The appellant, a registered social service worker, appealed a Discipline Committee decision finding her guilty of professional misconduct for surreptitiously recording a meeting and posting a hyperlink to confidential child protection records online.
She argued the Committee erred because she had been acquitted of criminal and provincial offences arising from the same conduct.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Committee was not bound by the criminal acquittal due to different evidentiary standards and evidence.
The court upheld the Committee's findings that the appellant published identifying information contrary to the Child and Family Services Act and engaged in disgraceful, dishonourable, or unprofessional conduct.
The penalty, including a six-month suspension, was affirmed.