Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Evan Van Dyk

8 cases2010–2013

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 5, 2010

Corporate employer liable for manager's inadequate response to employee's report of sexual harassment by customer.

The applicant, a kiosk employee, received a sexually explicit note from a regular customer and reported it to her manager.

The manager failed to respond promptly or sensitively, suggesting the matter was personal and that the applicant was partly to blame.

Although a personal respondent later intervened and offered reasonable accommodations, the applicant quit and filed a human rights application.

The Tribunal found the corporate respondent liable for the manager's inadequate initial response, which failed to provide a safe and discrimination-free environment.

The applicant was awarded $1,000 for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect, but her claim for lost wages was dismissed because her refusal to accept the alternative work location was unreasonable.

Ankamah v. Chauhan Food Services Inc., 2010 HRTO 2024

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 5, 2010

Respondent granted final extension to file response to human rights application before Tribunal proceeds undefended.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a response by the required deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent that failure to file a response by a final extended deadline could result in the Tribunal proceeding without them and deeming them to have accepted the allegations.

Winn v. Simcoe Home Hardware, 2010 HRTO 2028

Richard Charney

25 cases1986–2025

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 5, 2010

Request to remove personal respondent granted as corporate respondent conceded liability for his conduct.

The respondents requested the removal of the personal respondent from a human rights application alleging age discrimination and reprisal in employment.

The applicant opposed the request.

The Tribunal applied the principles from Persaud, noting that the corporate respondent conceded liability for the personal respondent's conduct and had the ability to remedy any alleged infringement.

Finding no compelling reason to continue the proceeding against the individual, as his personal conduct was not a central issue, the Tribunal granted the request and removed him as a party.

Mahant v. York University, 2010 HRTO 2023

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 29, 2010

Tribunal reconsiders interim decision adding respondent on its own initiative after discovering extension was granted.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision adding St. Michael's Hospital as a respondent, noting it had not filed submissions.

However, the Hospital had received an extension and subsequently filed a response opposing the addition.

Pursuant to Rule 26.9, the Tribunal reconsidered its interim decision on its own initiative and directed the parties to file written submissions regarding the Hospital's response.

Bruce v. Teixeira, 2010 HRTO 2000

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 29, 2010

Tribunal declines to dismiss employment discrimination allegations as time-barred, finding potential series of incidents.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal on the basis of disability (scent sensitivity) during her employment and in the respondent's subsequent refusal to re-hire her.

The respondent argued that the allegations relating to her employment were time-barred as she resigned 21 months before filing.

The Tribunal found it was not plain and obvious that the employment allegations were not part of a series of incidents culminating in the refusal to re-hire, and allowed the allegations to proceed to a hearing on the merits.

Kovios v. Convergys CMG Canada, 2010 HRTO 1996

Tribunal has jurisdiction to extend time for compliance with remedial orders; functus officio does not bar extension.

The Ontario Human Rights Commission sought reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that extended the period for the respondent government to comply with an order regarding special diet benefits.

The Commission argued that the Tribunal was functus officio and lacked the power to extend the compliance period.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the doctrine of functus officio does not restrict administrative tribunals more than courts, and that the Tribunal has the power to extend time periods for compliance with ordered remedies, similar to the Supreme Court of Canada in Charter cases.

Ball v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2010 HRTO 1990

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 27, 2010

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as unpardoned criminal charges do not constitute a 'record of offences'.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of 'record of offences' after he was forced to resign from his civilian position with the police service following criminal charges.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal held that the ground of 'record of offences' under the Human Rights Code only protects individuals who have received a pardon for a criminal conviction or who have been convicted of a provincial offence.

As the applicant had not been pardoned, the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the application.

Nyilas v. Toronto Police Service, 2010 HRTO 1965

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 24, 2010

Request to add hospital as a respondent to human rights application granted.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in the provision of services regarding medical treatment received at St. Michael's Hospital.

The applicant subsequently brought a Request for Order to add the hospital as a respondent, noting the initial failure to name it was inadvertent.

The individual respondent consented, and the hospital did not respond.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding the hospital to be a necessary party.

Bruce v. St. Michael’s Hospital, 2010 HRTO 1957

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 23, 2010

Request to amend human rights application granted due to early stage and lack of prejudice.

The applicant filed a Request for Order During Proceedings to amend his human rights application alleging age discrimination.

He sought to add further particulars, request ongoing monetary relief, and request a protocol for answering job references by phone.

The respondents did not oppose the request.

The Tribunal granted the amendment, noting the minor nature of the amendments, the early stage of the proceeding, and the absence of prejudice to the respondents.

Lawrence Bay v. Lowerys Basics and Terry Law, 2010 HRTO 1941

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 23, 2010

Request to remove individual respondent dismissed as her conduct was central to the harassment allegations.

The respondents brought a Request for Order During Proceedings to remove the individual respondent, who was the applicant's supervisor, from the human rights application.

The Tribunal applied the Persaud framework and found that the individual respondent's conduct was a central issue in the allegations of harassment prior to the applicant's maternity leave.

The Tribunal concluded it would not be appropriate to remove the individual respondent at this stage, as specific remedies against her might be warranted if an infringement is found.

The request was dismissed.

Hildebrandt v. E.D. Smith, 2010 HRTO 1944

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 23, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent union grievance.

The applicant requested to defer his human rights application until his union grievance was completed.

The respondent and the union did not make submissions.

The Tribunal found it appropriate to defer the application pending the conclusion of the grievance process.

Douglas Critch v. Hillside Park Retirement Residence, 2010 HRTO 1936

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 20, 2010

Respondent ordered to file complete Form 2 Response within five days or face default proceedings.

The applicant filed a human rights application.

The respondent submitted an incomplete document via a paralegal instead of the required Form 2 Response.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Incomplete Response, but the respondent failed to rectify the deficiency.

The Tribunal ordered the respondent to file a complete Form 2 within five days, warning that failure to do so could result in the matter proceeding without their participation.

Christopher Friel v. Williams & McDaniel, 2010 HRTO 1895

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 20, 2010

Request to add Corporation of the County of Northumberland as a respondent granted on consent.

The applicant brought a Request for Order During Proceedings to add the Corporation of the County of Northumberland as a respondent to his human rights application alleging discrimination in housing.

The other parties consented to the request.

The Tribunal found the proposed respondent to be a necessary party and granted the request, amending the style of cause accordingly.

Robert Spooner v. Northumberland County Social Housing and Corporation of the County of Northumberland, 2010 HRTO 1897

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 16, 2010

Human rights application deferred on consent pending conclusion of concurrent WSIB process.

The applicant requested to defer his human rights application until the conclusion of his Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) claim.

The corporate respondent and the applicant's employee association consented to the request.

The Tribunal found it appropriate to defer the application pending the conclusion of the WSIB process.

Stassos Efstathiou v. Chicopee Manufacturing Ltd., Jason Young, Jim O’Neill and Donna Langdon, 2010 HRTO 1872

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 13, 2010

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent Employment Standards Act proceedings before the OLRB.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability, family status, and marital status.

Prior to this, the applicant filed an Employment Standards Act claim based on the same factual allegations, which was appealed to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.

The respondent requested that the human rights application be dismissed or deferred pending the OLRB proceeding.

The Tribunal found that deferral was appropriate to avoid duplication of evidence and inconsistent findings of fact, and ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the ESA proceedings.

John Dykstra v. RLM Manufacturing Inc., 2010 HRTO 1871

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 13, 2010

Personal respondents removed and human rights application deferred pending concurrent OHSA reprisal claim.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal against his employer, two individuals, and a client of his employer.

The respondents requested the removal of the personal respondents and the client, and sought to defer the application pending the outcome of a concurrent reprisal claim filed under the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

The Tribunal applied the Persaud framework and removed the personal respondents and the client, finding no compelling reason to keep them as parties.

The Tribunal also deferred the application, noting the significant factual overlap with the OHSA claim and the risk of inconsistent findings.

Gerard Dunphy v. Primary Response Inc., 2010 HRTO 1865

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 10, 2010

Request to proceed with human rights application granted after related College proceeding concluded.

The applicant filed a Request to proceed with her human rights application under Rule 14.3 after her complaint before the College of Physicians and Surgeons was withdrawn.

The respondent did not file any response submissions.

The Tribunal granted the request and directed the Registrar to schedule the application for a hearing.

Christina Jahn v. James Casserly, 2010 HRTO 1856

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 31, 2010

Tribunal awards damages to chef for sexual orientation discrimination and termination after respondents fail to appear.

The applicant, an executive chef, alleged he was subjected to homophobic remarks and subsequently terminated from his employment based on his sexual orientation.

The respondents failed to attend the hearing.

The Tribunal found the applicant established a prima facie case of discrimination in employment.

The Tribunal ordered two of the personal respondents to pay damages for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect, but declined to order damages against a third personal respondent who was not involved in the harassment, or against the corporate respondent which was reportedly bankrupt.

Angus Pereira v. Daf’d Restaurants Inc., Rene Radzio, Sean Radzio and Larry Radzio, 2010 HRTO 1782

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 12, 2010

Human rights application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as allegations lacked nexus to Code grounds.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisal in employment on the basis of record of disability.

One of the respondents requested the Tribunal dismiss the application for lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide further particulars linking the alleged harassment to a Code ground.

The applicant failed to establish a nexus between the alleged unfairness or harassment and an enumerated ground under the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal also found no basis for the reprisal claim, as the applicant had not claimed or enforced a right under the Code.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Morrissey v. Investors Group Financial Services, 2010 HRTO 1673

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 12, 2010

Reprisal application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because underlying harassment grievance did not cite Code grounds.

The applicant filed an application alleging reprisal in employment after filing a harassment grievance regarding a dispute over timesheets.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to provide submissions on jurisdiction.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's harassment grievance did not allege harassment on the basis of any prohibited ground under the Human Rights Code.

Because the applicant was not claiming or enforcing a right under the Code, he could not claim the protection of the reprisal section.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Clifton Rawlins v. Molson Canada 2005, 2010 HRTO 1678

Page 42 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 42 of 49 (975 cases)

Evan Van Dyk

Naomi Overend

Ankamah v. Chauhan Food Services Inc., 2010 HRTO 2024

Naomi Overend

Winn v. Simcoe Home Hardware, 2010 HRTO 2028

Richard Charney

Naomi Overend

Mahant v. York University, 2010 HRTO 2023

Naomi Overend

Bruce v. Teixeira, 2010 HRTO 2000

Naomi Overend

Kovios v. Convergys CMG Canada, 2010 HRTO 1996

Sophie Nunnelley

Rochelle Fox

Robert E. Charney

Lesli Bisgould

Cynthia Wilkey

Christine Elwell

Cathy Pike

Bruce Ellis

Naomi Overend

Mark Hart

David A. Wright

Ball v. Ontario (Community and Social Services), 2010 HRTO 1990

Naomi Overend

Nyilas v. Toronto Police Service, 2010 HRTO 1965

Naomi Overend

Bruce v. St. Michael’s Hospital, 2010 HRTO 1957

Naomi Overend

Lawrence Bay v. Lowerys Basics and Terry Law, 2010 HRTO 1941

Naomi Overend

Hildebrandt v. E.D. Smith, 2010 HRTO 1944

Naomi Overend

Douglas Critch v. Hillside Park Retirement Residence, 2010 HRTO 1936

Naomi Overend

Christopher Friel v. Williams & McDaniel, 2010 HRTO 1895

Naomi Overend

Robert Spooner v. Northumberland County Social Housing and Corporation of the County of Northumberland, 2010 HRTO 1897

Naomi Overend

Stassos Efstathiou v. Chicopee Manufacturing Ltd., Jason Young, Jim O’Neill and Donna Langdon, 2010 HRTO 1872

Naomi Overend

John Dykstra v. RLM Manufacturing Inc., 2010 HRTO 1871

Naomi Overend

Gerard Dunphy v. Primary Response Inc., 2010 HRTO 1865

Naomi Overend

Christina Jahn v. James Casserly, 2010 HRTO 1856

Naomi Overend

Angus Pereira v. Daf’d Restaurants Inc., Rene Radzio, Sean Radzio and Larry Radzio, 2010 HRTO 1782

Naomi Overend

Morrissey v. Investors Group Financial Services, 2010 HRTO 1673

Naomi Overend

Clifton Rawlins v. Molson Canada 2005, 2010 HRTO 1678

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras