The moving party, Dramel Limited (respondent in the appeal), brought a motion for security for costs against the appellants, Gurnam Multani and Surjit Multani, in an appeal concerning over $25 million in mortgage debts.
The court granted the motion, finding that the appeal was frivolous and vexatious under Rule 61.06(1)(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, given the appellants' concession of unpaid loans, acknowledged amounts in forbearance agreements, and findings of deliberate attempts to mislead the court.
The court also determined that the appellants had insufficient assets to cover appeal costs and noted a history of procedural delay and unwillingness to pay.
Security for costs was ordered for both the appeal and a prior costs order.