Russell Goodfellow

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board found the agreed-upon bargaining unit appropriate.

The Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant and cancelled previously set meeting and hearing dates.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The responding party and intervenor requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement, noting it had dealt with these requests in other decisions.

Having found the bargaining unit appropriate and that more than 50% of the ballots in the representation vote were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least 40% of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the eligible employees in the voting constituency.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The intervenor requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and the resolution of raiding charges by the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement, noting it agreed with other Board decisions dealing with these requests.

As more than fifty percent of the ballots cast in the representation vote were in favour of the applicant, the Board granted certification and ordered a certificate to issue.

The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of nursing staff employed by the responding party.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that the proposed bargaining unit is appropriate.

Based on the membership evidence, the Board directed that a representation vote be held.

The responding party's section 8.1 notice was not numerically relevant, so the ballot box will not be sealed.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The intervenor union requested a postponement of the disposition based on a pending contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement request, noting it had dealt with and agreed with other Board decisions on this issue.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties on the bargaining unit description, and the representation vote where more than fifty percent of ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union sought certification for a bargaining unit of nurses.

The intervenor requested that the application be dismissed under section 8.1 of the Act and that the disposition be postponed pending a contempt motion and raiding charges.

The Board dismissed the intervenor's requests, noting that section 8.1 is only available to employers, not trade unions.

Having regard to the representation vote where more than fifty percent of ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board granted certification.

The applicant applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statement of desire to make representations filed, the Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees of the intervenor employer.

The applicant union applied for certification.

The intervenor requested the application be dismissed for non-compliance with the Board's Rules of Procedure, or postponed pending a related contempt motion and raiding charges.

The Board rejected these requests, finding no particulars to decline giving effect to the representation vote.

As more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon unit of therapy staff at the responding party's treatment centre.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party nursing home.

The intervenor union requested that the application be dismissed for alleged non-compliance with the Board's Rules of Procedure, or postponed pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board rejected these requests, noting a lack of particulars for dismissal and relying on prior Board decisions regarding postponement.

As more than fifty per cent of the ballots cast in the representation vote were in favour of the applicant, the Board certified the applicant as the bargaining agent for the agreed-upon unit of employees.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent office and clerical employees of the Community Care Access Centre of the District of Thunder Bay.

The intervenor union requested that the application be dismissed for non-compliance with the Board's Rules of Procedure, or postponed pending a contempt motion and raiding charges.

The Board rejected the intervenor's requests, noting the postponement issues were addressed in other decisions and no particulars supported dismissing the application.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty per cent of ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification and won a representation vote among the employees of the responding party.

The intervenor union requested a postponement of the disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement request, consistent with its previous decisions, and issued a certificate to the applicant union.

The applicant union applied for certification and won a representation vote.

The intervenor union requested that the Board postpone its disposition pending a contempt motion in Superior Court and raiding charges before the Canadian Labour Congress.

The Board denied the postponement request, consistent with its previous decisions, and ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant, Rodney Chambers, sought to withdraw his application against the Liquor Control Boards Employees' Union.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union within the meaning of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties on the appropriate bargaining unit and finding that not less than forty percent of the individuals in the proposed unit were members of the union, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken.

The applicant filed an application under section 74 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

The Board found that the application did not comply with Rule 26 of the Board's Rules of Procedure, as it lacked the trade union's address and facsimile number, and failed to describe how the trade union violated the Act.

The application was dismissed without prejudice to the applicant's right to file a new, compliant application.

The applicants submitted correspondence to the Board regarding a termination application.

The Board agreed with the responding party's counsel that the matters raised did not fall within the scope of the termination application, which had already been granted.

The Board also noted that the responding party's legal submissions appeared correct.

The Ontario Public Service Employees Union applied for certification to represent employees of the Rehabilitation Foundation for the Disabled.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that the proposed bargaining unit is appropriate.

Based on the membership evidence filed, the Board directed that a representation vote be taken among the eligible employees.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent lay office and clerical employees at the responding party hospital.

The intervenor union requested that the application be dismissed for alleged non-compliance with the Board's Rules of Procedure, or postponed pending a related contempt motion and raiding charges.

The Board rejected the intervenor's requests, noting a lack of supporting particulars and relying on prior Board decisions regarding the postponement.

As more than fifty percent of the ballots in the representation vote were cast in favour of the applicant, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant trade union filed an application for certification to represent hourly rated employees at the responding party's North Bay facilities.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board found that the applicant is a trade union and that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit were members of the union.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken and established the voting constituency, noting that any disputes regarding the bargaining unit description or employee inclusion would be handled by segregating ballots.