacked sufficient information regarding the ground or basis of the alleged Code violation.

Janzen v. White Digital Media, 2009 HRTO 958

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 2, 2009

Application alleging reprisal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as it did not engage Code rights.

The applicant filed an application alleging reprisal in employment after raising concerns about workload and unfair treatment.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application did not allege that the mistreatment occurred due to an attempt to claim or enforce rights under the Human Rights Code.

The applicant failed to provide submissions explaining how the conduct related to Code rights.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction, noting it does not have a general power to evaluate employment relationships or claims of unfairness outside the Code.

Andrew Burgoyne v. Alex Joannides, 2009 HRTO 945

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 29, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent grievance and WSIB proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging disability discrimination and failure to accommodate following a workplace injury.

The respondent requested that the Tribunal defer the application because the applicant had also filed a grievance and a WSIB claim regarding the same issues.

The Tribunal granted the request to defer, finding that the concurrent proceedings raised the same facts and issues, and deferral would avoid inconsistent findings and overlapping remedies.

Geiger v. St. Thomas-Elgin General Hospital, 2009 HRTO 931

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 26, 2009

Tribunal directs applicant to provide submissions on jurisdiction where reprisal claim lacks Code grounds.

The applicant filed an Application alleging reprisal in employment after being laid off.

She claimed reprisal for raising workload concerns and being privy to privileged information.

The Tribunal noted that the applicant did not allege she was dismissed for attempting to claim or enforce rights under the Human Rights Code, and did not identify any ground of discrimination.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide written submissions explaining how her allegations fall within the Tribunal's jurisdiction, failing which the Application may be dismissed.

Tina Colamartino v. TransGlobe Property Management Services, 2009 HRTO 917

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 25, 2009

Request to dismiss human rights application for delay denied as filing occurred within one year.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination regarding a denial of admission to an education program.

The respondents and an affected party, Queen's University Faculty of Education, requested early dismissal of the application due to delay, arguing the admission denial occurred in June 2007 but the application was not filed until October 2008.

The Tribunal granted Queen's University's unopposed request to intervene.

The Tribunal denied the request to dismiss for delay, finding that the application included allegations regarding discussions in October/November 2007, making the October 2008 filing timely under section 34(1) of the Human Rights Code.

Brown v. Seven Generations Education Institute, 2009 HRTO 909

Tribunal bifurcates hearing on liability and remedy but declines to prematurely exclude proposed expert witnesses.

The respondent Police Services Board brought preliminary requests to disallow the complainant's proposed expert witnesses and to bifurcate the hearing into liability and remedy phases.

The Tribunal dismissed the request to disallow the experts at the pre-hearing stage, finding it premature to assess their qualifications and the relevance of their evidence without hearing testimony.

The Tribunal granted the request to bifurcate the hearing, noting that the expansive systemic remedies sought by the complainant warranted dealing with liability first to ensure a fair and expeditious resolution.

McKay v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2009 HRTO 876

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 15, 2009

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to file withdrawal following settlement.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment and services on the ground of ethnic origin.

Prior to a scheduled mediation, the applicant advised the Tribunal that the parties had reached a resolution and she would be filing a Request to Withdraw.

The applicant subsequently failed to file the request or respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Rules of Procedure.

Angela Haskins v. TNS Canadian Facts and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Labour, 2009 HRTO 837

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 15, 2009

Employer's request to dismiss human rights application denied; internal complaint process is not a 'proceeding' under s. 45.1.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment.

The respondent employer requested early dismissal under s. 45.1 of the Code, arguing an internal complaint process had dealt with the substance of the application, and requested deferral under s. 45.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene.

The Tribunal denied the request to dismiss, finding that a purely private internal process without formal guarantees of procedural fairness is not a 'proceeding' under s. 45.1.

The request to defer was also dismissed as no other proceedings were pending.

Schuyler v. Ford Motor Company of Canada, 2009 HRTO 855

Page 42 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 42 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Tina Colamartino v. TransGlobe Property Management Services, 2009 HRTO 1177

Ena Chadha

Schiff v. Ridout & Maybee, 2009 HRTO 1162

Ena Chadha

Edwards v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2009 HRTO 1158

Ena Chadha

Generoux v. Wal-Mart Canada, 2009 HRTO 1157

Ena Chadha

Farima Ramezani-Namin v. IBM Canada Limited, 2009 HRTO 1073

Ena Chadha

Gerri Hynes v. The CUMIS Group Limited, 2009 HRTO 1076

Ena Chadha

Sutton v. Jarvis Ryan Associates, 2009 HRTO 1072

Ena Chadha

Ignacio Drenic v. The Governing Council of The Salvation Army in Canada, 2009 HRTO 1059

Ena Chadha

Black v. Niagara Health System, 2009 HRTO 1056

Ena Chadha

Mahesparan v. Kee, 2009 HRTO 1050

Ena Chadha

Norman Traversy v. The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Hazel McCallion, John McDougall, Kevin Duffy, Brian Walsh, Louise Ann Riddell, Roger Clement, and Janice Baker, 2009 HRTO 990

Ena Chadha

Parathan Paramanathan v. Best Buy Canada Ltd., Asif Zia, Michael Fernandes and Ashishkumar Patel, 2009 HRTO 957

Ena Chadha

Janzen v. White Digital Media, 2009 HRTO 958

Ena Chadha

Andrew Burgoyne v. Alex Joannides, 2009 HRTO 945

Ena Chadha

Geiger v. St. Thomas-Elgin General Hospital, 2009 HRTO 931

Ena Chadha

Tina Colamartino v. TransGlobe Property Management Services, 2009 HRTO 917

Ena Chadha

Brown v. Seven Generations Education Institute, 2009 HRTO 909

Melany Franklin

Mandy Eason

Kimberly R. Murray

Glenn Chu

Brian Smith

Ena Chadha

McKay v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2009 HRTO 876

Ena Chadha

Angela Haskins v. TNS Canadian Facts and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Labour, 2009 HRTO 837

Ena Chadha

Schuyler v. Ford Motor Company of Canada, 2009 HRTO 855

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

for Stanley Klimitz

for Stan Mei

for the Affected Party

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

for the Applicant

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli