Monty Dhaliwal

The defendants sought leave to amend their statement of defence to introduce new allegations regarding a complicated ownership scheme and a prior conflict of interest involving their former counsel, who was also the plaintiff's agent's deceased brother.

The plaintiff opposed, arguing irreparable prejudice due to the death of the former counsel.

The court granted leave to amend, finding that the amendments were prima facie meritorious and any prejudice could be compensated by costs or adjournment, aligning with the principle of proportionality to ensure all relevant information is before the court.