Who is D. A. MacDonald?

D. A. MacDonald is a board member at the Ontario Labour Relations Board with 151 decisions on record from 1982 to 1994. Key areas include employment and labour law, administrative law, construction law.

What tribunal does D. A. MacDonald sit on?

D. A. MacDonald sits on the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

What areas of law does D. A. MacDonald decide?

D. A. MacDonald's most common areas include Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions), Administrative Law (61 decisions), Construction Law (30 decisions). D. A. MacDonald has handled 151 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has D. A. MacDonald made?

D. A. MacDonald has 151 decisions on record from 1982 to 1994.

Who frequently appears before D. A. MacDonald?

Representatives who frequently appear before D. A. MacDonald include David McKee, Bernard Fishbein, N. L. Jesin.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

D. A. MacDonald — Board Member

Employment and Labour Law

Administrative Law

Construction Law

Other Tribunals

D. A. MacDonald

Board Member·Ontario Labour Relations Board·Since 1982

151

cases · 13 yrs · OLRB

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Board Member· 150Board Member· 1

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 21, 1989

Certification granted for plumbers and steamfitters; welders excluded from bargaining unit unless qualified in trade.

The applicant trade union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for plumbers and steamfitters employed by the respondent in the construction industry.

The applicant requested a clarity note to include welders working in these trades in the bargaining unit.

The Board held that because plumbing and steamfitting are compulsory certified trades under the Apprenticeship and Tradesmen's Qualification Act, only qualified journeymen or apprentices can lawfully work in those trades and be included in the bargaining unit.

The request for a clarity note regarding welders was denied, but the Board granted the application for certification for the qualified tradespersons.

United Brotherhood of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local Union 800 v. O. J. Pipelines Incorporated, 1989 CanLII 2995

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardSep 13, 1989

Board denies union's request to convert certification application and dismisses unfair labour practice complaint regarding employee transfers.

The applicant union sought to convert its application for certification from one requesting a pre-hearing representation vote to a regular application.

The Board denied the request, finding that an applicant must make its choice at the time of filing and cannot later resile from it without consent or extraordinary circumstances.

The Board also dismissed the applicant's unfair labour practice complaint, finding that the respondent employer's transfer of two employees out of the bargaining unit was done in the normal course of operations and was not motivated by anti-union animus.

Consequently, the transferred employees were not entitled to vote in the pre-hearing representation vote.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 27 v. Mollenhauer Limited, 1989 CanLII 2996

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 31, 1989

Pieceworkers employing more than one helper are independent contractors and excluded from the bargaining unit.

The Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183 applied for certification to displace the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 27 as the bargaining agent for carpenters employed by various carpentry contractors in the low-rise residential housing industry.

The primary issue was whether pieceworkers and their helpers were employees of the carpentry contractors.

The Board found that pieceworkers who employ more than one helper exercise fundamental control over those helpers and are therefore the employers of the helpers.

Furthermore, the Board held that such pieceworkers are independent contractors, not dependent contractors, and are excluded from the bargaining units.

The Board also determined that certain foremen exercised managerial functions under section 1(3)(b) of the Labour Relations Act.

Based on these findings, the Board dismissed the certification application regarding Westroyal Carpentry Ltd. as the applicant lacked the requisite membership support, and directed further meetings for the E. M. Carpentry application.

Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183 v. E. M. Carpentry (1982) Limited, 1989 CanLII 3086

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 28, 1989

Individual employee lacks standing to apply for determination of another's employee status under the Labour Relations Act.

The applicant, an individual employee, brought an application under section 106(2) of the Labour Relations Act seeking a determination that another individual was not an employee for the purposes of the Act by virtue of the managerial exclusion in section 1(3)(b).

The Board dismissed the application, affirming established precedent that section 106(2) is intended only to resolve disputes between the immediate parties to a collective bargaining relationship (the trade union and the employer).

As no question had arisen between the bargaining parties, the procedure was not available to an individual employee.

Tracy Castellan v. Chatelaine Villa Nursing Home, 1989 CanLII 3084

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardAug 21, 1989

Board refused employer's request to withdraw related employer application where union's reply sought independent relief.

The applicant employer sought to withdraw its application for a related employer declaration under subsection 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act after a related proceeding determined that another union did not hold bargaining rights for its carpenters.

The respondent union opposed the withdrawal, arguing that its reply contained a separate claim for relief seeking a related employer declaration and bargaining rights across multiple corporations.

The Board refused to grant leave to withdraw, finding that the respondent's claim for relief had a valid labour relations purpose and that requiring the respondent to file a new application would cause unnecessary delay and potential prejudice.

The Board directed that the application be listed for hearing on its merits.

Tactix Construction Limited v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 27, 1989 CanLII 3093

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJul 14, 1989

Union certification granted; $1.00 initiation fee borrowed from co-worker constitutes valid payment on own behalf.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The respondent employer alleged that an employee did not pay the required $1.00 initiation fee on his own behalf, as he borrowed it from another employee.

The Board held a hearing into the non-pay allegation and found that the loan was a bona fide private arrangement, meaning the employee tendered the money on his own behalf.

The Board also refused the employer's request to inspect other membership cards, citing statutory secrecy protections.

Finally, the Board resolved disputes over the list of employees, excluding truck drivers and hoist operators from the construction labourers bargaining unit, and issued certificates to the union.

Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 506 v. Grant Construction, 1989 CanLII 3065

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 28, 1989

Grievance dismissed; subcontractor had just cause to discharge employee barred from site by general contractor.

The union referred a grievance alleging the employer, a subcontractor, terminated the grievor without just cause.

The grievor was barred from the construction site by the general contractor after being identified as the person who threw firecrackers in the work area.

The employer discharged the grievor because it had no other work for him and could not lay him off due to collective agreement obligations.

The Board found that the grievor did throw the firecrackers and that the employer had just cause for discharge, as the general contractor had ultimate control over site access and the employer had no alternative work available.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 353 v. E. S. Fox Limited, 1989 CanLII 3058

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardJun 2, 1989

Union permitted to amend certification application to contract the proposed bargaining unit.

The applicant trade union applied for certification and subsequently sought to amend its proposed bargaining unit to exclude the industrial, commercial, and institutional sectors.

The respondent employer and objecting employees opposed the amendment, arguing it amounted to gerrymandering and that the applicant, as a council of trade unions, could not apply independently.

The Board held that the applicant was entitled to apply under either section 144(1) or (3) of the Labour Relations Act and permitted the amendment, finding it was merely a contraction of the unit and not gerrymandering.

A Labour Relations Officer was authorized to inquire into the composition of the bargaining unit.

Labourers' International Union of North America, Ontario Provincial District Council v. M.W.M. Construction of Kitchener Limited, 1989 CanLII 3255

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 23, 1989

Board approves alternative dispute resolution procedure using a Vice-Chair to resolve bargaining unit exclusions.

The applicant union and respondent university sought the Board's approval for an alternative dispute resolution procedure to resolve approximately 650 challenges to the inclusion of certain persons in the proposed bargaining unit under section 1(3)(b) of the Labour Relations Act.

The procedure involved the appointment of a Vice-Chair to assist the parties and make rulings that would constitute settlements.

The Board approved the procedure, finding it fell within its authority under section 103(2)(h) of the Act to authorize a Vice-Chair to inquire into a matter and report back to the panel.

Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Governing Council of the University of Toronto, 1989 CanLII 3471

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 10, 1989

Employer committed unfair labour practices during union organizing campaign; certification granted and compensation ordered.

The union applied for certification and filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging that the employer interfered with its organizing campaign.

The Board found that the employer violated the Labour Relations Act by interrogating employees about their union support, holding captive audience meetings that threatened job security, laying off two union supporters, and participating in the circulation of an anti-union petition.

The Board ordered the employer to compensate the laid-off employees, post a notice of rights, and permit the union to hold a meeting with employees.

Having resolved the list of employees, the Board granted certification to the union.

Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local 30 v. Rainscreen Metal Systems Incorporated, 1989 CanLII 3474

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMay 1, 1989

Board finds no settlement reached in jurisdictional dispute where offer was conditional and subsequently withdrawn.

The complainant union filed a jurisdictional dispute complaint under section 91 of the Labour Relations Act.

The respondent unions argued that a settlement had been reached between the unions.

The Board found that the complainant's written offer of settlement was conditional upon the approval of a third-party employer association.

Furthermore, the respondent union made a counter-offer which nullified the original offer, and the original offer was withdrawn before any valid acceptance.

The Board concluded that no settlement had been reached and directed that the hearing on the merits of the jurisdictional dispute continue.

The Board also denied a request by the Acoustical Association of Ontario to be added as a party.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 2041 v. Ferano Construction Limited, 1989 CanLII 3468

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardApr 13, 1989

Application for accreditation by employers' organization in the residential construction sector granted.

The Electrical Contractors' Association of Ottawa applied for accreditation as the bargaining agent for employers in the residential sector of the construction industry for whom the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 586 holds bargaining rights in the Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton, the United Counties of Prescott and Russell, and the County of Lanark.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the applicant to be a properly constituted employers' organization and the respondent to be a trade union.

The Board determined the appropriate unit of employers and found that the applicant represented a majority of the employers in the unit, who in turn employed a majority of the employees.

The Board granted the application and issued a certificate of accreditation.

The Electrical Contractors' Association of Ottawa v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 586, 1989 CanLII 3134

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardApr 6, 1989

Individual who occasionally helped out for small sums or meals found to be a casual employee.

The union applied for certification of a bargaining unit.

The employer argued that one of the two individuals in the proposed unit was not an employee, but rather a volunteer or independent contractor who occasionally helped out and received small sums of money or meals.

The Board found that the individual was a casual employee because he provided services in exchange for compensation.

The Board also declined to segregate the full-time and casual employees into separate bargaining units, as doing so would prevent collective bargaining altogether.

A certificate was issued to the union.

The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local Union 27 v. Calvano Lumber & Trim Co. Ltd., 1989 CanLII 3123

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMar 14, 1989

Minor variations in a union's name do not defeat the statutory presumption of trade union status.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The Registrar noted minor differences in punctuation and spelling between the applicant's name and the name previously found to be a trade union by the Board.

The Board held that minor, non-substantive differences in a union's name do not deprive it of the rebuttable evidentiary presumption of trade union status under section 105 of the Labour Relations Act.

The Board found the applicant to be a trade union and directed the Registrar to amend the trade union status records accordingly.

United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local Union 46 v. Pioneer Mechanical Limited, 1989 CanLII 3115

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardMar 7, 1989

Requests to reconsider Board decision on construction industry bargaining units and collective agreement interpretation dismissed.

The interveners and respondents requested that the Ontario Labour Relations Board reconsider its previous decision regarding the interpretation of collective agreements and the permitting of a craft carve-out for carpenters.

The Board reviewed its broad power to reconsider decisions under section 106(1) of the Labour Relations Act but noted its stringent approach requiring obvious error, new policy issues, or new conclusive evidence.

Finding that the parties were merely seeking to re-argue the case and that no relevant ambiguity existed in the agreements, the Board dismissed the requests for reconsideration while making minor typographical amendments to the original decision.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 27 v. Ellis-Don Limited, 1989 CanLII 3111

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardFeb 7, 1989

Board declines to exclude unlawfully hired employees from bargaining unit due to interveners' lack of diligence.

In an application for certification, the interveners argued that certain employees should not be counted in the bargaining unit because they were hired contrary to the existing collective agreement, relying on the April Waterproofing principle.

The Board declined to apply the principle, finding that the interveners had failed to act with reasonable diligence to enforce their bargaining rights after becoming aware of the project's resumption.

The Board directed that the ballots of the eligible employees be counted for bargaining unit #1, and dismissed the application respecting bargaining unit #2.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Aero Block and Precast Ltd., 1982 CanLII 1265

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardFeb 6, 1989

Provincial labour board has jurisdiction over vibration monitoring employees working on provincial construction near federal pipeline.

The applicant union sought certification for construction labourers employed by the respondent.

The respondent argued the work fell under federal jurisdiction because it involved monitoring vibrations near a federal pipeline.

The Board found that the work was integral to the construction of a provincial telecommunications cable, not the ongoing operation of the federal pipeline, and thus fell within provincial jurisdiction.

The Board also determined that the employees were engaged in the construction industry and were properly classified as construction labourers, as their work was commonly associated with blasting.

Labourers International Union of North America, Local 607 v. Vibration Assessment Limited, 1988 CanLII 3585

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardDec 8, 1988

Board permits craft carve-out for carpenters in construction industry certification applications and interprets existing agreements.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent carpenters and carpenters' apprentices employed by the respondents.

The respondents and interveners argued that the employees were already covered by existing collective agreements (the MTABA Agreement and the Ellis-Don Agreement) and that the applicant should not be permitted to carve out its craft from the existing bargaining units.

The Board found that the MTABA and Ellis-Don Agreements did not cover carpenters or carpenters' apprentices, denying status to the MTABA and limiting the status of Local 183.

The Board further held that, consistent with the craft-oriented nature of the construction industry and the provisions of the Labour Relations Act, the applicant was permitted to carve out its craft from the existing Form Work style agreement.

The Board defined the appropriate bargaining units and directed further hearings for the remaining issues.

United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 27 v. Ellis-Don Limited, 1988 CanLII 3603

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardDec 2, 1988

Union certified to represent electricians in the construction industry; dispute over employee list deemed immaterial.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent electricians and electricians' apprentices employed by the respondent in the construction industry.

The parties disagreed on whether the bargaining unit description should include the word 'registered' and whether two specific individuals should be included in the employee list.

The Board determined that the bargaining unit should be described without the word 'registered', consistent with its general practice and the relevant designation order.

The Board found it unnecessary to resolve the dispute over the two individuals because the union had more than 55% membership support regardless of their inclusion.

Certificates were issued to the applicant.

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1687 v. 510706 Ontario Limited, operating as Superior Contracting, 1988 CanLII 3611

OLRBOntario Labour Relations BoardNov 18, 1988

Board declined to interrupt Labour Relations Officer's inquiry to review rulings on bargaining unit challenges.

During a union certification application involving a large proposed bargaining unit, a pre-hearing vote was held with approximately one-third of the ballots segregated due to challenges by the respondent employer.

The parties agreed to a procedure for Labour Relations Officers to examine the challenged persons.

During the inquiry, the employer sought orders from the Board to require the Officers to make a full inquiry into certain duties and to permit the employer to add to the list of challenged individuals, effectively appealing the Officers' rulings.

The Board dismissed the request, holding that it is inconsistent with the expeditious conduct of an Officer's inquiry to interrupt it to review rulings, and directed the Officers to continue their inquiry.

C.U.P.E. v. Governing Council of the University of Toronto, 1988 CanLII 3712

Page 4 of 8 (151 cases)

for Acco Canadian Material Handling, a Division of Babcock Industries Canada Inc.

Anthony H. AllenCounsel
1 appearance
Fred HeeremaCounsel
1 appearance

for a group of employees

Allan RoussySelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard D. PennerSelf-represented
1 appearance

for all respondents

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance
John MarchildonCounsel
1 appearance

for Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 113

David E. GaudetteUnion representative
1 appearance

for A. Reisman Construction Limited and Red Banner Developments Limited

Al ReismanAgent
1 appearance
Joe CarrierCounsel
1 appearance
Manny BrykmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Brant County Home Care Program

Margaret ScottCounsel
1 appearance
Paul StillmanCounsel
1 appearance

for Comcare (Canada) Limited

Lewis NickersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lisa HamiltonCounsel
1 appearance
Robert CalderCounsel
1 appearance

for E. H. Price Limited

Philip R. MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellis-Don Limited, Milne & Nicholls Ltd. and Mollenhauer Limited

W. ThorntonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ferano Construction Limited

D. FerrarottoAgent
1 appearance
George RontirisCounsel
1 appearance

for Fred T. Reisman & Associates and M. R. Primary Trust

Fred ReismanAgent
1 appearance
Pamela YudcovitchCounsel
1 appearance

for F. T. Construction Inc., respondents

Fernando OliveiraAgent
1 appearance

for George Reisman Limited, Resigeorge Management Limited and G. R. Primary Trust

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Hamilton-Wentworth Home Care Program - Victorian Order of Nurses and Victorian Order of Nurses Respite Program

Brian LawsonCounsel
1 appearance

for International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades

Frank McCoolCounsel
1 appearance

for intervener #1

Ann MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Ann PepperCounsel
1 appearance
C. M. DassiosCounsel
1 appearance
David WarrenCounsel
1 appearance
Mal GodinCounsel
1 appearance
Mike TapaCounsel
1 appearance

for intervener #1 and The Form Work Council of Ontario

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance

for Intervener #1 and The Form Work Council of Ontario

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance

for interveners #1 and #2

Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
Rocco LotitoCounsel
1 appearance

for Ironworkers District Council of Ontario and International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Ironworkers, Local 700

F. MarrCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for Ironworkers, Local 700

G. MichalukCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for Jaddco Anderson Ltd.

B. TimminsCounsel
1 appearance
D. L. BrisbinCounsel
1 appearance

for Johnson Controls Ltd.

Ron McMasterAgent
1 appearance
Suzanne DuncanCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers 506

Tony CornacchiaUnion representative
1 appearance

for Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 1081

Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
Jo BraunCounsel
1 appearance
Paul TrudelleCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183

C. DeToniUnion representative
1 appearance
L. A. RichmondCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers Local 1081

Keith RimmingtonUnion representative
1 appearance

for Labourers' Local 183

A. PintoAgent
1 appearance
L. A. RichmondCounsel
1 appearance
Q. CeolinAgent
1 appearance

for Labourers' Local 183 and The Form Work Council of Ontario

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers' Ontario Provincial District Council

Arthur AdamsCounsel
1 appearance
John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Labourers, Ontario Provincial District Council

Larry SteinbergCounsel
1 appearance
Susan PhilpotCounsel
1 appearance

for Med Care Partnership

Charles HumphreyCounsel
1 appearance
Maryann CrnekovicCounsel
1 appearance

for Medical Personnel Pool (Hamilton) Ltd.

Larry G. CulverCounsel
1 appearance
Larry KielbowichCounsel
1 appearance
Tom DixonCounsel
1 appearance

for Metropolitan Plumbing and Heating Contractors Association

Ed WinterCounsel
1 appearance
Mark GeigerCounsel
1 appearance
Martin RosenbaumCounsel
1 appearance
Robert SalisburyCounsel
1 appearance

for Metropolitan Plumbing Contractors Association, Urban Mechanical Contractors Limited, Zentil Plumbing and Heating Co. Ltd., Lou Pupolin Plumbing and Heating Ltd., Keele Plumbing and Heating Ltd., DiMarco Plumbing and Heating Co. Ltd., Municipal Plumbing and Heating Ltd., Cesan Mechanical Systems Ltd., D. Zentil Mechanical Ltd.

M. E. GeigerCounsel
1 appearance
Howard RoherCounsel
1 appearance
Edward J. WinterCounsel
1 appearance
Martin RosenbaumCounsel
1 appearance

for Millwrights Local 1244

N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance
H. MartinakCounsel
1 appearance

for Millwrights, Local 1244

H. MartinakCounsel
1 appearance
N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance

for Millwrights, Local 1592

P. FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Mohawk Medical Services

Sue McGregorCounsel
1 appearance
John D. LewisCounsel
1 appearance
Donald B. JarvisCounsel
1 appearance

for Olsten Health Care Services

Jane RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance
Michelle GageCounsel
1 appearance
Anne HardyCounsel
1 appearance

for Ontario Sheet Metal and Air Handling Group and Megatech Contracting Limited

Keith BillingsCounsel
1 appearance
L. CianfaraniAgent
1 appearance

for Para-Med Health Services

Jennifer BarnesCounsel
1 appearance
Mel RhinelanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union

Robin McArthurCounsel
1 appearance
Eric del JuncoCounsel
1 appearance

for Sean O'Ryan and Local 46

V. McNeilCounsel
1 appearance
L. C. ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance

for Sean O'Ryan and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 46

L. C. ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
V. McNeilCounsel
1 appearance

for Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local 47 and Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Ontario Sheet Metal Workers' Conference

Ross MitchellAgent
1 appearance
Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
R. BellevilleAgent
1 appearance

for Square One Carpentry Inc.

Michele DiBiaseAgent
1 appearance
Carmine DiBiaseAgent
1 appearance

for the applicant

David McKeeCounsel
5 appearances
Bernard FishbeinCounsel
4 appearances
N. L. JesinCounsel
4 appearances
P. TurtleCounsel
3 appearances
A. M. MinskyCounsel
3 appearances
Douglas J. WrayCounsel
3 appearances
Nancy CourtneyCounsel
2 appearances
Maurice A. GreenCounsel
2 appearances
A. J. AheeAgent
2 appearances
L. SteinbergCounsel
2 appearances
Michael A. ChurchCounsel
2 appearances
Luis CamaraUnion representative
2 appearances
W. CurtisCounsel
2 appearances
L. A. RichmondCounsel
2 appearances
Bill VeitchCounsel
1 appearance
Bill WeatherupCounsel
1 appearance
Bob HumphriesCounsel
1 appearance
Brian SheehanCounsel
1 appearance
Brian ShellCounsel
1 appearance
Carl MorganAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Mary M. McCormickCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant/complainant

Elizabeth MitchellCounsel
3 appearances
Douglas J. WrayCounsel
1 appearance
Duane WellsCounsel
1 appearance
Ed FerreiraUnion representative
1 appearance
Frank ManoniUnion representative
1 appearance
G. CarolineAgent
1 appearance
Jack PorterAgent
1 appearance
Jim MoffattCounsel
1 appearance
Jim MoffattUnion representative
1 appearance
Joe AlmeidaAgent
1 appearance
N. W. MeikleAgent
1 appearance
Paul SimmonsUnion representative
1 appearance
Peter SimmonsUnion representative
1 appearance
R. TierAgent
1 appearance
Tom CrystalUnion representative
1 appearance
Tony BucciAgent
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance
David A. McKeeCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicants

Balbir KlerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Boris UlehlaCounsel
1 appearance
Charlene BanwaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
David StrangCounsel
1 appearance
Debbie MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Denis LaRocqueUnion representative
1 appearance
Doug AndersonCounsel
1 appearance
Linda MicksCounsel
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance
Richard ZawislakCounsel
1 appearance
Sean FitzpatrickCounsel
1 appearance
S. VirkSelf-represented
1 appearance

for The Canadian Red Cross Society Ontario Division

Tim LiznickCounsel
1 appearance
Barb HeatheringtonCounsel
1 appearance
Geoff GrahamCounsel
1 appearance
Helen FleischmanCounsel
1 appearance
Janice BakerCounsel
1 appearance
Robert LittleCounsel
1 appearance
Barbara TrahanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Carpenters

Dave WatsonUnion representative
1 appearance
Joe AlmeidaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Carpenters' District Council of Toronto and Vicinity on behalf of Locals 27 and 1304, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Jointers of America

Douglas J. WrayCounsel
1 appearance
James SmithCounsel
1 appearance
John CartwrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the complainant

James HayesCounsel
2 appearances
Martin SarraCounsel
1 appearance
Mohamed S. SabounjiCounsel
1 appearance
N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance
Robin B. CumineCounsel
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance
D. LangtryCounsel
1 appearance
Andy PilatAgent
1 appearance
Bob LeoneAgent
1 appearance
Bruce BinningCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher DassiosCounsel
1 appearance
Denis PowerCounsel
1 appearance
Donald GuilbeaultUnion representative
1 appearance
Ed OgibowskiCounsel
1 appearance
Everette ChapelleSelf-represented
1 appearance
H. MartinakCounsel
1 appearance
J. D. WatsonCounsel
1 appearance
Lawrence BranderAgent
1 appearance
Mark ContiniCounsel
1 appearance

for the complainant Bonita Clark

Laura TrachukCounsel
1 appearance
Mary CornishCounsel
1 appearance
Nelson RolandCounsel
1 appearance
Stan GrayAgent
1 appearance

for the complainants

Frank SheppardCounsel
1 appearance
J. Barry FraserSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul YoungCounsel
1 appearance
Royce S. ArnoldAgent
1 appearance

for the complainants/applicant

G. GrossmanCounsel
2 appearances
D. LewisSelf-represented
1 appearance
D. LewisAgent
1 appearance
W. J. McCarronAgent
1 appearance
W. J. McCarronSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the corporate respondents

Edward I. WinterCounsel
1 appearance
Howard RoherCounsel
1 appearance
Martin RosenbaumCounsel
1 appearance
M. E. GeigerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Electrical Contractors Association of Hamilton

J. Cameron NolanCounsel
1 appearance
S. C. BernardoCounsel
1 appearance

for The Form Work Council of Ontario and Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183

R. LotitoCounsel
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for the group of employees

Carl HughesAgent
1 appearance
Douglas BowmanAgent
1 appearance

for the IBEW and the IBEW Construction Council of Ontario

A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance
Donald LoundsAgent
1 appearance
Pat DillonAgent
1 appearance
Ralph TersigniAgent
1 appearance

for the International Association of Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers, Local 95

Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance
Robert 0. BeamishCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Kenneth G. Rose, Local 105, P. Dillon and T. Beattie

A.M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 105, P. Dillon and T. Beattie

S. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for the International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades and Ontario Council of International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades, Local Union 1891

Maurice A. GreenCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervener

A. DionysioCounsel
1 appearance
A. M. MinskyCounsel
1 appearance
Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance
Brian FooteCounsel
1 appearance
Chris EamesAgent
1 appearance
Cindy CollinsAgent
1 appearance
D. H. PeirceCounsel
1 appearance
E. BairosCounsel
1 appearance
Ed WinterAgent
1 appearance
F. J. W. BickfordCounsel
1 appearance
Jack SlaughterCounsel
1 appearance
Jim BacarriCounsel
1 appearance
J. R. WachoskiCounsel
1 appearance
J. SteffaniniCounsel
1 appearance
Lee WoodsAgent
1 appearance
Mark GeigerCounsel
1 appearance
Martin RosenbaumCounsel
1 appearance
Maurice A. GreenCounsel
1 appearance
Maurice BoucherAgent
1 appearance
Michael QuinnCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervener

R. WeissUnion representative
1 appearance
Susan PhilpottCounsel
1 appearance

for the interveners The Toronto Star and The Hamilton Spectator

Stuart M. RobertsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervener The Globe & Mail

Peter JacobsenCounsel
1 appearance

for the intervenor

Dave FoleyUnion representative
1 appearance
Elizabeth ForsterCounsel
1 appearance
John MoszynskiCounsel
1 appearance
Mike PopovichCounsel
1 appearance
Ron RupkeUnion representative
1 appearance
Tony LaMacchiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ironworkers

D. GirardUnion representative
1 appearance
J. PhairUnion representative
1 appearance
S. B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance

for the Labourers

C. DetoniCounsel
1 appearance
C. M. MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Labour Relations Bureau of the Ontario General Contractors Association, James Thomson, and Provincial Employer Bargaining Agency - Labourers

Joseph LibermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Metropolitan Toronto Apartment Builders Association

Doug GilbertCounsel
3 appearances

for the Millwrights

E. RyanUnion representative
1 appearance
N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance

for the objector

William A. LamonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the objectors

Ann LomackAgent
1 appearance
Armindo CascaoAgent
1 appearance
Art HordykCounsel
1 appearance
Betty IsbisterAgent
1 appearance
Bill BonvanieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bill HenninkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian St. GermainCounsel
1 appearance
Cindy DobbinAgent
1 appearance
Cindy MedeirosAgent
1 appearance
Dorothy MontagueAgent
1 appearance
Enrique BebosoAgent
1 appearance
Ian F. GoldCounsel
1 appearance
Jenny KokkasAgent
1 appearance
Joao T. CacadorAgent
1 appearance
John YanthaCounsel
1 appearance
Lillian ByrneAgent
1 appearance
Michael HoranCounsel
1 appearance
Norm MannsAgent
1 appearance
Roland SimoneauAgent
1 appearance
Shawn JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance

for The Ontario Form Work Association

Ernesto ArduiniCounsel
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the other respondents

Stephen B. D. WahlCounsel
1 appearance
B. CarrozziUnion representative
1 appearance
A. RoyUnion representative
1 appearance

for The Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth

David BeckCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

David McKeeCounsel
3 appearances
Jerry RandallCounsel
2 appearances
Laurence ArnoldCounsel
2 appearances
Bryan HackettCounsel
2 appearances
Walter ThorntonCounsel
2 appearances
Karen J. WeinsteinCounsel
2 appearances
Peter ChauvinCounsel
2 appearances
Lloyd HenningCounsel
2 appearances
Donald B. JarvisCounsel
2 appearances
Paul YoungCounsel
2 appearances
Joseph LibermanCounsel
2 appearances
M. E. GeigerCounsel
2 appearances
Carl PetersonAgent
1 appearance
Carole PietteCounsel
1 appearance
C. G. RiggsCounsel
1 appearance
Clare FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance
C. RoweAgent
1 appearance
Dave ChondonCounsel
1 appearance
Dave HallUnion representative
1 appearance
David C. DanielsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Helen O'ReganUnion representative
1 appearance

for the respondent 654812 Ontario Limited carrying on business as Canada Contracting

Rudy A. BianchiCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent and the intervener

Bruce BinningCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent Electrical Trade Bargaining Agency

Eryl RobertsAgent
1 appearance
Karen PetrieAgent
1 appearance
Peter BryantAgent
1 appearance
Scott G. ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent employer

Lionel ColemanAgent
1 appearance
R. Andrew StaniuszCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Guillot Builders Limited

David C. DanielsCounsel
1 appearance
Guy GuillotAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent Krest Masonry Contracting Limited

James G. KnightCounsel
1 appearance
William JahnAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent Masonry Contractors' Association of Toronto

Joe De CariaCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents

W. ThorntonCounsel
2 appearances
Brian FooteCounsel
1 appearance
Bruce BinningCounsel
1 appearance
Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Carole TruchonCounsel
1 appearance
Chuck HumphreyCounsel
1 appearance
Claude OuelletteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Don GuilbeauhAgent
1 appearance
Doug LamonAgent
1 appearance
Douglas WitmerAgent
1 appearance
Harry FreedmanCounsel
1 appearance
Hubert C. SteenbakkersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ian S. CampbellCounsel
1 appearance
James ThomsonCounsel
1 appearance
Maurice PotvinAgent
1 appearance
Michael MulroyCounsel
1 appearance
Nancy AustinAgent
1 appearance
Rene SeguinAgent
1 appearance
Russel W. ZinnCounsel
1 appearance
Bernard FishbeinCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents E. M. and Westroyal

Mauro AngeloniCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America

R. BurnsCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent The Labourers' International Union of North America

G. FlookCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent trade union

Ralph TersigniAgent
1 appearance
Frazer CollinsAgent
1 appearance
Laurence C. ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding parties

Graham ClarkeCounsel
1 appearance
Alum FortinCounsel
1 appearance
Robert LefebvreCounsel
1 appearance

for the responding party

Ray WerryCounsel
2 appearances
Richard NixonCounsel
1 appearance
Roy Fitz-GeraldAgent
1 appearance
Stephen A. McArthurCounsel
1 appearance
Oliver ToffolCounsel
1 appearance
Brian ChambersCounsel
1 appearance
David CowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Ed OzimekCounsel
1 appearance
Howard Fitz-GeraldAgent
1 appearance
James RosienAgent
1 appearance
Naomi MorisawaAgent
1 appearance
Neil WeaverAgent
1 appearance
R. A. WerryCounsel
1 appearance
Richard J. CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 785

K. BallUnion representative
1 appearance
N. L. JesinCounsel
1 appearance

for the United Brotherhood of Carpenters Local 27

David McKeeCounsel
1 appearance
Douglas J. WrayCounsel
1 appearance

for The Visiting Homemakers Association of Hamilton-Wentworth

Barbara CarsonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 2486

Fred KarstCounsel
1 appearance
James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 27

David A. McKeeCounsel
1 appearance
Luis CamaraUnion representative
1 appearance

for United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 785

Dave WatsonUnion representative
1 appearance
Karl BallUnion representative
1 appearance

for United Floor Company Ltd.

David CowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Frank CalviAgent
1 appearance
Vince PanettaAgent
1 appearance
Wally ThorntonAgent
1 appearance

for United Flooring

Frank CalviAgent
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers of America

Michael GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers of America, Local 1005

Brian GreenawayCounsel
1 appearance
Brian ShellCounsel
1 appearance

for Victorian Order of Nurses Brant-Haldimand-Norfolk Branch

Gordon WeirCounsel
1 appearance

for West York Construction Ltd., and Metropolitan Toronto Apartment Builders' Association

Karl MalletteCounsel
1 appearance
Richard J. CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of Oakridge Villa Nursing Home (Extendicare Health Services Inc.)

Judith ClarksonAgent
1 appearance
Paul JarvisAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Ontario Nurses' Association

Cathy GreenUnion representative
1 appearance
Edith KlassenUnion representative
1 appearance
Jean JordanUnion representative
1 appearance
Loretta MikusUnion representative
1 appearance
Mary HodderUnion representative
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Cindy Lee GallagherSelf-represented
1 appearance

151

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

1.6

cases/mo

OLRB151(100%)

Decision types

motion

trial

Page 4 of 8 (151 cases)