Émilie Bruneau

The member faced allegations of professional misconduct for physically and psychologically abusing students, including poking a student in the chest, drawing on a student's arm, and engaging in intimidating behaviour such as kicking a water bottle and throwing a highlighter.

The member pleaded no contest to the allegations.

The Discipline Committee found the member guilty of professional misconduct.

Accepting a joint submission on penalty, the Committee ordered a reprimand, a three-month suspension of the member's certificate, and the completion of a course on anger management and appropriate disciplinary measures.

The Member, a teacher, faced allegations of professional misconduct for bringing a urinary catheter and a diagram of a vulva into a classroom and showing students how to insert it, and for repeatedly making false statements to her school board to obtain paid sick leave while attending court for personal matters.

The Member pleaded no contest to the allegations.

The Discipline Committee found the Member guilty of professional misconduct, including disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional conduct.

Accepting a joint submission on penalty, the Committee ordered a reprimand, a two-month suspension of her Certificate of Qualification and Registration, and the successful completion of a course on professional ethics and boundaries.

The Member, a teacher, faced allegations of professional misconduct for verbally, physically, and psychologically abusing multiple students over several years.

The Member pleaded no contest to the allegations, admitting to incidents involving unnecessary physical force, aggressive language, and leaving students unsupervised.

The Discipline Committee accepted the uncontested facts and found the Member guilty of professional misconduct.

Accepting a joint submission on penalty, the Committee ordered a reprimand, a five-month suspension of the Member's certificate, and the completion of a course on classroom and anger management.

The Discipline Committee of the Ontario College of Teachers held a penalty hearing for a member previously found to have engaged in professional misconduct.

The member failed to implement individualized education plans (IEPs), made inappropriate remarks to students, and was insubordinate to her principal.

The member did not attend the penalty hearing.

The Committee ordered a reprimand, an eight-month suspension of the member's Certificate of Qualification and Registration, and the successful completion of a course on classroom management, appropriate communication, and boundary violations before returning to teaching.

The Member requested an adjournment of her discipline hearing, citing pending complaints involving third parties and a recent hospitalization.

The College consented to the adjournment but requested conditions.

The Discipline Committee granted the adjournment subject to conditions, including that the Member confirm the language of the hearing, a new date be set within five months, the parties discuss the case, and the Member provide a detailed medical report if seeking a future adjournment on medical grounds.

The Discipline Committee held a penalty hearing for a teacher previously found guilty of professional misconduct, including failing to accommodate students with IEPs, inadequate supervision, inappropriate remarks, and insubordination.

The member did not attend the hearing.

The Committee ordered a written reprimand, an 8-month suspension of her certificate of qualification and registration, and the successful completion of a pre-approved course on classroom management and professional boundaries before returning to practice.

Written reasons were to follow.

The Ontario College of Teachers brought allegations of professional misconduct against a teacher for incidents occurring during the 2016-2017 academic year.

The allegations included failing to accommodate a student's Individual Education Plan, inadequately supervising students, making inappropriate and religiously-themed comments to students, and failing to assess student work or follow the approved curriculum.

The Discipline Committee found that the College proved the allegations on a balance of probabilities.

The Committee concluded that the teacher committed professional misconduct by failing to maintain the standards of the profession, verbally and psychologically abusing students, failing to supervise adequately, and engaging in disgraceful, dishonourable, and unprofessional conduct.

Le comité de discipline a tenu une audience sur la sanction après avoir conclu que l'enseignant avait commis une faute professionnelle en montrant des vidéos inappropriées, en faisant des commentaires inappropriés et en manquant à son devoir de surveillance.

Le comité a ordonné une réprimande, une suspension de trois mois de son certificat de qualification et d'inscription, et l'obligation de suivre un cours sur la gestion de classe avant de pouvoir accepter un nouveau poste.

Le comité a également ordonné à l'enseignant de payer des frais de 5 000 $ à l'Ordre, en tenant compte de son manque de coopération partiel et de sa capacité de payer.

The member, a teacher, faced allegations of professional misconduct for verbally, physically, and psychologically abusing students, including an incident where she pulled a student's chair, causing the student to fall.

The member pleaded no contest to the allegations and entered into an undertaking to resign from the College and never seek reinstatement.

The Discipline Committee found the member guilty of professional misconduct and, accepting a joint submission on penalty, ordered that the member be reprimanded.

The Member, a school principal, faced allegations of professional misconduct including unauthorized absences, inappropriate personal use of a board credit card, claiming expenses multiple times, issuing cheques without supporting documents, failing to disclose a conflict of interest regarding the hiring of a relative, and creating a toxic work environment.

The Member pled guilty to the allegations via an Agreed Statement of Facts.

The Discipline Committee found the Member guilty of professional misconduct and accepted a joint submission on penalty, ordering a reprimand, a five-month suspension of her certificate, and the completion of a professional ethics course.