Who is Ken Bhattacharjee?

Ken Bhattacharjee is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, administrative law, employment and labour law.

What tribunal does Ken Bhattacharjee sit on?

Ken Bhattacharjee sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Ken Bhattacharjee decide?

Ken Bhattacharjee's most common areas include Human Rights (567 decisions), Administrative Law (209 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (151 decisions). Ken Bhattacharjee has handled 567 decisions across 10 areas.

How many decisions has Ken Bhattacharjee made?

Ken Bhattacharjee has 567 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Ken Bhattacharjee?

Representatives who frequently appear before Ken Bhattacharjee include Trevor Smith, Self-represented, Nancy Jammu-Taylor.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Ken Bhattacharjee — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Administrative Law

Employment and Labour Law

Other Tribunals

Landlord and Tenant

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Real Estate Law

Corporate/Commercial Law

Workers' Compensation

Ken Bhattacharjee

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

567

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 424Adjudicator· 94Vice-chair· 32Vice-Chair· 10Adjudicator· 7

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent WSIB proceeding regarding suitability of modified work.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination on the basis of disability after her employment was terminated following a dispute over the suitability of a modified work offer.

The applicant had an ongoing appeal before the WSIB regarding the same modified work offer.

The Tribunal found a clear overlap between the key facts and issues in the two proceedings and deferred the human rights application pending the conclusion of the WSIB proceeding to avoid duplication of evidence and inconsistent findings.

Christina Daniel v. St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital, 2013 HRTO 1693

Kathy Chittley-Young

2 cases2013–2014

Joseph Cohen-Lyons

6 cases2012–2026

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 4, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent Employment Standards proceeding regarding termination.

The respondents requested that the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario defer consideration of the human rights application pending the conclusion of the applicant's concurrent Employment Standards claim with the Ministry of Labour.

Both proceedings arose from the termination of the applicant's employment and sought monetary damages.

The Tribunal found that deferral was the most fair, just, and expeditious way to proceed, given the significant overlap in issues and the potential for duplication of evidence and inconsistent findings.

The application was deferred.

Skuse v. E.D. Smith Foods Ltd., 2013 HRTO 1674

Brian Silva

7 cases2013–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 3, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of concurrent Employment Standards claim regarding pregnancy-based termination.

The applicant, a former nanny for the respondents, filed a human rights application alleging her employment was terminated due to pregnancy.

She had previously filed an Employment Standards claim with the Ministry of Labour regarding the same termination.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the human rights application pending the conclusion of the Employment Standards proceeding.

Finding significant overlap in the issues and noting the Ministry of Labour proceeding was at a more advanced stage, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application to prevent duplication of evidence and inconsistent findings.

Brittany Smith v. Sundeep Singh and Sandhya Singh, 2013 HRTO 1668

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioOct 2, 2013

Applicant ordered to produce receipt to resolve conflicting testimony regarding time of alleged racial profiling.

The applicant alleged racial profiling by a pharmacy employee who demanded to search her backpack.

At the merits hearing, a dispute arose regarding the time of the incident.

The applicant claimed she had a receipt proving the time but failed to produce it.

The Tribunal issued an interim decision ordering the applicant to produce the receipt within one week, noting its potential relevance to resolving the conflicting testimony.

If the receipt is not produced, the parties are directed to make submissions on whether an adverse inference should be drawn.

McCarthy v. Kenny Tan Pharmacy Inc., 2013 HRTO 1663

Thomas Stefanik

17 cases1982–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 27, 2013

Summary hearing request to dismiss age discrimination application denied; matter to proceed to merits hearing.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination after he and another older candidate were excluded from a job competition for a call centre agent position, while younger candidates advanced.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine whether the application should be dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant had pointed to sufficient evidence—specifically, the advancement of younger candidates and his own extensive relevant experience—to establish a reasonable prospect that he could prove a link between his age and the respondent's actions.

The Tribunal directed the matter to proceed to mediation or a merits hearing.

Rutledge v. The Travel Corporation (Canada), 2013 HRTO 1634

Luke J. Saites

10 cases2012–2017

Kumail Karimjee

In Private Practice16 cases2004–2020

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 6, 2013

Human rights application dismissed after applicant failed to attend scheduled summary hearing.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination with respect to housing by her housing cooperative and its representatives.

A summary hearing was scheduled to determine if the application should be dismissed because its subject matter had been dealt with in Superior Court proceedings or had no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant failed to attend the teleconference summary hearing despite receiving notice.

The Tribunal dismissed the application due to the applicant's failure to appear and prosecute her case, noting the significant resources already expended by the respondents and the Tribunal.

Feliz v. Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, 2013 HRTO 1509

Lauren Chang MacLean

2 cases2013–2016

Carl Peterson

53 cases1984–2023

Brian Noble

3 cases2011–2013

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioSep 3, 2013

Human rights application dismissed for delay as applicant failed to explain late filing.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging racial discrimination by a taxi driver and company more than eight months after the one-year statutory time limit.

The applicant argued the delay was in good faith because he was attempting to obtain the driver's name through criminal disclosure and freedom of information requests.

The Tribunal found that while the initial delay might have been in good faith, the applicant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for waiting an additional three months and three weeks to file the application after his freedom of information request was denied.

The application was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Harden Browne v. Beck Taxi Limited, Irfan Butt and Jutt Motors, 2013 HRTO 1489

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 2, 2013

Request to reactivate deferred human rights application denied as parallel disciplinary proceeding remained ongoing.

The applicant filed a Request for an Order During Proceedings to reactivate her human rights application, which had been deferred pending the completion of a disciplinary proceeding against her before the Law Society of Upper Canada.

The Tribunal denied the request because the LSUC proceeding was not yet complete, noting that the applicant's request to proceed before the Tribunal contradicted her claim that she was too ill to deal with the LSUC proceeding.

Ann Bruce v. The Law Society of Upper Canada and Ismet Zeynep Onen, 2013 HRTO 1322

John W. Saunders

3 cases2010–2014

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 26, 2013

Tribunal declined to defer human rights application pending concurrent grievance arbitration involving a different employer.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging the respondent failed to hire her because she was receiving WSIB benefits.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the conclusion of a concurrent grievance arbitration regarding the termination of her employment by her previous employer.

The Tribunal declined to defer the application, finding that although the proceedings flowed from the same overall facts, they dealt with distinct issues involving different employers.

Michelle Kinney v. Middlesex-London Emergency Medical Services Authority, 2013 HRTO 1308

John Saunders

14 cases1989–2014

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 25, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of a concurrent union grievance proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application while a concurrent union grievance proceeding involving the same facts was ongoing.

The respondents requested that the Tribunal defer the application pending the resolution of the grievance.

The applicant did not file a reply to the deferral request.

The Tribunal found that deferral was the most fair, just, and expeditious way to proceed, as the grievance process was initiated first, involved the same issues, and the arbitrator had the authority to apply the Human Rights Code.

The application was deferred.

John Burtch v. Lafarge Canada Inc. and Brenda MacPhee, 2013 HRTO 1303

Jeff Andrew

14 cases1993–2013

Gordon Fitzgerald

7 cases2010–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 24, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of a concurrent union grievance proceeding.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging sexual harassment and reprisals by her employer and several individuals.

The applicant had also filed a union grievance concerning the same facts.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the conclusion of the grievance proceeding.

Finding that the grievance process was ongoing, involved the same facts and issues, and that the arbitrator had the authority to apply the Human Rights Code, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application.

Della Rocca v. Loblaws Inc., 2013 HRTO 1291

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 23, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending the conclusion of a concurrent union grievance proceeding.

The applicant filed an application alleging discrimination based on disability and reprisals in employment.

The applicant acknowledged that the facts of the application were part of an ongoing union grievance proceeding.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the conclusion of the grievance proceeding.

Finding that there was a clear overlap between the facts and issues in both proceedings and that the arbitrator had the authority to apply the Code, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application.

Jewlal v. Thames Valley District School Board, 2013 HRTO 1276

Marie-Claire Albanese

Practising Law - Employed2 cases2012–2013

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 22, 2013

Human rights application deferred pending conclusion of parallel wrongful dismissal civil action.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging disability discrimination regarding his termination, after having already commenced a civil action for wrongful dismissal in the Superior Court.

The Tribunal considered whether to defer the application pending the conclusion of the civil proceeding.

Finding that the claims overlapped and the civil proceeding was at a more advanced stage, the Tribunal ordered the deferral of the application to avoid duplication of evidence and inconsistent findings.

Bell v. Desjardins General Insurance Group, 2013 HRTO 1267

Katherine Ferreira

15 cases2013–2023

Dana McDonald

7 cases2009–2015

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 10, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as an abuse of process because the underlying issues were previously settled.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination and reprisal with respect to employment.

The respondent requested that the application be dismissed on a preliminary basis as an abuse of process, arguing that the parties had previously executed Minutes of Settlement resolving all outstanding employment issues, including human rights matters.

The applicant had refused to sign the subsequent release because she disagreed with its terms.

The Tribunal found that the parties had a joint intention to settle all outstanding issues when they signed the Minutes of Settlement, and the applicant could not void the settlement by refusing to sign the release.

The application was dismissed as an abuse of process for attempting to re-litigate settled matters.

Coelho v. Hydro One Brampton Networks Inc., 2013 HRTO 1204

Joel Thomas

5 cases2011–2016

Gavin Magrath

5 cases2009–2022

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 21, 2013

Scheduling discrimination claim dismissed for lack of medical documentation; termination reprisal claim proceeds to hearing.

The applicant, a retail employee, alleged discrimination, harassment, and reprisal on the basis of disability regarding his employer's scheduling practices and his subsequent termination.

At a summary hearing, the Tribunal dismissed the scheduling allegations, finding no reasonable prospect of success because the applicant failed to provide sufficient medical documentation to trigger the duty to accommodate his restricted availability.

However, the Tribunal allowed the termination allegations to proceed to a merits hearing, as there were significant factual disputes regarding whether the applicant's conduct was disability-related and whether the termination constituted a reprisal.

Cory Rhijnsburger v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2013 HRTO 1109

Lucy Siraco

28 cases2009–2016

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2013

Human rights application alleging workplace discrimination dismissed at summary hearing for no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant, a black man originally from Trinidad and Tobago, filed an application alleging discrimination and reprisals in employment by the respondent.

The respondent requested a summary hearing to dismiss the application for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The Tribunal found that the applicant's allegations were largely based on speculation, lacked probative value, and failed to show a link between the respondent's conduct and the alleged Code grounds.

The application was dismissed on a preliminary basis.

Stavros Clunis v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 HRTO 978

Matthew Orchard

2 cases2013–2013

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 3, 2013

Human rights application dismissed summarily; hotel's call to police was based on safety concerns, not discrimination.

The applicant, acting through her litigation guardian, alleged that the respondent hotel discriminated against her on the basis of disability (autism) when the hotel owner called the police and Children's Aid Society and threatened eviction.

The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the application had a reasonable prospect of success.

Assuming the applicant's allegations were true, the Tribunal found that the respondent's actions were prompted by the parents leaving the applicant alone in the hotel without notifying staff, rather than an unwillingness to accommodate her disability.

The application was dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

Anderson v. Stone Willow Inn, 2013 HRTO 979

Matthew A. Fisher

2 cases2011–2013

Daniel A. Lubin

2 cases2011–2013

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 17, 2013

Request to amend human rights application to increase monetary damages sought granted.

The applicant requested an order during proceedings to amend her human rights application to increase the amount of monetary damages sought for injury to dignity, feelings, and self-respect, and to add a claim for loss of income and benefits.

The individual respondent opposed the request.

The Tribunal granted the request, noting that the amendment related only to the relief sought and did not involve additional allegations, and that there was no prejudice to the respondents as a hearing had not yet been scheduled.

Iozia v. Canada Control Solutions International, Inc., 2013 HRTO 849

Sari L. Springer

9 cases2009–2017

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 6, 2013

Human rights application alleging age discrimination dismissed for having no reasonable prospect of success.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging age discrimination after his employment was terminated during his probationary period.

The respondent maintained the termination was due to the applicant's inappropriate and discriminatory comments.

After hearing the applicant's evidence at the merits hearing, the Tribunal dismissed the application on a summary basis, finding no reasonable prospect that the applicant could prove his age was a factor in the termination.

Clarke v. Coutts Information Services Limited, 2013 HRTO 754

Michael A. Cohen

7 cases2012–2021

James B. Tausendfreund

23 cases2012–2025

Ken Bhattacharjee

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 1, 2013

Human rights application dismissed as applicant failed to disclose disability needs to trigger accommodation duty.

The applicant, who has multiple disabilities, alleged that the respondent condominium builder discriminated against him by failing to allocate a parking spot in front of his building.

The Tribunal found that while the applicant had disabilities, he failed to make his disability-related needs known to the respondent's sales staff when purchasing the unit, thereby failing to trigger the respondent's duty to accommodate.

The application was dismissed.

Wilfrid Judge v. Baywood Homes, 2013 HRTO 727

Page 13 of 29 (567 cases)

Applicant

Mike NaraineSelf-represented
2 appearances
John InglisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ralph MazeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tom RabaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mario HawcoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stanley DombroskieSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard ToderanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Henry DelaneySelf-represented
1 appearance
Angela OlaskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul RadoiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marcio CabralSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HarveySelf-represented
1 appearance
Stephanie de KoningSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven GerredSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ruth CameronSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emile WickhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jeffrey KiersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharna SugarmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
S.D.Self-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

Peigi RossCounsel
2 appearances
Cathy PhanCounsel
1 appearance
Paula M. RusakCounsel
1 appearance
Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance
Thomas A. StefanikCounsel
1 appearance
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia ChandraCounsel
1 appearance
Stephanie M. RamsayCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth TraynorCounsel
1 appearance
Joseph GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
David M. GoodmanCounsel
1 appearance
Caroline V. (Nini) JonesCounsel
1 appearance
Tyler InksterCounsel
1 appearance
Lily HarmerCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth CowieCounsel
1 appearance
Patricia MatusiakCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Applicant

Ernest GuisteCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Respondents

Jennifer FantiniCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

Cindy SpenceAgent
1 appearance

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

Michael AlexanderCounsel
1 appearance

for Baywood Homes

Michael A. CohenCounsel
1 appearance

for Beck Taxi Limited

Carl PetersonCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren Chang MacLeanCounsel
1 appearance

for both Applicants

Taleh HuseynovSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Bruce Johnston

Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

Yashoda RanganathanCounsel
1 appearance

for himself

Felix MillienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Irfan ButtSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Hurley Corporation, Joe Cunha, Evelyn Hewitt, and Manny Silva

Gavin ClingbineAgent
1 appearance

for IIWI Foods Inc. and Gordon Macleod

Rachel GoldenbergCounsel
1 appearance

for Jodie Huber and Rick Pereira

Kumail KarimjeeCounsel
1 appearance

for Linda Tougas HR Consulting Inc. and Linda Tougas

Dan PalayewCounsel
1 appearance

for Loblaws Inc., Respondent

Gordon FitzgeraldCounsel
1 appearance

for Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, Julie Murphy, Debbie August-Moffat, Stephen English, Raymond Ouellet, Mark Smith, Napoleon Mulsa, Dum Siziba, and Lisa Forestell

Luke J. SaitesCounsel
1 appearance

for McDonald’s Restaurants of Canada Limited

Russell GrovesCounsel
1 appearance

for Regional Tourism Organization Four Inc. and David Peacock

Christopher McClellandCounsel
1 appearance

for Robert Half International

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for Sherilyn Koenig

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for Simerra Property Management Inc. and Simcoe Standard Condominium Corporation No. 338

James B. TausendfreundCounsel
1 appearance

for Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Maria McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance

for the Affected Organization

Martin CerquaUnion representative
1 appearance

for the Affected Party

Natasha De MennaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Trevor SmithAgent
7 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
6 appearances
Mary Jane CampigottoCounsel
5 appearances
Margaret WaySelf-represented
4 appearances
Christine LundyAgent
4 appearances
Victoria ShenCounsel
3 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
3 appearances
Andrea AndersonSelf-represented
3 appearances
Christine LongtinSelf-represented
3 appearances
Susan DevoeSelf-represented
3 appearances
Selwyn PietersSelf-represented
3 appearances
S.D.Self-represented
3 appearances
Melissa MarkCounsel
3 appearances
Cecil NormanAgent
3 appearances
Sean FlahertyCounsel
2 appearances
Corey ChandlerSelf-represented
2 appearances
Clara MathesonCounsel
2 appearances
Ernst GoetzeSelf-represented
2 appearances
Najeem EbrahimiAgent
2 appearances
Richard ClarkeSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicants

Barbara HoekstraSelf-represented
2 appearances
Sharan BasranCounsel
1 appearance
Bradley TruaxAgent
1 appearance
Nicholas MiniganSelf-represented
1 appearance
Shawn WestonAgent
1 appearance
Eric LettsCounsel
1 appearance
Donna WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Patrick JamesCounsel
1 appearance
John DoneCounsel
1 appearance
Lori MishibinijimaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for The Christian Reformed Church in North America – Canada Corporation, The Christian Reformed Church in North America, and Classis Hamilton

Sean JacksonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Susan BallantyneCounsel
1 appearance
Laurie KentCounsel
1 appearance
Michael McCrearyCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
Alycia ShawCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Pavle MasicCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Nurses' Association

Colin JohnsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Public Service Employees Union

Ed HolmesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Katherine FerreiraCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Elyse MallinsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

Nancy Jammu-TaylorCounsel
6 appearances
Sari SpringerCounsel
4 appearances
Daniel McDonaldCounsel
4 appearances
Erin PorterCounsel
3 appearances
Thomas StefanikCounsel
3 appearances
Carita PereiraCounsel
2 appearances
Christopher BurkettCounsel
2 appearances
Saba ZiaCounsel
2 appearances
Sean JacksonCounsel
2 appearances
Jordana JosephCounsel
2 appearances
Adrian MiedemaCounsel
2 appearances
Andrea YorkCounsel
2 appearances
Samantha ThorntonAgent
2 appearances
Matthew OrchardCounsel
1 appearance
C. April StewartAgent
1 appearance
Lucy SiracoCounsel
1 appearance
Shaheynoor TalukderCounsel
1 appearance
Lorraine PorCounsel
1 appearance
Roy FilionCounsel
1 appearance
Robert J. AtkinsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent 1243564 Ontario Limited o/a Total Scrap Management

Suzanne PorterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andrea Sequeira

Nicole ChrolaviciusCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Andriy Tsurkan

Andriy TsurkanSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Anthony Hutchinson

Anthony HutchinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bombardier Transportation Canada Inc.

Michael HorvatCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Brant Artillery Gunners Club Incorporated

Michael WhiteCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees and its Local 133

Mona StaplesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Cotton Inc.

Bradley J. TroupCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent DTZ Canada Incorporated

William T. MaccoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent ECE Distribution Ltd. o/a Branded Merchandise and Proposed Respondent Cooney Promotions Inc.

John A. AnnenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent George Cole

Raj AnandCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Giuseppe Alessandro

Richard KestenAgent
1 appearance
Tom GagovskiAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Henry Rivas

Crista ReaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Hudson Bay Company

Maria KotsopoulosCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Loblaw Companies Limited

Zoe KingCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Michael Burns

Daniel CondonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Office of the Independent Police Review Director

Jean C.H. IuCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent R.A. Centre

Andrew ListerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Right at Home Realty Inc. Brokerage

Michael WeberAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Rohan Chinniah

Philip KlumakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Russian Student Association (RSA) at University of Toronto

Valentin SotovAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Ryder Truck Rental Canada Ltd.

Andrew BrattCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Lyne LavergneCounsel
3 appearances
John-Paul AlexandrowiczCounsel
3 appearances
Brian SilvaCounsel
2 appearances
Nick StilloSelf-represented
2 appearances
Omo AkintanCounsel
2 appearances
Bruce DormanSelf-represented
2 appearances
Geneviève DebanéCounsel
2 appearances
William BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Elaine BourneSelf-represented
2 appearances
Leola PonCounsel
1 appearance
Glenn ChristieCounsel
1 appearance
Laura K. WilliamsCounsel
1 appearance
David TurnerCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WilliamsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrew PorterCounsel
1 appearance
Pranavan GaneshalingamSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter OsborneCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew CooperSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brennagh SmithCounsel
1 appearance
Allison TaylorCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 1 Canada

Helen NowakCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Service Employees International Union Local 2, Brewery, General & Professional Workers’ Union

Bruce PriceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology, Scott Dart, and Jeff Low

David FosterCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Imrana Jeoffrey and James Hanson

Vicky SattaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Michael McInnis and Constantina Tsilimigras

Jeffrey AndrewCounsel
1 appearance
Andrew MacIsaacCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Algonquin College of Applied Arts and Technology, Cynthia Poulin, Amandah Selvey, Reuben Helder, Louise Cowley, and Marjan Ghannad

Chris RutherfordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Governing Council of the University of Toronto and Vera Bril

Sari SpringerCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents The Regional Municipality of York Police Services Board, Andrew Burford, Olena Duff, Carley Nisbett, John Parker, Chris Palmer, Darren Hodskins, Ron Peever, Barbara Sanders, Brad Plummer, and Cathy Mathews

Anthony DeianaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Stuart Schoeman

Matthew A. FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent TD Bank Group

Pierre BitzAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Teamsters Canada Rail Conference – Division 660

Laura ReaumeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

Michelle GibbsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Corporation of the City of Niagara Falls

Mark MasonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent The Governing Council of the University of Toronto

Sari SpringerCounsel
2 appearances

for the Respondent The TDL Group Corporation

James D. HeeneyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Association

Katie RowenCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Thunder Bay Police Services Board

Robert EdwardsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unifor

Mike ArmstrongAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent University Health Network

Naomi MargoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Voysus Group Inc.

Kashif RazaAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent West Park Healthcare Centre

Sarah EvesCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
2 appearances
Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance
Melany FranklinCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Catholic District School Board, Desi Smulan and Rose Balmbra

Paul MatthewsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance
Antonella CeddiaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Union

J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance

for Thomas Gold Pettingill LLP

Lambert BoendersCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Cricket Skating and Curling Club

Assunta MazzottaCounsel
1 appearance

for Toronto Police Services Board, William Blair and Larry Sinclair

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Canada, Local 1000A

Jeff AndrewCounsel
1 appearance

for United Food and Commercial Workers Union Canada, Local 175

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance
Erin WallaceCounsel
1 appearance

for United Steelworkers Local 252G

Dale HoggUnion representative
1 appearance

for William Blair

Adam GuyCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for William Blair, John Moreira and Wayne O’Riordan

Lisa CabelCounsel
1 appearance
Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

on her own behalf

Katie ConnorSelf-represented
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Christine LongtinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan ShawSelf-represented
1 appearance
Manminder JagaitSelf-represented
1 appearance
Malika MounirSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kara FlanaganSelf-represented
1 appearance

On Her Own Behalf

Donna JennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne BlanchetteSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Raymond MortonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank QuattrociSelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank PaternoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jason AndersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance
Damola AlabiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dawit TuquaboSelf-represented
1 appearance

On His Own Behalf

Raffaele (Ralph) CapocciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sona BaruaSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LarkeSelf-represented
1 appearance
John FlemingSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

John VaccherAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

John FarantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Christine AshtonCounsel
1 appearance
Prabha HaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Andrea DenovanCounsel
1 appearance

Respondent/Proposed Intervenor

Shaheen HiraniCounsel
1 appearance

Respondents

William S. CookCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Kelly McNultySelf-represented
1 appearance
Mira FreidinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leonardo GaluegoSelf-represented
1 appearance

567

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

5.2

cases/mo

HRTO567(100%)

Decision types

motion

508

trial

Page 13 of 29 (567 cases)

Robert Whitteker

Brian O'Byrne

Ken Bhattacharjee

Christina Daniel v. St. Thomas Elgin General Hospital, 2013 HRTO 1693

Kathy Chittley-Young

Joseph Cohen-Lyons

Ken Bhattacharjee

Skuse v. E.D. Smith Foods Ltd., 2013 HRTO 1674

Brian Silva

Ken Bhattacharjee

Brittany Smith v. Sundeep Singh and Sandhya Singh, 2013 HRTO 1668

Ken Bhattacharjee

McCarthy v. Kenny Tan Pharmacy Inc., 2013 HRTO 1663

Thomas Stefanik

Ken Bhattacharjee

Rutledge v. The Travel Corporation (Canada), 2013 HRTO 1634

Luke J. Saites

Kumail Karimjee

Ken Bhattacharjee

Feliz v. Margaret Laurence Housing Co-operative, 2013 HRTO 1509

Lauren Chang MacLean

Carl Peterson

Brian Noble

Ken Bhattacharjee

Harden Browne v. Beck Taxi Limited, Irfan Butt and Jutt Motors, 2013 HRTO 1489

Ken Bhattacharjee

Ann Bruce v. The Law Society of Upper Canada and Ismet Zeynep Onen, 2013 HRTO 1322

John W. Saunders

Ken Bhattacharjee

Michelle Kinney v. Middlesex-London Emergency Medical Services Authority, 2013 HRTO 1308

John Saunders

Ken Bhattacharjee

John Burtch v. Lafarge Canada Inc. and Brenda MacPhee, 2013 HRTO 1303

Jeff Andrew

Gordon Fitzgerald

Ken Bhattacharjee

Della Rocca v. Loblaws Inc., 2013 HRTO 1291

Ken Bhattacharjee

Jewlal v. Thames Valley District School Board, 2013 HRTO 1276

Marie-Claire Albanese

Ken Bhattacharjee

Bell v. Desjardins General Insurance Group, 2013 HRTO 1267

Katherine Ferreira

Dana McDonald

Ken Bhattacharjee

Coelho v. Hydro One Brampton Networks Inc., 2013 HRTO 1204

Joel Thomas

Gavin Magrath

Ken Bhattacharjee

Cory Rhijnsburger v. Wal-Mart Canada Corp., 2013 HRTO 1109

Lucy Siraco

Ken Bhattacharjee

Stavros Clunis v. Toronto Transit Commission, 2013 HRTO 978

Matthew Orchard

Ken Bhattacharjee

Anderson v. Stone Willow Inn, 2013 HRTO 979

Matthew A. Fisher

Daniel A. Lubin

Ken Bhattacharjee

Iozia v. Canada Control Solutions International, Inc., 2013 HRTO 849

Sari L. Springer

Ken Bhattacharjee

Clarke v. Coutts Information Services Limited, 2013 HRTO 754

Michael A. Cohen

James B. Tausendfreund

Ken Bhattacharjee

Wilfrid Judge v. Baywood Homes, 2013 HRTO 727

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Applicant

Counsel for Respondents

Counsel for the Respondents

for Altis Human Resources (Ottawa) Inc.

for Andorra Building Maintenance Ltd.

for Baywood Homes

for Beck Taxi Limited

for both Applicants

for Bruce Johnston

for Dr. Victor Wai-Lee Chiu

for himself