22 total
Summary judgment dismisses conspiracy claim lacking evidence of agreement or damages.
The defendants brought a motion for summary judgment dismissing a civil claim alleging conspiracy relating to vehicle brake repairs and allegedly inflated pricing for brake disc/rotors.
The plaintiff alleged that the defendants conspired to overcharge for parts and to conceal a warped rotor by loosening a wheel bearing, seeking compensatory and punitive damages.
The court held that the tort of civil conspiracy requires proof of an agreement and resulting damages, as articulated in Canada Cement LaFarge Ltd. v. British Columbia Lightweight Aggregate Ltd. The evidentiary record contained no evidence of any agreement among the defendants or of damages arising from the alleged conspiracy.
Summary judgment was therefore granted dismissing the conspiracy claims, while the remaining repair-related claims were allowed to proceed to trial.
Board asserts provincial jurisdiction over interconnect company's labour relations and orders representation vote.
The Communications Workers of Canada applied for certification to represent employees of CTG Telecommunications Systems, an interconnect company that sells, installs, and maintains telephone systems.
The respondent challenged the Ontario Labour Relations Board's jurisdiction, arguing its operations were an integral part of the Bell Canada network and thus fell under federal jurisdiction.
The Board held that the respondent's operations were not vital, essential, or integral to the core federal undertaking of Bell Canada, and therefore fell within provincial jurisdiction.
The Board also determined the composition of the appropriate bargaining unit and ordered a representation vote.