Application adjourned sine die on consent for up to one year.
The parties agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
Board directed submissions on adjournment and whether to dismiss unfair labour practice complaint.
The union filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging the employer harassed a pregnant employee seeking alternate work.
The union requested an adjournment and change of venue because the employee was scheduled to give birth.
The Board noted the employer had already apologized and taken remedial steps regarding the accommodation process.
The Board directed the employer to respond to the adjournment request and directed both parties to file submissions on whether the Board should exercise its discretion not to inquire further into the complaint, given that no good labour relations purpose might be served.
Board grants reconsideration to allow applicant submissions but declines to assign a different panel.
The applicant union requested reconsideration of a Board decision that dismissed its unfair labour practice complaints against a rival union without first seeking its submissions.
The applicant argued it was denied natural justice.
The Board agreed that it should have sought submissions before determining if an arguable case was made out, and granted the reconsideration to allow for written submissions.
However, the Board declined the applicant's request to place the matter before a different panel, noting that adjudicators are capable of keeping an open mind and being persuaded by new submissions.
Employee appeal for termination pay dismissed as evidence showed she was not terminated.
The applicant appealed an Employment Standards Officer's determination that she was not entitled to termination and severance pay because she had quit her employment.
The applicant alleged she was told by her manager to leave and not return due to her illness.
The Board found that the applicant was not terminated, noting she provided a doctor's note after the alleged termination, received no termination letter or Record of Employment, and continued to receive benefits.
Furthermore, the employer repeatedly asked her to return to work, which she refused.
The application was dismissed.
The applicant requested an adjournment sine die of the application.
Having regard to the agreement of the parties, the Adjudicator/Referee consented to adjourn the application sine die for a period not exceeding one year, after which it will be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the application will be deemed terminated if no party requests to proceed.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board.
The applicant requested to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted the request and the application was withdrawn with leave of the Board.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board upon request by the applicant.
The applicant union requested to withdraw its application.
Board issues consent order for $41,981.25 in damages for collective agreement violations.
The applicant union referred a construction industry grievance to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995.
Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into Minutes of Settlement and requested a consent order.
The Board issued the consent order, declaring the responding party bound by the collective agreement, finding violations of the agreement, and ordering the responding party to pay $41,981.25 in damages as full and final settlement.
The applicant union and responding employer agreed to adjourn the application sine die.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if neither party requested to proceed.
Board issues consent declarations regarding unpaid remittances but declines to order parties to meet.
Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into Minutes of Settlement and requested a consent decision.
The Board issued declarations that the parties were bound by the Provincial Collective Agreement and that the responding party had violated the agreement by failing to remit vacation pay and trust fund contributions.
However, the Board declined to order the parties to meet, noting it was not appropriate to mandate such a meeting.
A hearing was scheduled to determine the quantum of damages.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board consented to the adjournment for a period not exceeding one year, after which the matter would be deemed terminated if no request to proceed is made.
Representation vote rescheduled to correct administrative errors and ensure availability of a bilingual officer.
The applicant union filed an application for certification in the construction industry.
The Board initially ordered a representation vote but made administrative errors regarding the application filing and delivery dates, resulting in the vote being ordered without considering the responding party's timely response.
The responding party raised concerns about confusion over voter eligibility and the late availability of French notices.
The Board adjourned the vote and rescheduled it to a date when a bilingual officer would be available, balancing the need for expedition with obligations under the French Language Services Act.
Applications withdrawn with leave of the Board following Minutes of Settlement.
The applicant union sought to withdraw its applications against the responding parties following the execution of Minutes of Settlement.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave and the applications were withdrawn.
Board issues preliminary directions in unfair labour practice complaint regarding union organizing drive.
The applicant union filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging the responding employer terminated an employee for participating in an organizing drive.
The employer raised preliminary issues, seeking to strike portions of the application for delay and lack of a prima facie case, and objecting to certain documents.
The Board directed the applicant to clarify its reliance on the disputed paragraphs and deferred the evidentiary issues to the hearing panel.
Consent order issued incorporating Minutes of Settlement for $100,000 payment in construction industry grievance.
The applicant union referred three construction industry grievances to the Ontario Labour Relations Board under section 133 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995, alleging the use of non-union workers and failure to pay benefits.
The parties resolved the matters and entered into Minutes of Settlement, requesting the Board to incorporate them into a consent order.
The Board issued the consent order, directing the responding party to pay $100,000 to the applicant in accordance with the agreed payment schedule, and declined to adjourn the matter sine die as there were no remaining issues to adjudicate.
Board finds union pleaded a prima facie case of a statutory freeze violation.
The applicant union filed an application under section 96 of the Labour Relations Act, alleging that the responding party breached the statutory freeze in section 86 by changing the terms and conditions of employment of an employee.
The responding party argued that the applicant failed to plead a prima facie case.
The Board reviewed the application and concluded that a prima facie case had been pleaded.
Board directs pre-hearing conference in complex unfair labour practice complaint involving unrepresented employees.
The applicants, a group of employees, filed an unfair labour practice complaint alleging that the SEIU and the employer breached the Act during the negotiation of a merger of bargaining units.
The SEIU and the employer argued the issue was moot because the CAW had since displaced the SEIU as the bargaining agent.
Noting the complexity of the legal issues and the applicants' lack of professional representation, the Board directed a pre-hearing conference to streamline the matters in dispute and explore opportunities for resolution.
Application withdrawn with leave of the Board at the employer's request.
The employer requested to withdraw its application.
The Ontario Labour Relations Board granted leave to withdraw the application.
Applicants directed to provide particulars regarding collective agreement status and related employer payroll for severance claim.
The applicants appealed a decision of an Employment Standards Officer denying their claim for severance pay following a plant closure.
The Officer had concluded that a collective agreement was in place, requiring the employees to seek entitlements through the grievance and arbitration procedure under section 64.5 of the Employment Standards Act.
The applicants alleged there was no collective agreement in place due to a lockout, and that the employer's payroll, combined with a related entity, exceeded the $2.5 million threshold for severance pay.
The Board directed the applicants to provide detailed particulars regarding the status of the collective agreement and the factual basis for linking the related entities before scheduling a hearing.