Danny Yeung v. Bayshore Specialty Rx, 2012 HRTO 1007

HUMAN RIGHTS TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO

B E T W E E N:

Danny Yeung

Applicant

-and-

Bayshore Specialty Rx

Respondent

DECISION

Adjudicator: Naomi Overend Decision Date: May 17, 2012 Citation: 2012 HRTO 1007 Indexed as: Yeung v. Bayshore Specialty Rx

Introduction

1The applicant filed an Application under s. 34 of the Human Rights Code, R.S.O. 1990, c. H.19, as amended (the “Code”), on March 5, 2012.

2On March 26, 2012 the Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Application (“NOID”) on the basis that the Application appears to be outside the Tribunal’s power to decide. The applicant was directed to respond to the issues raised in the NOID by no later than April 25, 2012. The NOID advised the applicant that failure to respond to the NOID may be considered an abandonment of the Application and it might be dismissed for that reason.

3The applicant has not responded to the NOID and the time for doing so has now passed.

4In the circumstances, the applicant is deemed to have abandoned the Application.

5The Application is dismissed.