Ena Chadha is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Ena Chadha sit on?

Ena Chadha sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ena Chadha decide?

Ena Chadha's most common areas include Human Rights (867 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (371 decisions), Administrative Law (238 decisions). Ena Chadha has handled 867 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ena Chadha made?

Ena Chadha has 867 decisions on record from 2008 to 2014.

Who frequently appears before Ena Chadha?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ena Chadha include Self-represented, Patrick James, Mandy Eason.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ena Chadha — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workers' Compensation

Health Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Ena Chadha

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

867

cases · 7 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 700Vice-chair· 103Adjudicator· 35Vice-Chair· 16Adjudicator· 7Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 4, 2012

Tribunal declines to dismiss family status discrimination application for delay at preliminary stage.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of family status, claiming she was denied work shifts because she, her husband, and her mother were employed at the same place.

The Tribunal initially issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application appeared to be filed more than one year after the last alleged incident.

After reviewing the applicant's submissions alleging ongoing discrimination, the Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application was out of time.

The Tribunal directed that the application be served on the respondents, who may raise the issue of delay in their response.

Unyi v. Durham Race Operations, 2012 HRTO 9

Tribunal dismisses older human rights allegations for delay but allows recent connected incidents to proceed.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in her medical residency program from 2003 to 2009.

The respondents argued that allegations prior to June 2009 were out of time.

The Tribunal found that allegations from 2003 to 2008 were discrete events with significant temporal gaps, did not form a series of incidents, and the delay was not incurred in good faith.

However, the Tribunal found that allegations from December 2008 onwards formed a series of incidents connected to timely allegations and were within the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

AlSaigh v. University of Ottawa, 2012 HRTO 2

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 3, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent Employment Standards Act claim.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of race and ethnic origin regarding the termination of her employment.

Prior to filing the application, she had filed an Employment Standards Act (ESA) claim regarding the same subject matter.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the conclusion of the ESA claim.

Finding significant overlap in the factual circumstances and potential remedies between the two proceedings, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the human rights application until the ESA process concluded.

Bhogal v. Banana Republic, 2012 HRTO 3

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 20, 2011

Tribunal consolidates three related human rights applications and grants union intervenor status.

The applicants, two paramedics, filed multiple human rights applications alleging discrimination and reprisal regarding the employer's uniform policies and accommodation efforts.

The Tribunal granted the Union intervenor status in the second application.

Finding significant overlap in facts, issues, and parties, the Tribunal ordered the consolidation of all three applications to avoid a multiplicity of proceedings.

The Tribunal deferred its decision on the respondents' request to defer the applications pending outstanding grievances and an OHSA appeal, ordering the parties to provide further clarification and submissions.

Pak v. Toronto (City), 2011 HRTO 2281

Sunil Mathai

4 cases2008–2012

Carole Jenkins

37 cases2001–2021

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 20, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent coroner's inquest into the same events.

The applicant estate filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal regarding the deceased's treatment at the respondent mental health centre.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because a coroner's inquest and a civil proceeding regarding the same events were underway.

The Tribunal ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the coroner's inquest to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings of fact.

The Estate of Kulmiye Aganeh v. Mental Health Centre Penetanguishene, 2011 HRTO 2280

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 19, 2011

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent workplace grievances raising the same issues.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of disability.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant had three outstanding workplace grievances based on the same facts and issues.

The applicant opposed deferral, citing delay and personal hardship, while the respondents and the applicant's union supported deferral.

The Tribunal found significant overlap between the application and the grievances, which were proceeding to mediation and arbitration.

To avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent findings, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application pending the conclusion of the grievance processes.

Gayle Anne Morris v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, Primary Care Branch, Laura Pinkney, and Donna McQuillan, 2011 HRTO 2265

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 19, 2011

Deferred human rights application reactivated on consent following dismissal of related grievances.

The applicant requested to reactivate his human rights application, which had been deferred pending the outcome of his grievances before the Public Service Grievance Board.

Following the dismissal of his grievances, the applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to reactivate the matter.

The respondent did not oppose the request.

The Tribunal granted the request and directed the respondent to file its Response within 35 days.

Daniel Muldoon v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services, 2011 HRTO 2264

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 16, 2011

Tribunal grants request to add Toronto Community Housing Corporation as a respondent on consent.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination with respect to housing on the basis of disability.

The applicant subsequently filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to add the Toronto Community Housing Corporation as a respondent.

As the original respondent and the proposed respondent consented to the request, the Tribunal granted the order and added the Toronto Community Housing Corporation as a respondent party.

Lyudmila Pechnikova v. Housing Connections and Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2011 HRTO 2259

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 16, 2011

Request to add employment agency as a respondent granted where pleadings alleged potential Code violations.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sex discrimination in employment.

She originally named her former employer and an employment agency together as a single respondent.

After the employer clarified that the employment agency was a separate legal entity, the applicant brought a request for an order during proceedings to add the employment agency as a respondent.

Applying the three-part test from Smyth, the Tribunal found that the applicant alleged facts that could support a Code violation by the agency, and that adding the agency at this early stage of the proceedings would not cause unfair prejudice.

The request to add the employment agency as a respondent was granted.

Thompson v. CF Industries, 2011 HRTO 2262

Adrian Ishak

In Private Practice1 case2011–2011

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 12, 2011

Tribunal sets aside default order and grants respondents an extension of time to file a Response.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The respondents failed to file a Response, leading the Tribunal to issue an interim decision deeming them to have waived their rights to participate.

The respondents subsequently filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to set aside the previous order and grant an extension of time to file a Response, citing administrative errors and misdirected mail.

The Tribunal found the respondents provided a satisfactory explanation for their failure to respond and, in the interests of fairness, granted the request, allowing them 30 days to file a Response.

Roepke v. Accenture Inc., 2011 HRTO 2230

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 12, 2011

Request to amend human rights application granted as amendments clarified existing allegations and detailed remedies.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability following a workplace injury and subsequent dismissal.

The applicant subsequently filed a Request for Order During Proceedings seeking to amend the original Application to reorganize the narrative, clarify allegations, detail remedial claims, and provide information on concurrent proceedings.

The Tribunal granted the request to amend, finding that the amendments did not raise new allegations distinct from the original narrative, the respondent was aware of the core allegations from the outset, and the remedial details would assist the parties and the Tribunal.

Elliott v. Can Art Aluminum Extrusions, 2011 HRTO 2231

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 8, 2011

Request to defer human rights application pending settlement discussions denied; application to proceed in normal course.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and requested that the Tribunal defer consideration pending another legal proceeding.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer, but no submissions were received from the parties.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was actually seeking deferral while the parties discussed a possible resolution, which is not an appropriate basis for deferral under the Tribunal's rules.

The Tribunal directed that the application be processed in the normal course.

McNeil v. Windsor (City), 2011 HRTO 2221

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 6, 2011

Human rights application reactivated after applicant withdrew concurrent workplace grievance.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability.

The application was previously deferred pending the resolution of a workplace grievance.

The applicant subsequently withdrew the grievance and requested to reactivate the application.

As there was no longer an outstanding grievance process, the Tribunal granted the request and reactivated the application, directing the matter to mediation.

Ambrose Zychowicz v. Canadian Auto Workers Local 707 and Ford Motor Company of Canada, 2011 HRTO 2193

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioDec 6, 2011

Human rights application dismissed under section 34(11) due to a concurrent civil action seeking overlapping remedies.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, claiming the respondent employer forced her to work excessive overtime and failed to accommodate her medical restrictions upon her return from medical leave.

The respondent requested the application be dismissed under section 34(11) of the Human Rights Code because the applicant had already commenced a civil action based on the same facts.

The Tribunal found that the civil Statement of Claim and the human rights Application were duplicative, asserting the same allegations and seeking overlapping remedies for the same alleged rights violations.

Consequently, the Tribunal determined it lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the application.

Williams-Salassidis v. KSD Enterprises Ltd., 2011 HRTO 2194

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 8, 2011

Human rights application dismissed as the Landlord and Tenant Board already dealt with the substance.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and harassment by her landlords on the basis of disability, family status, and receipt of public assistance.

The respondents requested the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing the allegations were already addressed in a Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) proceeding.

The Tribunal found that the LTB had appropriately dealt with the substance of the application, having considered the allegations of mistreatment, made findings regarding harassment, and awarded compensation for discriminatory comments.

The application was dismissed to avoid duplication of proceedings.

Verner v. Reginald Langlois, 2011 HRTO 2019

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 3, 2011

Application alleging discrimination based on record of offences allowed to proceed past preliminary delay assessment.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of a pardoned record of offences, claiming he was repeatedly denied a teaching position.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss due to apparent delay in filing.

The applicant submitted that the discrimination was ongoing and that any delay was due to his daughter's hospitalization.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the application was barred by delay and directed that it be served on the respondents.

Abdallah v. Conseil Scolaire de District des Ecoles Catholiques due Sud-Ouest, 2011 HRTO 1987

Christopher McClelland

26 cases2009–2025

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 3, 2011

Human rights application dismissed at summary hearing for failing to link alleged mistreatment to protected grounds.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on a record of offences, and later alleged age discrimination, following her dismissal for workplace infractions.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant misunderstood the ground of 'record of offences' and failed to provide any evidence linking her dismissal or workplace coaching to her age or any other protected ground.

The application was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

Eileen Lane v. Walmart Canada, 2011 HRTO 1990

Paul Meier

115 cases2006–2026

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 3, 2011

Application alleging breach of settlement dismissed; agreement required job offer, not permanent employment guarantee.

The applicant filed an application alleging the respondent breached a 2004 human rights settlement agreement by eliminating his position as a Tax Administration Manager in 2010.

The applicant argued the settlement guaranteed him permanent employment in that role.

The Tribunal found that the clear language of the settlement only required the respondent to offer the applicant the position, which it did, and did not create an indefinite job guarantee.

The application was dismissed.

Ihasz v. Ontario (Revenue), 2011 HRTO 1991

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 1, 2011

Application against union dismissed for failure to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed a human rights application against her employer and her union.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss regarding the union because the application failed to identify any specific acts of discrimination committed by it.

The applicant failed to respond to the Notice within the required time.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as against the union.

Wenzel v. ACCUCAPS Industries Limited, 2011 HRTO 1967

Ena Chadha

HRTO0 cases2008–2014

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioNov 1, 2011

Human rights application against OC Transpo dismissed as transit services fall under exclusive federal jurisdiction.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in the provision of transit services and a transit by-law by the City of Ottawa and OC Transpo.

The respondents requested early dismissal on the basis that OC Transpo is a federally-regulated inter-provincial transportation undertaking.

The Tribunal agreed, finding that the transit services and the impugned transit by-law fall within exclusive federal jurisdiction pursuant to section 92(10) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Anemone Cerridwen v. City of Ottawa and OC Transpo, 2011 HRTO 1969

Page 20 of 44 (867 cases)

Applicant

Christopher PillonSelf-represented
1 appearance
David MolnarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dubravko CvetkovicSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ekaterini AllagasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gawain ColeySelf-represented
1 appearance
James CunninghamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Janet BergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BriggsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph ManimalethuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary DopelhamerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary HardmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael TranchemontagneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randall HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard VellaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra BakshSelf-represented
1 appearance
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shirley GibsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan TillerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor PakSelf-represented
1 appearance
Virgin ElginSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Brian P. SmeenkCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
1 appearance
Kate HughesCounsel
1 appearance
Mark A. StoneCounsel
1 appearance
Richard EliaCounsel
1 appearance
Sally BryantCounsel
1 appearance
Sarah ShodyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

James HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for OPSEU

Eric O’BrienCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

George ParrisCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Bryan J. CrispCounsel
1 appearance
Justin HeimpelCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for York University

Brian WasyliwCounsel
1 appearance

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

Elisa MesitiUnion representative
1 appearance

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

Angela Mendoza-BaezSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Angelo Foti

Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance

for Canada Safeway Limited

Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance

for CAW-TCA Canada

Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Gary Klein

Susan ChapmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

Peter K. HrastovecCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Faron HaydenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rajanayagam BalaganthanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rohan AbbeySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Veronica MohanCounsel
1 appearance

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

Glynnis BurtCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

Richard J. MazarCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Watson

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohammed Manjra

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for OPSEU

Adrienne LiangCounsel
1 appearance

for Paul Cohn

Paul CohnSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for Stanley Klimitz

Jack CopeloviciCounsel
1 appearance

for Stan Mei

Geoffrey BakerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
3 appearances
Susan LuftCounsel
2 appearances
Heather AldenCounsel
1 appearance
Jorge V. HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance
Lorenzo LisiCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul BoileuaCounsel
1 appearance
Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

Jorge HurtadoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association

John W.T. JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
7 appearances
Patrick JamesCounsel
5 appearances
Tarek IbrahimSelf-represented
4 appearances
Douglas ChristieCounsel
4 appearances
Mark ThomasSelf-represented
3 appearances
Maria RotsSelf-represented
3 appearances
Barbara KueberSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michael ChristiansonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Shawn BinghamSelf-represented
3 appearances
Lina AhmedSelf-represented
2 appearances
Mary MackinnonCounsel
2 appearances
Ronald IhaszSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Nana Kow KuffuorSelf-represented
2 appearances
Farah MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Galina OkounevaSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neallos WedemireSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nelson RunnallsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Karina VilnerSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant Afat Ahmadli

Karina VilnerAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant Karina Vilner

Karina VilnerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

John VillellaAgent
1 appearance
Marcia CannerAgent
1 appearance
John HowarthSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
Isfahan MeraliCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShulmanCounsel
1 appearance
Prabhu RajanCounsel
1 appearance
Kikee MalikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Mandy EasonCounsel
5 appearances
Kimberly R. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Raj AnandCounsel
2 appearances
Paul McKeeverCounsel
2 appearances
Amanda DriscollCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants

Jane LettonAgent
1 appearance
Jane LettonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Governing Council of Salvation Army in Canada

Blair McCreadieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Jeff AndrewCounsel
2 appearances
Evan SchillerCounsel
2 appearances
Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance
Catherine DavisUnion representative
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Colette HoosonUnion representative
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Deborah HowdenCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Giuseppe AgostinoCounsel
1 appearance
Jeffery AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Jessica KearsleyCounsel
1 appearance
Mark WrightCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Mona StaplesUnion representative
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Robert ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor CAW Canada Local 4266

Mike ArmstrongUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Intervenor Teamster Canada Rail Conference, Division 660

Denis EllicksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zissert

Roslyn BachiooCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Labour Relations Board

Leonard MarvyAgent
1 appearance

for the Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Simon BlackstoneAgent
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent

Craig R. ColraineCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervener

Michael DunnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Michael DoiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Garth KiddCounsel
1 appearance
Adam BeattyCounsel
1 appearance
Karen InselsbacherCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Peter KrysiakCounsel
1 appearance
Tammy W. Grove-McClementCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondents

Zachary GreenCounsel
2 appearances

for the Proposed Respondent V.I.

V.I.Self-represented
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Peel

John GescherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Tracy A. KayCounsel
3 appearances
Donna PolgarCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle A. AltonCounsel
3 appearances
Caroline V. JonesCounsel
3 appearances
Michelle WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Adrienne CoutoCounsel
2 appearances
Sari L. SpringerCounsel
2 appearances
Karen SargeantCounsel
2 appearances
Roger R. MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Paul MeierCounsel
2 appearances
Carol VandenHoekCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Carolyn JohnstonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen JensenCounsel
2 appearances
Philip DayAgent
2 appearances
Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
2 appearances
Raquel ChisholmCounsel
2 appearances
James D. HigginsonCounsel
1 appearance
James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
Allen V. CraigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Kathleen E. AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Inc.

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113

Carlo Di GiovanniCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine RowanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Proposed Respondent

Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Angela Tesseris

Angela TesserisSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Sarah CrossleyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brinks Canada Ltd

George VassosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Christopher Fitkin

Melany FranklinCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent C[...] Inc.

F.H.Agent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Clinicare Health Services Wonderland Ltd.

Christopher A. SinalCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent CN National Railway Company

Jacynthe GirardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Crossby Dewar Inc.

Carissa TanzolaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domclean Limited

Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eve Tsai

Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Gilmore Investments Corporation – Gilmore Global

Colleen DunlopCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Great West Life-Scarborough Disability Office

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hamilton Wentworth District School Board

Mark ZegaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henniges Automotive

Christopher FioreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Christa L. ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hilton Toronto Hotel

Michelle A. AltonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent H.S.

H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jason Bacchiochi

Ann MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Jeffry McMaster

Elizabeth K.P. GraceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Joe Boute and Intervenor United Steelworkers Local 455

Robert HealyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kenneth Swan

David C. MooreCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kiran Panikar

Kiran PanikarSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services

Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mitsume Fukui

Michael KlugCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Naeem Muhammed

Jenny StephensonCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Nancy Dell’Osso

Nancy Dell’OssoSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Norman J. Groot

Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lucy SiracoCounsel
3 appearances
Glenn ChuCounsel
3 appearances
Deborah HowdenCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea GonsalvesCounsel
2 appearances
Kevin MacNeillCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JefferiesCounsel
2 appearances
Michele WrightCounsel
2 appearances
Kristin TaylorCounsel
2 appearances
Daryn M. JeffriesCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa Washington-WattsCounsel
2 appearances
Jennifer RichardsCounsel
2 appearances
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
2 appearances
Daniel R. McDonaldCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana K. JosephCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph TasconaCounsel
1 appearance
Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine FordCounsel
1 appearance
Katherine PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Kelsey OrthCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Canadian Union of Public Employees Ontario Division and CUPE 4153

Elizabeth NurseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and Elizabetta De Santis

Mandy WojcikCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Karimjee GreeneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffatt, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, March Smith, Napolean Muisa, Dumo Siziba and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Corporation of the City of Mississauga, Pam Hooke, Mickey Frost and Dara Marcoccia

Erin R. KuzzCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The University of Western Ontario, Donne Penne and Lisa Ann Korab

Barry J. BrownCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Sudbury Regional Hospital

Diane BarbeauAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, The Corporation of the County of Grey

Andrea M. DedrickCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ottawa Hospital

Andre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Ottawa

Karen JensenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Workplace Safety and Insurance Board

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

Ryan GoldvineUnion representative
1 appearance

for the United Steelworkers, Local 9042

Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance

for Tom Graham

Paul D. MackCounsel
2 appearances

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada, Locals 175 & 633

Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steel Workers, Local 5296, and Joe Bonsu

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, Chief of Police

Sie-Wing KhowCounsel
1 appearance

for Windsor Casino Limited and Joe Moore

Nancy Jummu-TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Gina CiampaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cheryl McDonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gayathri SeetharamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anica VisicSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Florips BajoucoSelf-represented
3 appearances
Caroline WedleySelf-represented
1 appearance
Melissa MarshallSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

William ThomsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Gerrald StangretSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondent

Brian GatienCounsel
1 appearance
Karen SargeantCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin D. SherkinCounsel
1 appearance
Ted KovacsCounsel
1 appearance
William DeplaedtSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Robert BaldwinCounsel
1 appearance
Zoya TrofimenkoCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Juno StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance

867

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

11.7

cases/mo

HRTO867(100%)

Decision types

motion

852

trial

Page 20 of 44 (867 cases)

Ena Chadha

Unyi v. Durham Race Operations, 2012 HRTO 9

J. Bruce Carr-Harris

Douglas Christie

Ena Chadha

AlSaigh v. University of Ottawa, 2012 HRTO 2

Ena Chadha

Bhogal v. Banana Republic, 2012 HRTO 3

Ena Chadha

Pak v. Toronto (City), 2011 HRTO 2281

Sunil Mathai

Carole Jenkins

Ena Chadha

The Estate of Kulmiye Aganeh v. Mental Health Centre Penetanguishene, 2011 HRTO 2280

Ena Chadha

Gayle Anne Morris v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, Primary Care Branch, Laura Pinkney, and Donna McQuillan, 2011 HRTO 2265

Ena Chadha

Daniel Muldoon v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services, 2011 HRTO 2264

Ena Chadha

Lyudmila Pechnikova v. Housing Connections and Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2011 HRTO 2259

Ena Chadha

Thompson v. CF Industries, 2011 HRTO 2262

Adrian Ishak

Ena Chadha

Roepke v. Accenture Inc., 2011 HRTO 2230

Ena Chadha

Elliott v. Can Art Aluminum Extrusions, 2011 HRTO 2231

Ena Chadha

McNeil v. Windsor (City), 2011 HRTO 2221

Ena Chadha

Ambrose Zychowicz v. Canadian Auto Workers Local 707 and Ford Motor Company of Canada, 2011 HRTO 2193

Ena Chadha

Williams-Salassidis v. KSD Enterprises Ltd., 2011 HRTO 2194

Ena Chadha

Verner v. Reginald Langlois, 2011 HRTO 2019

Ena Chadha

Abdallah v. Conseil Scolaire de District des Ecoles Catholiques due Sud-Ouest, 2011 HRTO 1987

Christopher McClelland

Ena Chadha

Eileen Lane v. Walmart Canada, 2011 HRTO 1990

Paul Meier

Ena Chadha

Ihasz v. Ontario (Revenue), 2011 HRTO 1991

Ena Chadha

Wenzel v. ACCUCAPS Industries Limited, 2011 HRTO 1967

Ena Chadha

Anemone Cerridwen v. City of Ottawa and OC Transpo, 2011 HRTO 1969

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Michael Markicevic

Counsel for OPSEU

Counsel for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Labour Relations Board

Counsel for the Respondent Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for York University

for AMAPCEO, Affected Party

for Angela Mendoza-Baez

for Angelo Foti

for Canada Safeway Limited

for CAW-TCA Canada

for Gary Klein

for Habeeburrahiman Kavangal

for himself

for Jennette Frost

for Manulife Financial

for Melvin Herzog and Denise Jepersen

for Menzies Chrysler Inc., Clark Menzies and Mark Lyons

for Menzies Chrysler Incorporated, Clark Menzies, Mark Lyons

for Michael Watson

for Mohammed Manjra

for OPSEU

for Paul Cohn

for Securitas Canada Ltd., Lee McGee and Milroy Mariampillai

for Stanley Klimitz

for Stan Mei

for the Affected Party

for the Affected Party Unite Here Local 75

for the Affected Party University of Western Ontario Faculty Association