Anthony Brown

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Based on the membership evidence filed, the Board determined that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees in the voting constituency, with segregated ballots for disputed Department Manager positions.

The applicants applied for a review of an order to pay under the Employment Standards Act.

On the date the hearing was scheduled to resume, the applicants advised the Board in writing that they accepted the Ministry's assessment for all remaining employees.

As this resolved all matters in dispute, the Board terminated the proceeding, noting the applicants' intention to seek judicial review of an earlier decision finding two of the applicants to be related businesses.

The applicants filed an application for termination of bargaining rights.

The responding union objected that the application was untimely under section 67(1)(a) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 and section 12 of the Hospital Labour Disputes Arbitration Act (HLDAA).

The employer agreed the application was untimely.

The Board found that section 12 of HLDAA applied and the application was not brought within an open period.

The application was dismissed as untimely.

The applicant sought to withdraw the application.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant filed an application against the union.

On consent of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board adjourned the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.

The applicants sought to withdraw their application against the respondent union.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant sought leave to withdraw the application.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.

The applicant filed an application alleging failure to comply with the terms of a settlement regarding a previous duty of fair representation complaint.

At the outset of the hearing, the Board was informed that the applicant had filed a new duty of fair representation complaint against the same union involving the same employer.

On agreement of the parties, the Board directed that both applications be scheduled to be heard together at a consultation.

The applicant requested to withdraw the application.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant sought a review of a refusal to issue an order under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The parties subsequently entered into written Minutes of Settlement with the assistance of a Labour Relations Officer.

As the settlement disposed of all issues in dispute, the Board terminated the application in accordance with subsection 69.1(5) of the Act.

The applicant sought a review of an Employment Standards Officer's refusal to issue an order to pay against the employer.

A hearing was scheduled, but neither the applicant nor the employer appeared.

As the applicant bore the onus of producing evidence and failed to do so, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application.

The employer and the trade union made a joint application for the Board's consent to the early termination of their collective agreement.

Notices were posted on the employer's premises, and no objections were filed by any affected employees.

The Board granted its consent to the early termination of the collective agreement.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent registered nurses at the responding party's long term care home.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate will issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees at the responding party's long term care home.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicants filed an application to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

A representation vote was held, and not more than 50 per cent of the ballots cast by employees in the bargaining unit were in opposition to the union.

Consequently, the Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and ordered the destruction of the ballots after 30 days.

The applicant sought review of an Employment Standards Officer's refusal to issue an order to pay.

At the hearing, the applicant no longer disputed the assessed amounts but requested the Board to issue a decision affirming the officer's findings while explicitly excluding any determination on termination pay, in order to preserve her right to pursue a civil action for wrongful dismissal under section 64.3 of the Employment Standards Act.

The Board dismissed the application, finding that the officer was entitled to investigate termination pay and that it is not the Board's role to determine whether the applicant's complaint bars a civil action.

The applicant union and responding employer requested that a representation vote scheduled for October 19, 2001, be rescheduled because affected employees were not scheduled to work that day.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and directed that the representation vote be held on October 22, 2001.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, based on a prior Registrar's certificate.

Finding that at least forty percent of the individuals in the agreed-upon bargaining unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be held.

The applicants applied under section 63 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 for a declaration terminating the responding party's bargaining rights.

The Board found the application timely and that not less than forty per cent of the employees in the bargaining unit had expressed a wish not to be represented by the trade union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken.