John Taylor is a vice-chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 86 decisions on record from 1997 to 2011. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does John Taylor sit on?

John Taylor sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does John Taylor decide?

John Taylor's most common areas include Administrative Law (83 decisions), Other Tribunals (78 decisions), Environmental Law (32 decisions). John Taylor has handled 86 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has John Taylor made?

John Taylor has 86 decisions on record from 1997 to 2011.

Who frequently appears before John Taylor?

Representatives who frequently appear before John Taylor include Peter Wechselmann, Joanne Cook, Don Dowdell.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

John Taylor — Vice-Chair

John Taylor

Vice-Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 1997

cases · 15 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice Chair· 32Vice-Chair· 30Vice Chair· 14vice-président· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1Vice Chair· 1Vice Chair· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 15, 2005

Appeal dismissed as the parties reached a settlement agreement prior to the hearing.

The appellant appealed a decision by Agricorp concerning the adjustment of his claim for his 2004 cucumber crop under the Crop Insurance Act.

Prior to the commencement of the hearing, the parties reached a settlement and signed a release.

As there were no outstanding issues to resolve, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal.

Todd Suter v. Agricorp, 2005 ONAFRAAT 29

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 9, 2005

Tribunal ordered redaction of third-party personal information inadvertently disclosed in discovery document binders.

At a pre-hearing conference, a third party requested the removal of his personal information from document binders prepared by Agricorp in response to the appellant's motion for discovery.

The Tribunal agreed that the personal information was inadvertently disclosed and ordered the appellant to return all copies of the binders to Agricorp.

Agricorp was ordered to redact any information protected under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act before returning the amended binders to the appellant and the Tribunal.

Vanderbeke v. Agricorp, 2005 ONAFRAAT 24

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 29, 2005

Motion for examination for discovery and FOIPPA disclosure denied; production of policy manuals ordered.

The appellant brought a motion seeking orders for the discovery of documents, examination for discovery of Agricorp employees, and disclosure of information previously requested under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIPPA).

The Tribunal ordered Agricorp to provide copies of its existing policy manuals and to produce two specific employees as witnesses at the hearing.

The Tribunal declined to order examinations for discovery, noting it would lead to delays and costs, and refused to order the disclosure of FOIPPA information, stating it should not assume the role of the Privacy Commissioner.

Vanderbeke v. Agricorp, 2005 ONAFRAAT 20

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 27, 2005

Appeal from engineer's report dismissed; open ditch drainage system approved over covered tile drain.

The appellants appealed an amended engineer's report under the Drainage Act that proposed an open ditch drainage system instead of the initially proposed covered tile drain.

The appellants argued the open ditch would be less efficient and harder to maintain.

The Tribunal found that the open ditch design, located entirely on the neighbouring property, would adequately remove surface water flows and address the appellants' concerns.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and ordered the municipality to adopt the amended report.

Piggott McHale Drain No. 2 (Re), 2005 ONAFRAAT 18

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 10, 2005

Drainage Act appeals dismissed regarding drain design but granted in part to reduce downstream maintenance assessment.

The appellants appealed the engineer's Addendum Report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Hambly-Sabourin and Beaulac-Beach Drains, citing concerns over erosion, the adequacy of proposed rip rap, and the fairness of maintenance assessments.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals regarding the design of the drainage works, finding no professional evidence to contradict the engineer's recommendations.

However, the Tribunal granted the appeal in part regarding the maintenance assessments, reducing the downstream appellant's maintenance assessment on a specific section of the drain from 50% to 20%, with the balance pro-rated to upstream landowners.

Hambly Sabourin Drain 2001/ Beaulac-Beach Drain (Re), 2005 ONAFRAAT 17

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 20, 2005

Crop insurance contract reinstated and corn claim allowed, but denial of soybean claim upheld.

The appellants appealed AGRICORP's decisions to deny insurance coverage for certain soybean fields, cancel their 2003 crop insurance contract, and deny claims for losses on their 2003 soybean and corn crops.

The Tribunal found that AGRICORP was justified in refusing to insure specific fields due to poor farming practices and in denying the soybean claim because the appellants failed to keep accurate records and mixed insured and uninsured crops.

However, the Tribunal found that the appellants' conduct did not amount to fraud, reinstated the insurance contract, and ordered AGRICORP to pay the undisputed corn claim with interest.

Claims for punitive damages and costs were dismissed.

Goyer and Green Acres Tech v. Agricorp, 2005 ONAFRAAT 14

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 18, 2005

Tribunal rescinds grape marketing regulation, finding growers' board lacked authority to unilaterally set sugar schedules.

The Wine Council of Ontario appealed decisions of the Grape Growers of Ontario to enact a regulation amending sugar grade schedules and to impose late harvest fees.

The Tribunal found that the GGO did not have the statutory authority to unilaterally set sugar schedules, as these schedules are integrally linked to the minimum price of grapes, which is the purview of the Negotiating Agency under Regulation 414 of the Farm Products Marketing Act.

The Tribunal rescinded the GGO's regulation.

Additionally, the Tribunal awarded nominal costs of $500 to the WCO because the GGO unreasonably delayed conceding that it lacked the authority to impose late payment penalties.

Wine Council of Ontario v Grape Growers of Ontario, 2005 ONAFRAAT 13

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 13, 2005

Municipality ordered to adopt engineer's report for proposed municipal drain to serve new subdivision.

Place Riviera Place Inc. appealed the Township of Champlain's decision not to adopt an engineer's report for the proposed Gauthier Municipal Drain.

The appellant sought the drain to provide an outlet for a proposed subdivision.

Several neighbouring landowners opposed the drain, arguing the appellant should bear the full cost.

The Tribunal found the proposed works were necessary and the engineer's report was sound.

The Tribunal ordered the municipality to adopt the report and pass a provisional by-law, allowing the drainage process to continue.

Drain Municipal Gauthier (RE), 2005 ONAFRAAT 9

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalFeb 14, 2005

Drainage assessment upheld; property outside watershed received cut-off benefit by preventing potential flooding.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the Sinclair Drain, arguing his property was outside the watershed and received no benefit.

The engineer testified that the drain provided a cut-off benefit by preventing water from crossing a road and flooding the appellant's property.

The Tribunal found that while the risk of flooding was minimal, the drain did provide a cut-off benefit by alleviating that risk.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the assessments.

Sinclair Drain (Re), 2005 ONAFRAAT 6

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 9, 2004

Tribunal upholds drainage works design but adjusts cost assessments to increase municipal and utility contributions.

Several landowners appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the proposed McFeeters Petition Drain.

The appellants raised concerns about the drain's design, potential downstream impacts, cost-benefit justification, watershed definition, and the equity of the cost assessments.

The Tribunal upheld the engineer's design, finding no significant downstream impacts and concluding the project was cost-beneficial without requiring a formal economic analysis.

However, the Tribunal found that the assessments were not entirely equitable and ordered adjustments to increase the benefit assessments for municipal roads, a hydro property, and one specific landowner, while proportionally decreasing the outlet liability for agricultural lands.

McFeeters Petition Drain (Re), 2004 ONAFRAAT 41

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 3, 2004

Drainage works appeal dismissed on design and cost-benefit, but benefit assessment varied to reflect actual benefit.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the repair and improvement of the Brown/Reid Drainage Works.

The appellant argued that the costs outweighed the benefits, alternative designs were not considered, and his property was unfairly assessed.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the design and cost-benefit, finding the proposed works practical and cost-beneficial.

However, the Tribunal varied the assessment, reducing the appellant's benefit assessment and increasing the assessment of an upstream landowner who benefited more from the improved outlet.

The Tribunal also ordered the inclusion of fish refuge areas as recommended by the engineer.

Paul Chantree v. Township of Melancthon, 2004 ONAFRAAT 40

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 6, 2004

Drainage report amended to allow larger tile at appellant's expense; request to crop grassed waterway denied.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Hope Drain under the Drainage Act.

The appellant sought modifications to the drainage works, including retaining a catchbasin, installing a larger tile, and allowing a proposed grassed waterway to be cropped.

The Tribunal ordered the report amended to retain the catchbasin and install the larger tile at the appellant's expense, as agreed or requested.

However, the Tribunal dismissed the request to crop the waterway, finding that a permanently grassed waterway was necessary to control erosion.

The appeal regarding the assessments was dismissed, subject to adjustments for the ordered modifications.

Donald Bailey v. Municipality of Leamington, 2004 ONAFRAAT 34

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalOct 4, 2004

Tribunal ordered modifications to municipal drain design but upheld engineer's cost assessments and allowances.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Tulpin Municipal Drain under the Drainage Act.

The appellant raised concerns about the design of the drainage works, the allowances provided to his property, and the assessment of costs.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals regarding assessments and allowances, finding them reasonable.

However, the Tribunal granted the appeal regarding the drain's design in part, ordering the engineer to modify the report to maintain an existing lane culvert, redesign the lower portion as an open drain, and provide detailed specifications.

Tulpin Municipal Drain (Re), 2004 ONAFRAAT 33

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 10, 2004

Motion to lift automatic stay on pork marketing board service charge increase dismissed.

The Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board (OPPMB) brought a motion to lift an automatic stay on its decision to increase the service charge on hogs by $0.80 per hog.

The appellants, Elite Swine Inc. and Cold Springs Farm Ltd., had appealed the OPPMB's decision not to rescind the increase.

The Tribunal found that the OPPMB's decision was an exercise of a statutory power of decision, triggering an automatic stay under the Statutory Powers Procedure Act.

The Tribunal dismissed the OPPMB's motion to lift the stay, finding that the OPPMB failed to demonstrate it would suffer irreparable harm if the stay remained in place pending the appeal.

Elite Swine Inc. et al. v Ontario Pork Producers' Marketing Board, 2004 ONAFRAAT 30

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 10, 2004

Costs of an abandoned engineer's report under the Drainage Act must be assessed against watershed landowners on an acreage basis.

The appellants appealed an engineer's report prepared under Section 40 of the Drainage Act concerning the Clear Creek Drain.

The project was initiated under Section 78 but was abandoned after landowners objected to the estimated costs.

The engineer assessed the costs of the abandoned report against the landowners based on a 1915 assessment schedule.

The Tribunal found that while the municipality and engineer handled the process poorly by allowing costs to accumulate without landowner support, the Act does not permit the Tribunal to order the municipality to bear the costs.

The Tribunal ordered the costs to be pro-rated among the lands in the watershed on an acreage basis.

Clear Creek Drain – South Branch (Re), 2004 ONAFRAAT 23

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 9, 2004

Appeal of municipal drain assessment denied; Tribunal ordered reallocation of engineering and overhead costs.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision not to vary his assessment on a municipal drain.

The appellant argued his property did not benefit from the works and that the drain served a housing development.

The Tribunal found the engineer used an acceptable method to distribute costs and that the appellant was treated fairly.

The Tribunal denied the appeal but ordered a reallocation of engineering and overhead costs to reduce outlet assessments.

Little Rideau Creek Extension/Upper W.J. Douglas Municipal Drain (Re), 2004 ONAFRAAT 22

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 20, 2004

Municipal drain relocation report remitted to engineer to enclose drain on appellants' fruit farm and revise allowances.

The appellants appealed an engineer's report and a Court of Revision decision regarding the relocation of a municipal drain across their fruit farm.

They argued the proposed open ditch would sever their property, destroy mature fruit trees, and that they were inadequately compensated and unfairly assessed.

The Tribunal ordered the engineer to revise the report to enclose the portion of the drain crossing the appellants' property, to revisit the allowances to account for actual land use and tree damage, and to cap the benefit assessment to the appellants at 15% of the cost of the abutting works.

Heinz E. Probst and Christine L. Probst v. Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake, 2004 ONAFRAAT 19

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJan 19, 2004

Tribunal upholds marketing board's order to destroy unlicensed and unmarketable tobacco.

The appellant appealed a decision of the Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers' Marketing Board to seize and destroy carryover tobacco and tobacco grown in 2003.

The Tribunal found that the carryover tobacco grown under a sharegrower arrangement could not be marketed because the quota holders had sold their quota.

The Tribunal also found that the 2003 tobacco was grown without a licence and without basic production quota.

The Tribunal ordered that all carryover tobacco, except for 7,400 lbs., and all tobacco grown in 2003 be destroyed.

Osztrovics v Ontario Flue-Cured Tobacco Growers’ Marketing Board, 2004 ONAFRAAT 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 11, 2003

Motion to dismiss appeal denied; Tribunal found jurisdiction to hear appeal of DFO decision.

The Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) brought a pre-hearing motion to dismiss an appeal by Georgian Bay Milk Company (GBMC) regarding the revocation of milk producer licences and the denial of an extension to a transition period.

The DFO argued the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction, the appeal was frivolous, and GBMC was estopped due to a pending judicial review.

The Tribunal dismissed the motion, finding it had jurisdiction to hear the appeal of the DFO's decision, the appeal was not frivolous given the impact on producers' livelihoods, and the issues before the Divisional Court were substantially different.

Georgian Bay Milk Company Ltd v Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2003 ONAFRAAT 36

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 11, 2003

Tribunal approves drain extension to by-pass pond and varies assessments to reflect special benefit.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Cook Leddy Municipal Drain 2003.

The dispute centered on the location of the drain outlet and the resulting assessments.

The Tribunal found that the existing outlet was insufficient and approved the engineer's recommendation to extend the drain to by-pass a pond on the Leddy property.

The Tribunal varied the assessments, allocating a special benefit assessment to the Leddy property due to the increased costs of routing the drain past the pond, and prorating the remaining costs among the upstream owners.

Cook Leddy Drain 2003 (RE), 2003 ONAFRAAT 35

Page 1 of 5 (86 cases)

agent of appellant Patrick Shanahan

Paul ShanahanAgent
1 appearance
Leo ShanahanAgent
1 appearance

appellant

Joanne CookSelf-represented
2 appearances
Art DunlopSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bill MundaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian ShanahanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel BrunerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SelmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerry DeBruynSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grant BurksSelf-represented
1 appearance
Heinz ProbstSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jean-Paul CussonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim McLaughlinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim StephensonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joe MalenfantSelf-represented
1 appearance
John Van BommelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph StephensonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken FoundSelf-represented
1 appearance
Larry McNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lise BéliveauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Luc CussonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary StephensonSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant in person

Harold ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth L. PeerSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, in person

Donald CarrollSelf-represented
1 appearance
George KlotzSelf-represented
1 appearance
John K. WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
L. George SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Liberato SaltarelliSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, JEMA Foods

Jim DiMennaAgent
1 appearance

appellants

Audrey StinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HamiltonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald MathesonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Elaine KonecnySelf-represented
1 appearance
Evelyn ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gilbert DePorterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gordon StinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
James HamiltonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
John PaetzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Norm StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Pauline MathesonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Phyllis CoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert BourqueSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharon LiekninsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vickie StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance
William CoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
William MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Beverly BaxterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian DammSelf-represented
1 appearance
Craig ThompsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dale McFeetersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald BellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald GreenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earle GraySelf-represented
1 appearance
Evelyn HamblySelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank DezsoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hank GorisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jackie ConnellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jack WilkinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joe Isley Jr.Self-represented
1 appearance
Joe MurphySelf-represented
1 appearance
John FarrowSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken HamblySelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken LeddySelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth SteerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lyle SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowners

Barry HarwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claude BourqueSelf-represented
1 appearance
David LaurenceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene BarnesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne LeesonSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed owner

Armand BrunetSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernice O’HearSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bon RicheterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bruce SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Commodore AllenSelf-represented
1 appearance
David FleckSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas SherkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ernie DerbyshireSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerry ShaubelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn PfistererSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BellonteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret BalgaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie AlbeeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rick BradySelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert StrettonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandy BunkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steve ChapoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tim BennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne DonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
William ParkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed owner, in person

Brian SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
David DurhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
N. LittleSelf-represented
1 appearance
R. DoddsSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed ratepayer, party to the hearing

A. VanHarenSelf-represented
1 appearance
C. TeezelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ted ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance

assistant to Mr. Foran

Elizabeth PatrickCounsel
1 appearance

au nom de l’intimée, la municipalité

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance
Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance

counsel for the appellant

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondent

Tom GrahamCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to appellant

Noël BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to JEMA Foods

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Joe Vink, appellant

John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Mr. Leddy

Mike MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

Paul EnnsCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, 757182 Ontario Limited

Don GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Donald Bailey

George ReynoldsCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Georgian Bay Milk Company

James P. McIlroyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Mr. Derek Crolla

Thomas Allen RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant Mr. Kevin Donohue

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants

Pascale GiguèreCounsel
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants, Gilbert Goyer and Green Acres Tech

Stephanie BouchardCounsel
1 appearance
Rodrigue EscayolaCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Todd Suter

Mark MacKewCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Municipality of Leamington

Brian SweetCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Barry BresnerCounsel
1 appearance
Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, AGRICORP

Peter WechselmannCounsel
4 appearances
David VickersCounsel
1 appearance
Peter WechselmanCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey P. SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Colchester South

E. MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

Crop Insurance Commodity Specialist, AGRICORP

Husseinali ShivjiAgent
1 appearance

Deputy Director of Public Works

Nick AragonaAgent
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared report

Mike DeVosAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent

Henri BennemeerAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the respondent the City of Port Colborne

René LandryAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the respondent, the Township of Champlain

Michael St. JeanAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Town of Minto

Chris PeterAgent
1 appearance

Engineer

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

engineer for the report

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the addendum to the report

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance
Kent SchachowskojAgent
1 appearance
Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the report

Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the Report

Gaetan H. LascellesAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report, for the Municipality of Leamington

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for 3A and Associates Investments Limited

M. BergmanCounsel
1 appearance

for AGRICORP

Bill QuippAgent
1 appearance
Eric BrouwerAgent
1 appearance
Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance
John TimmermansAgent
1 appearance

for Glen Tulpin

Julien DeplanckeAgent
1 appearance

for Grand River Conservation Authority

Jennifer WrightAgent
1 appearance

for herself

Carmen GirouardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy SauveSelf-represented
1 appearance
Isabel MosselerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Katherine CavanaughSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mariette Gareau-FosterSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Allan SimpsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bob KordybanSelf-represented
1 appearance
David DawsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ed SeguinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerard VermeerenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gilles ChretienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guilio NacciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guy DurocherSelf-represented
1 appearance
H. Vern SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jean Jacques DemersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louis DobrichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Luigi TroianiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Milton SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter HutchisonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ronald Van RaesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ron VanDenBrinkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stuart GomesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terry BuysSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ulrich SchaererSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor ReasbeckSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Just Beginning Inc., assessed owner

Anton NoorloosAgent
1 appearance

for Keith MacLennan

Douglas HewsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Marilyn Nicholson

Paul NicholsonAgent
1 appearance

former Deputy Reeve

Lawrie WepplerSelf-represented
1 appearance

former Reeve of the municipality

Denis PommainvilleSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Michael Brausam, assessed landowner

Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Montreal Soaring Council, assessed landowner

Walter EkiertAgent
1 appearance

for Mrs. Olga Woods, assessed owner

Will BartlettAgent
1 appearance

for Ms. Cindy Sauve and assessed landowners

Andrew RobinsonAgent
1 appearance

for R. Christensen

Thomas ChristensenAgent
1 appearance

for Tampa Farms Ltd., K. Fowler, B.&M. Vandenberg, B. Vandenberg, H. Stoelinga, R.&L. Graham and J.&R. Graham

William TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant

David JohnstonAgent
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Emile DeschambaultSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance
Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance
Keith VanderbekeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul BeaudetCounsel
1 appearance
Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance
Sheldon PettleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, International Dairy Direct

Donald R. GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant Milton Smith

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant Mr. Kevin Donohue

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Mr. Watson

Ron ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Olszowka Poultry Inc.

John JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Fred FunkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary EmerickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Philip EmerickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra FunkSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Numerous appellantsSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellants, Heinz and Christine Probst

Thomas RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Fancsy

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants Mr. Packet, Mr. Poort and Mr. Babensky

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Orland and Freida Dippel

Stephen DippelAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant the Renfrew County Roman Catholic Separate School Board

Don DowdellAgent
2 appearances

for the appellant V. DeJong

Klaus DeJongAgent
1 appearance

for the applicant (respondent in the appeal, the OPPMB)

Sean ForanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Armstrong appellants

Donald ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the assessed landowner

Lambertus (Bert) HuysSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne

Rene LandryAgent
1 appearance

for the City of St. Thomas

Burt LongAgent
1 appearance

for the DeJong Farm (Petrolia) Ltd., assessed owner

Everett DeJongAgent
1 appearance

for the Engineer

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the Grape Growers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the municipality

John D. ValleeAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Bruce CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Central Elgin

Donald LietchAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of West Nipissing

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of West Perth

Jim DemerlingAgent
1 appearance
Ken ClarkeAgent
1 appearance
Patricia TaylorAgent
1 appearance

for the O'Neil appellants

Charles O'NeilSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the respondent

Fred ThompsonAgent
1 appearance
Harry FraserAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance
Ron SwainCounsel
1 appearance
Rosaire St. PierreAgent
1 appearance
Wm. GrahamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, AgriCorp

Tom GrahamCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey P. SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents to the motion (appellants in the appeal), Elite Swine and Cold Springs Farm Ltd.

Robert ShapiroCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of LaSalle

Ed LaFontaineAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

J. A. McBrideAgent
1 appearance
J. R. DicksonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Colchester South

E. MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Dawn-Euphemia

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance
Paul DaltonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Enniskillen

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Gosfield North

Terrence SimsCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Malahide

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Melancthon

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Osgoode

Kevin GraceAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Plympton

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of West Grey

William J. MannerowAgent
1 appearance

for the township

Mr. ViceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of South-West Oxford

Wray RamseyAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of West Elgin

John PooleAgent
1 appearance
John SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the Wine Council of Ontario

James McIlroyCounsel
1 appearance

for Westview Church

George BartlettAgent
1 appearance

for William Henderson

W. JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance

General Adjuster, AGRICORP

Jim KonecnyAgent
1 appearance

landowner

Donna MichlowskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everett GrotenhuisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gordon SouthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret WenzelSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of 104284 Canada Lteé, appellant

Wayne AssalyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of 483038 Ontario Inc., appellant

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Clarkview Farms Ltd., party to the hearing

Roger ClarkAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Jean-Paul Cusson, appellant

Jean DecoeurAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Marion Piggott, assessed landowner

Gary PiggottAgent
1 appearance
Mark RankinAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Maurice Cheveaux, assessed landowner

Andrew DegrootAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of PPM Systems Inc.

Cec KuleyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant, Mr. Carl Hape

Paul CoureyCounsel
2 appearances

on behalf of the appellant, Mr. DeBruyn

Enio SulloAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellants

Melodie FoersterAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Counties of Prescott and Russell, appellant

Marc ClermontAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the City of Port Colborne

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the City of Thorold

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Nation Municipality

Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance
Stéphane LeclercAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Bosanquet

P. K. MehargAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Essex

Don JoudreyAgent
1 appearance
Elvey MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Ahfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Bromley

David A. StewartAgent
2 appearances

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Champlain

Leo TremblayAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Respondent, the Township of Champlain

Leo TremblayAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Colchester South

Elvey MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Dawn-Euphemia

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the township of Moore

Bill VietchAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Moore

Peter MehargAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Orford

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of West Lincoln

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Zorra

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Essex

Nick PeraltaAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Hawkesbury, appellant

Martin BonhommeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of Bosanquet

Jim MonteithAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of Enniskillen

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

principal of Mancini Homes, the appellant

Angelo ManciniAgent
1 appearance

Quality Assurance Manager, AGRICORP

Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’appelant

Noël BerthiaumeAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’appelant, Place Riviera Place Inc.

Michael ChambersAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’intimé, le canton de Champlain

Robert TolhurstAgent
1 appearance

representative of Cuddy Farms, assessed landowner

John CameronAgent
1 appearance

representative of the Grey/Bruce farmers group

Alan SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harriett EllicottSelf-represented
1 appearance

representing appellants Richard Gosselin and Garry Beach, and assessed landowner Sylvain Gauthier

Al FraserAgent
1 appearance

representing assessed landowner Anna Isley

John IsleyAgent
1 appearance

representing Royal Bourdeau and René Giroux, Jean-Claude Pavan, Ralph (Rapheal) Gour, Royal Bourdeau, René Giroux, appellants

Jean MartelCounsel
1 appearance

representing the Municipality

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance

representing the respondent, the City of Kawartha Lakes

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

representing the St. Michaels Parish Church

Sylvester PowerAgent
2 appearances

Senior Adjuster, AGRICORP

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

Senior Commodity Specialist, AgriCorp

Peter IllncykyjAgent
1 appearance

senior commodity specialist for the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter IlnyckyjAgent
1 appearance

Senior Manager Claims, AGRICORP

Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance

witness

Ronald BaileyAgent
1 appearance

witness to the Tribunal

Tim BellonteSelf-represented
1 appearance

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.8

cases/mo

OAFRAAT86(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

Page 1 of 5 (86 cases)