The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the proposed Klijn Municipal Drain.
The engineer had proposed a Northern route for a closed tile drain, which was more expensive but preferred by neighbouring landowners to avoid crossing their properties.
The appellant argued for a Western route following the natural flow of water or an open ditch.
The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, finding that the Western route was cheaper, followed the natural water flow, and would service the entire watershed.
The Tribunal directed the municipality to refer the report back to the engineer to design the drain along the Western route and give downstream owners the option of an open or closed drain.