John Taylor is a vice-chair at the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal with 86 decisions on record from 1997 to 2011. Key areas include administrative law, other tribunals, environmental law.

What tribunal does John Taylor sit on?

John Taylor sits on the Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal.

What areas of law does John Taylor decide?

John Taylor's most common areas include Administrative Law (83 decisions), Other Tribunals (78 decisions), Environmental Law (32 decisions). John Taylor has handled 86 decisions across 4 areas.

How many decisions has John Taylor made?

John Taylor has 86 decisions on record from 1997 to 2011.

Who frequently appears before John Taylor?

Representatives who frequently appear before John Taylor include Peter Wechselmann, Joanne Cook, Don Dowdell.

/Adjudicator

minicounsel

John Taylor — Vice-Chair

John Taylor

Vice-Chair·Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal·Since 1997

cases · 15 yrs · OAFRAAT

Trial

Motion

Costs

Appeal

Sentencing

Vice Chair· 32Vice-Chair· 30Vice Chair· 14vice-président· 2Vice-Chair· 2Vice Chair· 1Vice Chair· 1Vice Chair· 1

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 11, 2003

Tribunal approves drain extension to by-pass pond and varies assessments to reflect special benefit.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the Cook Leddy Municipal Drain 2003.

The dispute centered on the location of the drain outlet and the resulting assessments.

The Tribunal found that the existing outlet was insufficient and approved the engineer's recommendation to extend the drain to by-pass a pond on the Leddy property.

The Tribunal varied the assessments, allocating a special benefit assessment to the Leddy property due to the increased costs of routing the drain past the pond, and prorating the remaining costs among the upstream owners.

Cook Leddy Drain 2003 (RE), 2003 ONAFRAAT 35

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 15, 2003

Motion for additional disclosure and adjournment dismissed; parties ordered to comply with prior pre-hearing order.

The appellants brought a motion during a pre-hearing teleconference for an order compelling the respondent to make full disclosure of relevant materials and for an adjournment of the scheduled hearing.

The respondent confirmed it had complied with a previous disclosure order and that no further documents existed.

The appellants' representative acknowledged satisfaction with the disclosure, attributing the motion to a misunderstanding.

The Tribunal dismissed the motion for further disclosure and adjournment, ordering the appellants to submit their required materials and directing the respondent's witness to swear an affidavit confirming no further materials existed.

Denby et al. v Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2003 ONAFRAAT 26

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalAug 27, 2003

Drainage works approved but assessments adjusted to increase the Township's share for road drainage improvements.

Several landowners appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the Noble Drain in the Township of Malahide under the Drainage Act.

The appellants argued the costs of the proposed drainage works outweighed the benefits and that their assessments were too high.

The Tribunal found that the drainage project should proceed, as the current drainage capacity was insufficient for modern agricultural practices and the road required improved drainage.

However, the Tribunal adjusted the assessments on the Main Drain, reducing the burden on certain landowners and increasing the special benefit assessment against the Township for upsizing the drain.

Noble Drain (Re), 2003 ONAFRAAT 24

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 25, 2003

Request for review of drain routing decision denied; requester may appeal future engineer's report.

The requester sought a review of a previous Tribunal decision that directed an engineer to route a municipal drain improvement through his property (Proposal C).

The requester argued the construction would cause significant disruption and damage to his yard, trees, and structures.

The Tribunal denied the request for review, finding no obvious error in the previous decision that would justify a review.

The Tribunal noted that the requester would still have an opportunity to appeal the revised engineer's report once it is filed with the municipality.

Terry Buys v. Municipality of Thames Centre, 2003 ONAFRAAT 23

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 28, 2003

Crop insurance appeal resolved by settlement rescinding five-year ban and repayment of claims.

The appellants appealed a decision by AGRICORP to deny them crop insurance coverage for five years and to require the repayment of previously settled claims due to alleged misrepresentation of crop yields.

During the hearing, the parties reached a settlement.

The Tribunal adopted the minutes of settlement, which rescinded the five-year ban and the repayment requirement, but rendered the appellants ineligible for crop insurance for the 2003 crop year.

Walsh v Agricorp, 2003 ONAFRAAT 10

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalApr 17, 2003

Automatic stay of milk export decision suspended and hearing adjourned on consent.

The appellant appealed a decision of the Dairy Farmers of Ontario refusing to change its plan for complying with a WTO ruling on milk export practices.

The respondent brought a motion to limit the scope of the automatic stay of its decision, and the appellant requested an adjournment of the hearing.

On consent of both parties, the Tribunal ordered that the automatic stay be suspended as it affects these parties and granted the adjournment.

International Dairy Direct – Broker Agent v Dairy Farmers of Ontario, 2003 ONAFRAAT 9

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalDec 3, 2002

Municipality granted permission to procure engineer's report to vary drainage maintenance assessments.

The applicant municipality applied to the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal for permission to procure an engineer's report to vary the maintenance assessments on four drains under section 76 of the Drainage Act.

The municipality cited changes in watersheds, municipal boundaries, and land use as reasons for updating the outdated assessment schedules.

The neighbouring municipality consented to the application.

The Tribunal granted the municipality permission to appoint an engineer to procure the reports.

Small Drain, Norman Drain West, Norman Mills Drain (Re), 2002 ONAFRAAT 43

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 20, 2002

Appeal dismissed; farm access bridge over municipal drain must comply with engineer's report and municipal standards.

The appellant constructed a farm access bridge over a municipal drain without an engineer's report.

The municipality ordered construction to stop and appointed an engineer to prepare a report to bring the bridge into compliance with municipal standards.

The appellant appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision, arguing the bridge met provincial standards and the municipality's unwritten policies were discriminatory.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the municipality had the authority to enforce its construction standards and that reasonable efforts were made to compromise.

The Tribunal ordered the bridge to be constructed in accordance with the engineer's report and assessed $1,000 in hearing costs against the appellant.

George Vanderbeke v. Town of Kingsville, 2002 ONAFRAAT 35

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 4, 2002

Crop insurance claim recalculated to avoid double penalty where farmer failed to correct acreage report.

The appellants appealed AGRICORP's decision not to insure and pay an adjustment of claim for 138 acres of soybeans, as only 100 acres were recorded in the Final Acreage Report.

The Tribunal found that the appellant had ample opportunity to review and correct the acreage summary but failed to do so through his own neglect.

However, the Tribunal found that including the yield from the unreported 38 acres in the calculation for the 100 insured acres created a double penalty.

The Tribunal ordered AGRICORP to recalculate the claim based on a yield of 13.83 bushels per acre on the 100 insured acres.

Joe Vink and Concrete Holsteins v Agircorp, 2002 ONAFRAAT 32

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 16, 2002

Tribunal orders extension of municipal drain to remove downstream obstructions and restricts future culvert sizes.

Several landowners appealed the engineer's reports concerning the Upper and Lower W.J. Douglas Municipal Drains, raising concerns about assessments, culvert sizes, and the sufficiency of the Little Rideau Creek as an outlet.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding the assessment variation but ordered amendments to the engineer's report.

The Tribunal directed that the drainage works be extended downstream to the Ottawa River to remove obstructions and alleviate flooding risks, and imposed restrictions on the size of future culverts to control water flow.

Upper W.J. Douglas Municipal Drain and Lower W.J. Douglas Municipal Drain (Re), 2002 ONAFRAAT 24

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMar 21, 2002

Tribunal adopts original engineer's report for municipal drain, rejecting revised location and modifying assessments.

Several landowners appealed the engineer's report and the Court of Revision's decision regarding the Smith Municipal Drain.

The appellants objected to the proposed location of the drain and the associated assessments.

The Tribunal found that the original engineer's report, which located the drain on the Béliveau and Lalonde properties, was the most economical and least disruptive option, rejecting a revised report that moved the drain to the Cusson property.

The Tribunal ordered the adoption of the original report with modifications, including the provision of a berm, a fence allowance for Cusson, and special benefit assessments to cover the extra engineering costs and the fence.

Smith Municipal Drain (Re), 2002 ONAFRAAT 12

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalNov 2, 2001

Drainage works approved to meet environmental standards; benefit and outlet assessments adjusted for fairness.

The appellants appealed the engineer's report for the Middleton Street Drain 2001, arguing that existing natural drainage and dry wells were sufficient and that they should not be assessed for works designed to serve future developments.

The Tribunal found that the proposed storm water management system was necessary to comply with Ministry of Environment policies.

However, the Tribunal partially granted the appeals regarding the assessments, ordering adjustments to the benefit and outlet assessments for specific properties, including Coldstream Farms, to ensure a fairer distribution of costs.

Middleton Street Drain 2001 (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 51

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalSep 6, 2001

Crop insurance appeal partially granted; excessive rainfall prevented harvesting of soybeans.

The appellants appealed AGRICORP's decision to deny their crop insurance claim for 72 acres of unharvested soybeans.

AGRICORP had denied the claim on the basis that the appellants engaged in improper farming practices by failing to harvest the crop before winter.

The Tribunal found that excessive rainfall and poor field conditions prevented the harvesting of the soybeans, and that being among the last to harvest in an area does not inherently constitute a poor farming practice.

The appeal was partially granted, and AGRICORP was ordered to pay the claim for the unharvested soybeans.

Shanahan v. Agricorp, 2001 ONAFRAAT 41

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 25, 2001

Engineer's Report for requisition drain amended to award injuring liability to appellant for increased water flow.

The appellant appealed a decision of the Court of Revision and an Engineer's Report regarding the construction of a requisition drain intended to provide an outlet for a new subdivision.

The appellant argued the drain would increase water flow onto his property without providing any benefit, and that the estimated costs were too low.

The Tribunal found that the appellant was entitled to an allowance for injuring liability due to the increased rate of water flow.

The Tribunal also determined that the benefit to the appellant's land was over-stated and adjusted the assessment, ordering the subdivision developer to pay the costs assessed to the subdivision lands.

The Tribunal accepted the engineer's cost estimate and confirmed the project qualified as a requisition drain under the Drainage Act.

Gauthier-Cusson Requisition Drain (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 36

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 24, 2001

Le Tribunal modifie le rapport de l'ingénieur pour accorder une indemnité pour dommages et réviser la répartition des coûts du drain.

L'appelant a contesté le rapport de l'ingénieur concernant la construction d'un drain municipal destiné à desservir une nouvelle subdivision.

Le Tribunal a conclu que le drain proposé répondait à la définition de travaux exécutés sur demande, mais a modifié le rapport pour accorder à l'appelant une indemnité pour les dommages causés par l'augmentation de la vitesse d'écoulement de l'eau sur sa propriété.

Le Tribunal a également révisé la répartition des coûts, attribuant la majorité des avantages statutaires et des coûts à la subdivision plutôt qu'à l'appelant.

Dorilla Cusson c. Canton de Champlain, 2011 CanLII 101133

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 4, 2001

Tribunal permitted municipality to refer drainage report back to engineer to accommodate fish habitat modifications.

The Municipality of West Grey referred a matter to the Tribunal under section 51 of the Drainage Act regarding modifications required by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada to a proposed municipal drain.

The modifications, intended to compensate for fish habitat disruption, increased the project's cost by approximately 47%.

The Tribunal ordered that the municipality could refer the engineer's report back for modification and revise the assessment schedules, despite the authorizing by-law having already been passed.

Municipal Drain No. 21 (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 34

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJul 3, 2001

Municipality ordered to appoint engineer after improperly refusing to proceed with drainage petition.

The appellant filed a petition for drainage works under the Drainage Act.

The municipality decided not to proceed with the petition, arguing it did not meet the criteria under Section 4 and that the existing drain was in good working condition.

The appellant appealed to the Tribunal.

The Tribunal found that the municipality acted improperly in refusing to act upon the petition, as a reasonable effort was made to describe the area needing drainage improvement.

The appeal was granted, and the municipality was ordered to appoint an engineer to proceed with the drainage works.

Carl Hillebrecht v. Township of West Perth, 2001 ONAFRAAT 33

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 15, 2001

Special assessments for drain improvements reduced where municipality incurred engineering costs before resolving environmental concerns.

The appellant appealed the special assessments levied against his properties for improvements to a municipal drain.

The original plan to close the drain was rejected by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans due to fish habitat concerns, resulting in a revised engineer's report and increased engineering costs.

The Tribunal found that the municipality and the engineer should have resolved the environmental issues before incurring significant design costs, and that the municipality improperly directed the preparation of a report that conflicted with the DFO's prohibition.

The Tribunal ordered the special assessments against the appellant and other landowners reduced, with the balance of the engineering costs assessed to the municipality.

Jim McLaughlin v. Town of Minto, 2001 ONAFRAAT 31

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalJun 11, 2001

Farmers' appeal of crop insurance denial dismissed; insurer's use of simulated yield data upheld.

The appellants, a group of forage farmers, appealed AGRICORP's decision to deny their crop insurance claims for the 1999 hay crop.

The farmers argued that AGRICORP failed to properly administer the SYMFOY yield simulation model by using incorrect weather data, relying on closed weather stations, and using inconsistent rain gauges.

The Tribunal found that while AGRICORP's data collection methods had weaknesses and its failure to notify clients of a weather station change was negligent, it did not constitute a breach of contract.

AGRICORP had administered the plan consistently with the contract and corrected data errors when found.

The appeal was denied.

Ellicott et al. v Agricorp, 2001 ONAFRAAT 30

OAFRAATAgriculture, Food & Rural Affairs Appeal TribunalMay 9, 2001

Appeal of municipal drain assessment dismissed; engineer's cost apportionment found fair and reasonable.

The appellant appealed the decision of the Court of Revision regarding the engineer's report on the Davis Drain, arguing that his property would not benefit from the proposed drainage works and his assessment was unfair.

The engineer testified that the upgrades were necessary to resolve flooding in a subdivision and explained the methodology for apportioning costs between agricultural and residential properties.

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that the engineer's division of costs and calculation of assessments were fair, reasonable, and consistently applied.

Davis Drain (Re), 2001 ONAFRAAT 25

Page 2 of 5 (86 cases)

agent of appellant Patrick Shanahan

Paul ShanahanAgent
1 appearance
Leo ShanahanAgent
1 appearance

appellant

Joanne CookSelf-represented
2 appearances
Art DunlopSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bill MundaySelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian ShanahanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Daniel BrunerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Doug SelmanSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerry DeBruynSelf-represented
1 appearance
Grant BurksSelf-represented
1 appearance
Heinz ProbstSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jean-Paul CussonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim McLaughlinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim StephensonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joe MalenfantSelf-represented
1 appearance
John Van BommelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph StephensonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken FoundSelf-represented
1 appearance
Larry McNeilSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lise BéliveauSelf-represented
1 appearance
Luc CussonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary StephensonSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant in person

Harold ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth L. PeerSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, in person

Donald CarrollSelf-represented
1 appearance
George KlotzSelf-represented
1 appearance
John K. WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
L. George SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Liberato SaltarelliSelf-represented
1 appearance

appellant, JEMA Foods

Jim DiMennaAgent
1 appearance

appellants

Audrey StinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Barbara HamiltonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald MathesonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Elaine KonecnySelf-represented
1 appearance
Evelyn ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gilbert DePorterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gordon StinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
James HamiltonSelf-represented
1 appearance
John ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance
John PaetzSelf-represented
1 appearance
Norm StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance
Pauline MathesonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Phyllis CoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert BourqueSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sharon LiekninsSelf-represented
1 appearance
Vickie StewartSelf-represented
1 appearance
William CoreSelf-represented
1 appearance
William MillerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowner

Beverly BaxterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Brian DammSelf-represented
1 appearance
Craig ThompsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Dale McFeetersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald BellSelf-represented
1 appearance
Donald GreenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Earle GraySelf-represented
1 appearance
Evelyn HamblySelf-represented
1 appearance
Frank DezsoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Hank GorisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jackie ConnellySelf-represented
1 appearance
Jack WilkinsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jim WilsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joe Isley Jr.Self-represented
1 appearance
Joe MurphySelf-represented
1 appearance
John FarrowSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken HamblySelf-represented
1 appearance
Ken LeddySelf-represented
1 appearance
Kenneth SteerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Lyle SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed landowners

Barry HarwoodSelf-represented
1 appearance
Claude BourqueSelf-represented
1 appearance
David LaurenceSelf-represented
1 appearance
Eugene BarnesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne LeesonSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed owner

Armand BrunetSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bernice O’HearSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bon RicheterSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bruce SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Commodore AllenSelf-represented
1 appearance
David FleckSelf-represented
1 appearance
Douglas SherkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ernie DerbyshireSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerry ShaubelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Glenn PfistererSelf-represented
1 appearance
Joseph BellonteSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret BalgaSelf-represented
1 appearance
Marjorie AlbeeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Rick BradySelf-represented
1 appearance
Robert StrettonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandy BunkerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Steve ChapoSelf-represented
1 appearance
Tim BennerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Wayne DonaldSelf-represented
1 appearance
William ParkerSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed owner, in person

Brian SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
David DurhamSelf-represented
1 appearance
N. LittleSelf-represented
1 appearance
R. DoddsSelf-represented
1 appearance

assessed ratepayer, party to the hearing

A. VanHarenSelf-represented
1 appearance
C. TeezelSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ted ScottSelf-represented
1 appearance

assistant to Mr. Foran

Elizabeth PatrickCounsel
1 appearance

au nom de l’intimée, la municipalité

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance
Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance

counsel for the appellant

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel for the respondent

Tom GrahamCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to appellant

Noël BerthiaumeCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to JEMA Foods

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Joe Vink, appellant

John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to Mr. Leddy

Mike MitchellCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant

Paul EnnsCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, 757182 Ontario Limited

Don GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Donald Bailey

George ReynoldsCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Georgian Bay Milk Company

James P. McIlroyCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Mr. Derek Crolla

Thomas Allen RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant Mr. Kevin Donohue

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants

Pascale GiguèreCounsel
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellants, Gilbert Goyer and Green Acres Tech

Stephanie BouchardCounsel
1 appearance
Rodrigue EscayolaCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the appellant, Todd Suter

Mark MacKewCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the Municipality of Leamington

Brian SweetCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent

Barry BresnerCounsel
1 appearance
Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance
Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, AGRICORP

Peter WechselmannCounsel
4 appearances
David VickersCounsel
1 appearance
Peter WechselmanCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey P. SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

counsel to the respondent, the Corporation of the Township of Colchester South

E. MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

Crop Insurance Commodity Specialist, AGRICORP

Husseinali ShivjiAgent
1 appearance

Deputy Director of Public Works

Nick AragonaAgent
1 appearance

drainage engineer who prepared report

Mike DeVosAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent

Henri BennemeerAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the respondent the City of Port Colborne

René LandryAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent for the respondent, the Township of Champlain

Michael St. JeanAgent
1 appearance

Drainage Superintendent, Town of Minto

Chris PeterAgent
1 appearance

Engineer

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

engineer for the report

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the addendum to the report

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the report

Gerard RoodAgent
1 appearance
Kent SchachowskojAgent
1 appearance
Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the report

Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance

Engineer who prepared the Report

Gaetan H. LascellesAgent
1 appearance

engineer who prepared the Report, for the Municipality of Leamington

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for 3A and Associates Investments Limited

M. BergmanCounsel
1 appearance

for AGRICORP

Bill QuippAgent
1 appearance
Eric BrouwerAgent
1 appearance
Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance
John TimmermansAgent
1 appearance

for Glen Tulpin

Julien DeplanckeAgent
1 appearance

for Grand River Conservation Authority

Jennifer WrightAgent
1 appearance

for herself

Carmen GirouardSelf-represented
1 appearance
Cindy SauveSelf-represented
1 appearance
Isabel MosselerSelf-represented
1 appearance
Katherine CavanaughSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mariette Gareau-FosterSelf-represented
1 appearance

for himself

Allan SimpsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Bob KordybanSelf-represented
1 appearance
David DawsonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ed SeguinSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gerard VermeerenSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gilles ChretienSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guilio NacciSelf-represented
1 appearance
Guy DurocherSelf-represented
1 appearance
H. Vern SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Jean Jacques DemersSelf-represented
1 appearance
Louis DobrichSelf-represented
1 appearance
Luigi TroianiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Milton SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Peter HutchisonSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ronald Van RaesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ron VanDenBrinkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Stuart GomesSelf-represented
1 appearance
Terry BuysSelf-represented
1 appearance
Ulrich SchaererSelf-represented
1 appearance
Victor ReasbeckSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Just Beginning Inc., assessed owner

Anton NoorloosAgent
1 appearance

for Keith MacLennan

Douglas HewsonCounsel
1 appearance

for Marilyn Nicholson

Paul NicholsonAgent
1 appearance

former Deputy Reeve

Lawrie WepplerSelf-represented
1 appearance

former Reeve of the municipality

Denis PommainvilleSelf-represented
1 appearance

for Michael Brausam, assessed landowner

Valerie M’GarryCounsel
1 appearance

for Montreal Soaring Council, assessed landowner

Walter EkiertAgent
1 appearance

for Mrs. Olga Woods, assessed owner

Will BartlettAgent
1 appearance

for Ms. Cindy Sauve and assessed landowners

Andrew RobinsonAgent
1 appearance

for R. Christensen

Thomas ChristensenAgent
1 appearance

for Tampa Farms Ltd., K. Fowler, B.&M. Vandenberg, B. Vandenberg, H. Stoelinga, R.&L. Graham and J.&R. Graham

William TurvilleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant

David JohnstonAgent
1 appearance
Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance
Emile DeschambaultSelf-represented
1 appearance
John LangloisCounsel
1 appearance
Keith VanderbekeAgent
1 appearance
Keith VanderbekeSelf-represented
1 appearance
Paul BeaudetCounsel
1 appearance
Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance
Sheldon PettleCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, International Dairy Direct

Donald R. GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant Milton Smith

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant Mr. Kevin Donohue

Donald GoodCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Mr. Watson

Ron ReaumeCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellant, Olszowka Poultry Inc.

John JudsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants

Fred FunkSelf-represented
1 appearance
Mary EmerickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Philip EmerickSelf-represented
1 appearance
Sandra FunkSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the Appellants

Numerous appellantsSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the appellants, Heinz and Christine Probst

Thomas RichardsonCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Fancsy

Paul CoureyCounsel
1 appearance

for the appellants Mr. Packet, Mr. Poort and Mr. Babensky

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

for the appellants Orland and Freida Dippel

Stephen DippelAgent
1 appearance

for the appellant the Renfrew County Roman Catholic Separate School Board

Don DowdellAgent
2 appearances

for the appellant V. DeJong

Klaus DeJongAgent
1 appearance

for the applicant (respondent in the appeal, the OPPMB)

Sean ForanCounsel
1 appearance

for the Armstrong appellants

Donald ArmstrongSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the assessed landowner

Lambertus (Bert) HuysSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the City of Port Colborne

Rene LandryAgent
1 appearance

for the City of St. Thomas

Burt LongAgent
1 appearance

for the DeJong Farm (Petrolia) Ltd., assessed owner

Everett DeJongAgent
1 appearance

for the Engineer

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the Grape Growers of Ontario

Geoffrey SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the municipality

John D. ValleeAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality

Bruce CrozierAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of Central Elgin

Donald LietchAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of West Nipissing

Ken SmartAgent
1 appearance

for the Municipality of West Perth

Jim DemerlingAgent
1 appearance
Ken ClarkeAgent
1 appearance
Patricia TaylorAgent
1 appearance

for the O'Neil appellants

Charles O'NeilSelf-represented
1 appearance

for the respondent

Fred ThompsonAgent
1 appearance
Harry FraserAgent
1 appearance
John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance
Peter WechselmannCounsel
1 appearance
Ron SwainCounsel
1 appearance
Rosaire St. PierreAgent
1 appearance
Wm. GrahamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, AgriCorp

Tom GrahamCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, Dairy Farmers of Ontario

Geoffrey P. SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondents to the motion (appellants in the appeal), Elite Swine and Cold Springs Farm Ltd.

Robert ShapiroCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Chicken Farmers of Ontario

Geoff SpurrCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Town of LaSalle

Ed LaFontaineAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

J. A. McBrideAgent
1 appearance
J. R. DicksonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Colchester South

E. MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Dawn-Euphemia

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance
Paul DaltonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Enniskillen

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Gosfield North

Terrence SimsCounsel
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Malahide

John R. SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Melancthon

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent the Township of Osgoode

Kevin GraceAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of Plympton

Paul ElstonAgent
1 appearance

for the respondent, the Township of West Grey

William J. MannerowAgent
1 appearance

for the township

Mr. ViceCounsel
1 appearance

for the Township of South-West Oxford

Wray RamseyAgent
1 appearance

for the Township of West Elgin

John PooleAgent
1 appearance
John SprietAgent
1 appearance

for the Wine Council of Ontario

James McIlroyCounsel
1 appearance

for Westview Church

George BartlettAgent
1 appearance

for William Henderson

W. JohnstonCounsel
1 appearance

General Adjuster, AGRICORP

Jim KonecnyAgent
1 appearance

landowner

Donna MichlowskiSelf-represented
1 appearance
Everett GrotenhuisSelf-represented
1 appearance
Gordon SouthSelf-represented
1 appearance
Margaret WenzelSelf-represented
1 appearance

on behalf of 104284 Canada Lteé, appellant

Wayne AssalyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of 483038 Ontario Inc., appellant

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Clarkview Farms Ltd., party to the hearing

Roger ClarkAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Jean-Paul Cusson, appellant

Jean DecoeurAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Marion Piggott, assessed landowner

Gary PiggottAgent
1 appearance
Mark RankinAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of Maurice Cheveaux, assessed landowner

Andrew DegrootAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of PPM Systems Inc.

Cec KuleyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellant, Mr. Carl Hape

Paul CoureyCounsel
2 appearances

on behalf of the appellant, Mr. DeBruyn

Enio SulloAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the appellants

Melodie FoersterAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Counties of Prescott and Russell, appellant

Marc ClermontAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the City of Port Colborne

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the City of Thorold

Bryon WiebeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Municipality of Dutton/Dunwich

Wybe CnossenAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Nation Municipality

Neil LevacAgent
1 appearance
Stéphane LeclercAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Bosanquet

P. K. MehargAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Town of Essex

Don JoudreyAgent
1 appearance
Elvey MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Ahfield-Colborne-Wawanosh

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Bromley

David A. StewartAgent
2 appearances

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Champlain

Leo TremblayAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Respondent, the Township of Champlain

Leo TremblayAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Colchester South

Elvey MarshallCounsel
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Dawn-Euphemia

Dennis McCreadyAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the township of Moore

Bill VietchAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent the Township of Moore

Peter MehargAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Orford

Ed DriesAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of West Lincoln

John SprietAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the respondent, the Township of Zorra

John KuntzeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Essex

Nick PeraltaAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Town of Hawkesbury, appellant

Martin BonhommeAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of Bosanquet

Jim MonteithAgent
1 appearance

on behalf of the Township of Enniskillen

Ray DobbinAgent
1 appearance

principal of Mancini Homes, the appellant

Angelo ManciniAgent
1 appearance

Quality Assurance Manager, AGRICORP

Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’appelant

Noël BerthiaumeAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’appelant, Place Riviera Place Inc.

Michael ChambersAgent
1 appearance

représentant l’intimé, le canton de Champlain

Robert TolhurstAgent
1 appearance

representative of Cuddy Farms, assessed landowner

John CameronAgent
1 appearance

representative of the Grey/Bruce farmers group

Alan SmithSelf-represented
1 appearance
Harriett EllicottSelf-represented
1 appearance

representing appellants Richard Gosselin and Garry Beach, and assessed landowner Sylvain Gauthier

Al FraserAgent
1 appearance

representing assessed landowner Anna Isley

John IsleyAgent
1 appearance

representing Royal Bourdeau and René Giroux, Jean-Claude Pavan, Ralph (Rapheal) Gour, Royal Bourdeau, René Giroux, appellants

Jean MartelCounsel
1 appearance

representing the Municipality

André DesjardinsAgent
1 appearance

representing the respondent, the City of Kawartha Lakes

Tom PridhamAgent
1 appearance

representing the St. Michaels Parish Church

Sylvester PowerAgent
2 appearances

Senior Adjuster, AGRICORP

Fred ThomsonAgent
1 appearance

Senior Commodity Specialist, AgriCorp

Peter IllncykyjAgent
1 appearance

senior commodity specialist for the respondent, AgriCorp

Peter IlnyckyjAgent
1 appearance

Senior Manager Claims, AGRICORP

Jim ZavitzAgent
1 appearance

witness

Ronald BaileyAgent
1 appearance

witness to the Tribunal

Tim BellonteSelf-represented
1 appearance

Decisions

Years active

Tribunals

0.8

cases/mo

OAFRAAT86(100%)

Decision types

appeal

motion

Page 2 of 5 (86 cases)