Employee appeal terminated due to failure to file a complete application form.
The applicant filed an employee appeal of an Officer's decision not to issue an Order to Pay.
The application form was incomplete, and the applicant was advised to re-file with new forms.
The applicant failed to re-file the application.
The Board terminated the application.
Representation vote directed in union certification application after finding sufficient membership support.
The applicant trade union applied for certification to represent employees of the responding party.
The Board found the applicant to be a trade union under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and determined the appropriate bargaining unit based on the parties' agreement.
Finding that at least forty percent of the individuals in the proposed unit were union members, the Board directed that a representation vote be held.
Consent order issued in construction industry grievance for $11,962.68 in damages for collective agreement violations.
The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
On the scheduled hearing date, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement settling the matter.
The Board issued a consent order declaring that the responding party was bound by the collective agreement, had violated it by failing to pay benefits and using non-union workers, and ordered the payment of $11,962.68 in damages and costs.
Board issues consent order declaring employer bound by collective agreement and ordering costs for grievance.
On the scheduled hearing date, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Agreement.
The Board issued a consent order declaring that the responding party is bound by the collective agreement, violated its terms, and must pay $1,450 in costs, with the matter adjourned to a later date.
Reconsideration of employment standards appeal dismissal denied due to failure to provide supporting documents.
The applicant sought reconsideration of a decision dismissing his employment standards appeal.
The appeal was originally dismissed because the applicant had also brought a civil action for wrongful dismissal, contrary to section 64 of the Employment Standards Act.
The applicant claimed the civil action was dismissed because of the employment standards complaint, but failed to provide documents substantiating this claim despite being directed to do so.
The Board declined to reconsider the dismissal.
Employer's appeal allowed; termination of pregnant employee during restructuring was for bona fide business reasons.
The employer appealed an Employment Standards Officer's determination that it violated the Employment Standards Act by terminating an employee who was pregnant and entitled to take a leave.
The employer had eliminated the employee's management position as part of a broader corporate restructuring and cost-cutting initiative.
The Board found that the termination was for bona fide business reasons and not a reprisal for the employee's impending pregnancy leave.
The Board also rejected the argument that the employee was entitled to pay in lieu of notice because pregnancy complications prevented her from working through the full notice period.
The appeal was allowed and the order to pay was rescinded.
Application adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant sought to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
The applicant sought to withdraw its application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
Grievance referral adjourned sine die on consent of the parties.
The applicant union referred a grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
On the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.
Arrest warrant issued for witness who failed to attend construction grievance hearing after being summoned.
The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Board.
When the responding party failed to appear at the scheduled hearing, the applicant requested an arrest warrant for a principal of the responding party who had been properly served with a summons and conduct money.
The Board found that the witness's presence and documents were material to the ends of justice.
Pursuant to its powers under the Labour Relations Act, 1995, the Board issued an arrest warrant to compel the witness's attendance at the continuation of the hearing.
The parties agreed to adjourn the application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the matter sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
Employment standards matter terminated following parties' Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant brought an employment standards matter before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The parties reached Minutes of Settlement.
Having regard to the settlement, the Board ordered the matter terminated.
Applications withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Labourers' International Union of North America, Local 183, sought to withdraw its applications against the responding parties, The Atlas Corporation and Tectonic Infrastructure Inc. The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the applications were withdrawn.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.
The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
The Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed within that time.
Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted a consent request to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
If no party requests to proceed within that time, the matter will be deemed terminated.
Application for review will be terminated unless proper forms are filed by the specified deadline.
The employer sought an application for review of an Order to Pay but failed to file the correct forms with the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
The Board notified the employer and provided the necessary forms, but the employer did not respond for nearly five months.
The Board issued a decision stating that unless a proper application is filed by March 17, 2000, the matter will be terminated and the monies held in trust will be disbursed.
Board issues case management directions in appeals of a $612,501.46 Employment Standards Order to Pay.
The Board issued case management directions in an employer appeal and two employee appeals of an Employment Standards Officer's Order to Pay.
The Order to Pay assessed $612,501.46 against the employer for failing to keep accurate records, failing to pay overtime, failing to provide eating periods, and failing to pay proper public holiday pay.
The Board directed the union to formalize its participation, directed the Ministry of Labour to produce the calculations underlying the Order to Pay, and set deadlines for raising preliminary issues.
Board declines to accept affidavit evidence, directing applicant to serve a Summons to Witness instead.
The applicant's counsel requested direction on whether the Board would accept an affidavit for an important witness or how to assure their attendance.
The Board advised that it generally does not accept affidavits because natural justice requires witnesses to be available for cross-examination.
The Board directed counsel to serve a Summons to Witness with reasonable notice and conduct money to assure attendance.
Successorship application dismissed as the predecessor staff association was not a valid bargaining agent.
The applicant trade union sought a declaration under section 68 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995 that it was the successor to the City of Waterloo Staff Association.
The Board found that while the Staff Association met the definition of a 'trade union', it was not a 'bargaining agent' capable of transferring bargaining rights.
The Board concluded that the Staff Association's formation and administration were riddled with employer support, including mandatory membership and dues deduction, and that it had never acted as the exclusive bargaining agent for the employees.
As the Staff Association did not hold bargaining rights at the time of the alleged merger, the application was dismissed.