Board issues orders incorporating Minutes of Settlement for unpaid union benefits and dues.
The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the responding party failed to remit benefits, dues, contributions, and deductions.
Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Board issued declarations and orders incorporating the settlement, including that the responding party is bound to the provincial collective agreement, violated it by failing to remit amounts, and owes $6,050.00.
Extension of time to file response granted due to delay in receiving French forms.
The responding party requested an extension of time to file its response because it only recently received the response forms in French.
The Board granted the request and extended the time for serving and filing a response to July 11, 2000.
Board denies extension of time for response and directs representation vote in certification application.
The applicant trade union filed an application for certification under the construction industry provisions of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
The responding party failed to file a timely response and requested an extension because a principal was on vacation.
The Board denied the extension, finding insufficient reason to delay the statutory requirement for a speedy vote.
Finding that the applicant appeared to have the requisite membership support, the Board defined the appropriate bargaining unit and directed that a representation vote be held.
La Commission ordonne la tenue d'un scrutin de représentation suite à une requête en accréditation non contestée.
La requérante a déposé une requête en accréditation auprès de la Commission des relations de travail de l'Ontario.
L'intimé n'a pas déposé de réponse dans les délais prescrits.
La Commission a conclu que la requérante est un syndicat au sens de la Loi de 1995 sur les relations de travail et qu'au moins quarante pour cent des employés de l'unité de négociation proposée semblaient être membres du syndicat.
Par conséquent, la Commission a ordonné la tenue d'un scrutin de représentation.
Employer appeal of Order to Pay withdrawn; funds in trust ordered released to employee.
The employer appealed an Order to Pay in the amount of $652.49.
The employer subsequently indicated it was not continuing its appeal.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board permitted the appeal to be withdrawn and directed the funds held in trust to be paid to the employee.
Applications withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its applications against the City of Toronto and the Toronto Parking Authority.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the applications.
Employment standards review resolved by Minutes of Settlement; funds disbursed to employee.
The applicant employer sought a review of an Order to Pay under section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The workplace parties entered into Minutes of Settlement.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board ordered the funds held in trust by the Director to be disbursed in accordance with the settlement, with $581.56 paid to the employee and a $100 administration fee retained by the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Consent order issued declaring responding parties bound by collective agreement and ordering payment of $2,177.78.
The applicant union filed an application under sections 69 and 1(4) of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and referred a grievance in the construction industry.
The parties entered into Minutes of Settlement and requested a consent order.
The Board declared the responding parties bound by the collective agreement, found they had violated it, and ordered them to pay $2,177.78 to the applicant union on a joint and several basis.
Application adjourned sine die for up to one year on consent of the parties.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment, noting that the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed within that time.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant requested to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant, Falconbridge Sudbury Smelter, sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the application was withdrawn.
The applicant, Apex Woodworking Company Inc., sought to withdraw its application against the responding parties, Dr. Pikk, Inspector, and the Ministry of Labour.
The applicant brought an application before the Ontario Labour Relations Board.
Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Board consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.
Employee appeal of refusal to issue order to pay terminated due to untimeliness.
The applicant employee appealed an Officer's refusal to issue an order to pay for termination and severance pay.
The Board noted that the application appeared to be filed outside the 45-day time limit set out in section 68 of the Employment Standards Act.
The Board invited the applicant to explain the timeliness or seek an extension, but the applicant failed to respond.
Consequently, the Board terminated the matter.
The applicant and responding party agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
Adjournment request denied as representative's residential move did not justify reconsidering prior refusal.
The applicant employer requested an adjournment of a hearing scheduled for June 28, 2000, because its representative was moving residences on that day.
The Board had previously denied the request.
The applicant provided more details about the move, but the Board found no new information that would cause it to reconsider its earlier decision.
The request for an extension was denied.
The applicant, Stelco Inc., Hilton Works, requested to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the applicant's request.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request, and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.
Worker found to be an employee, not an independent contractor; Order to Pay affirmed.
The employer appealed an Order to Pay awarding termination pay, public holiday pay, vacation pay, and unpaid wages to the worker.
The employer argued the worker was an independent contractor.
The Board applied the four-fold and organization tests, finding that the worker was under the direct control of the employer, provided no materials, bore no risk of loss, and was integral to the employer's business.
The Board concluded the worker was an employee and affirmed the Order to Pay, noting that the Act prohibits setting off wages for alleged poor quality work.
Board denies union counsel's request to tour employer's refinery in non-construction employer application.
In an application by the employer for a declaration that it is a non-construction employer, the responding union requested that its counsel be permitted to tour the employer's Sarnia refinery.
The Board denied the request, noting it was extraordinary and doubting its jurisdiction to make such an order.
The Board also declined the applicant's request to sit for whatever additional time was necessary to conclude the case on the scheduled days, though it offered to sit for a reasonable period beyond usual hours if completion appeared possible.