J. Knight

The applicant requested to revive the application but subsequently advised the Board that the matter had been settled.

The Board accordingly ordered the application withdrawn.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if neither party requests to proceed.

The responding party, Artisan Masonry Inc., requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing dates due to a serious family health matter requiring the attendance of its advisors and witnesses in Windsor.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the adjournment request and referred the matter to the Registrar for rescheduling.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted a consent request to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.

If no party requests to proceed within that time, the matter will be deemed terminated.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the grievance referral sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if no party requested to proceed.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the Manager of Field Services to count the ballot in this matter, having regard to correspondence from the applicant's counsel and a prior Board decision.

The applicant union filed an application against the responding party employer.

On agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.

The applicant union referred a grievance to arbitration under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act.

The responding party employer failed to attend the hearing.

The Board proceeded in the employer's absence, declared the employer bound to the Provincial Collective Agreement, found it violated the agreement, and ordered it to pay $4,430.45 in damages and $749.00 in costs.

The applicant union filed an application under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, seeking a declaration that the responding parties constitute a single employer and are bound by the applicable collective agreement.

The responding parties failed to file a response.

The Board deemed the responding parties to have accepted the facts stated in the application, finding that the various corporate entities and individuals carried on associated or related activities under common control and direction to evade obligations under the collective agreement.

The Board granted the declaration and ordered that damages previously awarded against one entity be attributed jointly and severally to all responding parties.

The responding party union requested reconsideration of a decision terminating its bargaining rights, noting that the Board had incorrectly terminated its rights in the maintenance, service, and non-ICI bargaining unit.

The Board agreed that an error was made and amended its previous decision to clarify that the union's bargaining rights were terminated only in the Industrial, Commercial and Institutional (ICI) sector, while maintaining its rights in the maintenance, service, and non-ICI construction sectors.

The applicant union filed an application for certification and an unfair labour practice complaint against the responding employer.

The employer also filed an unfair labour practice complaint against the union and an individual.

At the scheduled hearing, the parties resolved the matters in dispute.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed a second representation vote for the agreed-upon bargaining unit of carpenters and carpenters' apprentices.

The unfair labour practice complaints were withdrawn with leave of the Board.

The applicant and responding parties agreed to adjourn the applications.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to adjourn the matters sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which they will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the grievance referral sine die.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the consent adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.

The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the matter.

The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the adjournment to October 25, 2001.

The applicant union referred a grievance to arbitration under the Labour Relations Act, alleging the employer improperly laid off a union steward and issued an unwarranted disciplinary letter.

The employer failed to attend the hearing.

The Board accepted the union's evidence that the project was not nearing completion and other electricians remained employed.

The Board declared the employer violated the collective agreement, ordered the rescission of the disciplinary letter, and directed the employer to pay $749.00.

The employer applied to terminate the union's bargaining rights under section 65 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

Prior to the hearing, the parties agreed to a consent order acknowledging that there were currently no employees in the bargaining unit.

The Board ordered that if no employees are hired into the bargaining unit by December 31, 2005, the union's bargaining rights will be deemed abandoned without the need for a further Board decision or application.

The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board, alleging the responding party knowingly violated the collective agreement by employing non-union workers.

The responding party failed to attend the hearing.

The Board accepted the union's uncontested evidence, found a knowing violation, and ordered the responding party to pay $4,800 in damages, a $25,000 penalty pursuant to the collective agreement, and $749 in costs.

The applicant trade union applied for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.

A representation vote was held, and a majority of the employees voted in favour of the applicant.

The responding party did not file a response or participate, but later submitted that the voters were not its employees, which the Board rejected as untimely.

The Board granted the applicant's request to amend the responding party's name and issued certificates to the applicant for the industrial, commercial, and institutional sector, as well as all other sectors in the specified geographic areas.

The applicant employees applied to terminate the bargaining rights of the responding party union.

Following a representation vote where more than fifty percent of the ballots were cast in opposition to the union, and with no statements of desire to make representations filed, the Ontario Labour Relations Board declared that the union no longer represents the employees in the specified bargaining units.