The plaintiff sought to enforce a 2008 Quebec default judgment against the defendants in Ontario.
The defendants raised a two-year limitation period defence under the Limitations Act, 2002.
The plaintiff argued that the action was not prescribed due to acknowledgment of debt, discoverability, or promissory estoppel.
The court found no valid written acknowledgment, rejected the discoverability argument as the plaintiff knew or ought to have known the defendants were domiciled in Ontario and had means to enforce the judgment, and dismissed the promissory estoppel claim due to a lack of evidence of an intention to affect legal relations regarding the limitation period.
The action was dismissed as prescribed, and costs were awarded to the defendants.