Who is Naomi Overend?

Naomi Overend is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Naomi Overend sit on?

Naomi Overend sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Naomi Overend decide?

Naomi Overend's most common areas include Human Rights (975 decisions), Administrative Law (286 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (257 decisions). Naomi Overend has handled 975 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Naomi Overend made?

Naomi Overend has 975 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Naomi Overend?

Representatives who frequently appear before Naomi Overend include Self-represented, Doug Surh, Mary Eberts.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Naomi Overend — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Real Estate Law

Health Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Naomi Overend

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

975

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 792Vice-chair· 78Adjudicator· 71Vice-Chair· 13Adjudicator· 11Associate Chair (Acting)· 3Vice-chair· 1Acting Associate Chair· 1

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 25, 2012

Request for interim remedy denied for failing to include a signed declaration and demonstrating necessity.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability regarding the respondents' attendance policy.

The applicant subsequently filed a Request for Interim Remedy.

The Tribunal denied the request because it was not supported by a signed declaration as required by Rule 23.3(b) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure, and the applicant failed to demonstrate that an interim remedy was necessary to ensure a complete and effective remedy at the end of the hearing.

Thurtle v. William Osler Health Centre, 2012 HRTO 1240

Tribunal clarifies bifurcated hearing order and resolves document production disputes in human rights complaint.

The applicant in a human rights complaint regarding a decanal search brought a Request for an Order During Proceeding seeking clarification on a previous order bifurcating the hearing.

The applicant sought to call evidence and cross-examine witnesses during the first phase on matters reserved for the second phase.

The Tribunal denied the request, restricting phase I evidence and cross-examination to phase I issues.

The Tribunal also addressed document production disputes, ordering the respondent University to organize its disclosure numerically and reminding the applicant of her obligation to comply with production deadlines and undertakings.

Carasco v. University of Windsor, 2012 HRTO 1214

Gita Anand

19 cases1991–2015

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 14, 2012

Applicant permitted to withdraw human rights application without conditions despite respondent's objection.

The applicant sought to withdraw his human rights application the evening before a scheduled mediation.

The respondent objected to an unconditional withdrawal, requesting that the application be dismissed or withdrawn on the condition that it not be reinstituted.

The Tribunal granted the applicant's request to withdraw without conditions, noting that if the applicant attempts to re-file the same allegations, the respondent may raise its objections at that time.

Hall v. Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, 2012 HRTO 1171

Susan Kaufman

1 case2012–2012

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 12, 2012

Hearing adjourned sine die due to applicant's health and ongoing settlement discussions.

The applicant filed an application alleging a contravention of settlement under the Human Rights Code.

After multiple scheduling issues and the applicant's inability to attend the most recent hearing date due to health reasons, the Tribunal adjourned the matter sine die to allow the parties time to attempt a resolution.

Ali Reza Salimi v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2012 HRTO 1154

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 7, 2012

Respondent granted 10 days to file a Response after failing to meet the initial deadline.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the deadline set in the Notice of Application.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to participate, including the possibility of the Tribunal proceeding without further notice under Rule 5.5.

The Tribunal granted the respondent 10 days to file a Response along with an explanation for the delay.

Mackin v. The Dream Team / Houselink, 2012 HRTO 1127

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 7, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Adriana Remes v. Toronto Police Service, 2012 HRTO 1126

Mark Mendl

4 cases2009–2016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 6, 2012

Human rights application dismissed summarily as untimely and lacking a nexus to a protected ground.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on perceived sexual orientation.

The respondents requested a summary dismissal.

The Tribunal found that the only allegation linked to a Code ground occurred in 2007, well outside the one-year limitation period, and the applicant failed to provide a good faith explanation for the delay.

The remaining allegations of ongoing harassment lacked any nexus to a protected ground.

The application was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

Tavares v. Evandrew Foods Inc., 2012 HRTO 1117

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 6, 2012

Respondent granted 10 days to file a response after failing to meet extended deadline.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent requested and was granted an extension of time to file a response but failed to do so by the extended deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision warning the respondent of the consequences of failing to respond under Rule 5.5 of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure and granted the respondent 10 days to file a response along with an explanation for the delay.

Lisa Matthews v. Franco Venturato, 2012 HRTO 1119

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 31, 2012

Applicant ordered to provide complete address for respondent or face dismissal of human rights application.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code but failed to provide a complete address for the respondent, preventing the Tribunal from delivering the Notice of Application and a previous Interim Decision.

The applicant was directed to provide a current, complete, and accurate address for the respondent by June 14, 2012, failing which the Application would be dismissed.

Howard v. Balson, 2012 HRTO 1084

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2012

Motion to dismiss under s. 45.1 denied as prior ESA claim did not address discrimination.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and family status.

The respondents requested to dismiss the application under s. 45.1 of the Human Rights Code, arguing that a prior Employment Standards Act claim had already dealt with the substance of the complaint.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the Employment Standards Officer's decision regarding termination pay did not address the substance of the discrimination allegations.

The Tribunal also granted the applicant's request to add an organizational respondent, leaving the factual dispute about employment status to be determined at the hearing.

Simon v. Independent Energy Services Co. Ltd, 2012 HRTO 1018

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2012

Two human rights applications alleging discriminatory conduct by mall security consolidated due to common issues.

The applicant filed two human rights applications alleging discrimination and reprisal by security guards at the respondent's shopping mall on two separate occasions.

The Tribunal sought submissions on whether the applications should be consolidated.

As neither party opposed and there were common issues of fact and law, the Tribunal ordered the applications consolidated to avoid a multiplicity of proceedings.

Surh v. Scarborough Town Centre Holdings Inc., 2012 HRTO 1016

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 18, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after the applicant failed to respond to a request to dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent filed a request to dismiss the application, arguing that the applicant had signed a full and final release regarding the same matter.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file written submissions in response to the request to dismiss, warning that failure to do so could result in the application being dismissed as abandoned.

The applicant failed to respond to the Tribunal's correspondence.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Prevost v. Regional Municipality of Halton (Allendale Long-Term Care), 2012 HRTO 1006

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 17, 2012

Respondent given 14 days to file a Response before Tribunal proceeds without notice.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The respondent failed to file a Response by the directed deadline.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision directing the respondent to file a Response within 14 days, failing which the Tribunal may proceed without further notice and deem the respondent to have accepted the allegations.

Chinnathambi v. Geotab, 2012 HRTO 1009

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 17, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Notice of Intent to Dismiss.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss (NOID) because the application appeared to be outside its jurisdiction.

The applicant failed to respond to the NOID by the specified deadline.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Danny Yeung v. Bayshore Specialty Rx, 2012 HRTO 1007

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 16, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to respond to Tribunal correspondence.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal attempted to reschedule a mediation at the respondent's request, but the applicant failed to respond to multiple emails and a formal letter requesting mutually agreeable dates and confirming her intentions.

As the applicant failed to respond by the specified deadline, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Robyn Theresa Wells v. David Kyle, 2012 HRTO 983

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 15, 2012

Request for interim remedy to halt eviction denied for lacking required signed declaration and sufficient evidence.

The applicant's sister filed a Request for Interim Remedy on the applicant's behalf to prevent the execution of an eviction order and the disposal of her possessions while she recovered from childbirth.

The Tribunal denied the request because it was not supported by a signed declaration as required by Rule 23.3(b) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure.

Furthermore, the Tribunal found the request lacked sufficient information to determine if the underlying human rights application had merit or if the Tribunal had jurisdiction over the matter.

Reyes v. Vertica Resident Services, 2012 HRTO 981

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 15, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend mediation or respond.

The applicant filed an application under section 34 of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal scheduled a mediation session, which the applicant failed to attend without explanation.

The Tribunal subsequently directed the applicant to advise of her intentions regarding the application, warning that failure to respond could result in deemed abandonment.

The applicant did not respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal deemed the application abandoned and dismissed it.

Julie Cleary v. B.M.I. Construction Co. Limited, 2012 HRTO 974

Ryan Goldvine

17 cases2011–2012

Patricia G. Murray

35 cases1990–2017

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 11, 2012

Human rights application reactivated following grievance arbitration; hearing scheduled to determine section 45.1 dismissal request.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability and reprisal.

The application was previously deferred pending the completion of a grievance arbitration proceeding.

Following the completion of the arbitration, the applicant filed a timely request to reactivate the application.

The respondent did not object to reactivation but requested that the application be dismissed under section 45.1 of the Human Rights Code or as an abuse of process.

The Tribunal granted the request to reactivate the application and ordered a hearing to determine whether the grievance proceeding appropriately dealt with the substance of the application.

Barron v. York Region District School Board, 2012 HRTO 955

Nadya Tymochenko

In Private Practice31 cases2000–2025

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 11, 2012

Request to dismiss human rights application as duplicative denied; applications for discrimination and breach of settlement consolidated.

The respondent school board brought a request for an order during proceedings to dismiss a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability, arguing it was duplicative of a separate application alleging breach of a prior settlement agreement.

The applicant, a student acting through his litigation guardian, opposed the dismissal but agreed to consolidation.

The Tribunal found that the terms of the settlement were sufficiently general that the applicant could potentially prove a breach of the Human Rights Code without proving a breach of the settlement.

Accordingly, the Tribunal denied the request to dismiss the discrimination application but granted the request to consolidate the two applications to be heard together.

Clough v. Simcoe County District School Board, 2012 HRTO 958

Elizabeth Forster

19 cases1980–2015

Avvy Yao-Yao Go

6 cases2007–2013

Naomi Overend

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 11, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending outcome of concurrent Employment Standards Act claim on identical facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the ground of sex (pregnancy) after her employment was terminated.

She also filed a concurrent claim under the Employment Standards Act based on identical factual allegations, though against her employment agency rather than the placement employer.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer.

Despite the applicant's argument that deferral was premature, the Tribunal deferred the application pending the outcome of the ESA claim to avoid the risk of inconsistent findings of fact.

Hui Li v. Visioneering Corp., 2012 HRTO 957

Page 25 of 49 (975 cases)

Applicant

Chad McLeodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christopher IyirhiaroSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel MuldoonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SurhSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gabriel LandrySelf-represented
1 appearance
Marianne AmodeoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Meghan SimonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mohammad ShabbeerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrice ChisholmSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara SilverbergSelf-represented
1 appearance
Simon MalekSelf-represented
1 appearance
Timothy ThurtleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vicki KellSelf-represented
1 appearance

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Dan ShieldsCounsel
1 appearance

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

Madeleine L. S. LowenbergCounsel
1 appearance

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Stefanie Chin-YickCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel

Ann BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Daryn JeffriesCounsel
1 appearance
Guy HunterCounsel
1 appearance
Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance
Leonard MarvyCounsel
1 appearance
Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance
Veronica KennyCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Applicant

Daniel A. LubinCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Robert FredericksCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Glorie AlfredCounsel
1 appearance
Robert TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

William D. AndersonCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

James K. McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

Leah SimonCounsel
1 appearance

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for Academic Women for Justice

Agnes WhitfieldAgent
1 appearance

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

David ChondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

Clarke MelvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

Maura ThompsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

Anthony BaluaraCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Leon BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

Bobbi-Jo SchwantzSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Alex GabrielSelf-represented
1 appearance
James BartonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Kinark Child and Family Services

Sabatina VassalliCounsel
1 appearance

for Kingston Access Services

Trevor FrayAgent
2 appearances

for Loblaw Inc.

John O’ReillyCounsel
1 appearance

for Lorna Jack

Bob DickisonAgent
1 appearance

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

D. Russ MakepeaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael Burns

Dan CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for Peel Children’s Aid Society

Carole G. JenkinsCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods, Respondent

Maureen BallCounsel
1 appearance

for Pizza Nova

Donna PolgarCounsel
1 appearance

for Presbyterian Church in Canada and Herb Gale

Stephen KendallAgent
1 appearance

for Primary Response Inc. and Meredith Cranswick

Tom FulfordAgent
1 appearance

for Richard Moon

Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Luke’s Church and Sheila Plant

Sheila PlantSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the affected party

Natasha UdellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for the applicant

Brenda CuthbertCounsel
1 appearance
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
1 appearance
Lina MiragliaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Self-representedSelf-represented
11 appearances
Doug SurhSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary EbertsCounsel
5 appearances
Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Arthur ZeilikmanCounsel
3 appearances
James LloySelf-represented
3 appearances
Laura PryseSelf-represented
3 appearances
Wasi KhanSelf-represented
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Eric MattisonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Hyun Whan KimSelf-represented
3 appearances
Michelle MulgraveCounsel
3 appearances
Guillermo FloresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Tara MyersSelf-represented
2 appearances
Nancy PolsinelliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Robert WeedenSelf-represented
2 appearances
Katherine LinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Ayoob KhanAgent
2 appearances
Caroline (Nini) JonesCounsel
2 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
4 appearances
Cyndy HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Dan HunterSelf-represented
2 appearances
Kevin LiuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elizabeth KeepSelf-represented
2 appearances
Grant DobsonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith ZhangSelf-represented
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.H.Self-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Andriy KrykunenkoSelf-represented
1 appearance
C.M.Self-represented
1 appearance
C.R.Self-represented
1 appearance
E.L.Self-represented
1 appearance
Olga OleanovskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paula SeymourCounsel
1 appearance
S.B.Agent
1 appearance

for the Barrie Police Services Board

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto

Rosanne GiuliettiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants S. and W.

Cynthia WilkeyCounsel
1 appearance
Lesli BisgouldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Corporation of the City of Kingston

Sarah GareauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Human Rights Legal Support Centre, Intervenor

Jo-Ann SeamonCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual respondent Quinton Taylor

Cheryl HessCounsel
1 appearance

for the Industrial Accident Victims Group of Ontario, Intervenor

Maryth YachninCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
2 appearances
Laurie KentCounsel
2 appearances
Katherine FerreiraCounsel
2 appearances
Paul O’RyanCounsel
2 appearances
Devon PaulCounsel
2 appearances
Jerrry RasoCounsel
1 appearance
Micheal KlugCounsel
1 appearance
Rebecca LeeCounsel
1 appearance
Richard LavertyUnion representative
1 appearance
Risa PancerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance
Caroline JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Dave SteeleCounsel
1 appearance
Gail MisraCounsel
1 appearance
Gavin LeebCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn WheelerAgent
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ministry of the Attorney General

Anita LyonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Office of the Employer Advisor, Intervenor

Michael ZacksCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission, Intervenor

Cathy PikeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent

Jinan KubursiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
4 appearances
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
4 appearances
Marnie CorboldCounsel
3 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
3 appearances
Mark DiGirolamoCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian JakibchukCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa KwasekCounsel
2 appearances
Mathias LinkCounsel
2 appearances
Michelle HenryCounsel
2 appearances
Blair McCreadieCounsel
2 appearances
Grant BowersCounsel
2 appearances
Susan MunnCounsel
2 appearances
Paula DowAgent
2 appearances
Ronald G. SlaghtCounsel
2 appearances
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
2 appearances
W. Gordon SteinbergAgent
2 appearances
Madeleine LoewenbergCounsel
2 appearances
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
2 appearances
David GourlayCounsel
2 appearances
Evan Van DyckCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 2185559 Ontario Inc.

Paul BursteinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Alison Freeland

Laura StewartCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent BMO Field

David LedermanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cheryl Paige

Glorie AlfredCounsel
3 appearances

for the Respondent Community Living Dufferin

Lisa CartyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Credit Valley Hospital

Kathyrn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Domain Registry Group Inc.

Alan BenloloAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Eugene Reid

Robert HealeyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ford Motor Company of Canada Limited

Anna AbbottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Halton (Region)

Edward MillwardCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Independent Electricity System Operator

Richard CharneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Marathon Pulp Inc.

Kevin D. MacNeillCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mariposa Co-operative Homes

Charles SinclairCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nimet Kara

Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services)

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Richard Moon

Jo-Anne PickelCounsel
2 appearances
Freya KristjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Freya KritjansonCounsel
1 appearance
Amanda DarrachCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Michelle O’BonsawinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent(s)

Michael MacLellanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Heather CrispCounsel
2 appearances
Ann BurkeCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa RiegelCounsel
2 appearances
Antoni CasalinuovoCounsel
2 appearances
Gregory PowerCounsel
2 appearances
Terry HillCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Indira SawhCounsel
2 appearances
Marian LintonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark ArnoldCounsel
1 appearance
Mark MendlCounsel
1 appearance
Andrea KrywonisCounsel
1 appearance
Ann E. BurkeCounsel
1 appearance
Baaba ForsonCounsel
1 appearance
Bhavanaben PatelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Caitlin KavanaghAgent
1 appearance
Carl W. PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Colin RaynerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana FullerCounsel
1 appearance
David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Allan Rosenfeld, Matthew Burnstein, and Ridgeway Occupational Consultants Inc.

Mira NovekCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents and Intervenor CUPE Local 3083 and CUPE National

Paul O’RyanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Home Depot of Canada Inc. and Jessica Basken

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents in Applications 2009-03081-I, 2009-03083-I, 2009-03084-I and 2009-03086-I

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Kap Chul Lee and Sun Hew Lee

John TealCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Office of the Independent Police Review Director and Gerry McNeilly

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Regional Municipality of Halton Police Services Board and Bill Marshall

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board (2010-07698-I) and Bradley Verspeeten (2010-04964-I)

Lisa C. CabelCounsel
4 appearances
Naomi CallaCounsel
2 appearances
Naomi E. CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board and Chris Dobbs (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondents Toronto Police Services Board, Officer Ruttner and Officer Taylor

Michele WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Subway Franchise Systems of Canada Ltd.

Peter DillonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Great West Life Assurance Company

Susan McCorquodaleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Town of Fort Erie

Woodward B. McKaigCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-04964-I)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
4 appearances

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board (2010-06416-I)

David A. GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
4 appearances

for the Toronto Police Association

Jessica DowlingCounsel
1 appearance
Tim ZayackUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board and Chief William Blair

Kerri KitchuraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Transit Commission

Marni TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the University of Windsor Faculty Association

James RenaudCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 175, Affected Party

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Women and the Law

Emir CrowneCounsel
1 appearance

LIUNA, Local 1059, Intervenor; Paul Coyne and Vernon Stoddart, Respondents

Lindsay LawrenceCounsel
1 appearance

Next Friend for the Applicants

A.T.Agent
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Kathie PassmoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marilynn MonnierSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rina Jade VanhelvoortSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Evgeny KopylovSelf-represented
1 appearance
John NearingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Legrand BertrandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Martin NyilasSelf-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
Jody VilleneuveSelf-represented
1 appearance
J. Paul WearingCounsel
1 appearance
Kevin InwoodCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Randall CharassSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ReidSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wazi KhanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-represented and Representative for John Buttigieg and Estate of Lorenza Buttigieg

Robert ButtigiegSelf-represented
1 appearance

William Osler Health Centre, Respondent

Andrew ShawCounsel
1 appearance

975

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

8.9

cases/mo

HRTO975(100%)

Decision types

motion

937

trial

Page 25 of 49 (975 cases)

Naomi Overend

Thurtle v. William Osler Health Centre, 2012 HRTO 1240

Raj Anand

Mary Eberts

Freya Kritjanson

Naomi Overend

Carasco v. University of Windsor, 2012 HRTO 1214

Gita Anand

Naomi Overend

Hall v. Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, 2012 HRTO 1171

Susan Kaufman

Naomi Overend

Ali Reza Salimi v. Toronto Community Housing Corporation, 2012 HRTO 1154

Naomi Overend

Mackin v. The Dream Team / Houselink, 2012 HRTO 1127

Naomi Overend

Adriana Remes v. Toronto Police Service, 2012 HRTO 1126

Mark Mendl

Naomi Overend

Tavares v. Evandrew Foods Inc., 2012 HRTO 1117

Naomi Overend

Lisa Matthews v. Franco Venturato, 2012 HRTO 1119

Naomi Overend

Howard v. Balson, 2012 HRTO 1084

Naomi Overend

Simon v. Independent Energy Services Co. Ltd, 2012 HRTO 1018

Naomi Overend

Surh v. Scarborough Town Centre Holdings Inc., 2012 HRTO 1016

Naomi Overend

Prevost v. Regional Municipality of Halton (Allendale Long-Term Care), 2012 HRTO 1006

Naomi Overend

Chinnathambi v. Geotab, 2012 HRTO 1009

Naomi Overend

Danny Yeung v. Bayshore Specialty Rx, 2012 HRTO 1007

Naomi Overend

Robyn Theresa Wells v. David Kyle, 2012 HRTO 983

Naomi Overend

Reyes v. Vertica Resident Services, 2012 HRTO 981

Naomi Overend

Julie Cleary v. B.M.I. Construction Co. Limited, 2012 HRTO 974

Ryan Goldvine

Patricia G. Murray

Naomi Overend

Barron v. York Region District School Board, 2012 HRTO 955

Nadya Tymochenko

Naomi Overend

Clough v. Simcoe County District School Board, 2012 HRTO 958

Elizabeth Forster

Avvy Yao-Yao Go

Naomi Overend

Hui Li v. Visioneering Corp., 2012 HRTO 957

Applicant

Carillion Services Inc., Respondent

Comstock Canada Ltd., Respondent

corporate counsel for Crown Taxi Inc.

Counsel

Counsel for the Applicant

Counsel for the City of Toronto

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

Counsel for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters’ Association

Crossby Dewar Inc., Respondent

CUPE, Local 145, Intervenor

for 1210670 Ontario Inc., Royal Taxi Inc., Beck Taxi Inc., Mohammed Bhatti, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Ltd.

for Academic Women for Justice

for Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and Heather Lisner-Kerbel

for Ellen Sue Mesbur

for Family and Children Services of Waterloo Region

for Food for Life and Karen Bonham

for herself

for herself, Ms. Germain and Marathon Pulp Inc.

for himself

for Kinark Child and Family Services

for Kingston Access Services

for Loblaw Inc.

for Lorna Jack

formerly for Crown Taxi Inc.

for Michael Burns

for Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

for Peel Children’s Aid Society