Who is Keith Brennenstuhl?

Keith Brennenstuhl is a vice-chair at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario with 435 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017. Key areas include human rights, employment and labour law, administrative law.

What tribunal does Keith Brennenstuhl sit on?

Keith Brennenstuhl sits on the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario.

What areas of law does Keith Brennenstuhl decide?

Keith Brennenstuhl's most common areas include Human Rights (435 decisions), Employment and Labour Law (137 decisions), Administrative Law (122 decisions). Keith Brennenstuhl has handled 435 decisions across 8 areas.

How many decisions has Keith Brennenstuhl made?

Keith Brennenstuhl has 435 decisions on record from 2008 to 2017.

Who frequently appears before Keith Brennenstuhl?

Representatives who frequently appear before Keith Brennenstuhl include Ronald Davie, AiLian Ou, Seifu Wondimagnehu.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

Keith Brennenstuhl — Vice-Chair

Human Rights

Employment and Labour Law

Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law

Workplace Safety and Insurance Law

Keith Brennenstuhl

Vice-Chair·Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario·Since 2008

435

cases · 10 yrs · HRTO

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice-chair· 366Adjudicator· 51Vice-chair· 14Adjudicator· 2Vice-Chair· 1

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioAug 4, 2009

Adjournment and confidentiality requests denied; late request to retain counsel and privacy concerns insufficient.

The applicant in a human rights complaint requested an adjournment of a scheduled hearing to retain counsel, and a confidentiality order to anonymize his name due to the stigma associated with his disability.

The Tribunal denied the adjournment, finding no exceptional circumstances for the late request.

The Tribunal also denied the confidentiality order, holding that the principle of open hearings outweighed the applicant's privacy concerns, and that the nature of the medical evidence was not exceptionally sensitive compared to other disability cases.

Davie v. PMA Brethour Real Estate, 2009 HRTO 1198

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 24, 2009

Adjournment request denied as pending reconsideration in separate application would not affect fairness of hearing.

The applicant requested an adjournment of the scheduled hearing pending a reconsideration determination in a separate application involving the same applicant but different respondents.

The respondents objected to the adjournment.

The Tribunal denied the request, finding that the outcome of the reconsideration would not affect the fairness of the hearing in this application, as the fair and expeditious determination of this matter was not dependent on the other application.

Ronald Davie v. PMA Brethour Real Estate Corp. Inc. and Sue Di Illio, 2009 HRTO 1133

Gregory F. McGinnis

1 case2009–2009

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJul 16, 2009

Human rights application dismissed; employer reasonably relied on WSIB ergonomic assessment to accommodate disabled employee.

The applicant, a binder who suffered a work-related neck and shoulder injury, alleged that her employer failed to accommodate her disability.

The employer had provided modified work based on a WSIB ergonomic assessment, which the applicant attempted for a few days before stopping due to pain.

Although a subsequent WSIAT decision found the applicant was unable to perform the modified work, the Tribunal held that the employer had satisfied its duty to accommodate based on the information available to it at the relevant time, specifically the WSIB ergonomic report.

The application was dismissed.

Sharon Saucier v. Smart Lazer Grafix, a Division of Smart Enterprises Corporation, Maureen Roberts and Phil Hall, 2009 HRTO 1053

Jeremy Hann

In Private Practice16 cases2009–2017

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJun 1, 2009

Human rights application dismissed for failing to connect workplace harassment allegations to a protected Code ground.

The applicant filed a transitional application alleging reprisal in employment against her former employer and several individuals.

She claimed that a coworker demeaned her and that management failed to intervene.

The Tribunal dismissed the application at a Case Resolution Conference, finding that the applicant failed to identify any protected ground of discrimination or provide evidence that the alleged conduct was a reprisal for claiming or enforcing a right under the Human Rights Code.

Grant v. Dura Automotive Systems, 2009 HRTO 727

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 25, 2009

Human rights application dismissed; allegations of failure to accommodate and discriminatory remarks found not credible.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination in employment and a poisoned work environment on the basis of disability and place of origin.

He claimed the respondents failed to accommodate his return from medical leave and made discriminatory remarks regarding his Irish accent and disability during a meeting.

The Tribunal found that a bona fide graduated return to work program had been prepared, which the applicant chose to abandon.

The Tribunal preferred the evidence of the respondents, finding the applicant's testimony inconsistent and evasive, and concluded that no discriminatory remarks or threats were made.

The application was dismissed.

Colm Tyrrell v. Intercall Canada Inc., Jason Foss and Jennifer Bellward, 2009 HRTO 680

Human rights application alleging discrimination based on disability and marital status regarding shift work dismissed.

The applicant, a 9-1-1 Communications Operator, alleged discrimination on the basis of disability (depression) and marital status, claiming she was subjected to a poisoned work environment that forced her resignation.

She had requested a transfer to straight day shifts to accommodate her depression and to align with her spouse's new shift schedule.

The Tribunal dismissed the application, finding no medical evidence that her depression required accommodation or prevented her from performing her duties.

The Tribunal also found no differential treatment based on marital status and concluded her resignation was a personal choice rather than the result of a poisoned work environment.

Morin v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2009 HRTO 618

U-Sheak Koroma

1 case2009–2009

Brian O'Byrne

20 cases1983–2016

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 20, 2009

Human rights applications alleging workplace discrimination, harassment, and reprisal dismissed for lack of credible evidence.

The applicant, a Black woman from Jamaica with severe asthma, alleged that she was subjected to discrimination and harassment in the workplace and that her subsequent termination was a reprisal for filing a human rights complaint.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario found insufficient credible evidence to support the allegations of a management-initiated rumour or discriminatory treatment.

The Tribunal concluded that the applicant's suspensions and ultimate termination were the result of documented workplace misconduct and service failures, and that the respondents were unaware of the human rights complaint at the time of termination.

The applications were dismissed.

Tulloch v. Cara Operations, 2009 HRTO 464

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 17, 2009

Human rights application deferred pending outcome of ongoing grievance arbitration on same facts.

The applicant filed a human rights application alleging termination of employment due to disability.

The respondents requested deferral of the application pending the outcome of an ongoing grievance arbitration dealing with the same facts and issues.

The Tribunal granted the deferral, noting that grievance arbitrators have the jurisdiction and responsibility to enforce human rights obligations, and that deferral avoids concurrent proceedings and inconsistent decisions.

Sheldon Brown v. Loblaw Companies Limited, 2009 HRTO 456

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioApr 15, 2009

Human rights application dismissed after applicant failed to attend the Case Resolution Conference.

The applicant filed a human rights application but failed to attend the scheduled Case Resolution Conference.

The Tribunal was satisfied that the applicant received notice of the conference and concluded that her failure to appear indicated she no longer wished to pursue the application.

The application was dismissed.

Phyllis Wright v. Royal Taxi Inc. et al., 2009 HRTO 442

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMar 27, 2009

Production of medical documents ordered as they are arguably relevant to the applicant's claims.

The respondents in a human rights application requested an order for the production of the applicant's medical documents relating to her claim for mental anguish and her absence from work.

The applicant, a nurse alleging discrimination based on race and disability, did not object.

The Tribunal granted the request, finding the documents arguably relevant to the nature of the alleged injury and the reasons for her absence, but limited production to the period between the alleged traumatic event and the date of the complaint.

Ocampo v. Revera Retirement, 2009 HRTO 358

Richard Worsfold

1 case2009–2009

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 24, 2009

Human rights application dismissed; clubhouse suspension was based on disruptive behaviour, not transgender status.

The applicant, a transgender woman, alleged that the respondents discriminated against her on the basis of sex by suspending her from a psychosocial rehabilitation centre clubhouse and subjecting her to derogatory name-calling.

The Tribunal found that the applicant was suspended due to a documented history of disruptive and inappropriate behaviour, including assaulting another individual and repeatedly pursuing a staff member, rather than her sex.

Furthermore, the Tribunal found that the alleged name-calling occurred at an unrelated drop-in centre over which the respondents had no control.

The application was dismissed.

Hartford v. Progress Place Rehabilitation Centre, 2009 HRTO 196

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 12, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant sought to withdraw her human rights application filed under section 53(3) of the Human Rights Code.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

O’Brien v. J & F Home Child Care, 2009 HRTO 157

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioFeb 12, 2009

Human rights application withdrawn with leave of the Tribunal.

The applicant sought to withdraw his human rights application filed under section 53(3) of the Human Rights Code.

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario granted leave and the application was withdrawn.

Persad v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113, 2009 HRTO 139

Brian Smith

28 cases1982–2025

Anne E. Posno

56 cases2001–2026

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioJan 16, 2009

Human rights complaint dismissed; physician's refusal to accept patient was based on house call expectations, not disability.

The complainant, who has a severe brain injury, alleged that the respondent family physician discriminated against him on the basis of disability by refusing to accept him as a new patient.

The respondent maintained that she refused the complainant because his mother expected her to make house calls, a service she does not provide to any patients.

The Tribunal found that the respondent's refusal was based entirely on the expectation of house calls and not on the complainant's disability.

The Tribunal also rejected the argument that the respondent's new patient interview process was inherently discriminatory.

The complaint was dismissed.

Sinopoli v. Walling, 2009 HRTO 50

Robert W. England

1 case2008–2008

Allyssa Case

7 cases2006–2008

Keith Brennenstuhl

HRTO0 cases2008–2017

HRTOHuman Rights Tribunal of OntarioMay 13, 2008

Motion for production of complainant's LTD insurance litigation documents dismissed for lack of arguable relevance.

The respondents in a human rights complaint alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of disability sought an order compelling the complainant to produce documents related to his civil action against his long-term disability insurer.

The Tribunal dismissed the request, finding that the documents were not arguably relevant to whether the respondents met their duty to accommodate the complainant under the Human Rights Code.

The issue in the insurance litigation was entitlement to benefits, which is distinct from the duty to accommodate.

Henry v. Faurecia Automotive Seating Canada Ltd., 2008 HRTO 30

Page 22 of 22 (435 cases)

Applicant

Carlito GomesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Munyonzwe HamalengwaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rozza KovalevaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Anthony JamesSelf-represented
1 appearance
AiLian OuSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard DeanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Crystal MartinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wilbert PauhlSelf-represented
1 appearance
David PrinceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Richard Da CostaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter ArmorerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Isaac DauteySelf-represented
1 appearance
Michael HorokySelf-represented
1 appearance
Leslie AustinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jaspal SamraSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ivanmarino MaziaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Swarna VijayakumaranSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steven EdwardsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joanne NickersonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Trudie GrantSelf-represented
1 appearance

Counsel

David PhilpottCounsel
1 appearance
Sonia RegenbogenCounsel
1 appearance
D. Brent LabordCounsel
1 appearance
Kathryn L. MeehanCounsel
1 appearance
Steven MorrisCounsel
1 appearance
Porter HeffernanCounsel
1 appearance
Orna RaubfogelCounsel
1 appearance
Elizabeth KosmidisCounsel
1 appearance
Patty MurrayCounsel
1 appearance
Larissa SchievenCounsel
1 appearance
Christine LeblancCounsel
1 appearance
Devon M. PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Jane M. GoodingCounsel
1 appearance
Anne GallopCounsel
1 appearance
Leanne E. StandrykCounsel
1 appearance
Richard WorsfoldCounsel
1 appearance
Derrick McIntoshCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Grand River Transit

Eric GillespieCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for Regional Municipality of Waterloo

Richard BrookesCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondent

Samantha CrumbCounsel
1 appearance

Counsel for the Respondents

Thomas GrahamCounsel
1 appearance

for Balan International, Respondent

Jean-Alexandre De BousquetCounsel
1 appearance

for Balan International, Robin Fan and David Rong

Jean-Alexandre De BousquetCounsel
1 appearance

for Bruyere Continuing Care

Jacquie DagherCounsel
1 appearance

for Caley Wray and Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 79

Douglas WrayCounsel
1 appearance

for Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 4599

Ryan GoldvineCounsel
1 appearance

for Dr. Jonathan Davids

Carolyn R. BrandowCounsel
1 appearance

for Emmanuel Jean

Denise BoyceAgent
1 appearance

for Epaminondas Kaltekis

Nicole KaltekisAgent
1 appearance

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community and Social Services

Cheryl EllisonCounsel
1 appearance

for herself

Saba FarooqiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sara FarooqiSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Innovative Community Support Services

Leanne FisherCounsel
1 appearance

for Kensington Garden

P. Christopher LloydCounsel
1 appearance

for Pamela Eisener-Parsche and Anne Harley

Jennifer KatsunoCounsel
1 appearance

for Pet Valu Canada Inc.

Christine Martin BevilacquaAgent
1 appearance

for the Applicant

Ronald DavieSelf-represented
3 appearances
AiLian OuSelf-represented
3 appearances
Seifu WondimagnehuSelf-represented
2 appearances
Neville HewageSelf-represented
2 appearances
Athanasios GiannosSelf-represented
2 appearances
Charles ArnottSelf-represented
2 appearances
Andrew MartinSelf-represented
2 appearances
Jan SikorskiSelf-represented
2 appearances
Lloyd TappAgent
2 appearances
Michael KlugCounsel
2 appearances
Kingsley LaurinCounsel
2 appearances
Mindy NobleCounsel
2 appearances
Wade PoziomkaCounsel
2 appearances
Haider BahadurCounsel
2 appearances
Collin DolnySelf-represented
2 appearances
Jeffrey EamonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Gregory ThorntonSelf-represented
2 appearances
Zenon MacyshynSelf-represented
2 appearances
Thomas PeacockAgent
2 appearances
Self-representedSelf-represented
2 appearances

for the Applicant and Intervenor

David P. JacobsCounsel
1 appearance

for the Applicants

Nicole SimesCounsel
1 appearance
Nadia HalumCounsel
1 appearance
Gulam WaljiSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Orillia

Michael MillerCounsel
1 appearance

for the City of Toronto Bendale Acres Long Term Care Homes and Services, Madge Flemming and Veronica Moore

Ian SolomonCounsel
1 appearance

for the College of Denturists

Pierre ChampagneCounsel
1 appearance

for the Commission

Allyssa CaseCounsel
1 appearance

for the Complainant

Vanina SinopoliSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Intervenor

Marisa PollockCounsel
1 appearance
Howard GoldblattCounsel
1 appearance
J. James NymanCounsel
1 appearance
Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance
Rick LerouxUnion representative
1 appearance
Emma PhillipsCounsel
1 appearance
John BartolomeoCounsel
1 appearance
Jesse KuglerCounsel
1 appearance
Danielle Leon Soun LinUnion representative
1 appearance
Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Intervenors

Devon PaulCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Brian SmithCounsel
1 appearance

for the Ontario Provincial Police

Lynette D’SouzaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Intervenor

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Proposed Respondent

Marcia BarryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Region of Peel

Ann C. DinnertCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent

William M. LeMayCounsel
2 appearances
Brenda J. BowlbyCounsel
2 appearances
Laura CassianiCounsel
2 appearances
Kyle D. BurgisCounsel
2 appearances
Elisha Jamieson-DaviesCounsel
2 appearances
Stephanie PopeCounsel
2 appearances
Eric RoherCounsel
2 appearances
Mark GernonAgent
2 appearances
Jayashree GoswamiCounsel
1 appearance
Richard BrookesCounsel
1 appearance
Shana FrenchCounsel
1 appearance
Alain RoussyCounsel
1 appearance
Janice GoodmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Suzanne HuntCounsel
1 appearance
Dawn ClellandSelf-represented
1 appearance
Leigh DavisAgent
1 appearance
Melissa McGuganCounsel
1 appearance
Lauren BernardiCounsel
1 appearance
Lauri ReesorCounsel
1 appearance
Larry GoodSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Bayshore Home Health Services

Sharaf SultanAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent, Canadian Tire Corporation

Laura KarabulutCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1480

Sue LottCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Fairmont Royal York Hotel

James KnightCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Greater Toronto Intergroup

James HendersonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kimberly Rose

John McLuckieCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Kitchener Waterloo Police Services Board

Gary MelansonCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Limestone District School Board

Vincent PanettaCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Nihal Taha

Nihal TahaSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondent Paradigm Sports, Inc.

Eivind LangeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondent Robertson Brown Health Services

Kerry Morrison-SaudadeAgent
1 appearance

for the Respondents

Olga KuchmarParalegal
2 appearances
David PatacairkCounsel
2 appearances
Mireille KhoraychCounsel
2 appearances
Hugh R. DyerCounsel
1 appearance
Roger MillsCounsel
1 appearance
Sharlene ZiniukCounsel
1 appearance
Kent ElsonCounsel
1 appearance
Ralph NeroCounsel
1 appearance
Jon BradburyCounsel
1 appearance
David StrashinCounsel
1 appearance
Indira SawhCounsel
1 appearance
David I. WakelyCounsel
1 appearance
Trevor EvansSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jennifer FerenCounsel
1 appearance
Robert G. KeelCounsel
1 appearance
Ron CreightonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Carolyn KayCounsel
1 appearance
Jim NeeveSelf-represented
1 appearance
Karin SacharCounsel
1 appearance
Chris StaffordSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Respondents Doreen Hayes and Zita Van Oosten

Jerry RasoCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents General Services Board of Alcoholics Anonymous Inc. and A.A. World Services, Inc.

J. Anthony CaldwellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Monarch Corporation and Brian Johnston

David ElenbaasCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents PMA Brethour Real Estate Corp. Inc. and Sue Di Illio

Christina J. WallisCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Richard Seagrave and Direct Kaddy

Alex Van KralingenCounsel
1 appearance
Mark RepathCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Skyline Boutique Hotels & Resorts Inc., Gil Blutrich, Laurence Roptus, Pearl Rossouw and Sarah Jaikishun

Katherine E. FordCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents Todd Canning, Liz McDonald and Tom Robbins

Anne GregoryCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondents York Region District School Board, Erin Hudson, Beverley Peters, Melissa Ficele, Connie Blundell and Rosemary McCarthy

Andrew ZabrovskyCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Toronto Police Services Board

David GourlayCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent Unite HERE Local 75

Heather Ann McConnellCounsel
1 appearance

for the Respondent William Blair

Naomi CallaCounsel
1 appearance

for University of Ottawa

David BolgerCounsel
1 appearance

On her own behalf

Brenda PalmerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Michelle HartfordSelf-represented
1 appearance

On his own behalf

Murray HillSelf-represented
1 appearance
Blaine Nicholas GallienneSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hossam ShaltoutSelf-represented
1 appearance

Representative

Monique Moreau-GrayAgent
1 appearance

Respondent

Evelyn E. DormerCounsel
1 appearance
Dana McDonaldCounsel
1 appearance
Jeremy HannCounsel
1 appearance
Byron Freehouse Inc.Self-represented
1 appearance

Respondents

Brian SmartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brad EidtSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lois DunlopSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerald GriffithsCounsel
1 appearance
Mario PignetilliSelf-represented
1 appearance
Katherine E. FordCounsel
1 appearance

Self-represented

Mary WasilkaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Masoud TchavoshiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Susan BorensteinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Emmanuel AbegunrinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wilbert PauhlSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bradley GallantSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gordon PulieseSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rodney WhitlowSelf-represented
1 appearance
Howard Allen RossSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mark WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance

435

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

3.8

cases/mo

HRTO435(100%)

Decision types

motion

389

trial

Page 22 of 22 (435 cases)

Keith Brennenstuhl

Davie v. PMA Brethour Real Estate, 2009 HRTO 1198

Keith Brennenstuhl

Ronald Davie v. PMA Brethour Real Estate Corp. Inc. and Sue Di Illio, 2009 HRTO 1133

Gregory F. McGinnis

Keith Brennenstuhl

Sharon Saucier v. Smart Lazer Grafix, a Division of Smart Enterprises Corporation, Maureen Roberts and Phil Hall, 2009 HRTO 1053

Jeremy Hann

Keith Brennenstuhl

Grant v. Dura Automotive Systems, 2009 HRTO 727

Keith Brennenstuhl

Colm Tyrrell v. Intercall Canada Inc., Jason Foss and Jennifer Bellward, 2009 HRTO 680

Sharmila Clark

Carolyn R. Brandow

Keith Brennenstuhl

Morin v. Toronto Police Services Board, 2009 HRTO 618

U-Sheak Koroma

Brian O'Byrne

Keith Brennenstuhl

Tulloch v. Cara Operations, 2009 HRTO 464

Keith Brennenstuhl

Sheldon Brown v. Loblaw Companies Limited, 2009 HRTO 456

Keith Brennenstuhl

Phyllis Wright v. Royal Taxi Inc. et al., 2009 HRTO 442

Keith Brennenstuhl

Ocampo v. Revera Retirement, 2009 HRTO 358

Richard Worsfold

Keith Brennenstuhl

Hartford v. Progress Place Rehabilitation Centre, 2009 HRTO 196

Keith Brennenstuhl

O’Brien v. J & F Home Child Care, 2009 HRTO 157

Keith Brennenstuhl

Persad v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 113, 2009 HRTO 139

Brian Smith

Anne E. Posno

Keith Brennenstuhl

Sinopoli v. Walling, 2009 HRTO 50

Robert W. England

Allyssa Case

Keith Brennenstuhl

Henry v. Faurecia Automotive Seating Canada Ltd., 2008 HRTO 30

Applicant

Counsel

Counsel for Grand River Transit

Counsel for Regional Municipality of Waterloo

Counsel for the Respondent

Counsel for the Respondents

for Balan International, Respondent

for Balan International, Robin Fan and David Rong

for Bruyere Continuing Care

for Caley Wray and Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 79

for Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 4599

for Dr. Jonathan Davids

for Emmanuel Jean

for Epaminondas Kaltekis

for Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Community and Social Services

for herself

for Innovative Community Support Services

for Kensington Garden

for Pamela Eisener-Parsche and Anne Harley

for Pet Valu Canada Inc.

for the Applicant

for the Applicant and Intervenor

for the Applicants

for the City of Orillia

for the City of Toronto Bendale Acres Long Term Care Homes and Services, Madge Flemming and Veronica Moore

for the College of Denturists

for the Commission

for the Complainant

for the Intervenor

for the Intervenors

for the Ontario Human Rights Commission

for the Ontario Provincial Police

for the Proposed Intervenor

for the Proposed Respondent

for the Region of Peel

for the Respondent

for the Respondent Bayshore Home Health Services

for the Respondent, Canadian Tire Corporation

for the Respondent Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 1480