Dan Weagant is a member at the Assessment Review Board with 252 decisions on record from 2015 to 2025. Key areas include property tax assessment, administrative law, other tribunals.

What tribunal does Dan Weagant sit on?

Dan Weagant sits on the Assessment Review Board.

What areas of law does Dan Weagant decide?

Dan Weagant's most common areas include Property Tax Assessment (252 decisions), Administrative Law (42 decisions), Other Tribunals (7 decisions). Dan Weagant has handled 252 decisions across 3 areas.

How many decisions has Dan Weagant made?

Dan Weagant has 252 decisions on record from 2015 to 2025.

Who frequently appears before Dan Weagant?

Representatives who frequently appear before Dan Weagant include Sean Doyle, Sean Doyle, William Somerville.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Dan Weagant — Member

Property Tax Assessment

Administrative Law

Other Tribunals

Dan Weagant

Member·Assessment Review Board·Since 2015

252

cases · 11 yrs · OARB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Member· 209Member· 27Member· 11MEMBER· 3MEMBER· 1MEMBER· 1

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

Anita Lovrich

OARB0 cases2024–2026

OARBAssessment Review BoardNov 1, 2024

Property assessment reduced to $35,000 based on comparable sales; late classification issue dismissed.

The appellants appealed the property assessment of their vacant commercial land for the 2022, 2023, and 2024 taxation years.

The appellants sought a reduction in the current value assessment to $34,890, while the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation requested it be confirmed at $48,000.

The Assessment Review Board found that the appellants' proposed comparable property sale from 2017 was the best evidence of value.

The Board reduced the assessment to $35,000 and declined to consider the issue of property classification as it was raised too late and would prejudice the respondents.

Burdett v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 18, 2024 CanLII 106823

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardOct 11, 2024

Tax cancellation of $10,999 ordered due to renovations preventing normal use of industrial property.

The appellant appealed the municipality's failure to make a decision on an application for a tax refund under s. 357(1)(g) of the Municipal Act, 2001.

The application related to renovations and repairs that allegedly prevented the normal use of portions of an industrial building for at least three months in 2022.

The Assessment Review Board found that the renovations prevented the normal use of the subject areas for 158 days and ordered a tax cancellation of $10,999.

Universal Resource Recovery Inc. v. City of Welland, 2024 CanLII 98557

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

Anita Lovrich

OARB0 cases2024–2026

OARBAssessment Review BoardAug 1, 2024

Assessment appeal allowed in part to reflect MPAC's amended valuation; appellant's modern construction discount rejected.

The appellant appealed the 2023 omitted assessment and the deemed 2024 assessment of a newly constructed single detached dwelling in Mississauga.

The appellant argued the assessment was too high because modern construction methods and materials were used, suggesting a lower value than traditionally built homes.

The Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) amended its opinion of current value to $2,202,000 prior to the hearing.

The Assessment Review Board rejected the appellant's proposed comparable properties as they lacked market-tested sales evidence near the valuation day and were substantially older and smaller.

The Board accepted MPAC's comparable sales and assessment-to-sales ratio analysis, finding no equitable adjustment was required.

The Board ordered the assessment reduced to $2,202,000 for the 2024 taxation year and the omitted assessment reduced to $1,459,000, reflecting MPAC's amended valuation.

Varand Abedi v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 15, 2024 CanLII 73800

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 10, 2024

Board orders appellant to provide additional documentation regarding renovations to support tax cancellation appeal.

The appellant appealed to the Assessment Review Board after the City of Welland failed to make a decision on its application for a tax cancellation or reduction for the 2022 taxation year.

The application was based on renovations that allegedly prevented the normal use of the property for at least three months.

The Board confirmed the appeal was properly made and issued a procedural order requiring the appellant to provide additional documentation, including a detailed description of the work, building permits, and plans, before a final decision could be made.

Universal Resource Recovery Inc. v. City of Welland, 2024 CanLII 66450

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 5, 2024

Property assessment reduced to $1,900,000 based on the direct comparison approach.

The appellant appealed the property assessment of a commercial property for the 2022 taxation year, which was deemed to apply to 2023 and 2024.

MPAC assessed the property at $2,499,000 using the income approach, while the appellant argued for a value of $1,400,000 using the direct comparison approach.

The Board found that the direct comparison approach was more appropriate in this case due to the lack of market-based rents in MPAC's income approach.

Relying on a comparable sale, the Board determined the correct current value of the property to be $1,900,000 and ordered the assessment reduced accordingly.

1504700 Ontario Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 09, 2024 CanLII 63722

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardApr 4, 2024

Property assessment confirmed at $866,000; slab-on-grade dwelling valuation upheld without equity reduction.

The appellants appealed the property assessment of their single-storey, slab-on-grade dwelling, arguing the returned value of $866,000 was too high compared to dwellings with basements.

The Assessment Review Board determined the correct current value to be $883,000 using a bracketing method based on comparable sales.

The Board found no evidence to support an equity reduction.

As the determined value was close to the returned value and MPAC did not seek an increase, the Board confirmed the assessment at $866,000.

Joe Montgomery v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 05, 2024 CanLII 29979

Laura Nyman

5 cases2023–2025

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMar 22, 2024

Property taxes reduced by $547.80 due to extreme poverty and inability to pay full amount.

The Applicant applied to the City of Toronto for a cancellation, reduction, or refund of her 2022 property taxes due to extreme poverty or sickness.

The Assessment Review Board found that the Applicant had $1,695.56 available after reasonable living expenses, which should have been applied to her $2,243.36 tax bill.

The Board determined the Applicant was unable to pay the remaining $547.80 due to extreme poverty caused by COVID-19 business disruptions, and reduced her 2022 property taxes by that amount.

W.W. v. City of Toronto, 2024 CanLII 24828

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 14, 2024

Property tax cancellation granted for 2022 due to building damage; prior years dismissed as out of time.

The appellants applied to the Township of Uxbridge to cancel, reduce, or refund property taxes for the years 2019 through 2022, arguing their commercial building was damaged by a municipal drainage project.

The Assessment Review Board found that the applications for 2019, 2020, and 2021 were filed past the statutory deadline and dismissed them.

For the 2022 taxation year, the Board found the application was timely and that the damage rendered 50% of the building substantially unusable.

The Board ordered the cancellation of 50% of the taxes levied on the property for 2022.

Richard Stanley Siwek and Jaclyn Dawn Siwek v. Township of Uxbridge, 2024 CanLII 11632

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardFeb 8, 2024

Property assessment reduced to $437,000 to achieve equity with similar neighbouring properties.

The appellant appealed the 2023 current value assessment of their residential property, which MPAC had increased to $532,000 following a 2022 sale.

The Board found the correct current value to be $515,000 based on the time-adjusted 2016 sale price, rejecting MPAC's addition for an unproven renovation.

Applying section 44(3)(b) of the Assessment Act, the Board further reduced the assessment to $437,000 to achieve equity with similar properties in the vicinity, preferring the appellant's comparison of six highly similar neighbouring properties over MPAC's broader equity study.

Joel Gianfrancesco v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 15 et al., 2024 CanLII 9727

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardDec 22, 2023

Property assessment increased to $1,661,000 after applying an equity reduction to the determined current value.

The City of Ottawa appealed the $495,000 assessment of a 106.3-acre property, arguing it was too low following its 2022 sale for $5,100,000.

The Assessment Review Board determined the correct current value of the property as of the January 1, 2016 valuation day was $2,129,295, based on the time-adjusted sale value of a nearby comparable property.

The Board then applied an assessment-to-sale ratio of 0.78 to ensure equitable assessment with similar lands in the vicinity, resulting in a final assessment of $1,661,000 in the Residential property class.

City of Ottawa v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 03 and Parkyards Inc., 2023 CanLII 123166

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardNov 21, 2023

Property assessments reduced as properties separated from canal by private land do not qualify as waterfront.

The appellants appealed the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation's (MPAC) decision to change the property description of their properties from 'Single Family Detached' to 'Waterfront Dwelling', which increased their current value assessments.

The Assessment Review Board found that the properties did not meet MPAC's criteria for waterfront property, as they lacked direct access to the adjacent canal and were separated from it by a privately owned strip of land that was not a right-of-way, private road, or unopened road.

The Board ordered the property descriptions reverted to 'Single Family Detached' and reduced the assessments to their previous values.

Teresa Allan, Andrew Allan, Richard Donaldson, Leonina Dale and Dean Vincent Dale v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 18 and City of Welland, 2023 CanLII 112297

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardNov 16, 2023

Property assessment reduced to $810,000 based on comparable sales; no further equity reduction warranted.

The appellants appealed the omitted assessment of their property following the addition of a single-storey dwelling in 2021.

The Municipal Property Assessment Corporation had increased the assessment to $870,000.

The Assessment Review Board evaluated comparable sales data and determined the current value of the property to be $810,000.

The Board further considered whether an equity reduction was warranted based on the assessments of similar lands in the vicinity, concluding that no downward adjustment was justified as the median assessment of the most similar properties exceeded the determined current value.

The assessment was amended accordingly.

Joseph Michael Jaroszek and Dianne Elizabeth Millar v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 19 and City of Hamilton, 2023 CanLII 110302

Laura Nyman

5 cases2023–2025

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardSep 6, 2023

Property tax relief application dismissed as financial records showed applicant had sufficient funds.

The applicant applied to the City of Toronto for a cancellation, reduction, or refund of his 2022 property taxes, claiming an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty under section 323(1)(e) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

The Assessment Review Board reviewed the applicant's financial records and found that his monthly income exceeded his disclosed expenses, leaving over $13,000 available after property taxes were paid.

The Board concluded the applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay and dismissed the application.

J.K. v. City of Toronto, 2023 CanLII 83077

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardAug 3, 2023

Property tax cancellation application granted due to extreme poverty, but cancellation amount was $0.

The Applicant applied to have his 2022 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded due to extreme poverty under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001.

The Assessment Review Board found that the Applicant's necessary household expenses exceeded his income, demonstrating an inability to pay due to extreme poverty.

However, because the property taxes levied for the 2022 taxation year were already $0 due to a previous Board decision, the amount of taxes cancelled was $0.

P.S. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 31, 2023 CanLII 72547

Michael Steinberg

5 cases2017–2023

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardAug 2, 2023

Property assessment reduced to $1,829,000 based on a determined Fair Market Rent of $9.28 per square foot.

The appellant appealed the property assessment of a converted light industrial building in Kitchener for the 2019-2023 taxation years.

The parties agreed to use the income approach to value but disputed the correct Fair Market Rent (FMR).

The Board found that the actual rents at the subject property were relevant due to its unique characteristics and location.

The Board determined the correct FMR to be $9.28 per square foot, resulting in a reduced current value assessment of $1,829,000.

The Allen Building Inc. v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 21, 2023 CanLII 72548

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 26, 2023

Property assessment reduced to $993,000 to reflect equitable assessment with similar lands in the vicinity.

The appellant appealed the property assessment of a single-family dwelling for the 2022 and 2023 taxation years.

The Assessment Review Board determined the current value of the property to be $1,135,000 based on comparable sales.

The Board further found that a reduction was required to reflect equitable assessment with similar lands in the vicinity, applying a median assessment-to-sale ratio of 0.875.

The assessment was reduced to $993,000.

Ying Sun v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 14, 2023 CanLII 69549

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 24, 2023

Application for property tax relief dismissed as applicant had sufficient resources to pay.

The Applicant applied to the City of Mississauga to have her 2022 property taxes cancelled, reduced, or refunded under s. 357(1)(d.1) of the Municipal Act, 2001, citing an inability to pay due to sickness or extreme poverty.

The Assessment Review Board found that despite experiencing financial challenges and a period of illness, the Applicant had sufficient resources, including equity in her home, savings, and contributions from her ex-spouse, to meet her financial obligations.

The Board concluded the Applicant failed to demonstrate an inability to pay and dismissed the application.

P.H. v. City of Mississauga, 2023 CanLII 69554

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardJul 12, 2023

Property assessment reduced to $1,882,000 to achieve equitable assessment with similar lands in the vicinity.

The appellant appealed the current value assessment of his residential property for the 2022 and 2023 taxation years.

The Assessment Review Board determined the current value of the property to be $2,075,000 based on its 2017 sale price adjusted for time.

The Board further found that a reduction was required to achieve equitable assessment with similar lands in the vicinity, applying an assessment-to-sale ratio of 0.907 derived from the most comparable property.

The assessment was reduced to $1,882,000.

Folino v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 15, 2023 CanLII 63999

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMay 16, 2023

Property tax assessment reduced for equity, but farm class denied for small tomato garden.

The appellant appealed the residential property assessment of her 2.71-acre property, arguing it should be classified as farm land and that its current value was too high.

The Assessment Review Board found that the property, which was heavily treed and used only for a small tomato garden, did not meet the definition of farm land used only for farm purposes under s. 19(5) of the Assessment Act.

However, the Board agreed that the assessed value was too high based on comparable sales and an equity study.

The Board reduced the current value from $286,000 to $256,000, and further reduced it by 7% to $238,000 to reflect equitable assessment with similar properties in the vicinity.

Asselstine v. Municipal Property Assessment Corporation Region 05, 2023 CanLII 44116

Paul Brennan

OARB0 cases2023–2023

Dan Weagant

OARB0 cases2015–2025

OARBAssessment Review BoardMay 8, 2023

Property tax appeal dismissed; mould from neglect is not damage by 'fire, demolition or otherwise'.

The appellant appealed a decision of the City of Brockville denying its application to cancel, reduce, or refund its 2021 property taxes for a property with an East Wing building that had suffered mould damage and disrepair.

The appellant argued the building was unusable and sought a tax refund under s. 357(1)(d)(ii) of the Municipal Act, 2001.

The Assessment Review Board dismissed the appeal, finding that the building was not damaged by 'fire, demolition or otherwise' as required by the statute.

The Board held that a property owner's neglect leading to mould contamination does not constitute an event similar to fire or demolition that causes physical damage.

Stonewater Properties Brockville Inc. v. City of Brockville, 2023 CanLII 41845

Page 2 of 13 (252 cases)

assisted the Applicant

A.E.-G.Agent
1 appearance

for 1490804 Ontario Limited and Angie Cormpilas

Angie CormpilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

for 2320480 Ontario Limited

Geoff WattsAgent
1 appearance

for 2440781 Ontario Limited

Akbar BapooAgent
1 appearance

for 3022056 Canada Inc.

Paul GrosmanCounsel
1 appearance

for 409315 Ontario Ltd.

William John BakerAgent
1 appearance

for 440 Elizabeth Street Holding and 440 Elizabeth Street Holdings Ltd.

Andrew AttardAgent
1 appearance
Daniel AttardAgent
1 appearance

for 625041 Ontario Limited

Peter StavrouCounsel
1 appearance

for 8768013 Canada Ltd.

Jeff PicklesAgent
2 appearances
Erin PicklesAgent
2 appearances
Ratha HalfordAgent
1 appearance

for Aipco Inc.

Benjamin FriedSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Amalie Holdings Limited

Paul GrosmanAgent
1 appearance

for Amos Weber and Betsy Hoover Weber

Abram WeberAgent
1 appearance

for Bell Canada

Daniel RosmanCounsel
1 appearance
Richard MinsterCounsel
1 appearance

for Bryfam Enterprises Inc.

Tammy BrysonAgent
1 appearance
Tim BrysonAgent
1 appearance

for Canadian Niagara Hotels Inc.

Mark BlidnerCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Burlington

Paul LacelleAgent
1 appearance
P. LacelleAgent
1 appearance

for City of Greater Sudbury

Richard MinsterCounsel
2 appearances
Dan RosmanCounsel
2 appearances

for City of Hamilton

John O’KaneAgent
2 appearances

for City of London

Brian ShimlaAgent
2 appearances

for City of Niagara Falls

John O’KaneCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Ottawa

Guy TudinoAgent
1 appearance

for City of Thunder Bay

Guy TudinoCounsel
1 appearance

for City of Woodstock (observing only)

Diane CampbellAgent
1 appearance

for CRH Canada Inc.

R. MinsterCounsel
2 appearances
D. RosmanCounsel
2 appearances

for Dennis Abram Driedger, Karen Anne Driedger, and A. Driedger Farms Inc.

Dennis DriedgerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for D. Murray Ventures Inc.

Patrick PrendergastAgent
1 appearance

for EMD Canada Acquisition Co.

Bob PattersonAgent
1 appearance

for Fellowship Wilderness Camp

Stu BurkholderAgent
1 appearance

for Firestone Textiles Company

Drew SamuelsAgent
1 appearance

for Glencore Canada Corporation

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Karina WongCounsel
1 appearance

for Glencore Canada Corporation (formerly Xstrata Canada Corporation)

Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance
Karina WongCounsel
1 appearance

for Greater Toronto Airports Authority

Thomas W. BarlowCounsel
1 appearance

for H.A. and A.S.M.

H.A.Self-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Ken RaySelf-represented
1 appearance

for Host Hospitality Inc.

G. GrewalAgent
1 appearance

for J & S Holdings Inc. and Gary Mayers

Gary MayersSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kamoaks Limited

Thomas ReveszAgent
1 appearance

for Kaprod Holdings Ltd.

P. GrosmanParalegal
1 appearance

for Millford Development Limited

Andrew WinkworthAgent
2 appearances
Mike GuillemetteAgent
2 appearances

for MPAC

William SomervilleAgent
7 appearances
Justin JohnstoneAgent
6 appearances
Pierre LefebvreAgent
6 appearances
Louise St. JeanAgent
5 appearances
Toban EdmundsAgent
5 appearances
Wayne WilliamsAgent
3 appearances
Don MitchellCounsel
3 appearances
Tony PileggiAgent
3 appearances
William SomervilleCounsel
3 appearances
Frank SheaCounsel
3 appearances
Ian JohnstoneCounsel
3 appearances
Antonietta Romano-BitontiAgent
3 appearances
Roxanne PoulainAgent
2 appearances
John TaraborrelliAgent
2 appearances
Carlo BassiAgent
2 appearances
John ColeAgent
2 appearances
Brian CongdonAgent
2 appearances
Tyler NastichAgent
2 appearances
Louis BiscaroAgent
2 appearances
Erin ComeauAgent
2 appearances

for Municipality of Brockton

Trish BagloleAgent
1 appearance

for Municipal Property Assessment Corporation

Sarah CormanCounsel
2 appearances
Hilary BrownCounsel
2 appearances
Michael RadanAgent
2 appearances
Melissa VanBerkumCounsel
2 appearances
Adam ParkerAgent
1 appearance
Francis X. SheaCounsel
1 appearance
Damian BernacikAgent
1 appearance
Leo ChapdelaineAgent
1 appearance
George KaldenbachAgent
1 appearance
Carrie CaroneCounsel
1 appearance
Michael RadanCounsel
1 appearance
Loris FataAgent
1 appearance

for North American Railway Hall of Fame

Larry LongfieldAgent
2 appearances
Paul SmithAgent
2 appearances
Matt JanesAgent
2 appearances

for Nuance Group Canada Inc., The Nuance Group Canada Inc., and Nuance Global Traders Inc.

James G. WalkerCounsel
1 appearance
Peter A. MilliganCounsel
1 appearance

for Parkyards Inc.

Lukas KwiatkowskiAgent
1 appearance

for Rutherford Properties Ltd.

Colin FrancisAgent
1 appearance
Chandelle HamiltonAgent
1 appearance

for Sota Holdings Ltd.

Dorota MarshallAgent
2 appearances

for Stelco Inc.

Lauren LackieCounsel
1 appearance
Kathleen PooleCounsel
1 appearance

for Stephanie Bowman and David Farwell

Surin ToorAgent
1 appearance

for St. Mary’s Cement Inc. (Canada); Capital Paving Inc; Preston Sand and Gravel Company; 2416854 Ontario Inc.

J. CowanCounsel
2 appearances

for Syed Raza and Sadia Raza

Marc KemererCounsel
1 appearance

for the Appellant

Robert BaranowskiAgent
6 appearances
Mike GuillemetteAgent
3 appearances
Surin ToorAgent
3 appearances
Andrew WinkworthAgent
3 appearances
Gurjit S. GrewalSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andrew AttardAgent
2 appearances
Peter TamAgent
2 appearances
Stephen LongoCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew PetersenAgent
1 appearance
Leonard ReevesAgent
1 appearance
F. R.Self-represented
1 appearance
Jaroslaw WowkAgent
1 appearance
Eugene SawchukAgent
1 appearance
Yossef LavieAgent
1 appearance
George William SweenieSelf-represented
1 appearance
M.C.Self-represented
1 appearance
Michael SteinbergCounsel
1 appearance
Victor LuceroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brendan ChartersAgent
1 appearance
N.N.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Bernarda KrasowskiSelf-represented
2 appearances
James CraneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Harry BattuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Steven Scott GriffithSelf-represented
2 appearances
Arnold AugspolsSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dawn Marie GriffithSelf-represented
2 appearances
Brendan ChartersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Norman CamermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vaneeta DabasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharon HipelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nicola TamasiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brianna BradyAgent
1 appearance
Peter StavrouAgent
1 appearance
James SnowSelf-represented
1 appearance
Debbie-Jane Prada-SheaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Angie CormpilasSelf-represented
1 appearance
Fritz NussbergerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael GerardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patricia MakuchSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret Jean DoreySelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

P.S.Self-represented
2 appearances
R.A.Self-represented
2 appearances
J.K.Self-represented
2 appearances
P.B.Agent
2 appearances
R.E.Self-represented
1 appearance
U.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
L.L.C.Agent
1 appearance
A.G.Self-represented
1 appearance
D.N.Self-represented
1 appearance
T.E.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.P.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.C.Agent
1 appearance
S.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.E.Self-represented
1 appearance
A.K.F.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
D. D.Self-represented
1 appearance
M.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
K.P.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicants

N.P.R.Self-represented
2 appearances
V.R.Self-represented
2 appearances
J.G.Self-represented
2 appearances
L.G.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
I.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
O.I.Self-represented
1 appearance
I.R-B.Self-represented
1 appearance
R.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.C.Self-represented
1 appearance
P.S.Agent
1 appearance
R.B.Self-represented
1 appearance
V.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
U.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
J.Y. and M.Y.Self-represented
1 appearance
H.S.Self-represented
1 appearance
M.I.Self-represented
1 appearance
A.K.M.F. and N.A.Self-represented
1 appearance
Y.S.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
N.K.Self-represented
1 appearance

for the Assessed

Eli MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Assessed Person

Jeff PicklesAgent
1 appearance
Erin PicklesAgent
1 appearance
Ratha HalfordAgent
1 appearance

for the Assessed Persons

Manassah Martin DoerksenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Isaak Penner DoerksenSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Brampton

Aida KarremanAgent
4 appearances

for the City of Burlington

Paul LacelleAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Cambridge

Kendra SchollAgent
2 appearances
David HotsonAgent
2 appearances
Shawn McConkeyAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Hamilton

Linda NimakoAgent
4 appearances
Irwin SampatAgent
3 appearances
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance
John O’KaneCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Kitchener

Paul YeomanAgent
1 appearance

for the City of London

Brian ShimlaAgent
2 appearances
Geoff BelchCounsel
1 appearance
James EdmundsAgent
1 appearance

for the City of London and Brian Shimla

Geoff BelchCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Mississauga

Sean DoyleAgent
8 appearances
Sean DoyleCounsel
2 appearances
Barb MaltaAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Niagara Falls

Stephanie YoungAgent
1 appearance
Anthony ScaringiAgent
1 appearance
Amber FergusonAgent
1 appearance
Miranda AdamsonAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Thunder Bay

Vince DesandoAgent
3 appearances

for the City of Toronto

Graham ThomsonCounsel
5 appearances
Luis VerasteguiCounsel
4 appearances
J. BoyczukCounsel
3 appearances
Christopher HendersonCounsel
1 appearance
Georgia KarakolisAgent
1 appearance
Jared WherleCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarAgent
1 appearance
Jennifer BoyczukCounsel
1 appearance
Luis VerasteguiAgent
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarCounsel
1 appearance
Laura NymanCounsel
1 appearance
Amy TieuCounsel
1 appearance
Alison MintoffCounsel
1 appearance
Graham ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance
Graham ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

for the City of Windsor

Janice GuthrieAgent
1 appearance
Jose MejalliAgent
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Dorothy GibbonsAgent
1 appearance
Joel FarberCounsel
1 appearance

for The Corporation of the City of Mississauga

Brad TeichmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the County of Lambton and City of Sarnia

Donald DaviesAgent
1 appearance
Gaetano TudinoAgent
1 appearance

for the County of Wellington

C. KuehlCounsel
2 appearances
R. ShoomCounsel
2 appearances

for the Estate of Peter Dyriw and Roman Dyriw

Roman DyriwSelf-represented
1 appearance

for themselves

Michelle Lynne SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damian Anthony SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Municipality

William DakinAgent
1 appearance
Dennis DoyleAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Greenstone

Jack KuzminskiAgent
1 appearance
Lorne ChristensonAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Huron Shores

Deborah TonelliAgent
2 appearances

for the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation

Tim OberleAgent
4 appearances
D. MitchellCounsel
2 appearances
Sheryl McRobertsAgent
2 appearances
Jessie YuAgent
2 appearances
J. BarlowCounsel
2 appearances
Terence JohnstonAgent
2 appearances
Michael RadanAgent
2 appearances
Laurie DeWinterAgent
2 appearances
Tanya Janeczek-BoyleAgent
1 appearance
Arik MahlerAgent
1 appearance
Brian LeggettAgent
1 appearance
John HyattAgent
1 appearance
Leokadia WalcAgent
1 appearance
Helene BlackburnAgent
1 appearance
Tong LiAgent
1 appearance
Jacqui IrwinAgent
1 appearance
Evan MendelAgent
1 appearance
Damian BernacikAgent
1 appearance
Karen BallAgent
1 appearance
Carlo BassiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Sean DoyleAgent
12 appearances
Sean DoyleCounsel
6 appearances
Jennifer BoyczukCounsel
3 appearances
Melanie ShankarAgent
2 appearances
Laura NymanCounsel
2 appearances
Barbara MaltaAgent
1 appearance
Alexander TyutyunnikAgent
1 appearance
Justin JohnstoneAgent
1 appearance
James EdmundsAgent
1 appearance
Amy BouchardAgent
1 appearance
Jennifer ErringtonAgent
1 appearance
Luis VerasteguiCounsel
1 appearance
Georgia TannerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue StraughanAgent
1 appearance
Linda NimakoAgent
1 appearance
Graham ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance
Angus MacKayCounsel
1 appearance
Melanie ShankarCounsel
1 appearance
Y. KwiecienAgent
1 appearance
A. KarremanAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Halton Hills

Elizabeth van RavensAgent
1 appearance

for the Town of Newmarket

Grace MarshAgent
1 appearance
Selene AliAgent
1 appearance
Dora WohlsteinAgent
1 appearance
Paul VoornCounsel
1 appearance

for the Town of Oakville

Susan PriceAgent
5 appearances

for the Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville

Tracy ParsonsAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Johnson

Herman KlingenbergAgent
5 appearances

for the Township of King

Alice LiuAgent
1 appearance
Karen WoottonAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of Laird

Jennifer ErringtonAgent
2 appearances

for the Township of Zorra

Kelly HallAgent
1 appearance

for Timberland Equipment Limited

Paul J. SmithAgent
3 appearances
Loryn LuxAgent
2 appearances

for Town of Halton Hills

Elizabeth van RavensAgent
1 appearance

for Town of Leamington

Laura RauchAgent
2 appearances
Ginny CampbellAgent
1 appearance
Delores JefferyAgent
1 appearance

for Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville

Tracy ParsonsAgent
1 appearance

for T Valeri Construction Limited

Paul GrosmanAgent
2 appearances

for Vale Canada Limited

Belinda SchubertCounsel
2 appearances
Philip SanfordCounsel
2 appearances

for Werh Group Inc.

Bonnie PetroAgent
1 appearance

for Z.C.

E.C.Agent
1 appearance

Self-represented

P.H.Self-represented
1 appearance

252

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.0

cases/mo

OARB252(100%)

Decision types

appeal

202

trial

motion

Page 2 of 13 (252 cases)