Russell Goodfellow

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The intervenor union requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement, noting it had dealt with these requests in other decisions.

Having found the bargaining unit appropriate and noting that more than 50% of the ballots in the representation vote were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification and won a representation vote among the employees of the responding party.

The intervenor union requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement request, consistent with its previous decisions, and issued a certificate to the applicant union.

The applicant union applied for certification and won a representation vote.

The intervenor union requested that the Board postpone its disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement request, consistent with its previous decisions, and ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The intervenor requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in the Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement, noting it agreed with other Board decisions dealing with these requests.

Having found the bargaining unit appropriate and that more than fifty per cent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant in a representation vote, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees at Merrymount Children's Centre.

The intervenor union requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement requests, consistent with its previous decisions.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The intervenor union requested a postponement of the disposition based on a pending contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement request, noting it had dealt with and agreed with other Board decisions on this issue.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties on the bargaining unit description, and the representation vote where more than fifty percent of ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of nursing staff employed by the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that the proposed bargaining unit is appropriate.

Based on the membership evidence, the Board directed that a representation vote be held.

The responding party's section 8.1 notice was not numerically relevant, so the ballot box will not be sealed.

The Ontario Nurses' Association applied to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

On consent of the parties, the Board adjourned the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The responding party and intervenor requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement, noting it had dealt with these requests in other decisions.

Having found the bargaining unit appropriate and that more than 50% of the ballots in the representation vote were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least 40% of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate.

The Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant and cancelled previously set meeting and hearing dates.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant filed an application under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that the application did not comply with Rule 26 of the Board's Rules of Procedure, as it lacked the trade union's address and facsimile number, and failed to describe how the trade union violated the Act.

The application was dismissed without prejudice to the applicant's right to file a new, compliant application.

The applicants submitted correspondence to the Board regarding a termination application.

The Board agreed with the responding party's counsel that the matters raised did not fall within the scope of the termination application, which had already been granted.

The Board also noted that the responding party's legal submissions appeared correct.

The applicant, Rodney Chambers, sought to withdraw his application against the Liquor Control Boards Employees' Union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties on the appropriate bargaining unit and finding that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The union applied for certification and both parties filed unfair labour practice complaints.

Following a representation vote, the certification application was dismissed.

The parties agreed to a one-year bar on further certification applications for the bargaining unit.

The unfair labour practice complaints were withdrawn with leave of the Board, and all previously scheduled hearing dates were cancelled.

The applicant, Teamsters Local Union 938, filed an application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found the applicant to be a trade union and determined the appropriate bargaining unit based on the parties' agreement.

Finding that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed unit were members of the union, the Board directed a representation vote.

The responding party's section 8.1 notice was deemed not numerically relevant, meaning the ballot box would not be sealed.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of professional engineers employed by the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant had not previously been found to be a trade union and directed it to file supporting documents.

Based on the membership evidence filed, the Board determined that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken and ordered the ballot box not to be sealed, as the employer's section 8.1 notice was not numerically relevant.