Who is D. A. MacDonald?

D. A. MacDonald is a board member at the Ontario Labour Relations Board with 151 decisions on record from 1982 to 1994. Key areas include employment and labour law, administrative law, construction law.

What tribunal does D. A. MacDonald sit on?

D. A. MacDonald sits on the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

What areas of law does D. A. MacDonald decide?

D. A. MacDonald's most common areas include Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions), Administrative Law (61 decisions), Construction Law (30 decisions). D. A. MacDonald has handled 151 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has D. A. MacDonald made?

D. A. MacDonald has 151 decisions on record from 1982 to 1994.

Who frequently appears before D. A. MacDonald?

Representatives who frequently appear before D. A. MacDonald include David McKee, Bernard Fishbein, N. L. Jesin.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

D. A. MacDonald — Board Member

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Construction Law

Other Tribunals

D. A. MacDonald

Board Member·Ontario Labour Relations Board·Since 1982

151

cases · 13 yrs · OLRB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Board Member· 150Board Member· 1

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardNov 3, 1988

Board determines employee list for construction industry certification, including shop employees commonly associated with on-site work.

The applicant trade union applied for certification in the construction industry.

The Board appointed a Labour Relations Officer to inquire into the list of employees in the bargaining unit.

The parties disputed whether several individuals performed bargaining unit work on the application date.

The Board found that one employee performed on-site work and three shop employees were commonly associated with on-site employees, placing them in the bargaining unit.

One employee was found not to have performed bargaining unit work on the application date and was excluded from the list.

Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local 30 v. Rainscreen Metal Systems Incorporated, 1988 CanLII 3711

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardOct 24, 1988

Board Officer appointed to examine duties of disputed individuals, except two whose status requires arbitration.

The applicant union applied under section 106(2) of the Labour Relations Act for a determination of whether several individuals were 'employees' within the meaning of the Act.

The respondent hospital argued that the individuals were excluded due to managerial or confidential duties, or because they were excluded in the original certificate.

The Board found that the informational requirements for such applications were met.

It declined to direct an examination for two librarians, finding their inclusion or exclusion from the bargaining unit was an issue for arbitration.

For the remaining individuals, the Board appointed a Board Officer to inquire into their duties and responsibilities.

London and District Service Workers' Union, Local 220, S.E.I.U.-A.F.L.-C.I.O.-C.L.C. v. The Freeport Hospital, 1988 CanLII 3746

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardOct 14, 1988

Board Officer appointed to examine employee status of six supervisors despite prior managerial exclusion agreement.

The applicant union sought a determination under section 106(2) of the Labour Relations Act regarding whether six individuals classified as supervisors were 'employees' within the meaning of the Act.

The respondent opposed the application, arguing that four of the individuals had previously been excluded as managerial during certification in 1982.

Applying the policy from The Windsor Star, the Board found that the applicant's material sufficiently indicated that the mischief against which section 1(3)(b) is directed may have ceased.

The Board concluded that a question existed between the parties and appointed a Board Officer to inquire into the duties and responsibilities of the six individuals.

Ontario Public Service Employees Union v. Superior Ambulance Services, 1988 CanLII 3754

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardOct 2, 1988

Board upholds voluntary recognition agreement signed with one employee and revokes rival union's certification.

The Board considered consolidated applications regarding representation rights for carpenters employed by a framing subcontractor.

Local 183 sought a single employer declaration and to revoke Local 27's certification, arguing it had a pre-existing collective agreement.

Local 27 argued Local 183's agreement was void for employer support and because it was signed when the employer had only one employee.

The Board held that a voluntary recognition agreement can be valid with a single employee.

It also found no employer support, as the employer signed the agreement to comply with a valid subcontracting clause of the general contractor.

The Board granted the single employer declaration, found Local 183's agreement valid, and revoked Local 27's certification.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local Union 27 v. Square One Carpentry Inc., 1988 CanLII 3753

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 28, 1988

Board appoints officer to examine duties of alleged independent contractor under section 106(2).

The applicant trade union applied under section 106(2) of the Labour Relations Act for a determination of whether an individual was an employee.

The respondent employer argued that the individual was an independent contractor and that the issue was merely whether he was covered by the collective agreement, not whether he was managerial.

The Board held that section 106(2) encompasses disputes over whether a person is an employee or an independent contractor, as independent contractors are excluded from the Act.

Finding that a valid question had arisen, the Board appointed a Board Officer to inquire into the individual's duties and responsibilities.

Ottawa Newspaper Guild v. The Ottawa Citizen, 1988 CanLII 3741

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 28, 1988

Board Officer appointed to inquire into employee status of five supervisors under section 106(2).

The applicant union applied under section 106(2) of the Labour Relations Act for a determination of whether five individuals classified as supervisors were 'employees' within the meaning of the Act.

The respondent employer opposed the application, arguing that the union failed to demonstrate the mischief against which section 1(3)(b) is directed and that there was a prior agreement excluding two of the individuals.

The Board found that a question existed as to the employee status of the individuals and that the mischief may have ceased.

The Board appointed a Board Officer to inquire into the duties and responsibilities of the five individuals.

Ontario Public Service Employees' Union v. Fleetwood Ambulance Services, 1988 CanLII 3721

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 17, 1988

Borrowed $1.00 payment for union membership dues satisfies statutory requirement for certification evidence.

In an application for certification, the respondent employer challenged the union's membership evidence, alleging a 'non-pay' issue.

An employee had borrowed the required $1.00 membership fee from a co-worker and paid it to the union organizer.

The employer argued this did not constitute a financial sacrifice or a payment 'on his own behalf' under section 1(1)(l) of the Labour Relations Act.

The Board rejected this argument, holding that the borrowed dollar became the employee's money to dispose of as he pleased, and its payment satisfied the statutory requirement.

The matter was re-listed to determine remaining issues regarding employee status and part-time exclusions.

The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local Union 27 v. Calvano Lumber & Trim Co. Ltd., 1988 CanLII 3772

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 3, 1988

Related employer declaration granted where non-union spin-off operated under common control to avoid collective agreement.

The applicant union sought a declaration under section 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act that Krest Masonry Contracting Limited and Canada Contracting were one employer, or alternatively that there was a sale of a business under section 63.

Krest, a unionized masonry contractor, was bound by a collective agreement.

Canada Contracting was incorporated by family members of Krest's directors and operated as a non-union broker on the same construction sites, utilizing Krest's materials and services.

The Board found that the two companies were engaged in related business activities under common control and direction, serving as a vehicle for Krest to avoid its collective agreement obligations.

The Board granted the section 1(4) declaration, making it effective as of the application date.

Bricklayers, Masons Independent Union of Canada, Local 1 v. Masonry Contractors' Association of Toronto Inc., 1988 CanLII 3781

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 8, 1988

Section 123(2) of the Labour Relations Act provides an additional, not exclusive, open period for termination.

The applicant sought to terminate the bargaining rights of the respondent union, which had been obtained through a voluntary recognition agreement in the construction industry.

The union argued the application was untimely under section 123(2) of the Labour Relations Act.

The Board held that section 123(2) provides an additional open period for termination applications in the construction industry, rather than overriding the general open period in section 57(2).

Therefore, the application brought during the last two months of the collective agreement's operation was timely.

Franco Pepe v. Ontario Provincial Council, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, 1988 CanLII 3654

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 7, 1988

Board declares prior voluntary recognition agreement invalid and grants union's application for certification.

The applicant union applied for certification in the construction industry.

The respondent and intervener claimed the application was untimely due to a prior voluntary recognition agreement.

Neither the respondent nor the intervener appeared at the hearing.

The Board treated the application as including a request under section 60 of the Labour Relations Act to declare the prior agreement invalid.

Finding no evidence to support the intervener's entitlement to represent the employees at the time the agreement was made, the Board declared the agreement invalid, found the certification application timely, and issued the requested certificates.

International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 793 v. Pry-Con Construction Inc., 1988 CanLII 3655

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 30, 1988

Board dismisses related employer application and grievance where owner directly engaged non-union subcontractor.

The applicant union alleged that the respondent general contractor, Dalton, violated the subcontracting clause of the provincial collective agreement when the project owner, Rumble, contracted directly with a non-union demolition contractor.

The union also sought a related employer declaration under subsection 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act.

The Board found that Rumble, not Dalton, engaged the non-union contractor, and therefore Dalton did not violate the collective agreement.

The Board also declined to exercise its discretion to issue a related employer declaration, finding that doing so would extend rather than preserve the union's bargaining rights.

Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 506 v. Dalton Engineering & Construction Limited, 1988 CanLII 3667

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 29, 1988

Board lacks jurisdiction over work assignment dispute where collective agreement requires reference to external tribunal.

The complainant employer filed a jurisdictional dispute under section 91 of the Labour Relations Act regarding a work assignment to the Ironworkers, which was grieved by the Millwrights.

The respondents argued the Board lacked jurisdiction under section 91(14) because the collective agreements required such disputes to be referred to the Impartial Jurisdictional Disputes Board (the Plan).

The dispute had been referred to the Plan, but the Plan declined to make a determination because the work was already completed.

The Board held that the Plan's application of its time limits did not mean it failed to entertain the dispute.

Because the collective agreements provided for a mutually selected tribunal that was functioning, section 91(14) deprived the Board of jurisdiction.

The complaint was dismissed.

Copper Cliff Mechanical Contractors Ltd. v. The Millwright District Council of Ontario et al., 1988 CanLII 3666

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 21, 1988

Intervener union granted status to participate in sector determination proceeding as it represented employees performing the disputed work.

The applicant referred a grievance to arbitration.

The respondent sought a determination under section 150 of the Labour Relations Act as to whether the work was within the industrial, commercial and institutional sector of the construction industry.

The respondent argued that the intervener union and others should be given notice and entitled to participate.

The applicant opposed their participation.

The Board applied the criteria for standing and found that the intervener union represented the employees who performed the work in the first phase of the project and may represent employees in future phases.

The Board ruled that the intervener union had status to intervene in the proceedings.

United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local Union 46 v. The Board of Governors of Exhibition Place, 1988 CanLII 3664

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 16, 1988

Board directed a hearing to determine the appropriate bargaining unit description and clarity note for welders.

The applicant trade union applied for certification in the construction industry and requested a clarity note including welders in the bargaining unit.

The respondent employer did not file a reply.

Noting that the trades of plumber and steamfitter are compulsory certified trades, and that similar applications were pending before the Board raising issues about the appropriateness of the requested clarity note, the Board declined to dispose of the application on the materials filed.

Instead, the Board directed the Registrar to schedule a hearing to determine the appropriate bargaining unit description and the clarity note.

The United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 46 v. Heritage Mechanical Ltd., 1988 CanLII 3669

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 3, 1988

Complaint dismissed as employer bargaining agency owes duty of fair representation to individual employers, not constituent organizations.

The complainants, including an employers' organization and two individual contractors, filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging that the Provincial Employer Bargaining Agency - Labourers violated section 151(2) of the Labour Relations Act.

The respondents raised preliminary objections.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the complaint, finding that section 151(2) imposes a duty on the employer bargaining agency to represent individual employers, not constituent employers' organizations.

As the complaint did not plead facts showing how the individual contractors were adversely affected, and no duty was owed to the employers' organization, the complaint failed to establish a violation of the Act.

Grand Valley Construction Association (General Contractors Section) v. Labour Relations Bureau of the Ontario General Contractors Association, 1988 CanLII 3668

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 26, 1988

Employee's challenge to segregated ballot procedure dismissed; two-envelope system ensures ballot secrecy.

An employee challenged the procedure for segregating ballots in a pre-hearing representation vote, expressing concern that the secrecy of the ballot was compromised because his voter number appeared on the outer envelope.

The Board explained the two-envelope system used for segregated ballots, confirming that the inner envelope and the ballot itself contain no identifying marks, and that ballots are mixed before counting to ensure secrecy.

The Board found no merit in the employee's concerns and declined to direct a new vote.

Ontario Secondary School Teachers' Federation v. The Board of Education for the City of Toronto, 1988 CanLII 3692

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardApr 28, 1988

Union granted access to employer's mining camp property for organizing purposes under section 11.

The applicant unions applied under section 11 of the Labour Relations Act for a direction allowing their representatives access to the employer's property, specifically the mining camp where employees reside, for the purpose of union organizing.

The employer objected to the scope and duration of the access, particularly regarding the bunkhouse areas located within the secured mine site.

The Board granted the application, finding no compelling reason to restrict access to areas where employees normally reside, and directed access subject to specific conditions and time limits.

Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 493 v. Noramco Mining Corporation, 1988 CanLII 3766

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardApr 27, 1988

Grievance dismissed; union did not violate collective agreement by JATC's merit-based apprentice selection policy.

The applicant employer association referred a grievance to arbitration, alleging that the respondent union violated the collective agreement by allowing the Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee (JATC) to limit the number of apprentices and select them based on merit rather than minimum qualifications.

The Board dismissed the grievance, finding that the collective agreement did not govern the internal workings of the JATC and that the JATC's policy of admitting only the most qualified candidates was not inconsistent with its mandate to assure an adequate supply of properly trained mechanics.

The Mechanical Contractors Association of Hamilton v. The United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 67, 1988 CanLII 3764

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardApr 26, 1988

Board abandons 'changes' restriction for status inquiries; librarian found to exercise managerial functions.

The employer applied under section 106(2) of the Labour Relations Act for a determination of whether a librarian exercised managerial functions and should be excluded from the bargaining unit.

The Board used this case to alter its policy regarding the scope of duties and responsibilities examinations, deciding it would no longer automatically restrict such inquiries to 'changes' in duties but would permit full examinations where a question as to status arises.

On the merits, the majority found that the librarian exercised effective control over the library, including making effective recommendations on automation, staffing, and hours, and had supervisory conflicts with bargaining unit staff.

The Board concluded she exercised managerial functions within the meaning of section 1(3)(b) and granted the application.

The Windsor Star v. Windsor Newspaper Guild Local 239, 1988 CanLII 3770

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardApr 22, 1988

Board deferred unfair labour practice complaint to arbitration as the dispute was primarily contractual.

The complainant union alleged that the respondent company violated the Labour Relations Act by unilaterally starting a new apprentice electrician at the third-year rate, bypassing the Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee.

The company brought a preliminary motion requesting the Board to defer the matter to arbitration.

The Board found that the essence of the complaint involved the interpretation of the collective agreement and the scope of the Joint Committee's duties.

Concluding that the dispute was primarily contractual and that arbitration was an adequate and appropriate forum, the Board granted the motion, deferred to the arbitration process, and declined to hear the complaint on its merits.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1744 v. Boise Cascade Canada Limited, 1988 CanLII 3757

Page 5 of 8 (151 cases)

for Acco Canadian Material Handling, a Division of Babcock Industries Canada Inc.

Anthony H. AllenCounsel
1 appearance
Fred HeeremaCounsel
1 appearance

for a group of employees

Allan RoussySelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard D. PennerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for all respondents

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance
John MarchildonCounsel
1 appearance

for Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113

David E. GaudetteUnion representative
1 appearance

for A. Reisman Construction Limited and Red Banner Developments Limited

Al ReismanAgent
1 appearance
Joe CarrierCounsel
1 appearance
Manny BrykmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Brant County Home Care Program

Margaret ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Paul StillmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Comcare (Canada) Limited

Lewis NickersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa HamiltonCounsel
1 appearance
Robert CalderCounsel
1 appearance

for E. H. Price Limited

Philip R. MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellis-Don Limited, Milne & Nicholls Ltd. and Mollenhauer Limited

W. ThorntonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ferano Construction Limited

D. FerrarottoAgent
1 appearance
George RontirisCounsel
1 appearance

for Fred T. Reisman & Associates and M. R. Primary Trust

Fred ReismanAgent
1 appearance
Pamela YudcovitchCounsel
1 appearance

for F. T. Construction Inc., respondents

Fernando OliveiraAgent
1 appearance

for George Reisman Limited, Resigeorge Management Limited and G. R. Primary Trust

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Hamilton-Wentworth Home Care Program - Victorian Order of Nurses and Victorian Order of Nurses Respite Program

Brian LawsonCounsel
1 appearance

for International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades

Frank McCoolCounsel
1 appearance

for intervener #1

Ann MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Ann PepperCounsel
1 appearance
C. M. DassiosCounsel
1 appearance
David WarrenCounsel
1 appearance
Mal GodinCounsel
1 appearance
Mike TapaCounsel
1 appearance

for intervener #1 and The Form Work Council of Ontario

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance

for Intervener #1 and The Form Work Council of Ontario

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance

for interveners #1 and #2

Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
Rocco LotitoCounsel
1 appearance

for Ironworkers District Council of Ontario and International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers, Local 700

F. MarrCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for Ironworkers, Local 700

G. MichalukCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for Jaddco Anderson Ltd.

B. TimminsCounsel
1 appearance
D. L. BrisbinCounsel
1 appearance

for Johnson Controls Ltd.

Ron McMasterAgent
1 appearance
Suzanne DuncanCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers 506

Tony CornacchiaUnion representative
1 appearance

for Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 1081

Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
Jo BraunCounsel
1 appearance
Paul TrudelleCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183

C. DeToniUnion representative
1 appearance
L. A. RichmondCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers Local 1081

Keith RimmingtonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Labourers' Local 183

A. PintoAgent
1 appearance
L. A. RichmondCounsel
1 appearance
Q. CeolinAgent
1 appearance

for Labourers' Local 183 and The Form Work Council of Ontario

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers' Ontario Provincial District Council

Arthur AdamsCounsel
1 appearance
John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers, Ontario Provincial District Council

Larry SteinbergCounsel
1 appearance
Susan PhilpotCounsel
1 appearance

for Med Care Partnership

Charles HumphreyCounsel
1 appearance
Maryann CrnekovicCounsel
1 appearance

for Medical Personnel Pool (Hamilton) Ltd.

Larry G. CulverCounsel
1 appearance
Larry KielbowichCounsel
1 appearance
Tom DixonCounsel
1 appearance

for Metropolitan Plumbing and Heating Contractors Association

Ed WinterCounsel
1 appearance
Mark GeigerCounsel
1 appearance
Martin RosenbaumCounsel
1 appearance
Robert SalisburyCounsel
1 appearance

for Metropolitan Plumbing Contractors Association, Urban Mechanical Contractors Limited, Zentil Plumbing and Heating Co. Ltd., Lou Pupolin Plumbing and Heating Ltd., Keele Plumbing and Heating Ltd., DiMarco Plumbing and Heating Co. Ltd., Municipal Plumbing and Heating Ltd., Cesan Mechanical Systems Ltd., D. Zentil Mechanical Ltd.

M. E. GeigerCounsel
1 appearance
Howard RoherCounsel
1 appearance
Edward J. WinterCounsel
1 appearance
Martin RosenbaumCounsel
1 appearance

for Millwrights Local 1244

N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance
H. MartinakCounsel
1 appearance

for Millwrights, Local 1244

H. MartinakCounsel
1 appearance
N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance

for Millwrights, Local 1592

P. FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohawk Medical Services

Sue McGregorCounsel
1 appearance
John D. LewisCounsel
1 appearance
Donald B. JarvisCounsel
1 appearance

for Olsten Health Care Services

Jane RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance
Michelle GageCounsel
1 appearance
Anne HardyCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Sheet Metal and Air Handling Group and Megatech Contracting Limited

Keith BillingsCounsel
1 appearance
L. CianfaraniAgent
1 appearance

for Para-Med Health Services

Jennifer BarnesCounsel
1 appearance
Mel RhinelanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union

Robin McArthurCounsel
1 appearance
Eric del JuncoCounsel
1 appearance

for Sean O'Ryan and Local 46

V. McNeilCounsel
1 appearance
L. C. ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance

for Sean O'Ryan and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 46

L. C. ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
V. McNeilCounsel
1 appearance

for Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local 47 and Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Ontario Sheet Metal Workers' Conference

Ross MitchellAgent
1 appearance
Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
R. BellevilleAgent
1 appearance

for Square One Carpentry Inc.

Michele DiBiaseAgent
1 appearance
Carmine DiBiaseAgent
1 appearance

for the applicant

David McKeeCounsel
5 appearances
Bernard FishbeinCounsel
4 appearances
N. L. JesinCounsel
4 appearances
P. TurtleCounsel
3 appearances
A. M. MinskyCounsel
3 appearances
Douglas J. WrayCounsel
3 appearances
Nancy CourtneyCounsel
2 appearances
Maurice A. GreenCounsel
2 appearances
A. J. AheeAgent
2 appearances
L. SteinbergCounsel
2 appearances
Michael A. ChurchCounsel
2 appearances
Luis CamaraUnion representative
2 appearances
W. CurtisCounsel
2 appearances
L. A. RichmondCounsel
2 appearances
Bill VeitchCounsel
1 appearance
Bill WeatherupCounsel
1 appearance
Bob HumphriesCounsel
1 appearance
Brian SheehanCounsel
1 appearance
Brian ShellCounsel
1 appearance
Carl MorganAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Mary M. McCormickCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant/complainant

Elizabeth MitchellCounsel
3 appearances
Douglas J. WrayCounsel
1 appearance
Duane WellsCounsel
1 appearance
Ed FerreiraUnion representative
1 appearance
Frank ManoniUnion representative
1 appearance
G. CarolineAgent
1 appearance
Jack PorterAgent
1 appearance
Jim MoffattCounsel
1 appearance
Jim MoffattUnion representative
1 appearance
Joe AlmeidaAgent
1 appearance
N. W. MeikleAgent
1 appearance
Paul SimmonsUnion representative
1 appearance
Peter SimmonsUnion representative
1 appearance
R. TierAgent
1 appearance
Tom CrystalUnion representative
1 appearance
Tony BucciAgent
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance
David A. McKeeCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicants

Balbir KlerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Boris UlehlaCounsel
1 appearance
Charlene BanwaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
David StrangCounsel
1 appearance
Debbie MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Denis LaRocqueUnion representative
1 appearance
Doug AndersonCounsel
1 appearance
Linda MicksCounsel
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance
Richard ZawislakCounsel
1 appearance
Sean FitzpatrickCounsel
1 appearance
S. VirkSelf-represented
1 appearance

for The Canadian Red Cross Society Ontario Division

Tim LiznickCounsel
1 appearance
Barb HeatheringtonCounsel
1 appearance
Geoff GrahamCounsel
1 appearance
Helen FleischmanCounsel
1 appearance
Janice BakerCounsel
1 appearance
Robert LittleCounsel
1 appearance
Barbara TrahanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Carpenters

Dave WatsonUnion representative
1 appearance
Joe AlmeidaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Carpenters' District Council of Toronto and Vicinity on behalf of Locals 27 and 1304, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Jointers of America

Douglas J. WrayCounsel
1 appearance
James SmithCounsel
1 appearance
John CartwrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the complainant

James HayesCounsel
2 appearances
Martin SarraCounsel
1 appearance
Mohamed S. SabounjiCounsel
1 appearance
N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance
Robin B. CumineCounsel
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance
D. LangtryCounsel
1 appearance
Andy PilatAgent
1 appearance
Bob LeoneAgent
1 appearance
Bruce BinningCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher DassiosCounsel
1 appearance
Denis PowerCounsel
1 appearance
Donald GuilbeaultUnion representative
1 appearance
Ed OgibowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Everette ChapelleSelf-represented
1 appearance
H. MartinakCounsel
1 appearance
J. D. WatsonCounsel
1 appearance
Lawrence BranderAgent
1 appearance
Mark ContiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the complainant Bonita Clark

Laura TrachukCounsel
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance
Nelson RolandCounsel
1 appearance
Stan GrayAgent
1 appearance

for the complainants

Frank SheppardCounsel
1 appearance
J. Barry FraserSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Royce S. ArnoldAgent
1 appearance

for the complainants/applicant

G. GrossmanCounsel
2 appearances
D. LewisSelf-represented
1 appearance
D. LewisAgent
1 appearance
W. J. McCarronAgent
1 appearance
W. J. McCarronSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the corporate respondents

Edward I. WinterCounsel
1 appearance
Howard RoherCounsel
1 appearance
Martin RosenbaumCounsel
1 appearance
M. E. GeigerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Electrical Contractors Association of Hamilton

J. Cameron NolanCounsel
1 appearance
S. C. BernardoCounsel
1 appearance

for The Form Work Council of Ontario and Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183

R. LotitoCounsel
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for the group of employees

Carl HughesAgent
1 appearance
Douglas BowmanAgent
1 appearance

for the IBEW and the IBEW Construction Council of Ontario

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance
Donald LoundsAgent
1 appearance
Pat DillonAgent
1 appearance
Ralph TersigniAgent
1 appearance

for the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, Local 95

Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance
Robert 0. BeamishCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Kenneth G. Rose, Local 105, P. Dillon and T. Beattie

A.M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 105, P. Dillon and T. Beattie

S. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades and Ontario Council of International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades, Local Union 1891

Maurice A. GreenCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervener

A. DionysioCounsel
1 appearance
A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance
Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
Brian FooteCounsel
1 appearance
Chris EamesAgent
1 appearance
Cindy CollinsAgent
1 appearance
D. H. PeirceCounsel
1 appearance
E. BairosCounsel
1 appearance
Ed WinterAgent
1 appearance
F. J. W. BickfordCounsel
1 appearance
Jack SlaughterCounsel
1 appearance
Jim BacarriCounsel
1 appearance
J. R. WachoskiCounsel
1 appearance
J. SteffaniniCounsel
1 appearance
Lee WoodsAgent
1 appearance
Mark GeigerCounsel
1 appearance
Martin RosenbaumCounsel
1 appearance
Maurice A. GreenCounsel
1 appearance
Maurice BoucherAgent
1 appearance
Michael QuinnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

R. WeissUnion representative
1 appearance
Susan PhilpottCounsel
1 appearance

for the interveners The Toronto Star and The Hamilton Spectator

Stuart M. RobertsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervener The Globe & Mail

Peter JacobsenCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Dave FoleyUnion representative
1 appearance
Elizabeth ForsterCounsel
1 appearance
John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Mike PopovichCounsel
1 appearance
Ron RupkeUnion representative
1 appearance
Tony LaMacchiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ironworkers

D. GirardUnion representative
1 appearance
J. PhairUnion representative
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for the Labourers

C. DetoniCounsel
1 appearance
C. M. MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Labour Relations Bureau of the Ontario General Contractors Association, James Thomson, and Provincial Employer Bargaining Agency - Labourers

Joseph LibermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Metropolitan Toronto Apartment Builders Association

Doug GilbertCounsel
3 appearances

for the Millwrights

E. RyanUnion representative
1 appearance
N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance

for the objector

William A. LamonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the objectors

Ann LomackAgent
1 appearance
Armindo CascaoAgent
1 appearance
Art HordykCounsel
1 appearance
Betty IsbisterAgent
1 appearance
Bill BonvanieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bill HenninkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian St. GermainCounsel
1 appearance
Cindy DobbinAgent
1 appearance
Cindy MedeirosAgent
1 appearance
Dorothy MontagueAgent
1 appearance
Enrique BebosoAgent
1 appearance
Ian F. GoldCounsel
1 appearance
Jenny KokkasAgent
1 appearance
Joao T. CacadorAgent
1 appearance
John YanthaCounsel
1 appearance
Lillian ByrneAgent
1 appearance
Michael HoranCounsel
1 appearance
Norm MannsAgent
1 appearance
Roland SimoneauAgent
1 appearance
Shawn JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Ontario Form Work Association

Ernesto ArduiniCounsel
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the other respondents

Stephen B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance
B. CarrozziUnion representative
1 appearance
A. RoyUnion representative
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth

David BeckCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

David McKeeCounsel
3 appearances
Jerry RandallCounsel
2 appearances
Laurence ArnoldCounsel
2 appearances
Bryan HackettCounsel
2 appearances
Walter ThorntonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen J. WeinsteinCounsel
2 appearances
Peter ChauvinCounsel
2 appearances
Lloyd HenningCounsel
2 appearances
Donald B. JarvisCounsel
2 appearances
Paul YoungCounsel
2 appearances
Joseph LibermanCounsel
2 appearances
M. E. GeigerCounsel
2 appearances
Carl PetersonAgent
1 appearance
Carole PietteCounsel
1 appearance
C. G. RiggsCounsel
1 appearance
Clare FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance
C. RoweAgent
1 appearance
Dave ChondonCounsel
1 appearance
Dave HallUnion representative
1 appearance
David C. DanielsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Helen O'ReganUnion representative
1 appearance

for the respondent 654812 Ontario Limited carrying on business as Canada Contracting

Rudy A. BianchiCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent and the intervener

Bruce BinningCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent Electrical Trade Bargaining Agency

Eryl RobertsAgent
1 appearance
Karen PetrieAgent
1 appearance
Peter BryantAgent
1 appearance
Scott G. ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent employer

Lionel ColemanAgent
1 appearance
R. Andrew StaniuszCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Guillot Builders Limited

David C. DanielsCounsel
1 appearance
Guy GuillotAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent Krest Masonry Contracting Limited

James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
William JahnAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent Masonry Contractors' Association of Toronto

Joe De CariaCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents

W. ThorntonCounsel
2 appearances
Brian FooteCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce BinningCounsel
1 appearance
Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Carole TruchonCounsel
1 appearance
Chuck HumphreyCounsel
1 appearance
Claude OuelletteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don GuilbeauhAgent
1 appearance
Doug LamonAgent
1 appearance
Douglas WitmerAgent
1 appearance
Harry FreedmanCounsel
1 appearance
Hubert C. SteenbakkersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ian S. CampbellCounsel
1 appearance
James ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance
Maurice PotvinAgent
1 appearance
Michael MulroyCounsel
1 appearance
Nancy AustinAgent
1 appearance
Rene SeguinAgent
1 appearance
Russel W. ZinnCounsel
1 appearance
Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents E. M. and Westroyal

Mauro AngeloniCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

R. BurnsCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent The Labourers' International Union of North America

G. FlookCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent trade union

Ralph TersigniAgent
1 appearance
Frazer CollinsAgent
1 appearance
Laurence C. ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding parties

Graham ClarkeCounsel
1 appearance
Alum FortinCounsel
1 appearance
Robert LefebvreCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding party

Ray WerryCounsel
2 appearances
Richard NixonCounsel
1 appearance
Roy Fitz-GeraldAgent
1 appearance
Stephen A. McArthurCounsel
1 appearance
Oliver ToffolCounsel
1 appearance
Brian ChambersCounsel
1 appearance
David CowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Ed OzimekCounsel
1 appearance
Howard Fitz-GeraldAgent
1 appearance
James RosienAgent
1 appearance
Naomi MorisawaAgent
1 appearance
Neil WeaverAgent
1 appearance
R. A. WerryCounsel
1 appearance
Richard J. CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 785

K. BallUnion representative
1 appearance
N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance

for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters Local 27

David McKeeCounsel
1 appearance
Douglas J. WrayCounsel
1 appearance

for The Visiting Homemakers Association of Hamilton-Wentworth

Barbara CarsonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 2486

Fred KarstCounsel
1 appearance
James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 27

David A. McKeeCounsel
1 appearance
Luis CamaraUnion representative
1 appearance

for United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 785

Dave WatsonUnion representative
1 appearance
Karl BallUnion representative
1 appearance

for United Floor Company Ltd.

David CowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Frank CalviAgent
1 appearance
Vince PanettaAgent
1 appearance
Wally ThorntonAgent
1 appearance

for United Flooring

Frank CalviAgent
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers of America

Michael GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers of America, Local 1005

Brian GreenawayCounsel
1 appearance
Brian ShellCounsel
1 appearance

for Victorian Order of Nurses Brant-Haldimand-Norfolk Branch

Gordon WeirCounsel
1 appearance

for West York Construction Ltd., and Metropolitan Toronto Apartment Builders' Association

Karl MalletteCounsel
1 appearance
Richard J. CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of Oakridge Villa Nursing Home (Extendicare Health Services Inc.)

Judith ClarksonAgent
1 appearance
Paul JarvisAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Ontario Nurses' Association

Cathy GreenUnion representative
1 appearance
Edith KlassenUnion representative
1 appearance
Jean JordanUnion representative
1 appearance
Loretta MikusUnion representative
1 appearance
Mary HodderUnion representative
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Cindy Lee GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance

151

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

1.6

cases/mo

OLRB151(100%)

Decision types

motion

trial

Page 5 of 8 (151 cases)