Who is Leslie Reaume?

Leslie Reaume is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 325 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Leslie Reaume sit on?

Leslie Reaume sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Leslie Reaume decide?

Leslie Reaume's most common areas include Human Rights (325 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (97 decisions), Administrative Law (94 decisions). Leslie Reaume has handled 325 decisions across 8 areas.

How many decisions has Leslie Reaume made?

Leslie Reaume has 325 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Leslie Reaume?

Representatives who frequently appear before Leslie Reaume include David Patacairk, Alexandre Papouchine, Yavar Hameed.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Leslie Reaume — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Family and Matrimonial Law

Real Estate Law

Leslie Reaume

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

325

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 229Adjudicator· 50Vice-chair· 29Adjudicator· 7Vice-Chair· 4Vice-chair· 2Vice-Chair· 2Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario· 1

Patty Murray

25 cases1994–2022

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 30, 2012

Human rights application alleging discriminatory arrest dismissed as an improper attempt to re-litigate a criminal conviction.

The applicant alleged that police officers discriminated against him on the basis of race, colour, place of origin, citizenship, and creed when they arrested him for uttering a death threat to a neighbour.

The respondents requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application.

The Tribunal found that because the applicant had pled guilty to the criminal charge, his human rights application was an improper attempt to re-litigate the criminal court's findings.

Applying the Supreme Court's decision in Toronto (City) v. C.U.P.E., the Tribunal dismissed the application as having no reasonable prospect of success.

Soufan v. Regional Municipality of Peel Police Services Board, 2012 HRTO 855

Individual respondents removed from human rights complaint on consent.

The parties consented to the removal of all individual respondents from the human rights complaint.

The Tribunal ordered their removal and amended the style of cause accordingly.

Conway v. Ontario (Health and Long Term Care), 2012 HRTO 826

Suzan Fraser

3 cases2010–2012

Shane Smith

In Private Practice53 cases2001–2026

Beth Beattie

13 cases2008–2016

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 24, 2012

Consent order issued resolving racial discrimination complaint with $20,000 payment and systemic remedies.

The applicant filed a human rights complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of race during his involuntary detention at a mental health facility.

The parties brought a joint motion for a consent order to resolve the complaint.

The Tribunal granted the motion and issued a consent order requiring the facility to educate patients on harassment and discrimination, requiring a doctor to meet with the applicant to discuss prevention strategies, and ordering the Ministry to pay the applicant $20,000.

Conway v. Ontario (Health and Long-Term Care), 2012 HRTO 827

Suzanne Hunt

13 cases2011–2024

Kandace Davies

4 cases2007–2017

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 23, 2012

Summary hearing motion to dismiss human rights application denied; matter to proceed to full hearing.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine whether the applicant's human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of race, ancestry, ethnic origin, sex, and reprisal should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged discriminatory comments and conduct based on her gender and status as a new resident, both in her employment and as a citizen participating in public council meetings.

The Tribunal concluded that the application should move forward to a full hearing, as it could not determine at this stage that the application had no reasonable prospect of success.

Barbara Shaw v. Wollaston Township and Dan McCaw, 2012 HRTO 802

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 19, 2012

Union's unopposed request to intervene in human rights application granted.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of race, colour, and reprisal.

The applicant's union, CUPE Local 82, filed a Request to Intervene.

Neither the applicant nor the respondent opposed the request.

The Tribunal granted the union's request to intervene, noting its significant interest in the remedial orders requested, with the extent of participation to be determined at a later stage.

Louis Davis v. City of Windsor, 2012 HRTO 801

Roy Filion

55 cases1987–2019

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 16, 2012

Human rights application dismissed at summary hearing for being out of time and lacking reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant, a retired teacher, alleged discrimination on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, ethnic origin, disability, and age against the school board and her former principal.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to address the timeliness of pre-retirement allegations and whether the timely post-retirement allegation had a reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the pre-retirement allegations were out of time and did not form a series of incidents with the post-retirement refusal to provide a reference.

The Tribunal also found no reasonable prospect of success for the timely allegation, as the applicant could not point to evidence linking the refusal to a prohibited ground beyond mere speculation.

The application was dismissed.

Lanoue v. Peel District School Board, 2012 HRTO 758

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 11, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant indicated inability to pursue it.

The applicant indicated by email that he did not have time to pursue his human rights application.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction cancelling the scheduled hearing dates and stating the application would be dismissed as abandoned if no objection was received.

No objection was received, and the application was dismissed as abandoned.

Trevor David v. Thomas Roddick, 2012 HRTO 719

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 23, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending resolution of concurrent union grievance on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging she was unfairly denied tenure in connection with her maternity leave.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer the application pending the resolution of an ongoing union grievance dealing with the same subject matter.

The Tribunal found that the issues in the application and the grievance overlapped significantly and that proceeding concurrently could lead to inconsistent decisions.

The Tribunal ordered the application deferred pending the conclusion of the grievance and arbitration process.

Mary Kate Garrity v. Ryerson University, 2012 HRTO 590

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 23, 2012

Request for reconsideration denied as the applicant merely sought to re-argue his original allegations.

The applicant filed a Request for Reconsideration of a previous Tribunal decision that dismissed his human rights application following a summary hearing.

The applicant argued that the original decision was incorrect and reiterated his initial allegations of wrongful dismissal and the respondent's refusal to accept a doctor's note.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the applicant was merely attempting to re-argue his case.

The Tribunal concluded that none of the factors required for reconsideration under Rule 26 were met and there was no basis to overturn the original decision.

Mitsubishi Thompson v. Gemma Communications LP, 2012 HRTO 614

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 21, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending completion of related union grievance arbitration.

The applicant filed an application under the Human Rights Code regarding the accommodation of her medical condition.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Defer because the applicant's union had filed a grievance based on the same facts and issues, which had advanced to arbitration.

The respondent supported deferral, and the applicant did not file submissions.

The Tribunal deferred the application to avoid concurrent proceedings and the possibility of inconsistent decisions.

Anna Petroccia v. Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board, 2012 HRTO 585

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 21, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after the applicant failed to file a required Reply.

The respondent requested that the human rights application be dismissed because it was filed beyond the statutory time limit under section 34(1) of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal directed the applicant to file a Reply to the respondent's allegations.

After the applicant failed to do so, the Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction warning that the application would be dismissed as abandoned if the Reply was not filed within 10 days.

The applicant did not respond.

Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Rules of Procedure.

Abbas Moradi v. City of Ottawa, 2012 HRTO 586

Andrea Denovan

20 cases2003–2013

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 14, 2012

Human rights application dismissed as abandoned after applicant failed to attend summary hearing.

The Tribunal scheduled a summary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant failed to attend the teleconference hearing despite receiving notice.

In the absence of the applicant or any explanation for his failure to attend, the Tribunal dismissed the application as abandoned.

Ali Mohamad Muhumed v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2012 HRTO 534

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 2, 2012

Human rights application dismissed at summary hearing due to lack of evidence connecting treatment to prohibited grounds.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of race, colour, ancestry, place of origin, citizenship, and ethnic origin against an insurance ombudservice and two of its employees.

The applicant failed to attend the scheduled summary hearing.

The Tribunal proceeded in his absence and found no evidence connecting the respondents' written communications regarding his insurance dispute to any prohibited grounds.

The application was dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Edgar Cowie v. General Insurance Ombudservice, 2012 HRTO 381

Yavar Hameed

In Private Practice36 cases2010–2026

Stephane Perreault

In Private Practice9 cases2012–2022

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 24, 2012

Taxi brokerage shareholders engaged in reprisal by blocking applicant's affiliation due to his human rights advocacy.

The applicant, a taxi owner of Pakistani origin, alleged that the respondent taxi brokerage and its shareholders discriminated against him on the basis of race, colour, ethnic origin, place of origin, and creed, and engaged in reprisal by refusing to allow him to affiliate his taxi with their company.

The Tribunal found that the relationship between a taxi owner and a brokerage falls within the scope of employment under section 5(1) of the Human Rights Code.

The Tribunal concluded that while the initial refusals to accept the applicant were not discriminatory, the actions of key shareholders at an April 2007 meeting constituted reprisal for the applicant's previous advocacy against discrimination in the taxi industry.

One shareholder was also found to have discriminated against the applicant on the basis of creed.

The Tribunal deferred its decision on remedy to allow the parties to attempt a resolution.

Chaudhry v. Choice Taxi of Cornwall Inc., 2012 HRTO 391

Raj Anand

54 cases1981–2017

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 16, 2012

Adjournment and in-person hearing requests for a summary hearing denied absent exceptional circumstances.

The applicant requested an adjournment of a scheduled summary hearing by teleconference, asking that it be rescheduled to her spring break and held in person in Thunder Bay.

The Tribunal denied both requests, noting that the applicant failed to raise any specific prejudice requiring an in-person hearing for a summary proceeding.

Furthermore, the applicant did not demonstrate exceptional circumstances to justify an adjournment under the Tribunal's Practice Directions.

Pidgeon v. College of Nurses of Ontario, 2012 HRTO 106

Paula Yudkovitch

1 case2012–2012

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 16, 2012

Human rights application regarding child apprehension dismissed at summary hearing for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant alleged discrimination on multiple grounds after the respondent Children's Aid Society apprehended her child.

The Tribunal scheduled a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant failed to attend the hearing.

The Tribunal found that the child protection matter had already been determined by the Ontario Court of Justice on consent, and the application contained no evidence linking the respondents' actions to any prohibited grounds.

The application was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success.

M.T. v. The Children’s Aid Society of the Region of Peel, 2012 HRTO 104

Peggy E. Smith

7 cases1998–2017

Jehuda J. Kaminer

2 cases2004–2012

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 10, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent criminal proceedings against the respondent.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of sex.

The Tribunal issued a Case Assessment Direction seeking submissions on whether the application should be deferred pending the completion of concurrent criminal proceedings against the respondent.

The applicant did not oppose deferral but requested terms to ensure the matter was not deferred indefinitely.

The Tribunal ordered the application deferred, requiring the respondent to provide regular updates on the status of the criminal proceedings.

Birchall v. Andres, 2012 HRTO 48

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 10, 2012

Application dismissed at preliminary stage as applicant misinterpreted 'record of offences' to mean workplace discipline.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment based on 'record of offences'.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss because the application described general labour relations issues and workplace discipline, rather than a conviction for an offence under the Criminal Records Act or a provincial enactment.

The Tribunal found that the applicant misinterpreted the ground 'record of offences' to include disciplinary offences.

As there were no facts to support an allegation of discrimination under the Code, the application was dismissed at a preliminary stage for lack of jurisdiction.

Richard Gagnier v. Kellogg Canada Inc. and Al Todd, 2012 HRTO 52

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 9, 2012

Human rights application deferred pending completion of concurrent union grievance process.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on multiple grounds.

The applicant also had a concurrent union grievance in progress relating to the same facts.

The Tribunal issued a Notice of Intention to Defer.

Finding that the grievance proceeding had not concluded and involved the same facts, the Tribunal deferred the application pending the completion of the grievance process to avoid concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions.

Quijano v. Waterford Services, 2012 HRTO 36

Martin J. Addario

3 cases1986–2012

Leslie Reaume

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 4, 2012

Human rights application dismissed at summary hearing as applicant failed to allege a failure to accommodate.

The applicant alleged discrimination on the basis of disability after being bumped into a Welder position during a workplace downsizing, rather than his preferred Plateworker/Welder position.

The respondent requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was accommodated in his current position with no loss of income and did not allege a failure to accommodate, only that he was not in his ideal position.

The Tribunal dismissed the application as having no reasonable prospect of success, noting that the duty to accommodate does not require placing an employee in their ideal position.

Seguin v. Xstrata Nickel, 2012 HRTO 15

Page 13 of 17 (325 cases)

Applicant

Nadia CurrieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret CraigSelf-represented
1 appearance
I.K.Self-represented
1 appearance
Sohiala KhaksarSelf-represented
1 appearance
Desmond PitterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Nana Kow KuffourSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rubie Ann ComrieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Crystal ParkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Judith PidgeonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald WaiteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Naser SoufanSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Michele M. WarnerCounsel
1 appearance
Dianne KellyCounsel
1 appearance
Omar ShahabCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Tania Bloomfield, Jonathan Cohen, Davina Blenman, Zoraida Van Ael, Nina Sengupta, Christine MacDonell and Sarah Hicks

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Commission

Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Daniel GuttmanCounsel
1 appearance
Geoffry BakerCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
1 appearance
Gail GeronimoCounsel
1 appearance

for Akbar Ali

Akbar AliSelf-represented
1 appearance

for ArcelorMittal Dofasco

Kathryn BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for ARCH Legal Clinic

Tess SheldonCounsel
1 appearance

for Audi Mississauga

David AlliCounsel
1 appearance

for CAPREIT

Kristin LeyCounsel
1 appearance

for Eglinton-Bayview Physiotherapy Centre and Toula Reppas

Maria KotsopolousCounsel
1 appearance

for Great-West Life

Jody HechtCounsel
1 appearance

for Hellenic Home for the Aged Inc. and Kosta Kostouros

John D. CampbellCounsel
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Revenue and the Ministry of Finance, Marion Crane, Helmut Zisser

Roslyn BaichooCounsel
1 appearance

for Houselink Community Homes

Jessica DiFedericoCounsel
1 appearance

for Irmela Murphy and Ottawa-Carleton District School Board

Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance

for James White

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for Jean-Pierre Juneau, 2117125 Ontario Inc. o/a Caldwell and Associates Property Management, and Named Individual

David LymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Jennette Frost

Ian WerkerCounsel
1 appearance

for Kevin Dhinsa

Mark LabenskiCounsel
1 appearance

for Lucy Troisi

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for Manulife Financial

Sophia ZaidiCounsel
1 appearance

for Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 971

Mr. AntiaAgent
1 appearance

for Morneau Sheppell Ltd.

Roslyn KoganCounsel
1 appearance

for Niagara Health System, Carl Sebasta

Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance

for Outotec (Canada) Ltd.

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

for Peter Wilson

Sarah ColemanCounsel
1 appearance

for P & H Foods Division of Parrish & Heimbecker Limited, Reg Philips, Tracy Vanness-Brozoska, Craig Shaw and Luc Lacelle

Kathryn J. BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for Ram Shakyaver

Ram ShakyaverSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Ryan Baker, Brendan Stevenson, Michael Limsiaco, David Russell

Melanie FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for St. Joseph’s Health Centre

Michelle WarnerCounsel
1 appearance

for Storm Roll & Coil Repair Limited

Moira WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

Mei-Mei K. ClarkeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Alexandre PapouchineSelf-represented
4 appearances
Yavar HameedCounsel
4 appearances
Wayne CookSelf-represented
2 appearances
Joshua CohenAgent
2 appearances
D.D.Self-represented
2 appearances
Jemila MacanovicSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sheryl AbbeySelf-represented
2 appearances
Donna MageeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Desiree DespresSelf-represented
2 appearances
Marisa Scotto di LuzioCounsel
2 appearances
Samuel AlexanderSelf-represented
2 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
2 appearances
Clayton Talbert Sr.Agent
2 appearances
Virginia NelderCounsel
2 appearances
Bay RyleyCounsel
2 appearances
John BartolomeoCounsel
2 appearances
Grant HowellAgent
2 appearances
Mohit BaliSelf-represented
2 appearances
Judith PidgeonSelf-represented
2 appearances
David BloomCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicants

Mohammad BhattiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Samir IbrahimSelf-represented
1 appearance
Muhammad AlviSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Chief of Police and Toronto Police Service

Ansuya PachaiCounsel
1 appearance

for the Children’s Aid Society of the District of Nipissing and Parry Sound and Kristine Smith

Heather ZuckCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto, Mark Lawson, Ann Ulusoy, Arthur Beauregard, Donna Kovachis, Kathy Wiele and Don Boyle

Amandi EsonwanneCounsel
1 appearance

for the College of Physicians and Surgeons

Carina LentschCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Kikee MalikCounsel
2 appearances
Anthony D. GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Nils RiisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Suzan FraserCounsel
2 appearances
Peter RosenthalCounsel
1 appearance
Reni ChangCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie LetherenCounsel
1 appearance
Laura TherrienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kerri JoffeCounsel
1 appearance
Janet HaynesAgent
1 appearance
Munyonzwe HamalengwaCounsel
1 appearance
John HaratsisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Randy SelingerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Loralyn BenoitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cecil NormanAgent
1 appearance
Asafo AddaiSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant and for Darlene Hendershott and himself

Mel HendershottSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant/Applicant

Kimberly HealySelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Complainant Chad Aiken

Richard MillerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant Dimeji Temidire

Taiwo OlalereCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainants and Applicants

Julian H. FalconerCounsel
1 appearance
Jackie EsmondeCounsel
1 appearance
Asha JamesCounsel
1 appearance

for the District of Nipissing Social Services Administrative Board

Peter E.G. LeckieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Hamilton Police Association

Joshua S. PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Hamilton Police Services Board and Chief Mullan

Lynda BordeleauCounsel
1 appearance
David MigicovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the individual Respondents

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Matthew ToddCounsel
2 appearances
Steven WelchnerCounsel
1 appearance
Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance
Ian J. FellowsCounsel
1 appearance
Cathy BrakerCounsel
1 appearance
Neil KeatingCounsel
1 appearance
Samantha LambCounsel
1 appearance
Melissa KronickCounsel
1 appearance
Bridgette OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance
David WrightCounsel
1 appearance

for the James W. Stewart Medicine Professional Corporation and B.A. Demers Medicine Professional Corporation

Jennifer KatsunoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Jean-Jacques Primeau

Dona SalmonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Kelly J. Morgan Psychotherapy/Assessments

Amanda SmallwoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the Legal Department Paralegal

Chris LafranceAgent
1 appearance

for the North Bay Regional Health Centre

Shane SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Prabhu RajanCounsel
2 appearances
Raj DhirCounsel
1 appearance
Christine ElwellCounsel
1 appearance
Megan Evans MaxwellCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony GriffinCounsel
1 appearance
Anthony D. GriffinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondent James White

Susan UrselCounsel
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondents

Steven WelchnerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Personal Respondents Peter Wilson and Irmela Murphy

Phuong T.V. NgoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Public Guardian and Trustee

Judie ImCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Patrick BrodeCounsel
3 appearances
Sharon GreeneCounsel
2 appearances
Darrell KloezeCounsel
2 appearances
Gordon WoodsCounsel
2 appearances
David PatacairkCounsel
2 appearances
John Paul ZubecCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
2 appearances
Greg BullenCounsel
2 appearances
Chris DockrillCounsel
2 appearances
Laura ClarkCounsel
2 appearances
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
2 appearances
Todd WeisbergCounsel
1 appearance
William RobinsonCounsel
1 appearance
The Ethiopian Emergency Mutual Relief Association of Toronto Inc.Self-represented
1 appearance
Iain AspenliederCounsel
1 appearance
Suzanne GautreauAgent
1 appearance
A. AdamCounsel
1 appearance
Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance
Matthew DemeoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 559185 Ontario Ltd. cob Can Tech Services

Paul LewisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Amalgamated Transit Union - Local 1572

Beverley J. BurnsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent and Intervenor

Jacqueline Dais-ViscaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brockville Professional Firefighters Association

Peter EngelmannCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent City of Brockville

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent City of Toronto

Matthew LongoCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Dan McCaw

Kandace DaviesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Durham Regional Police Services Board

Angela J. KhouryCounsel
1 appearance
Ian B. JohnstoneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Guelph Police Service

Judith C. Sidlofsky StoffmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Education and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities

Kisha ChaterjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Finance

Lori PatykCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Beth BeattieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as Represented by the Ministry of the Attorney General

Tamar FriedmanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kely Morgan

Lisa E. HamiltonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Liquor Control Board of Ontario

Lauri ReesorCounsel
1 appearance
Justin DiggleCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Mental Health Penetanguishene Corporation

Shane SmithCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent Mike Del Grande

Melanie FranklynCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada), Local 555

Lewis GottheilCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa-Carleton District School Board

Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ottawa Police Services Board

Leanne N. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Royal Ottawa Health Care Group

Stephen BirdCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

David PatacairkCounsel
6 appearances
William D. AndersonCounsel
2 appearances
Trevor LawsonCounsel
2 appearances
Roger MillsCounsel
2 appearances
Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Gary BoydCounsel
1 appearance
Nicole GodfreyCounsel
1 appearance
Marnie TolenskyCounsel
1 appearance
Mary KokosisAgent
1 appearance
Paula YudkovitchCounsel
1 appearance
Gail GeronimoCounsel
1 appearance
Stephane PerreaultCounsel
1 appearance
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
1 appearance
Kara SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Kecia PodetzCounsel
1 appearance
David ElenbaasCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia G. MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Christopher G. RiggsCounsel
1 appearance
Danesh RanaCounsel
1 appearance
Denyse BouletCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents (Browne Complaint)

Kevin McGivneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents City of Mississauga Transportation and Works and MiWay Transit

Graham WalshCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Electrical Fire Safety Authority and Jenn Vautour

David G. CowlingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents (Maynard Complaint)

Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents McMaster University, Dale Schenk and Peter George

George AvraamCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Peterborough

Alan BarberCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Ontario Educational Communications Authority on behalf of the Independent Learning Centre

Jonathan LauCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Wollaston Township

Suzanne HuntCounsel
1 appearance

for the Salvation Army

Christine LeBlancCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto District School Board

Grant BowersCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

Glenn ChuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Workplace Safety Insurance Board Head Office

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Community Housing Corporation and Winston X

Saira CassimCounsel
1 appearance

for Touram L.P. d.b.a. Air Canada Vacations

Jean-Francois Bisson RossAgent
1 appearance

for Travel Industry Council of Ontario

Tracey McKiernanCounsel
1 appearance

for Trustees of CMHA - Ottawa Branch and Various Individual Respondents

Stephanie DoucetCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food & Commercial Workers Canada Locals 175 & 633

Catherine DavisCounsel
1 appearance

for Volkswagen Canada and Arthur Bode

Matthew CarrollCounsel
1 appearance

for Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Mike Shewan

Gurjit BrarCounsel
1 appearance

for Yvonne D’souza

Yvonne D’souzaSelf-represented
1 appearance

Litigation Guardian for the Applicant

Dan DanielAgent
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Sylvia OsvaldSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Rivka HermanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lin ZhangSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Alexander AllarieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Abdallah KarsiemSelf-represented
1 appearance

On their own behalf

Keith RoubleSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leslie RoubleSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative for the Respondents

Kim FerjoAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Steve LavenderCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

Denis D. BuchananCounsel
1 appearance

Sarnia Marriott Reservation Centre and Carol Kameka, Marie Frew, John Johnson, Marianne Gibbs, Linda Ryan, Respondents

Jonathan DyeCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Samuel AlexanderSelf-represented
1 appearance

Self-Represented

Zenon MacyshynSelf-represented
1 appearance

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, Respondent

Greg BullenCounsel
1 appearance

325

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

2.8

cases/mo

HRTO325(100%)

Decision types

motion

281

trial

Page 13 of 17 (325 cases)