122 total
Appeal from Social Benefits Tribunal dismissed because the appellant raised factual complaints rather than questions of law.
The appellant appealed a decision of the Social Benefits Tribunal regarding the administration and calculation of her entitlements under the Ontario Works Act.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, holding that appeals under the Act are restricted to questions of law.
Because the appellant raised only administrative and factual complaints, the court found no error of law.
Limitation period for credit card debt begins when agreement is terminated and debt becomes payable.
The appellants appealed a summary judgment decision granting the respondent bank recovery of a credit card debt.
The central issue was whether the action was barred by the six-year limitation period.
The Divisional Court upheld the motions judge's finding that the limitation period began to run when the bank terminated the credit card agreement and the entire debt became immediately payable, rather than on the date of the initial missed minimum payment.
The appeal was dismissed.