Dan Weagant is a member at the Assessment Review Board with 252 decisions on record from 2015 to 2025. Key areas include property tax assessment, administrative law, other tribunals.

What tribunal does Dan Weagant sit on?

Dan Weagant sits on the Assessment Review Board.

What areas of law does Dan Weagant decide?

Dan Weagant's most common areas include Property Tax Assessment (252 decisions), Administrative Law (42 decisions), Other Tribunals (7 decisions). Dan Weagant has handled 252 decisions across 3 areas.

How many decisions has Dan Weagant made?

Dan Weagant has 252 decisions on record from 2015 to 2025.

Who frequently appears before Dan Weagant?

Representatives who frequently appear before Dan Weagant include Sean Doyle, Sean Doyle, William Somerville.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Dan Weagant — Member

Property Tax Assessment

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Dan Weagant

Member·Assessment Review Board·Since 2015

252

cases · 11 yrs · OARB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Member· 209Member· 27Member· 11MEMBER· 3MEMBER· 1MEMBER· 1

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 21, 2025

Property tax assessment of new multi-residential building reduced to $34,368,000 using income approach and equity adjustment.

The appellant appealed the property tax assessment of a newly constructed multi-residential building in Hamilton for the 2022-2025 taxation years.

The original assessment was $36,759,000.

The Board applied the income approach to value, determining a current value of $35,430,731 by blending the parties' evidence on fair market rents, vacancy rates, operating expenses, and capitalization rates.

The Board then applied a 3% reduction for equitable assessment based on the assessment-to-sale ratio of a comparable new multi-residential property, resulting in a final assessed value of $34,368,000.

T Valeri Construction Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 19, 2025 CanLII 74177

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMay 27, 2025

Assessment of new multi-residential property reduced to $36,106,000 after applying income approach and equity reduction.

The appellant appealed the property tax assessment of a newly built multi-residential property in Hamilton for the 2022 to 2025 taxation years.

The parties agreed on the income approach to value but disputed the inputs, including fair market rents, vacancy allowance, expense allowance, and capitalization rate.

The Assessment Review Board determined the current value to be $37,222,907 based on a blend of the parties' evidence.

The Board further found that a 3% reduction was required for equitable assessment, reducing the final assessed value to $36,106,000.

T Valeri Construction Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 19, 2025 CanLII 50793

Laura Nyman

5 cases2023–2025

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMay 26, 2025

Property tax relief application dismissed due to insufficient evidence of inability to pay.

The Applicant applied to the City of Toronto to have his 2023 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded under s. 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board dismissed the application, finding that the Applicant failed to provide sufficient documentary evidence of his income and expenses to demonstrate an inability to pay the taxes levied in 2023.

J.K. v. City of Toronto, 2025 CanLII 50794

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardApr 17, 2025

Property assessment reduced to $811,000 after applying a 7.5% equitable reduction to the determined current value.

The appellants appealed the 2023 property assessment of a converted commercial property in Ottawa, which was returned at $852,000.

The Assessment Review Board rejected the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation's cost approach due to missing depreciation data and instead used a bracketing approach with comparable properties to determine a current value of $877,000.

The Board then applied an assessment-to-sales ratio (ASR) study of similar properties in the vicinity, finding a median ASR of 0.925.

Consequently, the Board applied a 7.5% equitable reduction, lowering the final assessment to $811,000 for the 2023, 2024, and 2025 taxation years.

1000134493 Ontario Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 03, 2025 CanLII 34498

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 10, 2025

Property taxes of $3,468.49 cancelled due to applicants' extreme poverty.

The applicants applied to the City of Greater Sudbury to cancel their 2023 property taxes due to extreme poverty under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001.

The City delegated its authority to determine the application to the Assessment Review Board.

Following an interim decision finding the applicants were unable to pay due to extreme poverty, the Board ordered the cancellation of the 2023 levied taxes in the amount of $3,468.49, noting it had no jurisdiction to adjust penalties or interest.

J.G. v. City of Greater Sudbury, 2025 CanLII 11868

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 3, 2025

Property tax relief application granted on interim basis due to extreme poverty; City ordered to provide tax amount.

The applicants applied to the City of Greater Sudbury to have their 2023 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded due to an inability to pay caused by sickness or extreme poverty under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001.

The City delegated its authority to determine such applications to the Assessment Review Board.

The Board found that the applicants' monthly expenses significantly exceeded their income, demonstrating an inability to pay due to extreme poverty.

The Board issued an interim order directing the City to provide the amount of taxes levied in 2023 before making a final determination on the amount to be cancelled.

J.G. v. City of Greater Sudbury, 2025 CanLII 9121

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJan 22, 2025

Property assessment reduced by 5% to $836,000 to reflect equitable assessment based on ASR study.

The appellant appealed the property assessment of a single-family dwelling in Hamilton, arguing for an equity reduction.

The parties agreed on a current value of $879,975 but disputed whether an equity reduction was warranted.

The Assessment Review Board analyzed the Assessment to Sales Ratio (ASR) studies provided by both parties.

After time-adjusting the appellant's sales data to align with the valuation day, the Board found a median ASR of 0.95 for the combined sample.

Consequently, the Board ordered a 5% downward adjustment, reducing the assessment to $836,000 to ensure equity with similar lands in the vicinity.

Terry Koufidis v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 19 and City of Hamilton, 2025 CanLII 4922

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardDec 20, 2024

Property assessment reduced to $1,575,000 to achieve equitable assessment with similar waterfront properties.

The appellants appealed the current value assessment of their waterfront property for the 2023 and 2024 taxation years.

MPAC presented a valuation report suggesting a current value of $1,814,000 based on a time-adjusted sale of a comparable property, while the appellants argued for a value of $1,163,000 based on the assessed values of other properties.

The Assessment Review Board rejected the appellants' methodology of comparing assessed values to determine current value, preferring MPAC's direct comparison approach.

The Board determined the current value to be $1,675,000 based on the time-adjusted sale of the most comparable property.

However, applying section 44(3)(b) of the Assessment Act, the Board found that a reduction was required to achieve equitable assessment with similar lands in the vicinity.

Applying an assessment-to-sale ratio of 0.94, the Board reduced the assessment to $1,575,000 for both taxation years.

Victor Hugo Lucero v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 16, 2024 CanLII 126267

Property assessment reduced to $51,013,000 based on time-adjusted historical sales of the subject property.

The appellant appealed the 2022-2024 property assessment of a commercial shopping centre in Thunder Bay, arguing the returned value of $54,985,000 was too high.

MPAC sought a reduction to $54,322,000 based on the income approach, while the City sought an increase to $61,442,000.

The Assessment Review Board rejected the income and paired-sales approaches, finding the best evidence of current value was the average of two actual sales of the subject property from 2013 and 2021, adjusted for time.

The Board determined the correct current value to be $51,013,000 and found no evidence to support a further reduction for equitable assessment.

3022056 Canada Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 32, 2024 CanLII 126281

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardDec 13, 2024

Property assessment reduced to $1,959,000 after applying a 5.5% reduction for equitable assessment.

The appellant appealed the current value assessment of their residential property for the 2023 and 2024 taxation years.

The parties presented direct comparison approaches that were very close in value, leading the Board to determine the current value at the mid-point of $2,073,000.

On the issue of equitable assessment, the Board reviewed the assessment to sales ratio studies provided by both parties.

Finding that the most similar properties in the vicinity had a median ratio of 0.945, the Board concluded a reduction was necessary to achieve equity.

The assessment was reduced by 5.5% to $1,959,000.

Dmytro Lyeypi v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 15, 2024 CanLII 124424

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardDec 5, 2024

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicant had sufficient income and savings to pay taxes.

The applicant applied for a cancellation, reduction, or refund of her 2023 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, claiming an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Board found that the applicant and her son had sufficient monthly income, significant cash savings, and had already paid the 2023 property taxes in full without incurring financial hardship.

The application was dismissed as the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay.

N.I. v. City of Mississauga, 2024 CanLII 122058

Sean Doyle

25 cases2015–2026

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardDec 4, 2024

Property tax relief application dismissed as the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay.

The Applicant applied to the City of Mississauga for a cancellation, reduction, or refund of his 2023 property taxes, claiming an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001.

The Assessment Review Board found that the Applicant's monthly income, supplemented by financial support from his family, exceeded his reported expenses.

Because the Applicant was able to draw upon available resources to meet his financial obligations and successfully paid his 2023 property taxes, the Board concluded he failed to demonstrate an inability to pay.

The application was dismissed.

J.H. v. City of Mississauga, 2024 CanLII 122061

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

Anita Lovrich

OARB0 cases2024–2026

OARBAssessment Review BoardDec 3, 2024

Property assessment reduced and effective date of supplementary assessment amended based on comparable sales.

The appellant appealed the supplementary and annual property assessments for a newly built seasonal dwelling.

The Assessment Review Board reduced the current value of the property from $581,000 to $498,000 based on comparable sales, particularly a nearby property with similar beach access.

The Board also changed the effective date of the supplementary assessment from March 2, 2023, to June 20, 2024, based on the appellant's evidence of when the property was first used.

No equitable adjustment was made.

Maria Kozlowski v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 16, 2024 CanLII 122060

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardDec 3, 2024

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicant had sufficient bank funds to pay the levied taxes.

The applicant applied to the Township of Laird to have his 2023 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded, claiming an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001.

The Township delegated the application to the Assessment Review Board.

The Board found that the applicant had over $11,000 in his bank accounts at the end of 2023, while his property taxes were $2,167.90.

The Board concluded the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay and dismissed the application.

P.S. v. Township of Laird, 2024 CanLII 122059

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardNov 29, 2024

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicant failed to demonstrate inability to pay.

The Applicant applied to the City of Hamilton to have his 2023 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board reviewed the Applicant's financial evidence, which showed an average monthly household income of approximately $11,997 and positive bank balances at the end of the year after the taxes were paid in full.

The Board found that the Applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay the property taxes levied in 2023 and dismissed the application.

S.K. v. City of Hamilton, 2024 CanLII 119901

Sean Doyle

25 cases2015–2026

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardNov 21, 2024

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicant had sufficient funds to pay the levied taxes.

The Applicant applied to the City of Mississauga to have her 2023 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded due to sickness or extreme poverty under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001.

The City delegated the application to the Assessment Review Board.

The Board found that the Applicant had a positive bank balance of over $13,000 at the end of 2023 and chose to save the funds rather than pay the $2,388.97 in levied taxes.

The Board concluded the Applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay and dismissed the application.

U.B. v. City of Mississauga, 2024 CanLII 116640

Sean Doyle

25 cases2015–2026

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardNov 21, 2024

Property tax relief application dismissed as applicant had access to credit to pay taxes.

The applicant applied to the City of Mississauga for a cancellation, reduction, or refund of her 2023 property taxes under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, citing an inability to pay due to sickness.

The Assessment Review Board found that while the applicant was sick and unable to work, she had access to a line of credit and credit cards which she used to meet her financial obligations, including paying her property taxes in full for the year.

The Board concluded the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay and dismissed the application.

T.E. v. City of Mississauga, 2024 CanLII 116639

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

Anita Lovrich

OARB0 cases2024–2026

OARBAssessment Review BoardNov 18, 2024

Interim order issued requiring submissions on whether a late property tax relief application can be extended.

The applicant applied to the municipality for a reduction, cancellation, or refund of 2023 property taxes due to sickness or extreme poverty under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act.

The municipality delegated its authority to the Assessment Review Board.

At a pre-hearing conference, the Board noted the application appeared to have been filed after the statutory deadline of the last day of February 2024.

The Board issued an interim order requiring the municipality to provide the exact filing date and submissions on whether the Board has jurisdiction to extend the deadline, with an opportunity for the applicant to respond.

G.E.B. v. Township of West Lincoln, 2024 CanLII 116638

Mark Blidner

14 cases2015–2024

John O’Kane

24 cases2017–2025

Francis X. Shea

13 cases2013–2024

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardNov 8, 2024

Board upholds MPAC's omitted assessments and determines property value using cost and income approaches.

The appellant appealed the property assessments for a parking garage and waterpark complex for the 2015 through 2024 taxation years.

The Board found that MPAC properly applied higher omitted assessments for the years in question.

The Board determined that the highest and best use of the property was its current use.

Applying the cost approach for the waterpark and the income approach for the parking garage, the Board concluded the correct current value of the subject property was $48,476,000.

Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 18, 2024 CanLII 110829

Stephen Longo

47 cases2010–2026

Paul Hettinga

1 case2024–2024

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

Anita Lovrich

OARB0 cases2024–2026

OARBAssessment Review BoardNov 1, 2024

Property tax refund granted for office building undergoing renovations that prevented normal use.

The appellant applied for a property tax refund under s. 357(1)(g) of the Municipal Act, 2001, arguing that renovations prevented the normal use of the fourth floor of its office building for all of 2022.

The municipality granted a partial refund.

On appeal, the Assessment Review Board found that renovations prevented normal use from January 1 to December 15, 2022.

The Board calculated the eligible relief based on a 50% current value adjustment for the renovated area and ordered the municipality to issue a further refund of $113,088.15.

227 King Street Waterloo (Nominee) Inc. v. City of Waterloo, 2024 CanLII 106827

Page 1 of 13 (252 cases)

assisted the Applicant

A.E.-G.Agent
1 appearance

for 1490804 Ontario Limited and Angie Cormpilas

Angie CormpilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

for 2320480 Ontario Limited

Geoff WattsAgent
1 appearance

for 2440781 Ontario Limited

Akbar BapooAgent
1 appearance

for 3022056 Canada Inc.

Paul GrosmanCounsel
1 appearance

for 409315 Ontario Ltd.

William John BakerAgent
1 appearance

for 440 Elizabeth Street Holding and 440 Elizabeth Street Holdings Ltd.

Andrew AttardAgent
1 appearance
Daniel AttardAgent
1 appearance

for 625041 Ontario Limited

Peter StavrouCounsel
1 appearance

for 8768013 Canada Ltd.

Erin PicklesAgent
2 appearances
Jeff PicklesAgent
2 appearances
Ratha HalfordAgent
1 appearance

for Aipco Inc.

Benjamin FriedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Amalie Holdings Limited

Paul GrosmanAgent
1 appearance

for Amos Weber and Betsy Hoover Weber

Abram WeberAgent
1 appearance

for Bell Canada

Daniel RosmanCounsel
1 appearance
Richard MinsterCounsel
1 appearance

for Bryfam Enterprises Inc.

Tammy BrysonAgent
1 appearance
Tim BrysonAgent
1 appearance

for Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc.

Mark BlidnerCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Burlington

Paul LacelleAgent
1 appearance
P. LacelleAgent
1 appearance

for City of Greater Sudbury

Dan RosmanCounsel
2 appearances
Richard MinsterCounsel
2 appearances

for City of Hamilton

John O’KaneAgent
2 appearances

for City of London

Brian ShimlaAgent
2 appearances

for City of Niagara Falls

John O’KaneCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Ottawa

Guy TudinoAgent
1 appearance

for City of Thunder Bay

Guy TudinoCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Woodstock (observing only)

Diane CampbellAgent
1 appearance

for CRH Canada Inc.

D. RosmanCounsel
2 appearances
R. MinsterCounsel
2 appearances

for Dennis Abram Driedger, Karen Anne Driedger, and A. Driedger Farms Inc.

Dennis DriedgerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for D. Murray Ventures Inc.

Patrick PrendergastAgent
1 appearance

for EMD Canada Acquisition Co.

Bob PattersonAgent
1 appearance

for Fellowship Wilderness Camp

Stu BurkholderAgent
1 appearance

for Firestone Textiles Company

Drew SamuelsAgent
1 appearance

for Glencore Canada Corporation

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Karina WongCounsel
1 appearance

for Glencore Canada Corporation (formerly Xstrata Canada Corporation)

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Karina WongCounsel
1 appearance

for Greater Toronto Airports Authority

Thomas W. BarlowCounsel
1 appearance

for H.A. and A.S.M.

H.A.Self-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Ken RaySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Host Hospitality Inc.

G. GrewalAgent
1 appearance

for J & S Holdings Inc. and Gary Mayers

Gary MayersSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kamoaks Limited

Thomas ReveszAgent
1 appearance

for Kaprod Holdings Ltd.

P. GrosmanParalegal
1 appearance

for Millford Development Limited

Andrew WinkworthAgent
2 appearances
Mike GuillemetteAgent
2 appearances

for MPAC

William SomervilleAgent
7 appearances
Pierre LefebvreAgent
6 appearances
Justin JohnstoneAgent
6 appearances
Louise St. JeanAgent
5 appearances
Toban EdmundsAgent
5 appearances
Frank SheaCounsel
3 appearances
Ian JohnstoneCounsel
3 appearances
Don MitchellCounsel
3 appearances
Antonietta Romano-BitontiAgent
3 appearances
William SomervilleCounsel
3 appearances
Wayne WilliamsAgent
3 appearances
Tony PileggiAgent
3 appearances
Bonnie MickAgent
2 appearances
Erin ComeauAgent
2 appearances
Jessie YuAgent
2 appearances
John ColeAgent
2 appearances
John TaraborrelliAgent
2 appearances
Corinne Van RaayAgent
2 appearances
Jane Sokol-KennedyAgent
2 appearances
Geoff HigginsonAgent
2 appearances

for Municipality of Brockton

Trish BagloleAgent
1 appearance

for Municipal Property Assessment Corporation

Sarah CormanCounsel
2 appearances
Hilary BrownCounsel
2 appearances
Melissa VanBerkumCounsel
2 appearances
Michael RadanAgent
2 appearances
Leo ChapdelaineAgent
1 appearance
Loris FataAgent
1 appearance
Michael RadanCounsel
1 appearance
Adam ParkerAgent
1 appearance
Carrie CaroneCounsel
1 appearance
Damian BernacikAgent
1 appearance
Francis X. SheaCounsel
1 appearance
George KaldenbachAgent
1 appearance

for North American Railway Hall of Fame

Larry LongfieldAgent
2 appearances
Paul SmithAgent
2 appearances
Matt JanesAgent
2 appearances

for Nuance Group Canada Inc., The Nuance Group Canada Inc., and Nuance Global Traders Inc.

Peter A. MilliganCounsel
1 appearance
James G. WalkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Parkyards Inc.

Lukas KwiatkowskiAgent
1 appearance

for Rutherford Properties Ltd.

Chandelle HamiltonAgent
1 appearance
Colin FrancisAgent
1 appearance

for Sota Holdings Ltd.

Dorota MarshallAgent
2 appearances

for Stelco Inc.

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren LackieCounsel
1 appearance

for Stephanie Bowman and David Farwell

Surin ToorAgent
1 appearance

for St. Mary’s Cement Inc. (Canada); Capital Paving Inc; Preston Sand and Gravel Company; 2416854 Ontario Inc.

J. CowanCounsel
2 appearances

for Syed Raza and Sadia Raza

Marc KemererCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Robert BaranowskiAgent
6 appearances
Surin ToorAgent
3 appearances
Andrew WinkworthAgent
3 appearances
Mike GuillemetteAgent
3 appearances
Gurjit S. GrewalSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andrew AttardAgent
2 appearances
Peter TamAgent
2 appearances
Alan Benjamin YoungSelf-represented
1 appearance
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance
Allan HolmesAgent
1 appearance
A.M.C.Self-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PetersenAgent
1 appearance
Arwa MhawiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernard CassarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brendan ChartersAgent
1 appearance
Charles DobuckiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy AsselstineSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene SawchukAgent
1 appearance
F. R.Self-represented
1 appearance
Garth AllenAgent
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Harry BattuSelf-represented
2 appearances
James CraneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dawn Marie GriffithSelf-represented
2 appearances
Steven Scott GriffithSelf-represented
2 appearances
Bernarda KrasowskiSelf-represented
2 appearances
Arnold AugspolsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Craig LaneSelf-represented
1 appearance
David Van SegbrookSelf-represented
1 appearance
Debbie-Jane Prada-SheaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dianne Elizabeth MillarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald RennickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earnest LightSelf-represented
1 appearance
Edward SheaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Elizabeth DeMerchantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene Stewart DoreySelf-represented
1 appearance
Fritz NussbergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gary CaseSelf-represented
1 appearance
George ParazaderSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn McNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
James Edward CraneSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

J.K.Self-represented
2 appearances
P.B.Agent
2 appearances
P.S.Self-represented
2 appearances
R.A.Self-represented
2 appearances
C.A.Agent
1 appearance
D. D.Self-represented
1 appearance
D.N.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.C.Agent
1 appearance
G.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
G.C.Agent
1 appearance
G.E.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
G. H.Self-represented
1 appearance
I.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.E.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.O.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.P.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
K.P.Self-represented
1 appearance
K.S.Agent
1 appearance

for the Applicants

N.P.R.Self-represented
2 appearances
V.R.Self-represented
2 appearances
J.G.Self-represented
2 appearances
I.R-B.Self-represented
1 appearance
I.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.Y. and M.Y.Self-represented
1 appearance
L.G.Self-represented
1 appearance
M.I.Self-represented
1 appearance
M.N.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.C.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
O.I.Self-represented
1 appearance
P.S.Agent
1 appearance
R.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
U.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
V.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
Y.S.K.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Assessed

Eli MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Assessed Person

Erin PicklesAgent
1 appearance
Jeff PicklesAgent
1 appearance
Ratha HalfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Assessed Persons

Isaak Penner DoerksenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manassah Martin DoerksenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Brampton

Aida KarremanAgent
4 appearances

for the City of Burlington

Paul LacelleAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Cambridge

David HotsonAgent
2 appearances
Kendra SchollAgent
2 appearances
Shawn McConkeyAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Hamilton

Linda NimakoAgent
4 appearances
Irwin SampatAgent
3 appearances
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance
John O’KaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kitchener

Paul YeomanAgent
1 appearance

for the City of London

Brian ShimlaAgent
2 appearances
Geoff BelchCounsel
1 appearance
James EdmundsAgent
1 appearance

for the City of London and Brian Shimla

Geoff BelchCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Mississauga

Sean DoyleAgent
8 appearances
Sean DoyleCounsel
2 appearances
Barb MaltaAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Niagara Falls

Stephanie YoungAgent
1 appearance
Amber FergusonAgent
1 appearance
Anthony ScaringiAgent
1 appearance
Miranda AdamsonAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Thunder Bay

Vince DesandoAgent
3 appearances

for the City of Toronto

Graham ThomsonCounsel
5 appearances
Luis VerasteguiCounsel
4 appearances
J. BoyczukCounsel
3 appearances
Georgia KarakolisAgent
1 appearance
Graham ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance
Graham ThomsonAgent
1 appearance
Jared WherleCounsel
1 appearance
Jennifer BoyczukCounsel
1 appearance
Laura NymanCounsel
1 appearance
Luis VerasteguiAgent
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarCounsel
1 appearance
Alison MintoffCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarAgent
1 appearance
Amy TieuCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Windsor

Janice GuthrieAgent
1 appearance
Jose MejalliAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Dorothy GibbonsAgent
1 appearance
Joel FarberCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the City of Mississauga

Brad TeichmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the County of Lambton and City of Sarnia

Donald DaviesAgent
1 appearance
Gaetano TudinoAgent
1 appearance

for the County of Wellington

C. KuehlCounsel
2 appearances
R. ShoomCounsel
2 appearances

for the Estate of Peter Dyriw and Roman Dyriw

Roman DyriwSelf-represented
1 appearance

for themselves

Damian Anthony SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michelle Lynne SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Dennis DoyleAgent
1 appearance
William DakinAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Greenstone

Jack KuzminskiAgent
1 appearance
Lorne ChristensonAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Huron Shores

Deborah TonelliAgent
2 appearances

for the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation

Tim OberleAgent
4 appearances
Jessie YuAgent
2 appearances
D. MitchellCounsel
2 appearances
J. BarlowCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie DeWinterAgent
2 appearances
Michael RadanAgent
2 appearances
Sheryl McRobertsAgent
2 appearances
Terence JohnstonAgent
2 appearances
Damian BernacikAgent
1 appearance
Amanda GordonAgent
1 appearance
Donald MitchellCounsel
1 appearance
Evan MendelAgent
1 appearance
Helene BlackburnAgent
1 appearance
Jacqui IrwinAgent
1 appearance
Tanya Janeczek-BoyleAgent
1 appearance
Amber WalshAgent
1 appearance
John HyattAgent
1 appearance
Kalin DoucetAgent
1 appearance
Karen BallAgent
1 appearance
Tara JonesAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Sean DoyleAgent
12 appearances
Sean DoyleCounsel
6 appearances
Jennifer BoyczukCounsel
3 appearances
Laura NymanCounsel
2 appearances
Melanie ShankarAgent
2 appearances
Georgia TannerCounsel
1 appearance
Graham ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance
Irwin SampatAgent
1 appearance
James EdmundsAgent
1 appearance
Jennifer ErringtonAgent
1 appearance
Justin JohnstoneAgent
1 appearance
Linda LiottiAgent
1 appearance
Linda NimakoAgent
1 appearance
Luis VerasteguiCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarCounsel
1 appearance
Paul HettingaCounsel
1 appearance
Sue StraughanAgent
1 appearance
Y. KwiecienAgent
1 appearance
A. KarremanAgent
1 appearance
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Halton Hills

Elizabeth van RavensAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Newmarket

Dora WohlsteinAgent
1 appearance
Grace MarshAgent
1 appearance
Paul VoornCounsel
1 appearance
Selene AliAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Oakville

Susan PriceAgent
5 appearances

for the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville

Tracy ParsonsAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Johnson

Herman KlingenbergAgent
5 appearances

for the Township of King

Alice LiuAgent
1 appearance
Karen WoottonAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Laird

Jennifer ErringtonAgent
2 appearances

for the Township of Zorra

Kelly HallAgent
1 appearance

for Timberland Equipment Limited

Paul J. SmithAgent
3 appearances
Loryn LuxAgent
2 appearances

for Town of Halton Hills

Elizabeth van RavensAgent
1 appearance

for Town of Leamington

Laura RauchAgent
2 appearances
Ginny CampbellAgent
1 appearance
Delores JefferyAgent
1 appearance

for Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville

Tracy ParsonsAgent
1 appearance

for T Valeri Construction Limited

Paul GrosmanAgent
2 appearances

for Vale Canada Limited

Belinda SchubertCounsel
2 appearances
Philip SanfordCounsel
2 appearances

for Werh Group Inc.

Bonnie PetroAgent
1 appearance

for Z.C.

E.C.Agent
1 appearance

Self-represented

P.H.Self-represented
1 appearance

252

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.0

cases/mo

OARB252(100%)

Decision types

appeal

202

trial

motion

Page 1 of 13 (252 cases)

Dan Weagant

T Valeri Construction Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 19, 2025 CanLII 74177

Dan Weagant

T Valeri Construction Limited v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 19, 2025 CanLII 50793

Laura Nyman

Dan Weagant

J.K. v. City of Toronto, 2025 CanLII 50794

Dan Weagant

1000134493 Ontario Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 03, 2025 CanLII 34498

Dan Weagant

J.G. v. City of Greater Sudbury, 2025 CanLII 11868

Dan Weagant

J.G. v. City of Greater Sudbury, 2025 CanLII 9121

Dan Weagant

Terry Koufidis v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 19 and City of Hamilton, 2025 CanLII 4922

Dan Weagant

Victor Hugo Lucero v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 16, 2024 CanLII 126267

Paul Grosman

Guy Tudino

Carrie Carone

Dan Weagant

3022056 Canada Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 32, 2024 CanLII 126281

Dan Weagant

Dmytro Lyeypi v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 15, 2024 CanLII 124424

Dan Weagant

N.I. v. City of Mississauga, 2024 CanLII 122058

Sean Doyle

Dan Weagant

J.H. v. City of Mississauga, 2024 CanLII 122061

Dan Weagant

Anita Lovrich

Maria Kozlowski v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 16, 2024 CanLII 122060

Dan Weagant

P.S. v. Township of Laird, 2024 CanLII 122059

Dan Weagant

S.K. v. City of Hamilton, 2024 CanLII 119901

Sean Doyle

Dan Weagant

U.B. v. City of Mississauga, 2024 CanLII 116640

Sean Doyle

Dan Weagant

T.E. v. City of Mississauga, 2024 CanLII 116639

Dan Weagant

Anita Lovrich

G.E.B. v. Township of West Lincoln, 2024 CanLII 116638

Mark Blidner

John O’Kane

Francis X. Shea

Dan Weagant

Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 18, 2024 CanLII 110829

Stephen Longo

Paul Hettinga

Dan Weagant

Anita Lovrich

227 King Street Waterloo (Nominee) Inc. v. City of Waterloo, 2024 CanLII 106827

assisted the Applicant

for 1490804 Ontario Limited and Angie Cormpilas

for 2320480 Ontario Limited

for 2440781 Ontario Limited

for 3022056 Canada Inc.

for 409315 Ontario Ltd.

for 440 Elizabeth Street Holding and 440 Elizabeth Street Holdings Ltd.

for 625041 Ontario Limited

for 8768013 Canada Ltd.

for Aipco Inc.

for Amalie Holdings Limited

for Amos Weber and Betsy Hoover Weber

for Bell Canada

for Bryfam Enterprises Inc.

for Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc.

for City of Burlington

for City of Greater Sudbury

for City of Hamilton

for City of London

for City of Niagara Falls

for City of Ottawa

for City of Thunder Bay

for City of Woodstock (observing only)

for CRH Canada Inc.

for Dennis Abram Driedger, Karen Anne Driedger, and A. Driedger Farms Inc.