The appellant appealed an order striking his pleadings in their entirety and refusing leave to amend.
The pleadings alleged assault, breach of contract, malicious prosecution, unreasonable refusal of club membership, and defamation.
The Court of Appeal found that the new allegations were not raised before the motion judge and were inadequately pleaded, the membership refusal did not give rise to a cause of action, and the defamation claim lacked the required specificity.
The court upheld the motion judge's discretionary decision to refuse leave to amend due to the passage of time and failure to provide proposed amended pleadings.
The appeal was dismissed.