Russell Goodfellow

The responding party requested an extension of time to file its response.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, extending the deadline to January 8, 2001.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of security guards employed by the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for the employees of the responding party.

A representation vote was held, and not more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the union.

No statement of desire to make representations was filed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board dismissed the application and imposed a one-year bar on further certification applications by the union for this bargaining unit.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board directed that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit of registered and graduate nurses.

The applicant union applied for certification as the bargaining agent for a unit of employees of the responding party.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board certified the applicant union and ordered a certificate to issue.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent a bargaining unit of employees at Grace Villa Hospital.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant trade union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor.

The Board found that the applicant established sufficient membership support in its proposed bargaining unit to obtain a representation vote.

The responding party's section 8.1 notice was found not to be numerically relevant.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken of the individuals in the voting constituency.

The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the Fort William Clinic.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant.

The applicant union applied for certification.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in favour of the applicant, and with no submissions from the responding party opposing certification, the Board ordered that a certificate issue to the applicant for the agreed-upon bargaining unit.

The responding party requested an extension of time to file its response.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the extension to January 5, 2001.

The applicant filed an application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging the union breached its duty of fair representation under section 74 by refusing to file a grievance regarding his discharge.

The union and the intervenor employer requested the application be dismissed for failing to establish a prima facie case, arguing the union is not obliged to solicit grievances.

The Board declined to dismiss the application, finding that the facts regarding whether the applicant took sufficient steps to solicit the union's help were in dispute.

The matter was listed for consultation.

The applicant union filed a displacement application for certification to represent employees currently represented by the intervenor union at a retirement centre.

The Board found that the applicant is a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and that it appeared to have the requisite membership support of not less than forty per cent of the individuals in the proposed bargaining unit.

The Board directed that a representation vote be taken to allow employees to choose between the applicant and the intervenor.

The applicants sought to withdraw their application against the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Local 1287.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

The applicant applied for a review of a refusal to issue an order to pay under the Employment Standards Act.

The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement with the assistance of a Labour Relations Officer, whereby the employer agreed to pay the applicant $900.00.

As the settlement disposed of all issues in dispute, the Board terminated the application pursuant to section 69.1(5) of the Act.

The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.

The employer and the responding employee executed Minutes of Settlement agreeing to the disbursement of funds held in trust by the Director.

The Board ordered the funds to be disbursed in accordance with the settlement, subject to any objection from the Ministry of Labour, and terminated the application pursuant to section 69.1(5) of the Act.

The applicant requested reconsideration of an interim decision that dismissed his argument that the exception to the ratification requirement in section 44(2)(a) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 does not apply to a collective agreement concluded by voluntary arbitration under section 40.

The Board found no obvious errors of fact or law in its previous decision and clarified that section 43(18) limits matters for involuntary third-party resolution, unlike voluntary arbitration.

The Board also noted that the applicant's section 74 duty of fair representation complaint would still proceed to a hearing on the merits.

The request for reconsideration was dismissed.

The parties requested an adjournment of the matter so that notice could be given to the directors of the responding party.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the request and adjourned the matter to a date to be set by the Registrar.

The applicant union applied for certification of a bargaining unit consisting of professional and technical employees at the Ontario College of Nurses of Ontario.

The employer argued that an 'all employee' unit was appropriate.

The Board found that the proposed unit lacked distinctiveness, both in its criteria for inclusion and within the employer's organizational structure, as it cut across various departments and operational groups without a clear objective demarcation.

Consequently, the Board concluded that the proposed unit was not appropriate and directed the parties to advise on how the application should be disposed of.

The applicant filed an application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Board ordered that the application be terminated.

The applicant requested to withdraw her application against the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 794.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.